header

header

Wednesday, February 4, 2026

Rep. Gill Files Bill to Ban Somali Immigration to the US for 25 Years

 

Portrait of a smiling man in a suit with a red tie, standing in front of the American flag, representing a professional political figure.
Rep Brandon Gill, via Wikimedia Commons

Congressman Brandon Gill has announced that he’s filed legislation to slap a 25-year moratorium on Somali immigration.

Gill didn’t hold back, declaring in a post on X on Wednesday, “Mass Somali immigration makes life worse for Americans. That’s why I filed a bill today to stop it.”

The post links directly to an interview with The Dallas Express, in which Gill lays out his case against the “fundamental transformation” of Texas communities through Islamic migration.

“We have a huge problem in Texas, particularly in the Dallas area, with mass Islamic migration,” Gill told the outlet.

Gill cited welfare fraud and high crime rates, Somali immigrants to unapproved school visits promoting Sharia law, and sprawling mosque developments as part of the problem.

“This is a simple recognition that mass immigration from Somalia doesn’t make the United States better off,” Gill told The Dallas Express. “Somali immigrants use welfare at rates that are significantly higher than Americans. They have crime rates that are significantly higher than Americans. That doesn’t do anything to make life better for us.”

“Most Americans and most Texans don’t want to be woken up at 6 a.m. hearing a Muslim call to prayer. I certainly don’t,” Gill said. “They don’t want Sharia law in their communities, in their state, in this country, in any way whatsoever.”

The proposed legislation would not impact those already here legally, including green card holders and diplomatic visa recipients, but slams the door on future migrants.


Gill has also sponsored legislation to denaturalize legal immigrants who have engaged in fraud.

The Dallas Express reports:

Across America, 81% of Somali immigrant households are on welfare, according to a 2025 report by the nonprofit Center for Immigration Studies.

Meanwhile, in Minnesota, with the nation’s highest Somali population, 73% of such immigrants are on Medicaid, while 54% are on food stamps.

“We’ve seen the fraud in Minnesota, which we’ve been talking about for weeks, predominantly committed by Somali immigrants,” Gill said. “Somali immigrants coming into the United States, not living the American dream, not getting themselves to become self-sufficient and productive members of society, but coming here because they realize they can get free stuff.”


 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/rep-gill-files-bill-ban-somali-immigration-us/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/fireworks-scott-bessent-fires-back-maxine-waters-after/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/scott-bessent-burns-rep-stephen-lynch-hilarious-zinger/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/watch-democrat-rep-causes-hearing-go-rails-massive/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/kristi-noem-issues-blistering-response-informed-famous-musicians/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/02/ilhan-omar-calls-ice-rogue-unlawful-paramilitary-force/



Garbage socialism: Mamdani gives it to New Yorkers good and hard

 Trash and rats are piling up as snow stays uncleared, but Mayor Mamdani has more important things to do.


Under socialism, New Yorkers are learning the hard way how fast a city can go downhill.  

Garbage filled streets is providing New Yorkers with the Warmth of Collectivism. https://t.co/hewdZHfJKq

— Rob Schneider 🇺🇸 (@RobSchneider) February 3, 2026

In Mayor Mamdani's New York City, they don't actually remove the snow, they just spread it out on the street so that everyone suffers equally.

It's called Socialist Snow Plowing. pic.twitter.com/LW7EcOJoKe

— Joel M. Petlin (@Joelmpetlin) February 4, 2026

NYC outdoor death toll rises to 17 as Arctic blast expected to hit this weekend https://t.co/jheZwg7vxT pic.twitter.com/Lf1cE43vRL

— New York Post (@nypost) February 4, 2026

Here's one theory as to what is happening:

Mamdani fired all the infrastructure experts to give radicals jobs they can’t even remove snow right lmao 🤣

— 0HOUR1 (@0hour1) February 4, 2026

This is what happened in Venezuela in 2003 in its oil industry. With socialists, it's always monkey-see, monkey-do.

Regardless of whether that is correct or not, here's what Mamdani is focused on:

Too many of our Haitian neighbors are stuck in legal limbo. As the fight over Temporary Protected Status continues, we encourage anyone with TPS to use the city’s free immigration legal support and explore every legal pathway available. Call 800-354-0365 to learn more. pic.twitter.com/GrDjfnuZPS

— Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@NYCMayor) February 3, 2026

Does this have anything to do with New York?


