Illinois Dem Gov Candidate Who Sought Office from Blagojevich is Major Clinton Funder

This Clown was on tape wanting Obama's seat and he's running for Governor. This Clown also is advertising that he can create jobs for Illinois but also talking out the other side of his Ass and wanting to raise taxes, especially on the wealthy and Corporations. That would be the biggest incentive for them to leave Illinois like many are doing. The Liberals never change. Tax and Spend. Madigan is blocking Rauner from doing anything because he don't want change. Illinois is in the Shitter now especially when the credit rating just got dropped to almost Junk. This Clown gets in, nothing will change. He wanted a favor from Blago. How far will he go if he got elected?

J.B. Pritzker, a Democratic candidate for governor in Illinois who was recently reported to have sought political office from former governor and convicted felon Rod Blagojevich, has donated millions to the political campaigns and causes of failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.

The Chicago Tribune first reported that Pritzker sought political office in 2008 from Blagojevich, who was sentenced to 14 years in prison for corruption charges stemming from soliciting bribes for political appointments after Barack Obama had won the presidency and left his Illinois Senate seat.

During one phone conversation, Pritzker said that he was not interested in taking over the vacated Senate seat, but rather expressed interest in becoming treasurer of the state, according to FBI wiretaps of phone conversations.

"Ooh, interesting," Blagojevich said. "Let's think about that. You interested in that?"

"Yeah," Pritzker responded, "That's the one I would want."

Blagojevich asked Pritzker for a "significant campaign contributions" during one of the conversations. Blagojevich also informed Pritzker at the time that a spot for attorney general could possibly become available.

Pritzker did not receive either position, as neither the treasurer nor attorney general spots were vacated. Pritzker called Blagojevich in December 2008 to inform him that he was pulling his name out of the running. Just six days after the phone call, Blagojevich was arrested.

Pritzker, a billionaire venture capitalist, along with his wife, Mary Kay, are major Democratic donors and longtime supporters and funders of Hillary Clinton campaigns and causes.

J.B. Pritzker has donated thousands to Clinton political campaigns and to HILLPAC, a leadership PAC that was operated by Clinton during her time in the Senate.

The Pritzkers have given between $10 and $25 million to the Clinton Foundation. They have also donated between $1 and $5 million to the Clinton Health Access Initiative through the Pritzker Family Foundation. The couple additionally made two commitments to the Clinton Global Initiative that totaled $1.3 million.

In 2008, when J.B. was a bundler for the Clinton campaign, the venture capitalist was tapped as chairman of Citizens for Hillary. His wife was placed on Clinton's National Council of Civic Leaders.

The Pritzkers sponsored the second annual Clinton Global Initiative meeting in 2012. One year later, J.B. was appointed to the leadership council of the Too Small To Fail Initiative, an initiative created by the Clinton Foundation.

During the 2016 election cycle, Pritzker gave more than $350,000 to the Hillary Victory Fund, which was a joint fundraising partnership between the Clinton campaign, the Democratic National Committee, and more than 30 state Democratic parties. Pritzker's wife added $330,000 to the committee.

"Look, there was nothing inappropriate about my conversation with the governor," Pritkzer said of the Blagojevich controversy. "It should be unsurprising to people that after 25 years of doing public service in a variety of ways that when an opportunity might have arisen for me to do public service that I would be willing to do that. And that was what the conversation was all about."

Pritzker's campaign did not return requests for comment by press time.

http://freebeacon.com/politics/illinois-dem-gov-candidate-major-clinton-funder/

Obama Administration - 8 Years of Lies and Corruption - Just another puppet after all

               

A Few More Shared Facebook Post

       

                     



No Shame, Good Job Guys

Seth Rich Murder Update: The Curious Case of Former CEO of the DNC Amy Dacey

Did Amy Dacey snitch on Seth Rich and tell John Podesta that Rich was leaking emails to WikiLeaks?

On July 10th, 2016, 27 year-old Omaha native and Democratic staffer Seth Rich was murdered in an upscale Washington DC neighborhood. Rich was talking to his girlfriend and then suddenly told her he had to go.  According to his parents at 4:18am in the morning there were two shots fired.  Police found Rich conscious and breathing but he died later in a hospital.  The killer or killers took nothing from their victim, leaving behind his wallet, watch and phone.

Seth Rich’s father Joel told reporters, “If it was a robbery — it failed because he still has his watch, he still has his money — he still has his credit cards, still had his phone so it was a wasted effort except we lost a life.”

