Surprise! House Releases Bombshell Report on January 6 Pipe Bomber Revealing FBI Engaged in Massive Coverup and Refuses to Cooperate with Investigators

 Another setup that was hidden?

A new report released by the Committee on House Administration Subcommittee on Oversight into the January 6 pipe bomber shows the FBI stopped looking for the suspect in 2021 and covered up evidence.

The FBI is now refusing to cooperate with Congressional investigators.

In September, former Secret Service agent Dan Bongino said according to a whistleblower, after the pipe bombs were found at the RNC and DNC headquarters, “assets on the ground, including a whistleblower, was briefed about the pipe bombs the next day and show a picture of a guy in a hoodie.”

However, according to the whistleblower, the law enforcement agents were told to stand down two days later.

“But two days later after the pipe bombs, he notes, emphasis his — without explanation, they were told to stand down! No need to look for the guy anymore” Bongino said.

This directly contradicts previous statements by FBI Director Christopher Wray.

Loudermilk released more information to back up Bongino’s whistleblower report.

“Nearly four years later, federal law enforcement has yet to identity the individual responsible for planting the pipe bombs, which remains one of the unanswered questions from that day. In the early weeks of the investigation, the FBI took significant investigative steps, identifying multiple persons of interest, issuing search warrants, reviewing hours of security camera footage, and analyzing the components of the pipe bombs. Despite the threat the pipe bombs posed to Congress and the public and the role they played in diverting resources away from the Capitol, federal law enforcement has refused to provide substantive updates to Congress about the status of the investigation,” Loudermilk’s report stated.

Loudermilk’s report said there has been conflicting information whether the FBI received “corrupted” cellular data from cell carriers.

“There is conflicting information as to whether the FBI received “corrupted” cellular data from the major cell carriers. A former senior FBI official testified that the major cell carrier companies provided “corrupted” cell data to the FBI and suggested that that “corrupted” data may have contained the identity of the pipe bomber; however, in responses to letters from the Subcommittee, the major cell carriers confirmed that they did not provide corrupted data to the FBI and that the FBI never notified them of any issues with accessing the cellular data,” the House report stated.

For years we’ve been told an unidentified suspect planted pipe bombs at the RNC and DNC headquarters on January 5, the night before the Capitol riot.

The FBI still ‘can’t find’ the person who planted the bombs.

The US Capitol was shut down on January 6 after the feds found the bombs near the Republican and Democrat Party headquarters.

But did this so-called suspect actually plant the bombs the night before?

Video recently released from January 6 shows a police officer carrying a bag toward the location of the DNC ‘pipe bomb’ at 12:51 pm on Jan. 6 – just 15 minutes before the ‘explosive device’ was discovered by another officer.

WATCH:

Did this police officer place the pipe bomb next to the park bench on January 6?

Not one Secret Service agent saw the pipe bomb during a sweep of the building before Kamala Harris arrived that day.

The bomb-sniffing dog that was brought to the location earlier in the day also didn’t detect the bomb.

Trending: Popular Restaurant Unable to Survive Even One Day of New $20.76 Minimum Wage Law

Last year J6 footage released showed a highly-trained bomb-sniffing dog somehow missing the DNC ‘pipe bomb’ just a few feet away at approximately 9:51 am that morning.

WATCH:

Additionally Secret Service agents also miraculously didn’t seem concerned that a deadly ‘pipe bomb’ was discovered within close proximity to Kamala Harris.

Harris’s Secret Service detail arrived at 11:25 am that morning and did not find the pipe bomb…that’s because it was likely planted by the police officer 90 minutes later.

WATCH:

Last year Darren Beattie of Revolver News joined Tucker Carlson to discuss the J6 footage showing how unconcerned Secret Service agents were after they found out about the so-called bomb.

Darren Beattie said what’s so shocking about the new footage is just how “utterly unconcerned both the metro PD and the Secret Service are about being informed that there was a pipe bomb literally within feet of them and within feet of their protectee, VP-elect Kamala Harris.”

