Who's payroll was this Dirty Stinking Scumbag on?
Either Judge James Boasberg just hasn’t gotten the message about his outrageous behavior, or this Obama-appointed judge thinks he’s above the law. He’s proved to be a rogue judge, running roughshod over the separation of powers, and repeatedly acting in ways that are unethical, possibly illegal, and blatantly partisan. And these actions go all the way back to President Trump’s first term.
Just how vile are his actions? Remember Russiagate? Well, he was involved in the “get Trump” conspiracy back then too, as reported by Jonathan Turley:
Indeed, it was Boasberg … who ordered the resulting investigation into the false information given to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court as part of the Russiagate investigation. He was criticized for appointing an attorney to assist him, David Kris, whom the Washington Post described as ‘highly controversial’ given his past denials of any wrongdoing by the Justice Department.
Turley also notes that Boasberg was keenly aware of “abuses of power” against Trump associates and ordinary citizens regarding illegal surveillance and J6, yet it didn’t get in the way of him continuing that agenda. One of the most shocking actions (at least, that have been discovered) taken by Judge Boasberg recently came to light: during the Biden administration under the heading “Arctic Frost,” the DoJ weaponized its power to pursue phone records of Republican legislators:
A bicameral group of Republicans in Congress is grilling James Boasberg, the U.S. district chief judge for Washington, D.C., on his decision to allow lawfare activist Jack Smith to spy on the Senate, offering him the ‘opportunity to explain yourself publicly’ for a decision that almost certainly violated federal law.
As The Federalist reported, Boasberg approved a scheme under the Department of Justice’s Arctic Frost weaponization against Republicans in which Smith could subpoena the phone records of House and Senate Republicans and attach a nondisclosure order (NDO) so that the congressional bodies could not find out about it from the telecommunications providers being subpoenaed.
In recent months, he’s acted against Trump’s efforts to deport illegally alien gang members; fortunately, the Supreme Court intervened:
The Supreme Court decision reversing U.S. District Judge James Boasberg’s block on President Donald Trump’s deportation of gang members under the Alien Enemies Act sent a stern message to federal judges nationwide that overreach and venue shopping won't be tolerated.
Nevertheless, judges all over the country have found a work-around, and Judge Boasberg has continued to operate in the same way. The Solicitor General has pointed out that Temporary Restraining Orders under the Trump Administration are at historic highs:
![]()
An April 2024 study from the Harvard Law Review found that 96 TROs had been issued since President George W. Bush took office up until the publication date. Sixty-four of those were under Trump’s first term. Biden faced only 14 and Trump’s second term has already exceeded that total.
The [Trump] administration previously highlighted to the court that ‘District courts have issued more universal injunctions and TROs during February 2025 alone than through the first three years of the Biden Administration.’
As if these activities were not significant enough, he made public statements that are prohibited by the judicial system, which prompted the DoJ to file a complaint against Boasberg for misconduct:
The DOJ complaint cites comments Boasberg made at the Judicial Conference in March, where he expressed concern that the Trump administration would ‘disregard rulings of federal courts’ and trigger ‘a constitutional crisis.’
According to the complaint, Boasberg’s words and conduct ‘erode public confidence in judicial neutrality, and warrant a formal investigation under Rule 11,’ which stipulates how a chief judge of a U.S. Court of Appeals should respond when a judicial misconduct or disability complaint is filed.
The department said the judge's remarks undermined the appearance of judicial neutrality and breached ethical standards requiring judges to avoid political commentary.
Back to the new phone records scandal: There is no way that Boasberg could have believed that this scheme was acceptable. To intentionally hide this information from the legislators violated the law. As a result, articles of impeachment are being considered, but Senator Eric Schmitt wants to ensure that Boasberg cannot take judicial action in the meantime. He has written to the Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Subcommittee on the Constitution and to D.C. Circuit Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan calling for the administrative suspension of Chief Judge James Boasberg for abusing his judicial authority to target the Trump administration, sitting Republican Senators, and conservative organizations. To ensure that a response is expected to be received from Chief Judge Sri Srinivasan, the letter has requested the following responses:
- A status update on the DOJ judicial misconduct complaint filed against Judge Boasberg on July 28, 2025.
- If this judicial misconduct complaint has been dismissed, provide written explanation for dismissing it, as well as any other misconduct complaints against Chief Judge Boasberg that have been filed in 2025.
- If he (Judge Srinivasan) is yet to act on this judicial misconduct complaint, provide a written explanation for why he has failed to ‘expeditiously’ act upon the complaint.
- If he has formed a special committee to investigate the judicial misconduct complaint.
We’ll watch this process unfold to determine how corrupt and defiant the D.C. Circuit Chief Judge is prepared to be. And, whether justice will finally be upheld for these flagrant violations of the Constitution and the abuse of the separation of powers.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/11/impeachment_of_judge_boasberg_is_long_overdue.html
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/11/did_democrat_incumbents_create_a_vaccine_against_being_primaried.html
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/11/cow_farts_and_crazy_uncle_bobs.html
No comments:
Post a Comment