Who needs fraudulent drivers licenses to vote in elections when birth tourism promises babies born on American soil authentic U.S. IDs?
One of the biggest revelations from President Donald Trump’s declassified election document dump on Thursday night was a report indicating the Chinese Communist Party acquired and exploited American voter data to influence the 2020 election.
One FBI information report released alleged China manufactured tens of thousands of fraudulent drivers’ licenses using data harvested “from millions of TikTok accounts” to ensure noncitizen “Chinese students and immigrants sympathetic” to the authoritarian regime could send mail-in votes for Joe Biden in 2020.
The allegation is alarming, but not as alarming as the fact that, over the next few decades, China could hack U.S. elections without ever breaking a law, risking punishment, or even raising the eyebrows of the intelligence community.
Thanks to the Supreme Court’s recent birthplace citizenship ruling, the CCP doesn’t need to manufacture fake IDs to sway votes in favor of Democrats. All China has to do to take advantage of America’s elections is to use the birth tourism industry to manufacture babies who are entitled to real American IDs as soon as they are born in the U.S.
China is already a known top exploiter of the U.S. birth tourism industry. One 2024 report claimed Chinese nationals made up 41.7 percent of the surrogacy contracts between foreigners and American women between 2014 and 2020. During that same time period, foreigners’ use of the American birthplace citizenship surrogacy scheme increased by 78 percent.
At that rate, the CCP could ballot-harvest an entire generation of Americans who are sold to any foreigner rich enough to rent a U.S. woman’s womb, get that baby’s U.S. paperwork, and whisk the child back to be raised in China. Because the Supreme Court ruled that if an infant is born on magic U.S. dirt, that child will be entitled to all of the rights of an American child, including the right to cast a ballot as an overseas citizen voter, even though he is susceptible to indoctrination and weaponization by Xi Jinping’s communist regime.
The CCP has already proved it can infiltrate American universities, installing spies posing as students and professors to steal U.S. research and trade secrets. According to a series of declassified memos from an unnamed “sensitive government agency,” China also “had developed capabilities” ahead of the 2020 election to “encourage,” among other hot-button issues, violent demonstrations such as Black Lives Matter riots on both social media and in corporate media.
Birthplace citizenship promises China the opportunity to prime political interference in children even younger than college students and online-addicted teens. For the CCP, violating America’s sovereignty starts in the cradle — no TikTok user data harvesting required.
In his address to the nation Thursday evening, President Donald Trump walked through some of the more egregious attacks on election integrity and security in a 2020 election that government bureaucrats absurdly declared “the most secure in American history.” And Trump brought the receipts.
During his primetime address, the White House released four tranches of newly declassified documents from intelligence community files, overseen by the White House Government Transparency Taskforce. The records expose China’s meddling in the election and point to hundreds of thousands of noncitizens on state voter rolls.
“The president’s news is shocking but not surprising given prior hacks of U.S. data by the Chinese. But what should make Americans very angry is the cover-up to hide what happened and the failure to prosecute wrongdoers for obvious politically partisan reasons,” Hans von Spakovsky, senior fellow at Advancing American Freedom, told The Federalist.
Some of the more damning documents come from the FBI’s investigation into a leftist voter registration scheme in swing state Michigan, where Democrat Joe Biden, as he did in other battlegrounds, claimed a narrow victory. The declassified records offer a window into a massive voter registration fraud operation in Muskegon, Michigan, and a years-long investigation that tracked as many as 10,000 suspicious or forged registration forms submitted in the weeks before election. They also undercut the real Big Lie by Democrats and their accomplice media pals, that election administration in the 2020 election is beyond reproach.
The probe involved thousands of man hours that included interviews with former employees of a canvassing company that witnesses say signed off on fictitious registrations and hired registration form pirates who traded marijuana and cash for voter regulation applications.
Trump said the Biden Justice Department slow-walked and eventually killed the case. The documents suggest the Criminal Division’s Public Integrity section did just that. Then Michigan’s leftist attorney general refused to press charges because the fraudulent activity was discovered and broken up before Election Day.
“Tonight, I am asking the FBI director to ensure the matter is fully investigated and to work with the Department of Justice to prosecute those responsible for any crimes,” Trump said.
