header

header

Sunday, September 30, 2018

Trump: Democrat the ‘Party of Crime,’ Radical Socialism, Open Borders

Sure looks like the truth to me. Since Trump has been in they are exposing there true colors. The Left cant win on Congressional Policy. They have used the Courts to win. They lose majority in Supreme Court and they are F^cked.  Tough Shit Dirtbags. As Obama said. "elections have consequences" 

In this Aug. 1, 2018 file photo, Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., joins protesters objecting to President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh at a rally Capitol in Washington. Schumer, who plans to meet Kavanaugh privately early this week, is methodically building arguments that would help vulnerable Democratic …


President Donald Trump branded the Democrat Party the “party of crime” during a Saturday West Virginia rally for Senate candidate Patrick Morrissey.

“The Democrat Party is radical socialism, Venezuela, and open borders. it’s now called, to me, you’ve never heard this before, the party of crime,” Trump told the packed West Virginia rally crowd.
“You see this horrible, horrible, radical group of Democrats,” Trump said referring to the Senate hearings on allegations against Supreme Court nominee Judge Brett Kavanaugh. “You see the meanness, the nastiness, they don’t care who they hurt, who they have to run over to get power and control.”
President Trump said they will not “give them power.” He accused them of being on a “mission to resist” and destroy. “We’ve seen that over the last four days,” said Trump.

“On Thursday the American people saw the brilliant and really incredible character” of Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Trump conveyed. He then cited a poll of West Virginians that resulted in 58 percent support for Kavanaugh and just 28 percent opposition. He said a vote for Kavanaugh is a vote against “the ruthless and outrageous tactics of the Democrat Party”
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/29/trump-democrat-the-party-of-crime-radical-socialism-open-borders/

GOP Rep. Mo Brooks: Democrats Threaten America ‘as We Know It’ with Push for Illegal Alien, Non-Citizen Voting Rights

(Jeff Poor/Breitbart News)

SCOTTSBORO, Alabama — According to Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), the “lawful” policy some municipalities around the country are implementing that allows illegal aliens and non-citizens to vote could be the nation’s “biggest threat.”

In a speech to a gathering of local Republicans in northeastern Alabama on Saturday, Brooks explained this effort underway in these cities is a trend the entire Democratic Party wants to adopt, and if successful it would dilute the vote of American citizens.
“This may be the biggest threat to our nation,” Brooks proclaimed to the Jackson County, AL Republican Party gathering. “Democrats want non-citizens voting in our elections. Not only do they want that – there are about a dozen cities right now, Democrat-controlled cities – they have passed municipal ordinances that allow illegal aliens and unlawful immigrants to register to vote and actually vote in their local elections. That means it is no longer a United States that they’re seeking. It’s a United Nations of sorts where we are no longer Americans, as we have been for centuries. We’re something different.”
“That is the Democratic Party’s position,” he added. “The biggest city is San Francisco and don’t take my word for this threat. Look at how these cities are lawfully registering [illegal aliens and non-citizens]. It’s lawful because they’re passing ordinances that allow illegal aliens and non-citizens to register to vote and then vote, thereby diluting the vote of American citizens.”
Brooks argued that if successful, the United States’ as we know it would be gone.
“It’s a harbinger of things to come that they want nationally if they get the power to impose that kind of law nationally,” Brooks added. “And if they do that, our country, our America as we know it – that beacon on the hill – is gone.”

Earlier this month, Brooks also warned in an appearance on SiriusXM’s “Breitbart News Saturday” that a push to count illegal aliens in the upcoming 2020 census could threaten the balance of power. He said that count would give more congressional representation to blue states that would elect Democrats to the U.S. House of Representatives.
https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/30/gop-rep-mo-brooks-democrats-threaten-america-as-we-know-it-with-push-for-illegal-alien-non-citizen-voting-rights/

Migrant Families, Minors Crossing AZ Border Nearly Doubles 2017 Reports

Border Patrol agents in Arizona witnessed a near doubling in the number of migrant families and unaccompanied minors who are illegally crossing the border and putting their lives at risk in the desert.