In a few short months, @DianaforQueens built an incredible coalition and ran a movement campaign that earned nearly 75% of the vote last night.

I'm grateful that she will serve out my term in the Assembly, and hopefully many to come. Astoria is in good hands. pic.twitter.com/a3FhZCgZhm

— Zohran Kwame Mamdani (@ZohranKMamdani) February 4, 2026

It's always about elections, and electing more Democrats, isn't it?

What’s incredible is how quickly he’s failing…and that’s WITH our successful Police Commissioner Tisch. I can’t imagine her lasting much longer. If and when she goes, the gates of hell will be opened wide. https://t.co/JMdFeWFImk

— David Asman (@DavidAsmanfox) February 4, 2026

Getting criminals out on the streets and preying on New Yorkers is big with him.

Here's what his boosters at the New York Times are zeroing in on:

NYT gushes over Mamdani’s custom Carhartt winter storm jacket — as New Yorkers die in freezing temps, trash piles up https://t.co/IgJRve4bii pic.twitter.com/DuF25LnlhD

— New York Post (@nypost) February 3, 2026

It's a nightmare. I've lived in New York and know what it's like in February. Black snow, freezing rain and slippery sidewalks are bad enough, and everyone is just sick of the cold temperatures and snow mess that's made as the wreckage of winter slowly melts away. But the snow was always cleared under Mayors Rudy Giuliani and Michael Bloomberg. Now they don't bother. Handicapped people cannot cross streets, snow plows are abandoned, and garbage is piling up, complete with rats eating through the decay and putrification.

Mamdani was elected mayor of New York, not ruler of the world. But he's acting like the latter. Mayors keep streets plowed and garbage collected. Mamdani makes Instagrams instead. Now New Yorkers are learning the hard way that they don't matter as all power concentrates in the hands of the state under socialism. This is as true of New York City as it is of China, Venezuela, Cuba, or any place that has embraced the socialist model.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/02/garbage_socialism_mamdani_gives_it_to_new_yorkers_good_and_hard.html

Leftists won’t survive unless they incite a civil war

 The demographics are working against their survival. They desperately need open borders and illegal voters who don’t need to show ID.

Living out in the wilderness can teach you some very important lessons.  Most aggressive species will avoid human contact if possible, and if the trees are marked (don’t ask).  Snakes tend to be odoriferous, indicating their presence nearby.  And these wild animals will fight their hardest if cornered, and their survival is at stake, when they have no other choice.

Such is the situation with the collectivist comrades of the left.

Many people are fed up with the big-government authoritarianism of the socialist slavery states of the left and moving to the limited free states of the right.  Bluntly speaking, this means that the left will lose electoral votes while the free states gain them.  That leaves no other choice than to bring in “new voters” to pad the Census and eventually vote.  This explains most of their recent actions and brings understanding of the key to defeating them.

The first piece on their demographic desperation was entitled “This Is Why Democrats Can’t Win Without Open Borders.”

They simply ran the population numbers that showed people are moving from Democrat bastions to Republican free states.  Add deportations and a citizens-only Census, and the math becomes undeniable.  As with others, they conclude that the Democrats would have to “completely reinvent” themselves in order to win another national election.  But the problem there is that the party is becoming a far-left echo chamber with little tolerance for new or moderate ideas.

The story from Politico paints an equally gloomy picture:

By combining the census bureau’s new state population estimates for 2025 with previous years’ data, experts quickly projected the number of House seats — and Electoral College votes — states will gain or lose after the 2030 Census in the process known as reapportionment. And while those projections differ slightly, they all had bad news for Democrats: GOP-leaning states will gain electoral power and Democratic-leaning states will lose it if the trends continue.


 Also this:

CNN senior data reporter Harry Enten said on Sunday that Democrats may struggle to win the Electoral College in the upcoming presidential elections as more people move to red states.


(Here, too.)

Think of this as a Rosetta stone that makes it clear why the left is fighting tooth and nail in Minnesota to keep hardened criminal illegal invaders from being deported.  They simply cannot afford to have their new voting bloc sent home where they belong.  This is the same story from around the world, and yet we are supposed to believe that it’s just an issue with President Trump.

This has nothing to do with equality, tolerance, or any of the usual leftist pablum and everything to do with simply buying votes and staying in power.