The Secret Service allowed children to cross the street toward the bomb several minutes after it was discovered under the park bench.

Darren Beattie said according to sources who have seen the extended video, bomb robots showed up several minutes later and dismantled and diffused the pipe bomb.

Darren Beattie weighed in on the shocking footage released over the summer.

“Thanks to new footage presented by Julie Kelly, overwhelming likely that the FBI surveillance footage is fake and the bombs were actually planted not the evening before but day of Jan 6,” Darren Beattie.

“That explains why no one including secret service was able to “find” the bomb. It was planted later, to be conveniently found, along with the RNC bomb, within a 15 minute time frame that perfectly coincided with unfolding Ray Epps orchestrated breach of Capitol,” Beattie.

The FBI is also withholding critical surveillance footage of the pipe bomber sitting on the bench.

Here is video proof the FBI is withholding critical footage that would show whether or not the pipe bomber planted the bomb when they said he/she did:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/01/breaking-bombshell-house-report-reveals-new-information-fbis/

Megalomania without end: Now Biden is mulling a permanent ban on offshore drilling on his way out Read more: https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/01/megalomania_without_end_now_biden_is_mulling_a_permanent_ban_on_offshore_drilling_on_his_way_out.html#ixzz8wJzHLCu3 Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook

 The voters rejected him, his designated successor, and his radical left-wing agenda.

So now Joe Biden is trying to extend his rule by other means, particularly if means blowing the place up on his way out.

He's come up with this, according to JustTheNews:

President Joe Biden may take one more shot at the oil and gas industry before he departs the White House.

According to Bloomberg, citing unnamed sources, the president plans to issue a decree that would permanently ban new offshore oil and gas development within U.S. coastal waters. 

“Joe Biden is again attacking American energy like he’s done for the last four years, but today’s action will do nothing but further enshrine failure as the biggest part of his legacy. President Trump should overturn this order on the first day and quickly usher Biden’s green agenda into the dustbin of history,” Daniel Turner, executive director of Power the Future, an energy advocacy group, said in a statement. 

President-elect Donald Trump is expected to overturn many of Biden’s anti-fossil fuel actions, but he might not be able to reverse a permanent ban on offshore oil and gas development. The 1953 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act gave presidents the authority to permanently protect U.S. waters from leasing, but it contains no specific provision to undo the protections.

That's funny. Two years ago, he told the American public he wouldn't dream of shutting down American oil production, and to the contrary, was all in for energy self-sufficiency, claiming in a speech from the White House in 2022:

... we need to responsibly increase American oil production without delaying or deferring our transition to clean energy.  Let me — let’s debunk some myths here.  My administration has not stopped or slowed U.S. oil production; quite the opposite.  We’re producing 12 million barrels of oil per day.  And by the end of this year, we will be producing 1 million barrels a day, more than the day in which I took office.  In fact, we’re on track for record oil production in 2023.
 
And today, the United States is the largest producer of oil and petroleum products in the world.  We export more than we import.  And I still heard from oil comp- — and I’ve heard from oil companies that they’re worried that investing in additional oil production today will — will — in case of the — in case demand goes down in the future, and they’re not going to be able to sell their oil products at a competitive price later.

Sen. John Barrasso of Wyoming pointed out this past April that he was lying:

 

He knows he deserves zero credit for production records. For three years, he has attacked affordable, available and reliable American energy.

The credit belongs to the innovators, entrepreneurs and roughnecks in places such as my home state of Wyoming. These individuals work hard and take enormous risks every day. Their vision and labor made the U.S. energy independent in 2019 — for the first time in 70 years.

 

Instead of celebrating their achievement, candidate Joe Biden threatened to throw them out of work. He “guaranteed” his administration would “end fossil fuel.” In his first days in office, he killed the Keystone Pipeline and cancelled federal lease sales and then existing leases. He has launched an unprecedented regulatory assault on the fuels that provide four-fifths of the nation’s energy.