A recent report released by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) reveals that the illegal crossing of Family Unit Aliens (FMUA) and Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) increased from 13,181 in Fiscal Year 2017 year-to-date (YTD) reports to 25,911 in Fiscal Year 2018 – a 98 percent increase, according to the August Southwest Border Migration report. Yuma and Tucson Sector officials reported these classes of migrants are crossing in large numbers from Mexico into the southern Arizona desert where at least 83 migrants died during calendar year 2018.
Yuma Sector officials reported the largest increases in both FMUA and UAC categories. The apprehension of FMUAs in the Yuma Sector increased from 5,429 in FY2017 to 12,367 — a 128 percent increase, CBP officials stated. UAC apprehensions almost doubled in this sector, rising from 2,534 in FY2017 to 5,060.
During the fiscal year’s final month (September), the numbers continue to swell. Yuma Sector agents recently arrested nearly 200 migrants in the desert during a 33-hour period, Breitbart Texas reported.
Between noon on Tuesday and 9 a.m. Wednesday morning, Yuma Station agents arrested 23 groups of illegal immigrants after they crossed the border from Mexico. The 23 groups came to the U.S. from seven countries and included Family Unit Aliens (FMUA) and Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC), according to Yuma Sector Border Patrol officials.
The largest cohort came to the U.S. from Guatemala (149). Officials said that 155 persons were in family units while 18 were unaccompanied minors.
“With the 128 percent increase in family unit apprehensions and 100 percent increase in unaccompanied alien children apprehensions in Yuma Sector, compared to the same time last year, we want to emphasize the extreme hazards that accompany crossing the border illegally during the summer months.” Yuma Sector Chief Patrol Agent Anthony Porvaznik told Breitbart Texas in response to an email inquiry. “With peak days reaching close to 130 degrees, parents who are planning on crossing the border illegally need to seriously reconsider the possibly fatal dangers they will not only be subjecting themselves to, but their children as well.”

Tucson Sector officials also witnessed a doubling in the number of family units apprehended in the desert. During the first 11 months of FY2017, agents arrested 1,907 families who illegally crossed from Mexico into the U.S. This more than doubled to 3,860 during the same period in FY2018, officials reported. Unaccompanied minors actually outnumbered family units during FY2018 in this sector. Agents 4,624 UACs in FY2017 — up from 3,311 in FY2017 (a 40 percent increase).
https://www.breitbart.com/texas/2018/09/30/migrant-families-minors-crossing-az-border-nearly-doubles-2017-reports/

This Doesn’t Look Good: Business Was Listed Operating Out of Christine Ford’s Home – Would Explain Second Door

The Lie from the Left could be huge. This is really one of them, like the whole Mueller investigation was started on a Lie. 



Dr. Christina Ford testified in front of the Senate Judiciary Committee that she began having memories related to being abused years ago when she and her husband put a second front door on her house.

As The Gateway Pundit reported on Saturday — with photos — the second front door was installed years before she claimed in her testimony.

Now it looks more likely that the second door was not related to any abuse at all.  This may have been totally made up.

In her testimony on Thursday, Dr. Ford stated that she put a second door on her house in 2012:
Over the years, I told very, very few friends that I had this traumatic experience. I told my husband before we were married that I had experienced a sexual assault. I had never told the details to anyone — the specific details — until May 2012, during a couples counseling session.
The reason this came up in counseling is that my husband and I had completed a very extensive, very long remodel of our home and I insisted on a second front door, an idea that he and others disagreed with and could not understand.

 In explaining why I wanted a second front door, I began to describe the assault in detail. I recall saying that the boy who assaulted me could someday be on the U.S. Supreme Court, and spoke a bit about his background at an elitist all-boys school in Bethesda, Maryland. My husband recalls that I named my attacker as Brett Kavanaugh.

We now have proof that this was a lie — a major lie.  This was the basis for the entire story she told the US Senate Judiciary Committee under oath — And this was NOT TRUE.

As noted previously Dr. Ford and her husband put the second front door on their house sometime after 2008.
Ford’s house in 2007 – there was only one door pictured.

Ford’s house in March 2011 – This clearly shows the second front door is already installed.

Ford’s house in November 2011 – The second front door is there.

