FBI director admitted Hillary was a Compulsive Liar and now she is Lying and saying he did not say she was a Liar. What a Dirtbag
Sunday, July 31, 2016
The Hillary strategy to win is to destroy Donald Trump. This was the theme of the convention, with each speaker attacking Trump. Doug Schoen, who has run many Democrat campaigns, said on Fox that Hillary will spend two billion dollars in negative ads.
Hillary has nothing positive to offer. Her record as secretary of state is a failure, from supporting the killing of Gaddafi, which caused Libya to descend into anarchy and become a haven for ISIS, to failing to provide the requested security at Benghazi, then doing nothing on the day of the attack and lying about its cause. She actually, without shame, told the mother of Sean Smith that the attack was cause by a video. This alone should be enough to disqualify and defeat her. She should have been indicted for lying about the emails and endangering national security, but the director of the FBI gave her a pass. Now we learn that the DNC worked with her to defeat Bernie so she could win.
Her record as a senator is that she voted for the Iraq War, which she now is trying to explain away.
Her record as first lady is a failed plan to have government run health care, scandal in firing the White House travel office workers to give the jobs to her friends, having FBI records of political opponents, covering up the sexual harassment by her husband, selling pardons, hiding billing records to hide her role in Whitewater, and generally lying about anything and everything.
Since 2000 she has used her political persona to amass $200 million in speaking fees, book deals, and whatever.
Her record as the governor’s wife in Arkansas was basically to use the governor’s office to steer business to the Rose Law Firm, and the sordid affairs of Whitewater. Web Howell went to jail, Jim McDougall went to jail, Vince Foster killed himself, but Hillary keeps on making money.
Her record as an attorney was that she was fired from the Watergate Committee for ethics violation. Dick Morris says she failed the D.C. bar exam.
As a law student, she associated with Saul Alinsky and the Black Panthers.
This is the first time that a presidential candidate has absolutely nothing to offer. There is nothing in her background to suggest she is fit to be president.
At the convention the best that anyone could say, and the highpoint of the convention, is that she is a mother and a grandmother.
Thus we have candidate Hillary who has nothing to offer except she has a daughter and two grandchildren, and was not indicted.
So she will attack Trump every day. Too bad she and Obama did not bring this focus and determination in fighting terrorism.
Now that the performances at the DNC are over and the scripts have been retired to the memory hole, it is worthwhile reviewing what Hillary believes as we go into the election campaign...
- She believes that the police are occupying black communities and that they need reeducation to stop shooting black men for no good reason
- She believes that all of white America is at fault on race and needs reeducation
- She believes that the needs of teachers’ unions come first in managing public education
- She believes that Common Core is a good program
- She believes that the southern border should be left open and that illegal immigrants here now should be amnestied
- She believes that the immigration of Muslims from radical countries in the Middle East should be increased by five.
- She believes that ObamaCare is good policy.
- She believes that BLM is a legitimate movement.
- She was in favor of TPP. It appears that Trump has forced her to recant on this.
- She believed it was not necessary to send the cavalry for our guys in Benghazi and instead went home, thus abandoning them in the field when they were in a jam and calling for help and when, as we now know, the DoD had equipment “spinning up” on the tarmac (the fact that only the president could make the final decision does not make any of the foregoing incorrect).
- She was in favor of having the USAF take out Gaddafi, creating chaos in Libya.
- She believes the Iran deal is a good one.
- She is the leading progressive in the country. The progressive narrative is that the history of the United States is one of racism, sexism, homophobia, aggression and genocide and that the founding was an illegitimate activity of rich white slaveholding men. If she rejects this narrative, there is no evidence of it.
- She feels it is appropriate to conduct the high affairs of state on an unsecured private server and does not expect to be called to account for it even though experts now conclude that her servers was hacked by foreign intelligence agencies.
- She believes that she and Bill are entitled to enrich themselves to the tune of hundreds of millions of dollars -- so far -- by being unfaithful servants of the public interest and selling out the country’s policies.
We do not know how much more Hillary and Bill plan to accumulate if she becomes president, but the opportunities to do so are much broader than as Secretary of State. The only drawback to this activity is that (a) it shows that progressivism is a racket which uses alleged concern for others as the pretext for self-enrichment, and (b) that if it is accepted by the culture, it will destroy the Republic. Just think how it would work if all our high officials sell out their offices by having their spouses give speeches to our opponents and enemies. We would become a third-world nation. That practice of the politicians siphoning off the public interest is what keeps these countries down. Our never having had that done by our high officials is one of the things that make us who we are.