While oil output is at a record high, we could be producing even more but for the president’s “whole of government” effort to chill investment. The year before President Biden was inaugurated, the Energy Information Administration was forecasting oil output in 2023 of 14 million barrels a day. Actual output came in at 1.1 million barrels per day below that forecast.

He also was gaslighting. Barrasso noted just why these Biden claims were so phony:

Oil production hit a record in 2023 because more and more of our oil and natural gas production is occurring on private and state lands, where developers don’t need permission from Washington to drill. In 2005, about 68 percent of our oil and 62 percent of our gas came from private and state lands.Today it’s risen to roughly 75 percent and 90 percent, respectively. It’s also no accident that most of this production takes place in Republican-led states, including Wyoming.

When it comes to production on federal lands, however, we’re living on borrowed time. We’ve been able to maintain output thanks to production from wells drilled on leases issued before Biden became president. While the administration has issued drilling permits to existing leaseholders — as required by law — that hasn’t stopped it from slow walking these permits.

That was noted several months ago, back when there was an election to win.

Now that Biden is on the way out, he's changed his tune, determined to extend his rule to well beyond his time in office.

He's taking advantage of a badly written law to destroy America's energy largesse, keeping it in the ground forever, no matter what our economy needs. He's nominally doing it in the name of a green energy transition, which as Power Line has noted, couldn't be fulfilled even if everyone in America wanted it, owing to the absence of necessary resources. Even Elon Musk, who runs Tesla, America's top electric car company, has stated that fossil fuels are critical to the global economy and should not be "demonized."

In reality, Biden's doing it to please his greenie donors, who contributed much to Democrat campaign efforts -- shutting down offshore drilling will be just the thing to boost their profits with oil production on the outs.

Worse still, he's doing it to Get Trump, unable to accept that he has lost the election and been repudiated by voters, and determined to backseat-drive the Trump presidency to a failure as resounding as his own. While he can (phonily) claim credit for increased oil production on his watch, he wants to make sure that Trump can't get the energy America needs as he shuts the door to energy production on the way out.

It's outrageous, and lawmakers had better get to work modifying that law. No sleazy bitter president, heading out of office, should have a right to determine the voters' energy future by executive order, just to Get Trump.

At a minimum, revoking what Biden decrees will put the Trump administration in courts with leftist lawsuits for possibly the duration of the presidency, and with a corrupted judicial system, could lead to any outcome.

Americans deserve better than that. Biden and his successor were thrown from power for this reason. The American people have the right to determine their leaders and their energy future, not the miserable smoking ruins of Biden's failed presidency.

 

 https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/01/megalomania_without_end_now_biden_is_mulling_a_permanent_ban_on_offshore_drilling_on_his_way_out.html#ixzz8wJzQ9SAP

Will Elon Musk bring down the British government over the grooming gang cover-up?

 My X feed suddenly started featuring posts about the infamous and utterly heinous story that Muslim rape gangs in Northern England had, for more than three decades (from the late 1970s to 2013), exploited hundreds of thousands of British children. Worse, they were enabled by British police and politicians afraid of “inflaming tensions” with the Muslim population.

Why the sudden interest in an 11-year-old story? It turns out that Elon Musk, who is unafraid of being imprisoned by Britain’s increasingly totalitarian government, learned about what happened and went on an X rampage, forcing the story into the daylight, including PM Keir Starmer’s apparent role in the cover-up.

Here’s what I was able to piece together:

Beginning in the 1970s and accelerating hard and fast in the 1990s, Yorkshire, once the most English region in the UK, became the primary destination outside of London for Pakistani immigrants. In 2013, news broke that Muslim rape gangs had been sexually exploiting non-Muslim children in Rotherham, a town in Yorkshire. That was terrible, but what made the story a scandal was that the police and government had known about these gangs and had done nothing for fear of “inflaming” the Muslim population.

Image by Grok.

As time went by, it became clear that the grooming wasn’t limited to Rotherham. In one town and city after another across Britain (although mostly in the North and the Midlands), the same pattern was revealed: Muslims were horrifically exploiting non-Muslim British children while the authorities deliberately turned a blind eye.