Now it turns out that the second door may not have been put in because of Dr. Ford’s alleged groping by Supreme Court nominee Judge Kavanaugh.
It may be  more likely that the second door on the Ford house was installed  to house renters or as a means for customers to visit a business set up in the house.
There may have been a business running out of the household with the second front door.
According to information found on the Internet, a business was located at the exact same address as the Ford house (please note that the address of this house was released on the Internet weeks ago).  The Couples Research Center was located at the exact same location as the Ford’s home.

It seems more plausible that the second door was put in place so a business could operate at the Ford house or so renters had separate quarters than due to some decades old memories of abuse.  What is the real reason?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/this-doesnt-look-good-business-was-listed-operating-out-of-christine-fords-home-would-explain-second-door/

https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/09/30/tom-cotton-dems-turned-advice-and-consent-into-search-and-destroy/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/lindsey-graham-announces-plans-to-investigate-democrat-antics-and-improper-behavior-during-kavanaugh-confirmation-process-video/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/list-the-top-20-inaccuracies-and-flaws-in-christina-fords-letter-to-senator-feinstein/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/if-christine-fords-memories-recovered-through-hypnosis-they-are-not-admissible-in-court-would-be-thrown/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/president-trump-in-west-virginia-honestly-the-democrats-are-a-disgrace-their-number-one-enabler-is-fake-news-media-video/
Funny
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/hah-jeff-flake-welcomes-audience-to-global-citizen-festival-with-chris-coons-crowd-yells-fck-you-video/

This Shitbag has to be a puppet of Soros?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/body-language-expert-feinstein-is-hiding-something-she-stutters-looks-down-and-appears-nervous-when-asked-about-leaks-video/

HERE is the COMPLETE LIST of Inconsistencies and Lies that Prove Christine Ford’s Accusations Against Judge Kavanaugh Belong in a Trash Heap

Dr. Christine Ford flew from California to the east coast this month to testify against conservative Judge Brett Kavanaugh.
Ford said she was afraid to fly but now we know she has flown all over the Pacific Ocean and the United Statesfor work and vacation.
Christine Ford says she is a California psychologist but her name is not in the state database and Stanford scrubbed her bio page earlier this month.
The rest of her social media presence is still a mystery — meaning it is likely full of far left filth.
Christine Ford told Congress, the Washington Post and her far left activist lawyers she had memories of Kavanaugh when she put a second front door on her home in 2012 but photos of the property show the door was installed before 2011.
And there is also a record of business operating out of the same address which would explain a second door.
And her current charges against Judge Brett Kavanaugh continue to evolve by the day.

Christine Ford’s testimony to Congress was littered with lies and inconsistencies.