He learned from his former Boss
The Bolshevik/Menshevik crisis we saw in the first stages of the Russian Revolution is bubbling to the surface in our country through the Democratic Party.
The Democratic Party today reflects an updated version of the Bolshevik/Menshevik split of the early 20th century. In 1903, the Russian Social-Democratic Labor Party (communist) split into two opposing groups, the Mensheviks and the Bolsheviks. Vladimir Lenin, leader of the pro-dictatorial Bolsheviks, defined the difference between the two groups, as one being "hard" (Bolsheviks) and the other being "soft," led by Leon Trotsky, Georgi Plekhanov, Julius Martov, and others. Both were for the overthrow of capitalism and of the Tsarist regime, but the Mensheviks would allow for a somewhat broader range of views within the communist apparatus. Ironically, the meeting that sealed this split was held in London, a center of capitalism, where differences could be aired, and even revolutionary groups could meet without fear of reprisal.
After the outbreak of the Russian Revolution, Russia withdrew from WWI, and a long civil war raged between the two parties, which the Bolsheviks won. A dictatorship of the proletariat was happily introduced by Lenin, but because of weak production, particularly in agriculture, there was some modification in the direction of private ownership under Lenin's New Economic Policy. When Lenin died, the dictatorial confiscation of private property was reinstated under Josef Stalin, Lenin's successor. Trotsky had to escape to Mexico, where one of Stalin's hired assassins murdered him.
Stalin's policy was to purge, purge, purge. The revolution had to be purified. You see, some prosperous peasants in Ukraine, the kulaks, were not happy turning over their land and their equipment – in short, their small agri-businesses – to this vicious ideologue who was intent on collectivizing agriculture. Many kulaks were murdered. Others left their homes and fled as far as Siberia. Their properties and possessions were confiscated. It was one of the most horrible episodes in the history of humankind of a government dispossessing and brutally enslaving and killing its own people.
The Menshevik opposition was crushed in Russia, but it lived on elsewhere as a communist ideal, violently opposed to capitalism, albeit anti-Stalinist. So when we saw the collapse of communism in the USSR, we saw the collapse of Bolshevism, but Menshevism has lived on all these decades and is now the order of the day in the Democratic Party.
What are the parallels between then and now? With the followers of Bernie Sanders, we see the essence of the Menshevik pattern. It is solidly anti-capitalist and Marxist in its foundation. Bernie's willingness to relinquish his microphone to Black Lives Matter was a symbol of his willingness to accommodate to the more thuggish and violent elements of the Democratic Party. Under the rubric of listening to "the people's voice," Bernie and friends will give ground to the violent voices. At the convention, we hear speakers like Leon Panetta, Tim Kaine, and Joe Biden being drowned out by the Sanders Menshevik group at various point in their speeches. Meanwhile, outside the hall, other communists were burning flags and screaming their pro-communist obscenities. This violent (Stalinist) voice will continue to accompany the mainstream Menshevik voice, since both are ideologically on the same page.
Many news articles noted that terrorism was barely discussed during the convention. The reason is that the left is united ideologically with the Islamist terrorists in their bid to destabilize the U.S. and the West and to overthrow capitalism using the Islamists' strategically to accomplish long-run goals, intending to dispense with them at the right time. Of course, the Islamists, in a parallel fashion, are using their left-wing sympathizers to accomplish their goals to destroy the infidels and their governments. At the right time, we can be sure that they intend to put the left-wing infidels in their place as second-class, jizya-paying infidels.
Hillary is also a Menshevik, albeit a more subtle Menshevik than Sanders. She selects the impressive Tim Kaine as her running mate. He, like Hillary, does not openly and boastfully speak of their identification with Marxist philosophy, but instead speaks of his commitment to "social justice." Kaine boasts of his Catholic upbringing (remember, Josef Stalin attended a seminary for a while to become a priest in the Russian Orthodox Church). Kaine doesn't say he is vigorously pro-life. But he portrays himself as a warrior of the caring wing of Catholicism like Pope Francis – all for one and one for all. All religions are peaceful. We all have much more in common than the perceived differences would seem to suggest. The convention theme is "Together."