It makes it blatantly obvious why they are fighting voter ID laws.  Once again, this is an 80/20 issue, with the left on the wrong side of history.  Leftists can’t be honest about the reason they’re against voter ID — because it would be an obvious safeguard against voter fraud. Even CNN’s Harry Enten says Americans of all races aren’t buying Democrats’ race-baiting narrative on voter ID.

Even worse for leftists is that they are between a rock and a hard place in their current virtue-signaling push to defund ICE.  They want to play a two-faced game of pretending to support a strong border and deporting criminals, while wanting to get rid of border enforcement entirely.

It’s doubly ironic coming from President Obama, known in his day as “the Deporter in Chief.” Of course, Obama didn’t have to worry about violent protestors opposing his immigration raids; the Left never bothered when it was their guy doing it. ...

So, what’s the Democrats’ plan for getting them to leave?

They don’t have one — because they don’t actually have a problem with those criminals being here.

Consider the Democrats’ current demands before they are willing to fund the Department of Homeland Security: They apparently want ICE to acquire a warrant from a judge for every deportation (!) and they want ICE to take off their masks and identify themselves to the general public—a public that calls them Nazis every day, doxxes them, and storms their churches, traumatizing children.

These demands would quite simply be an end to the President’s deportation agenda.

And that’s the point.

All of this means that leftists will be out in force for the midterms, because this is Armageddon for them.  Stopping the deportations and even adding more illegal invaders will be a priority for them.  And they will likely try to do something if they squeak out a win in the midterms — defunding ICE and leaving the door wide open.  If that doesn’t work, they’ll try it after the next presidential election.

This means we have to be eternally vigilant and not believe a word they say.  Once again, the next election is going to be pivotal.  If they are defeated, they will be diminished as a party.  If they win, they will rerun the same playbook, and we’ll go through the same ordeal once again.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/02/leftists_won_t_survive_unless_they_incite_a_civil_war.html

Don Lemon Needs To Read Constitutional Law For Dummies

Lemon has always been a Scumbag that thought he was a Journalist


 On January 29, former CNN host Don Lemon was arrested for joining anti-ICE rioters who had invaded Cities Church services in St. Paul, Minnesota, eleven days earlier. Terrifying the attendees, these activists sought to condemn the pastor’s alleged ICE connection after the death of Renee Good.

At this point, it is important to recognize that there is a difference between a “protest” and a “riot.” Perhaps international security firm TAL Global provides the simplest distinction between the two. It notes, “The difference between protest and a riot often comes down to intent and control. Protest maintains a message. Riots spiral away from one.”

In other words, what starts out as a peaceful protest at some point may well cross a line, transitioning into a riot as it becomes violent or violates the law.

In the aftermath of the Cities Church incident, Lemon—while examining a video of it—insisted on describing anti-ICE activists with whom he was embedded as “protesters.” This was despite the fact that they had already stepped over a distinctive line by storming onto private property where a religious service was ongoing, chanting “Hands up, don’t shoot” and “ICE out.” Church attendees had every right to be where they were and doing what they were doing without having their religious service interrupted by protesters (now rioters) gone bad.

Among the first celebrities to criticize Lemon was Grammy-winner Nicki Minaj, who did so in language that was both explicit and unapologetic. Many saw the church occupation not as an act of journalism but as an act of harassment against Christians. Lemon and his friends dared not attempt a similar invasion at a mosque holding religious services, as a much different reception would have awaited them.

Lemon went on to support the rioters, defending their actions in disrupting church services as this was just acting in a manner similar to what civil rights protesters had done decades earlier. He continued, further demonstrating his “independent” journalistic reporting, by saying:

This is the beginning of what’s going to happen here. When you violate people’s due process, when you pull people off the street, you start dragging them and hurting them, and not abiding by the constitution, you start doing all of that, people get upset and angry. Remember what the civil rights movement was about. The civil rights movement was about these very kinds of protests.


 Lemon—obviously no expert on constitutional law—claimed people had no right to object to protests like the one in Cities Church as the U.S. Constitution allows for them at any time. “The whole point of it,” he added, “is to disrupt and make people uncomfortable.” But the naive journalist failed to recognize that the Constitution was inapplicable to the Cities Church invasion and that he and his fellow rioters violated the law.