Of course, the liberal media once again is ignoring the truth.
John Nolte from Breitbart.com has listed the many facts that discredit Dr. Ford’s testimony and her credibility.
  • She has aligned herself with the far-left.
  • She straight-up lied about being afraid to fly.
  • She said she wanted anonymity but continually reached out to the far-left Washington Post.
  • Her polygraph is a farce.
  • Her story has been carefully weaved into a Kafka-esque nightmare no man (even with detailed calendars) can ever escape from.
  • Every single one of her witnesses refutes her story — has no memory of the gathering in question or says it doesn’t happen, and this includes a lifelong friend.
  • Her team was so desperate to have The Woman Who Wants Anonymity to testify publicly, they turned down the opportunity to have her questioned in private at her home in California — and then lied about it.
  • Ford’s therapist’s notes from 2012 also refute here tale, even as the media and Democrats try to gaslight us into believing the opposite. Ford originally claimed four boys tried to rape her when she was in her late teens in the mid-eighties. Now she says it was one rapist and one bystander when she was 15 in the early eighties.
  • Ford refused to give her therapist’s notes to the Senate Judiciary Committee.
  • In the statement she wrote out in her farce of a polygraph test, Ford crossed out “early 80’s” so it would only read “80’s.”
  • Ford told the Committee the “primary impact” of the event occurred during the “four years after” it happened. She goes on to say, “I struggled academically. I struggled very much in Chapel Hill and in College. When I was 17 I went off to college, I had a very hard time.” Note how she skips over two whole years, her junior and senior years in high school; the two school years directly after the attack (unless it did indeed happen in her late teens).
  • To later confirm the event did in fact happen in 1982, Ford told the Committee she was able to pin it down to 1982 because she remembered she did not yet have her drivers’ license. But… she also says she doesn’t remember how she got to or from the house party, so how does she know she didn’t drive herself?
  • Ford also used Mark Judge’s Safeway job to confirm the 1982 timeline. She testified she saw him working there 6-8 weeks after the attack. She could not yet drive, so her mother drove her there, but for some bizarre reason Ford and her mother entered the Safeway using different doors. (And now mom can’t confirm this happened!)
  • Five times during her testimony she mentioned Safeway to verify the date. How could she know such a thing unless it really happened? Well, in his memoir (which began circulating online among Kavanaugh critics in the week before Ford’s testimony) Judge helpfully reveals he was working at the “local supermarket” during the “summer before senior year.”
  • In summation: On top of all four of her own witnesses refuting her allegations against Kavanaugh, so too do the notes taken by her own therapist. (Margot Cleveland’s tweet thread was indispensable for much of this — you will want to readit all.)
Dr. Ford’s allegations are not only not credible — they are ludicrous, a joke.
Attorney Margot Cleveland listed a number of questionable statements from Ford’s testimony.
And Arizona Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell, who questioned Ford under oath, later told Republican Senators there is no way she would prosecute Judge Brett Kavanaugh based on the testimony by Christine Ford.
The liberal media and FOX News pundits believe this woman is “very credible.”

There is NOTHING credible about this woman, her story, or her testimony that left her dry-eyed and without need of a single tissue.

America is better than this.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/here-is-the-complete-list-of-inconsistencies-and-lies-that-prove-christine-fords-accusations-against-judge-kavanaugh-belong-in-a-trash-heap/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/sen-feinstein-sends-letter-to-fbi-director-wray-requesting-written-directive-of-kavanaugh-investigation/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/09/trump-fires-warning-shot-to-democrats-obstructing-kavanaugh-stay-tuned-and-watch/

Fords Lawyer and she is with who?

Maxine Waters: Kavanaugh ‘Should Not Be Confirmed’ — He Is Trump’s ‘Puppet’

This Dumbass is always a gift that keeps on giving. She calls a women she never meant "Credible" What a DipShit

 

 
Sunday on MSNBC’s “AM Joy,” Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA) said Supreme Court associate justice nominee Brett Kavanaugh‘s testimony before the Judiciary Committee showed he was “nothing but a tool and a puppet to the president United States of America.”
Waters said, “We have to fight. We have to not only fight to make sure that women get the respect that they deserve, but when you have a credible person like Christine Blasey Ford, it helps us to point out that no matter how credible they are, no matter you how well spoken they are, no matter how smart they are, that these senators do not intend to allow sexual harassment to be the reason why someone will not be confirmed. And so I think that this has played out in a way that will only strengthen us and strengthen women and those who care about justice to fight and to confront them and protest against what we’re seeing.”
She continued, “Kavanaugh is very interesting. I think one of the most serious things that we have learned about him is he is trying to be confirmed to the highest court in the land, but he is not an independent. What he did is he went back up to the White House, and the president told him what goes back and say and how to act. So if he is nothing but a tool and a puppet to the president United States of America, why would we want him on the highest court of the land. It doesn’t bode well for America.
She added, “It sounded as if it was coming straight out of Trump’s mouth, so he had his orders. And he came back, and he did exactly what he was told to do. I think that is a serious problem with anybody who is wishing to be confirmed to the highest court of the land. He cannot be trusted. And if he is nothing but a mouthpiece for Trump, we know what that means for democracy. We know what that means for a lack of justice that is going to come out of the Supreme Court by someone like him. It is outrageous that he would allow himself to basically take those kind of orders and come back and execute them. Everybody could recognize what that was all about. And the difference between even how he first comported himself and after he had gone to the White House, it is so obvious that he is not independent and will never be independent. To bring politics into it and to talk about Hillary Clinton and the Democrats? No Supreme Court justice should act that way. He cannot be trusted, and he should not be confirmed.”
https://www.breitbart.com/video/2018/09/30/maxine-waters-kavanaugh-should-not-be-confirmed-he-is-trumps-puppet/