Also, in a strange way, Hillary's old-school corruption, where she is bought by Wall Street and foreign individuals and entities, creates the impression that she is simply greedy and not really a threat to our freedom or to capitalism. How could somebody who benefits so much from a parasitical relationship with capitalism be opposed to capitalism?
You see, Hillary is a disciple of the community organizer Saul Alinsky, just like Pres. Obama. Consider this quotation from Alinsky's classic book about community organizing, Rules for Radicals: "If I were organizing in an orthodox Jewish community I would not walk in there eating a ham sandwich, unless I wanted to be rejected so I could have an excuse to cop out. My 'thing,' if I want to organize, is solid communication with the people in the community. Lacking communication I am in reality silent; throughout history silence has been regarded as assent — in this case assent to the system" (my italics).
If you are one of the more intelligent promoters of Alinskyism, you will realize that Hillary's engagement with the big money moguls both domestic and foreign is a twofold strategy. Her selfishness and corruption from taking bribes and contributions can be (falsely) perceived as her assent to capitalism, to the system of high-level corruption which Sanders claims to oppose and which Trump jokes about as necessary in order to do business. But what did Alinsky write? If you want to organize orthodox Jews, you cannot eat ham in front of them. If you want to organize America, you have to seem to be putting money first. This is not the country of high-minded Christian ethics it was at our founding. Hillary's character flaw, greediness so-called, is part of her Menshevik Alinsky strategy – to seem committed to the very system that in fact she is dedicated to destroying.
By taking the money, she seems to be assenting to capitalism; however, in fact, she wants to bring down the system, which we see from her commitment to protecting the Islamists in the Middle East and in the U.S., like Obama, by avoiding the rhetoric of "Islamic terrorism." Also, she has put herself foursquare on the side of exponentially expanding the scope of the federal government's role in the economy and in our private lives. Further, instead of supporting the family and the individual, she supports the "global village" concept, the pro-abortion movement, and the expansion – not the reduction – of people's dependence on governmental welfare programs. In short, she is as much of a Menshevik as Sanders, only she has learned the Alinsky method at a deeper level than Sanders.
At my local gym using an aerobic machine, I saw on TV Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood, speaking at the DNC. Seeing this despicable, cold, calculating, and evil woman at the podium defined the Democrat party as the source of the putrid smell spreading across our country. The DNC emanated the foul odor of America's moral decline. Richards is running a national dead-baby-body-parts chop shop. And yet, this vile woman had the audacity to deceptively portray herself as an advocate for women and Trump as anti-woman.
After the release of numerous undercover videos exposing the horrors and illegality happening behind the walls of Planned Parenthood, why on earth would the Democrats gift the abortion factory's president with hero status at their national convention?
Rev. Joseph Prince says a key component of spiritual warfare is to relax and trust God. In other words, lay your burdens at God's feet and trust Him to make things right. Mary and I decided to have a spiritual warfare day, relaxing at New Smyrna Beach, FL. Note: we stay close to the shore in shallow water. Shark attacks at New Smyrna are up.
We posted “Trump” signs on the beach beside our tent. Responses from people driving and walking on the beach were overwhelmingly positive; 99% in favor of Trump; honks and thumps up. Some yelled, “Make America great again!” Clearly, that theme really resonates.
A tall muscular white guy approached our tent. He was a tourist from South Carolina. He said our Trump sign renewed his faith in Florida. As we chatted about the decline of our country, it became obvious that he was a Christian. He asked if we could pray together for our country. Mary and I jumped at the opportunity. We joined hands as he led us in prayer. It was awesome. Very cool. After he left, it dawned on me that we never exchanged names.
Comfy in my beach chair, I read, You Can If You Think You Can by Norman Vincent Peale. Upon reading the following passage, I thought, Oh my gosh, this book was published back in 1984. And yet, Peale's statement perfectly describes and rebukes the mindset of Bernie Sanders disciples and the message Democrats are using to con Americans at their national convention.
“One wonders what has come over this great, free country. We are the descendants of a once great breed of men who had problems and had them plenty. But did they whine and whimper and crawl through life on their hands and knees piteously demanding of some so-called benevolent government that they be taken care of? Not on your life! They stood solidly on their feet and they took care of themselves. And they built the greatest economy in the history of the world -- one that has made available more goods and services to more people than any other in the long life of mankind on earth.”