Apparently, making no effort to master the Constitution, Lemon misses an important aspect of it. The First Amendment prohibits the government from restricting speech and recognizes that people have the right to engage in religious practices as they wish without interruption. Defenders of ICE would have no right to demonstrate on Lemon’s private property, just like he and his anti-ICE gang had no right to demonstrate on private church property.


Fellow members of the media sought to portray Lemon as an “independent” member of the media who was simply following a developing story. Such independence was hard to grasp as Lemon used the pronoun “we” in referencing the group’s invasion and even dubbed it “our operation.”

Had the developing story involved activists enroute to robbing a bank, would Lemon have had a right to enter its premises with them just to follow the story? Absolutely not! When subjects of a developing story show they are willing to break the law—in the Cities Church case, at a minimum, they trespassed—it gives a journalist no right to break the law as well. A long-embraced ethic of journalism is for journalists to report a story but never to become part of it in doing so.


As a newsman, Lemon should have recognized the illegality of his actions based on an incident occurring just two days earlier in Manhattan. Following 45 minutes of forewarnings, the NYPD arrested anti-ICE protesters after they entered a hotel and occupied the lobby. Like Lemon, they illegally trespassed onto private property.

However, Lemon’s actions went further: he’s also being charged with conspiracy to deprive parishioners of their rights and for violation of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances (FACE Act). Despite its title, the FACE Act additionally protects places of religious worship.

Upon being released without bail after his arrest, Lemon said he believes he is being unjustly prosecuted and—apparently referring to his “independent” reporting—that he won’t stop “now or ever!” With his first hearing on February 9, he claims to “look forward to my day in court.”

Lemon was not the only journalist involved in the incident, while lacking constitutional law expertise. After the church invasion, another alleged independent journalist, Georgia Fort, livestreamed her actual arrest as federal agents began knocking on her door. Like Lemon, she showed her constitutional naivete, claiming as a journalist she had the right to record the incident, any other laws be damned.

Meanwhile, Lady Gaga took the opportunity of entertaining an audience outside the U.S. to share her anti-ICE views. In an act again illustrative of tremendous naivete, the venue she selected to deliver her message was Japan. One wonders if she even realized the irony of her doing so in that particular country.

The reason we hear nothing about Japan arresting illegal aliens is that, among free world nations, it is perhaps the most restrictive concerning immigration. Whether or not it is a fear of diluting its culture and values, Japan allows few legal immigrants. Its lack of desire for legal immigrants has sent the message to would-be illegal immigrants not to try it, thus leaving Japan with few ICE issues.

Lemon’s fellow participants in the Cities Church invasion are slowly being arrested as their identities are revealed. It looks like they, along with Lemon, will finally be forced to FACE the music.


https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2026/02/don_lemon_needs_to_read_constitutional_law_for_dummies.html

Polar bears are fatter and healthier than ever, and climate changers scramble to explain it

 Leftists will do everything but face science and reality.


There’s a funny meme format that goes around, showing obese women participating in all sorts of bizarre exercises—maybe they’re bouncing around in some springed “Kangoo” shoes, or maybe they’re strapped in a bungee harness and swinging around from the ceiling. Accompanying these memes is always some version of a caption that reads how fat women will do anything and everything except the obvious and easiest remedy, or the path of least resistance, which is diet and simple exercise; achieving their objective, that is, weight loss and fitness, is so much easier than they’re making it.

It occurred to me that a similar dynamic is present elsewhere: Leftists will also do anything and everything…but accept science and reality, which again, is the “obvious remedy” for the issues they’re (ostensibly) attempting to solve, or the path of least resistance to knowledge and understanding. How can you process and handle real world situations if you’re rejecting information from the real world? Answer: You can’t. (A painful reality we thinkers are routinely forced to endure with each and every enacted progressive policy.)

I had the thought when I came across a recent CNN article that explained how polar bears in Norway’s Arctic “are getting fatter and healthier” than ever, in a “region [that] has lost sea-ice habitat more than twice as fast as any other area where polar bears live.” (Ergo, the skinnier and less healthy bears are in the places where ice hasn’t melted as fast.)

Of course, climate changers are scrambling to explain, saying that polar bears “have so far been able to compensate” for the change in habitat, intimating that at some point, they won’t be able to, herein ignoring science and reality...those silly little notions that we conservatives have been advocating for all along.