Life in a Gynocracy

The performance of women this week – from Senator Dianne Feinstein to Christine Blasey Ford to the howling mobs on Capitol Hill – made me seriously consider surgically altering my sex.  They are demanding special treatment because of their sex and in the process placing all of us – male and female alike – at peril of witch hunts against men and then, in time, against all who will not bow to their rule.
My Facebook friend Alex Bensky reminded me of the advantage to me of transgendering: 
Ah, then we'd be unable to criticize your politics, your social viewpoints, your choice of teams to root for, and anything else you say because we'd be transphobic.
‪As a footnote, I've seen an estimate that the transgender population is about 0.05% of the population.  This is hardly a warrant for beating up people but it is not clear to me why unless we substantially alter social arrangements that have existed in almost every known human society and celebrate...not just accept but celebrate...transgenderism, we are mean, hateful people.
Victor Davis Hanson offered up the most succinct summary of Blasey Ford's testimony: 

The "process" of memorializing Ford's testimony involved a strange inversion of constitutional norms: The idea of a statute of limitations is ossified; hearsay is legitimate testimony; inexact and contradictory recall is proof of trauma, and therefore of validity; the burden of proof is on the accused, not the accuser; detail and evidence are subordinated to assumed sincerity; proof that one later relates an allegation to another is considered proof that the assault actually occurred in the manner alleged; motive is largely irrelevant; the accuser establishes the guidelines of the state's investigation of the allegations; and the individual allegation gains credence by cosmic resonance with all other such similar allegations.
Unless, however, you do not want to transgender, I want to note how we came to such a place, a place both ridiculous and dangerous.
I want you to pay attention to the distortions of language and statistics used to advance the gynocrats' agenda.
Since when do those accusing others of crimes become "survivors" rather than "accusers"?  How you frame your self-description affects views, doesn't it?  If you claimed that someone had raped you, why must we always believe you just because you tag yourself "a survivor"?  Do we do this with those who claim to have been robbed or beaten?  "I'm a robbery survivor, so you have to believe me when I say X robbed me."  The shift in language is to message that accusers must always be believed.  It is, at heart, based on a gross distortion of statistics. 
 It is difficult for many reasons to determine the percentage of false rape claims, to be sure, but like the claims about 97% of "climate scientists" and global warming, the assertion that only 2% of women's rape claims are false is itself demonstrably false.  We don't know the answer, and since we don't, we should not upset laws and precepts guaranteeing due process for all those accused of the crime – men and women alike.
Indirect data, in fact, highly suggest that far more than two percent of rape accusations are false.  The 2% genesis was a handout from Susan Brownmiller's file.  (Brownmiller, the author of Against Our Will, Men, Women and Rape, argued that existing definitions of rape were a tool of male dominance.)  It was her "interpretation of some data, now a quarter-century old, of unknown provenance from a single police department unit."
This fact is significant because based on this dubious statistic, efforts are made to transform rape accusations into a strict liability offense.  Those who believe this nonsense contend that if only half of the accusations result in convictions, the definition of "consent" must be altered, making intent irrelevant to the crime and creating "a new breed of strict liability." 
Brownmiller's desire to revise the definition (indeed, the meaning of sex crimes involving women) was not the only fake statistic used to turn the presumption of innocence on its head.
The same kind of jiggered statistics were used to justify Title IX tribunals in colleges where men were grossly mistreated following false accusations. The Duke lacrosse team and University of Virginia cases come to mind, but daily we read of men who fought back, were reinstated to college, and even won substantial damages because their schools followed the Obama Department of Education's gynocratic star chamber policies.  Those policies were based on an equally suspect claim that 20% of college women experienced a sexual assault.  Countless others doubtless lacked the financial ability to do so and had their lives damaged if not ruined by campus star chambers.
Statistics surrounding sexual assault are notoriously unreliable and inconsistent, primarily because of vague and expansive definitions of what qualifies as sexual assault.  Christina Hoff Sommers of the American Enterprise Institute explains that the study often cited as the origin of the "one in five" factoid is an online survey conducted under a grant from the Justice Department.  Surveyors employed such a broad definition that "'forced kissing" and even "attempted forced kissing" qualified as sexual assault.