The past might have stayed in the past were it not for Elon Musk, who became aware of a debate on X about Muslim immigration to the UK. The debate started by talking about Muslim immigration generally, with a leftist saying it worked wonderfully and Sam Bidwell, a conservative, giving chapter and verse about its failures. In that tweet, he said, “We still have dozens of towns which bear the scars of Pakistani grooming gangs, who targeted young girls because they were white.”

Naturally, a leftist challenged him to name those “dozens” of towns. Bidwell obliged with a list of 20 towns (and commenters added more), and Elon Musk took notice:

CEO Says This is Worth 23 Nvidias

The Motley Fool

Are Your Vitamins Putting Your Heart at Risk? Read This First!

Vitality Vista

A Must-have for Everyone in Peoria: The $59 Blood Sugar Testing Smartwatch

Ribili

These Headlight Glasses Make Nighttime Driving Like Daytime Driving

Ribili

When Elon Musk notices something, the world notices. On January 1, while physical bombs went off in New Orleans and Las Vegas, Musk ignited a fact bomb on X when he retweeted a post by Ian Miles Cheong about the rape gangs:

The short video tells the story of just one exploited child and the police and judicial response (which was to victimize the victim). The moment Musk reposted that tweet, he must have started receiving a lot of information, not just about what happened in the past, but about PM Keir Starmer and his government.

Suddenly, Musk was on fire, retweeting to the tens of millions who read his tweets story after story about the horrors the Muslim gangs inflicted on British children and about institutional British complicity, with everyone—the government, the police, and the media—covering up and downplaying what happened.

Musk also retweeted this thread (which I urge you to read), giving a detailed history about the rape gangs and the institutional cover-up.

After just a few of these retweets, Musk stated the obvious, which is that many in the British government need to go to jail and that Reform UK is Britain’s only hope:

There are now hundreds, perhaps thousands, of posts about the rape gangs flooding X, all because Musk got hold of a tweet thread about immigration. Tommy Robinson, whom the British government has persecuted relentlessly for speaking out about the Islamic gangs, got Musk’s attention, too:

This revisiting of past events might have died there were it not for the fact that Musk discovered PM Starmer’s role in the grooming gang story. First, he retweeted a report that, back in October, Jess Phillips, the Labour Party’s ironically named “Minister for Safeguarding and Violence Against Women and Girls,” blocked a nationwide inquiry into the gangs, saying that, while rape is bad and inquiries are good, all inquiries should be conducted at a purely local level, leaving the British government out of it:

Musk was not pleased:

(Musk later discovered that the Tories were equally complicit in covering up what happened. The British government, left and right, is a club.)

And then Musk discovered that Starmer himself may have been part of the cover-up:

With Elon Musk reminding people of what happened and exposing the fact that, even now, at least one of the gang leaders is still living comfortably in Britain despite a nine-year-old deportation order and another one received a peerage, the dam of cowed silence in Britain is beginning to break.

That Musk is forcing awareness on the British people matters because the British thought police are out there. If you make people (read: Muslims or so-called “transgenders”) uncomfortable (read: angry), you will be arrested. Freedom of speech and thought is dead in Britain, and that’s true whether Labour or Tory leads the government. Their politicians are afraid of alienating Muslim voters, who now make up sizable, activist voting blocs. If you’re in the government and try to speak, you will be silenced.

This has been a long post, and it could easily be ten times as long. I’ll leave you with two tweets from this morning, both affirming that Musk wants to bring down the Labour government (and, as he said, get Reform UK in power):

And as you’ll inevitably hear leftists shriek about Musk’s billions, please note that Musk isn’t effecting this change by using his money to drive secret backroom dealings. He’s doing it solely by exposing people to the truth—especially the people of Britain, who can almost certainly handle the truth but who are forbidden to speak it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/01/will_elon_musk_bring_down_the_british_government_over_the_grooming_gang_cover_up.html