‘Red Flags’
According to emails from the case file, the Muskegon Police Department was investigating suspicious registration forms flooding into the Muskegon City Clerk’s office in the weeks leading up to the election. State and federal law enforcement got involved in early October. On Oct. 5, the clerk’s office received six packages of voter registration applications via the U.S. Postal Service, an FBI email notes.
Muskegon elections officials determined that “some of the applications were fraudulent based on nonexistent addresses, invalid telephone numbers and signatures on applications not matching Michigan Secretary of State voting or DMV records,” the document states. Curiously, the forms appeared to have been completed in the same hand-writing.
The documents were delivered by one individual and arrived from the same address. That information is redacted. There are a lot of redactions in the files.The same individual hand-delivered numerous applications “with similar red flags,” according to the agency. Investigators estimated that the registration wrangler submitted “approximately 8,000 to 10,000 applications.”
FBI agents interviewed former employees of the registration form collector, approximately 100, and others, according to one email.
One woman told law enforcement officials that she worked for an organization (redacted). She said she was paid for voter registration work. Most of the frontline workers received prepaid debit cards for their efforts, records show.
“She was involved in similar registration drives in Detroit, Ypsilanti, Southfield, Flint, and Lansing,” the FBI email states. A data search revealed that she worked in 2018 for a candidate campaigning for Georgia’s 7th Congressional District seat, agents reported. The woman was paid $52,000 for “field consulting” and canvassing.
The case was being prosecuted by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, a highly partisan Democrat, the FBI communication states.
‘Easy Money’
One former employer told FBI agents that her bosses required her to submit “two to 3 applications to get paid.”
“Most of the employees submitted the registrations with false information because it was easy money,” the former form wrangler told investigators, according to one email.
In an interview on Dec 18, 2023, more than three years after the shenanigans-filled presidential election, one former employee told FBI agents that she knew of other canvassers “who would trade marijuana and money for voter registration applications.”
Employees told the law enforcement officials that canvassers were instructed, “if they couldn’t get enough applications, they should just fill them in.”
“This occurred at a meeting with over 100 employees present,” an email states. One of the employees asked what the company official meant. He picked up a blank application and filled it out, making up information and said, “This is what I mean,” the investigation records claim.
One former employee estimated she submitted 100 fake voter registration applications.
‘Failed to Charge’
The investigation plodded along, in fits and starts at times.
In a memo dated, Thursday Aug. 12, 2021, FBI agents were told by DOJ higher ups that “no further action should be taken in this district at this time.”
One agent in particular fought to keep the investigation alive. In a redacted email, the FBI official noted that investigators were preparing to close the probe.
“Before I do so, I was hoping to discuss with you the limited scope that PIN (Public Integrity section) approved in the investigation of the fraudulent voter registration applications,” the agent wrote. “It appears as though this type of fraud would result in a full field investigation.”
The agent’s arguments appear to have won out. Records show the investigation resumed. But nobody was ever held accountable. In 2023, Republicans in the Michigan House of Representative introduced articles of impeachment against Nessel, who, according to the lawmakers, “violated her constitutional oath of office by failing to faithfully discharge the duties of her office.”
“Despite the fact that an October 2020 investigation found evidence that an organization submitted clearly fraudulent voter registration applications to the Muskegon City Clerk, Attorney General Nessel has failed to charge those responsible for forging and filing these documents,” the resolution stated.
The Michigan State Police, which worked with Nessel’s office on the state probe into the fraud allegations, covered for the controversial attorney general.
“[N]one of the irregular voter registrations in Muskegon resulted in voters receiving absentee ballots, any resulting registrations have been voided, and there is no expected impact on any election,” the law enforcement agency said in a statement.
‘Private Takeover’
Michigan played a pivotal role in deciding the closely contested 2020 election. It also was plagued with election irregularities that created confusion and raised doubts about the state’s election administration. Far-left Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson, like election officials in other swing states, opened Michigan’s election administration doors to massive amounts of Zuckbucks — and the leftist political operatives that came with it.