The Bureau of Justice Statistics' "Violent Victimization of College Students" report tells a different and more plausible story about campus culture.  During the years surveyed, 1995-2002, the DOJ found that there were six rapes or sexual assaults per thousand per year.  Across the nation's four million female college students, that comes to about one victim in forty students. Other DOJ statistics show that the overall rape rate is in sharp decline: since 1995, the estimated rate of female rape or sexual assault victimizations has decreased by about 60 percent. ...
Bolstered by inflated statistics and alarmist depictions of campus culture, advocates have been successful in initiating policy changes designed to better protect victims of sexual violence.  Duke, Swarthmore, Amherst, Emerson and the University of North Carolina are among the many institutions that have recently reviewed and revised their policies.  It is not clear that these policies have made campuses safer places for women, but they have certainly made them treacherous places for falsely accused men.
It is in this fevered atmosphere, where women are led to believe that all men are rapists or would-be rapists, that a charge made months earlier with a request for anonymity and kept hidden by Senator Feinstein (but not from the Washington Post) was finally disclosed, with demands for a reopened hearing on the suitability of Judge Brett Kavanaugh for the Supreme Court.  He has, without doubt, a pristine reputation.  The accusation was vague – no date, no place were given.  The others she claimed were present, like the nominee, all denied the claim under penalty of perjury.  On examination by a mild prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell from Arizona, Ford made a number of inconsistent statements and other assertions that were hardly credible.  Miss Mitchell notified the committee that had she received this information as a prosecutor, she would not have filed a charge against Kavanaugh and doubted she would even have been able to get a search warrant issued. 
I have to agree with Powerline blog's John Hinderaker
If we can do this to the Boy Scout Brett Kavanaugh, we can do it to anyone.  Are you thinking of serving in a Republican administration?  Or accepting an appointment to the federal judiciary from a Republican president?  Think twice, and then think again.
Because our smear machine will reach back to middle school if necessary.  If we can't find any dirt on you, we will manufacture some.  There is no depth to which we will not stoop, and your honesty, integrity and spotless reputation are no match for our control over the media and our determination to dredge up ridiculous allegations against anyone who stands in our way. 
Really, the more ridiculous the better.  If we can accuse Brett Kavanaugh, one of the most respected lawyers and judges in America, of gang rape, we can accuse anyone of anything!  And our insane accusations will dominate the news.
That is the Democratic Party's message.  And we have learned from the Christine Ford fiasco that accusations don't require corroborating evidence.  A single wacky, false allegation will negate decades of hard work on behalf of the American people. ...
Given that strategy, the fact that they are smearing a man of obviously sterling character on absurdly flimsy grounds is not a bug, it is a feature.  The fact that the Democrats' smears are so patently false is ultimately their main point.
The Democrats are telling us: Republicans, beware – if this can happen to Brett Kavanaugh, it can happen to anyone.  You'd better go quietly and cede power to us.
Hinderaker is right about the strategy of the Democrats in Kavanaugh's case, but Brownmiller, the Obama Department of Education, and the various left-wing organizations and their media cohorts have created an atmosphere within which they could commit this outrage.
And the pussy-hatted women are telling us they can do this to you whether or not you are a Republican, as long as you are a man.
Really, guys, you have to fight this.  You pick your weapon.  You can march around in penis hats and accost senators in elevators demanding that since some men have been falsely accused of rape, all accusations of rape must be deemed falsely made.  You can call a nationwide strike by men.  Let the women dig the ditches, fix the electrical wires and telephone lines, fight all the fires and wars, and conduct all the police work and intricate surgeries.  Do all the countless things men do every day to protect all of us – men and women alike.
Or maybe, like me, you can vow to never vote for a Democrat again and fight tooth and nail against such efforts to distort our constitutional rights to due process.


 
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2018/09/life_in_a_gynocracy.html