Peale succinctly explained my repulsion against the Democrats. They have successfully brainwashed far too many Americans into believing they are victims; they are owed; they are weak and they cannot make it without daily sucking on the breast of government. Bernie Sanders supporters eat that crap up.
Also contributing to the putrid smell emanating from the DNC is the party's aggressive attempts to divide Americans into victimized camps, repeal more personal freedoms, spread hate for traditional values and spread hate for cops. Their convention flat out stinks to high heaven, folks.
As a matter of fact, Rush Limbaugh offered Trump the script for an extremely effective short speech.
"Black Lives Matter, New Black Panthers, Occupy Wall Street, stripping God from their party platform, transgender bathroom advocates, pro-death panels in health care, baby butchers at Planned Parenthood, a candidate who violated the Espionage Act thousands of times, pedophiles, illegal immigrants, Sharia law Muslims, Marxists! That's the modern day Democrat Party," and you close it with a simple ending: "It's time to clean up this mess."We deserve better. Let them manage their own affairs. Thank you, God bless you, and God bless America."
Folks, Rush nailed it. This is the modern Democrat Party. Disgusting.
Just when you thought the depravity of the Democrats could not descend any deeper into the pits of hell, this act broke the needle on my evil-meter. The Democrats featured the mothers of black men killed by police. In essence, the Democrats poured a boatload of gasoline on the flames of hatred for cops. They had to know that featuring the moms would further the lie that cops murder blacks and inspire the assassination of more cops.
Clearly, the Democrats deem the lives of our brave men and women in blue acceptable collateral damage in their quest to secure the black vote for Hillary. It is hard to believe that such evil is being spread by a major political party in the United States of America.
I am passionately campaigning for Trump. For those who see little difference between Trump and Hillary, Americans have died due to decisions made by Hillary. Clearly, her personal political ambitions and agenda take priority over American lives. That is really scary. Staying home or writing in another candidate, in essence, equals giving this wicked, wicked woman, and her Democratic minions our WH. This is the simple, obvious truth. God bless.
I sent this to my socialist Progressive co worker. His defense was the Stock market is rolling under Obama. We know it is artificial too. Obama has the worst GDP growth in years. Pathetic.
The sputtering, weezing US economy is barely managing to keep its head above water as the Department of Commerce announced second quarter growth of 1.2%, far below the 2.6% predicted by private economists..
In addition, first quarter growth was revised downward from 1.1% to 0.8%.
Most indices were equally weak with a couple of exceptions. Consumer spending rose 4.2% and inventories were cut substantially. But while payrolls are growing modestly, there doesn't seem to be any momentum behind the job growth.
The quarter's growth failed to take off even amid signs that the headwinds created by slow growth overseas have abated. Over the past two years, weak global growth has driven down the price of oil, decimating the U.S. energy sector, and propped up the dollar, hurting manufacturers. But in both quarters of 2016, trade has stopped subtracting from Gross Domestic Product and even boosted it, very mildly."In short, growth was weaker than expected, although mainly because of a larger-than-expected drag from inventories, which is positive for future growth," wrote Jim O'Sullivan, economist for the forecasting firm High Frequency Economics.One major question for the rest of the year is whether the weak output numbers or the relatively strong job growth of recent months proves to be reliable. While the GDP reports suggest that the economy is sputtering, payroll job growth has averaged 147,000 over the past three months, more than enough to keep unemployment falling rather than rising.If it turns out that the output numbers are the better indicator, Republicans will not hesitate to run even harder against the economic record of President Obama. "Americans deserve better than the anemic growth they're getting today," GOP Ways and Means Committee chairman Kevin Brady of Texas said in response to Friday's report.
Slow growth didn't do much to derail Obama in 2012 so it's an open question just how much these stats matter to most voters. Far more relevant is how their personal economic situation is holding up. Anxiety about one's job, or slow wage growth has a greater impact on a voter's decision who to cast their ballot for.
Then there's the fact that a lot of people simply don't believe government statistics anymore. This factor will become more prominent if economic stats show a spurt before the election. No matter what the previous 7 years have shown, if there is a good growth rate reported at the end of the third quarter in September, you can bet the Clinton campaign will point to it as evidence of the success of Democratic economic policies.
Crazy Scary Shit. Listen for who wants and don't want Globalism. We know Obama and Hillary does, Donald Trump don't.
Ask yourself why?
Ask yourself why?