The state received approximately $8 million in election safety grants distributed by the Center for Technology and Civic Life, a leftist election group founded by former Obama campaign staff, Detroit, a Democrat stronghold, received the biggest chunk: $3.5 million. CTCL raked in an eye-popping $350 million in funding from Mark Zuckerberg and his wife, money used in large part for a get-out-the vote drive targeting liberal voters. The groups in the CTCL network were deeply engaged in voter registration efforts.
Several states have banned private money in election administration. Michigan is not one of them.
In her testimony before the House Administration Committee in 2024, Hemingway warned of the takeover of election administration by politically motivated private entities.
“Instead of having election administration that is rigorously nonpartisan and impartial under the law, we have allowed the private takeover of government election offices by partisan oligarchs and their armies of activists who use those offices and their authorities to tilt the election toward favored candidates,” The Federalist’s editor-in-chief said.
Two nights ago, President Trump went on national television and again called out the vulnerability of electronic voting machines to manipulation. TheWhite House election-integrity pageputs it bluntly: “For years Americans were blatantly lied to about the security of our election infrastructure, including electronic voting machines and ballot-counting systems.”
In its typical smokescreen tactic to distract the public from the facts, the left immediately dismissed the concerns as a “conspiracy theory.” But in this case, not so fast... The left should have asked federal democrat Judge Amy Totenberg first.
In October 2020—just weeks before the presidential election—U.S. District Judge Amy Totenberg of the Northern District of Georgia issued a lengthy opinion in Curling v. Raffensperger. The case was brought by progressive groups, including the Coalition for Good Governance, challenging Georgia’s new Dominion ballot-marking device (BMD) system.
That system, selected under then-Governor Brian Kemp, puts a Dominion machine in every county in the state. Before the 2020 election turned the issue partisan, left-leaning organizations and even Rachel Maddow’s MSNBC praised the lawsuit for highlighting serious problems with Georgia’s voting equipment.
Judge Totenberg is no conservative. She is a Democrat appointed by Barack Obama. She is the sister of longtime liberal NPR legal correspondent Nina Totenberg. Yet her October 11, 2020, Opinion and Order contains some of the most devastating judicial findings ever written about the reliability of Dominion’s QR-code-based ballot-marking devices.
The core problem Totenberg identified is simple and profound: voters never get to verify the votes that are actually counted.
She wrote that “the tabulation of the vote is actually based on the ballot’s non-encrypted QR barcode on the ballot—designed to summarize the voter’s ballot selections in code—that by itself is not voter reviewable or verifiable.” The human-readable text on the paper is irrelevant. The scanner “tabulates the ballot votes solely based on the QR code—and not based on the human readable text on the printed ballot.”
The Court laid out the evidence in stark terms:
(1) The QR barcode-based BMD voting system does not produce a voter-verifiable paper record of the votes cast. Therefore, voters will be unable to conduct any verification of the information encoded in the non-human readable barcode, will have no way of knowing what votes they are actually casting, and will instead be forced to trust that the barcode accurately conveys their intended ballot selections. Both the QR barcode recording of votes and the text summary of ballot selections are subject to being accessed and manipulated through hacking…
(2) The QR barcode-based BMD voting system poses major security and fidelity of vote issues because the BMD system is susceptible to significant cybersecurity risks and manipulation through hacking access to any one of its multiple components (BMD, printer, scanner) and through untraceable manipulation or alteration of code. The QR barcode is not encrypted and may also be a vector of data system manipulation.
(3) The QR barcode-based BMD voting system is incapable of being meaningfully audited for a variety of reasons: (a) the QR code cannot itself be verified by a voter…
University of Michigan computer scientist J. Alex Halderman’s testing, accepted by the Court,
...indicated the practical feasibility through a cyber attack of causing the swapping or deletion of specific votes cast and the compromise of the system through different cyber attack strategies, including through access to and alteration or manipulation of the QR barcode.
Totenberg quoted the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine:
[A]ll digital information—such as ballot definitions, voter choice records, vote tallies, or voter registration lists—is subject to malicious alteration; there is no technical mechanism currently available that can ensure that a computer application—such as one used to record or count votes—will produce accurate results; testing alone cannot ensure that systems have not been compromised; and any computer system used for elections—such as a voting machine or e-pollbook—can be rendered inoperable.