‘The most likely explanation is that polar bears in Svalbard have so far been able to compensate for reduced access to sea ice by exploiting alternative foraging opportunities and by showing considerable ecological flexibility,’ lead study author Jon Aars, a population geneticist and a senior researcher at the Norwegian Polar Institute, told CNN on Friday.

‘In this region, bears have access (to) reindeer and eggs on land, walrus carcasses, and also harbour seals,’ he continued.

An increasing number of bears had previously been observed spending more time on land during the summer, plundering birds’ nests in west Svalbard, and data had shown more adult females in east Svalbard spending more time in areas with bird colonies.


 It doesn’t even take a fancy team of researchers or taxpayer-funded inquiries to see the obvious: When ice doesn’t cover everything, plants spring to life, and when plants spring to life, herbivorous populations surge, creating more food for carnivorous animals.

Duh.


Warmer temperatures almost always mean more life (with the rare exception of the few hyper-arid extreme heat deserts around the world), as evidenced throughout history. But, that’s all irrelevant, because $cientists are afoot!

Will Aars accept that perhaps sea ice melts and re-forms, melts and re-forms—again, as evidenced throughout history—and the creatures there adapt to the changes? (I would assume Aars is a believer in Darwinism.) Will he finally concede that maybe, just maybe, CO2 isn’t actually a poisonous gas, but a crucial component in ecosystems around the world? Or, will he continue to reject the evidence of his eyes and ears, i.e. science and reality, instead going to great lengths to favor the commands of the greenie left?


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/02/polar_bears_are_fatter_and_healthier_than_ever_and_climate_changers_scramble_to_explain_it.html

Schumer Threatens To Shut Down Government So Republicans Can’t Stop Noncitizens From Voting

 This is the Human Stinking Garbage on the Far Left Anti American Scumbags.  You notice again this Smelly Piece of Crap is reading everything.  He is to stupid to speak on his own


Share

Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) threatened Monday to shut the government down unless Republicans drop their efforts to secure elections and keep noncitizens from voting.

Schumer said in a post on X: “The SAVE Act is nothing more than Jim Crow 2.0. It would disenfranchise millions of Americans. Every single Senate Democrat will vote against any bill that contains it. Speaker Johnson should tell SAVE Act Republicans to stand down or else this shutdown will be on them.”

The Safeguarding American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act would amend the 1993 National Voter Registration Act to require documentary proof of citizenship to register to vote in federal elections. While the House previously passed the legislation (including with the support of four Democrats) it has stalled in the Senate. But as Congress debates a new spending bill ahead of a possible shutdown, Senate Majority Leader John Thune suggested there could possibly be efforts to vote on the SAVE Act as a standalone bill in the Senate.

While noncitizen voting is already illegal, current federal law is largely toothless. Prospective voters check a tiny square box on a federal voter registration form attesting under penalty of perjury that they are a citizen. Such an insecure system has led to thousands of noncitizens to either register to vote or even vote.

[READ NEXT: 5 Common Lies About The SAVE Act — And How To Refute Them]

Such a system has led to people like Clayton County, Georgia resident Melanie Pickett to vote multiple times despite being a noncitizen. A Bahamian native, Pickett admitted in December that after getting a driver’s license, she started receiving voting-related information in the mail. Pickett said she “maybe” voted three times. Similarly, a Georgia audit found 20 noncitizens registered to vote — nearly half of which cast a ballot in previous elections, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

Pennsylvania previously found 11,198 noncitizens to registered to vote despite, as Democrats have made clear, it being illegal for noncitizens to vote, according to the Washington Times. Oregon’s Secretary of State found nine noncitizens who had voted in past elections after discovering “more than 300 noncitizens were erroneously registered to vote.”

Meanwhile, Alabama’s Republican Secretary of State Wes Allen announced in January that his office found 186 noncitizens who were registered to vote, 25 of whom had allegedly cast ballots illegally.

When elections are decided on razor-thin margins, like that of Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks who won her 2020 election by just six votes, then every mote matters. But that doesn’t mean that every vote should count — like those cast by noncitizens, which is why the SAVE Act is so important.


https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/03/schumer-threatens-to-shut-down-government-so-republicans-cant-stop-noncitizens-from-voting/


https://thefederalist.com/2026/02/04/europeans-testify-on-how-europe-is-banning-americans-from-saying-what-they-believe/