Later in the opinion, she summarized the constitutional injury: voters are forced
...to cast a ballot on the BMD system that cannot be confirmed or verified as reflecting their actual vote choices because the votes are tabulated solely from a computer generated QR barcode that is not human-readable and is vulnerable in the current system to failure or breach.
Votes cast on these machines “pose the significant risk of having the votes altered, diluted, or effectively not counted.” Plaintiffs had shown “demonstrable evidence” that the system puts voters “at imminent risk of deprivation of their fundamental right to cast an effective vote (i.e., a vote that is accurately counted).” The Court viewed that burden as “significant.”
Totenberg ultimately declined to order a statewide switch to hand-marked paper ballots for the 2020 election. She cited the Purcell principle—the danger of court-ordered changes so close to an election.
But she did not walk back her findings about the machines themselves. She noted that the Secretary of State and State Election Board still had the opportunity to strengthen verification and auditing for future cycles. The problems she identified did not vanish after Election Day. Subsequent CISA advisories and further expert analysis only reinforced them.
This is not a right-wing judge or a Trump-appointed judge. This is an Obama appointee, the sister of Nina Totenberg, writing in a case brought by progressive plaintiffs who were once celebrated on MSNBC. Her own words establish that Georgia’s Dominion system—used in every county—relies on an unverifiable, non-encrypted QR code that voters cannot check, that is vulnerable to manipulation, and that cannot be meaningfully audited.
President Trump is not inventing a problem. A federal judge who is nobody’s idea of a conservative already put it in the Federal Reporter. The only question left is whether the country is finally willing to listen.
These Idiots on the left are so damn stupid and don't even know it
Caleb Hammer challenges self-described socialist activist “Doomsday” during a heated debate over capitalism. (Screenshot: Financial Audit/Youtube)
A blue-haired socialist activist who goes by the name “Doomsday” just got absolutely obliterated on camera by financial content creator Caleb Hammer.
The 25-year-old from South Dakota, who identifies as a member of the “queer community” and says her name was given to her by her “chosen family,” sits there spewing the usual leftist talking points about how Americans are forced to work multiple jobs just to survive under evil capitalism.
There’s just one problem: she works in corporate finance while claiming to hate the system that pays her.
According to the episode, “Doomsday” works in corporate finance connected to stadiums, earns approximately $60,000 annually, lives in a converted ambulance, and was carrying significant consumer debt while advocating against capitalism.
Hammer, the no-nonsense host of the popular YouTube show Financial Audit, wasn’t having any of it.
When the activist started claiming that “these people have to have multiple jobs in order to sustain a lifestyle” and that Americans are “relying on minimum wage,” Hammer asked a basic question any adult should know:
“What percentage of the American population is relying on federal minimum wage?”
Her answer: “I don’t know.”
Hammer pressed. She admitted she hasn’t met anyone making the federal minimum wage, then tried to pivot to anecdotes. Hammer shut it down hard.
“Your anecdotal collection of bullshit is not the real world. It isn’t.”
He asked again what percentage she thought it was. After stalling, she finally guessed:
“30%?”
Hammer’s response was pure fire:
“It’s less than 1%. You know nothing. You’re outraged. You’re performative. You’re a virtue signaling moron. You have prepared talking points and you know nothing about the real world.”
The socialist then tried to claim waitresses make less than the federal minimum. Hammer corrected her again: after tips, it’s still less than 1 percent of the workforce.
This is the modern left in a nutshell.
WATCH:
SOCIALIST ACTIVIST: “These people have to have multiple jobs in order to sustain a lifestyle!”
CALEB HAMMER: “Not the median American… What percent of the American population is relying on federal minimum wage?”
This is the exact problem with the radical Left in America today. They are driven entirely by emotional melodrama, virtue signaling, and manufactured rage, completely disconnected from cold, hard facts. When pressed outside of their echo chambers, their entire narrative crumbles in seconds.
During the interview, “Doomsday” couldn’t identify a single country where socialism has worked successfully. She also called the immigration detention center “concentration camps.”
(@VigilantFox) 