A few weeks after Rich’s murder, former Head of the DNC, Debbie Wasserman Schultz,  lost her position during the DNC Convention due to WikiLeaks emails being released that showed her efforts to enable Hillary Clinton to win the DNC nomination and steal the nomination from Bernie Sanders.  (Wasserman Schultz’s brother, Steven Wasserman, is the Assistant US Attorney at the Attorney’s office for the District of Columbia.  Questions have arisen as to whether Steven played a part in burying the Seth Rich murder case in DC.  No one has yet been charged in spite of the many unanswered questions related to the murder case.)

Because Rich reportedly provided emails to WikiLeaks there are many who believe Rich was murdered as a result.  One reason for this belief occurred in August of 2016.   At that time Wikileaks offered a $20,000 reward for information on the murder of DNC staffer Seth Rich.  WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange, in an interview alluded to the fact that Seth Rich may have supplied the emails that WikiLeaks leaked during the election last year.

Was Seth Rich, the source of #DNCleaks, murdered? https://t.co/bKwYQJcmQp

— Mike Cernovich (@Cernovich) August 10, 2016

There are numerous others who have offered rewards for information on the death of Seth Rich.  Many believe that Seth Rich provided DNC emails to WikiLeaks shortly before his death and Kim Dot Com revealed that he has proof that Seth Rich provided the emails to WikiLeaks.

One question that remains open until today is who provided information to the DNC that implicated Rich in releasing emails to WikiLeaks? 

According to research found at reddit, one DNC staffer by the name of Amy Dacey had a long relationship with John Podesta, Hillary Clinton’s seedy Campaign Manager.  As far back as 2007, Dacey was in contact with Podesta according to Podesta’s own emails released by WikiLeaks.  Dacey worked at the SEIU and then later was Executive Director at Fund for America all the time working with the Podesta crowd.

Dacey eventually worked her way in as CEO of the DNC and was leading the investigation into the voter database compromise that happened at the end of 2015.  According to Dacey’s own report embedded in an email from December 2015 released by WikiLeaks, the DNC hired a firm by the name of NGP Van as its software partner.  According to Dacey:

NGP VAN applied a new software patch to the DNC’s voter database system, and because of an error in the code, users were capable of accessing some limited, yet extremely valuable information belonging to other campaigns for a very brief window of time.

After NGP VAN fixed the “glitch”, the DNC asked the software firm to:

– Identify any users who may have accessed information from another campaign inappropriately,
– Pinpoint exactly what actions any such users took in the system, and
– Report these findings to the DNC so we would know what, if any, data was actually acquired.

According to Dacey in her report to Hillary’s Campaign Manager John Podesta:

NGP VAN found that campaign staff on the Sanders campaign, including the campaign’s national data director, had accessed proprietary information about which voters were being targeted by the Clinton campaign — and in doing so violated their agreements with the DNC. These staffers then saved this information in their personal folders on the system, and over the course of the next day, we learned that at least one staffer appeared to have generated reports and exported them from the system. None of this is in dispute. It’s fully documented in the system logs. And these details reveal nothing less than a serious violation of the agreements governing the use of this data. Underscoring that fact is the point that the Sanders campaign has fired their national data director and indicated further disciplinary actions may be taken pending the results of their own investigation.

Towards the end of Dacey’s report she noted that the DNC will “continue to investigate the incident with the help of an independent auditor.”

Another email at the time written by Podesta notes that she [Hillary] “is whipped up on actual damage“.  Apparently Hillary wanted to know all that that had been leaked as if she was hiding something with major implications.

A couple months later in February of 2016 the DNC was still talking about information being leaked.  Podesta reports in an email released by WikiLeaks at that time that he was “definitely for making an example of a suspected leaker whether or not we have any real basis for it.”

Counter to “think progress”:https://t.co/pMQaBnGq8l#PodestaEmails #WIKILEAKS#MURDERER #Democrats

— Dr C Cat (@JonLopez357) May 23, 2017

It appears at this time that the DNC was still focused on finding a leaker in the spring of 2016 and the leaker had not yet been found.  It is also a fact that Podesta wanted to make an example of the leaker as noted in the email above and Seth Rich was murdered on the night of July 10th.

In early August of 2016 Amy Dacey, Seth Rich’s boss resigned from her post as CEO of the DNC due to some embarrassing emails released by WikiLeaks.

Disgraced Amy Dacey and the individuals who performed her audit in early 2016 are key suspects in knowledge of when and if Seth Rich was identified as the DNC leaker. She also should be asked to whom this was communicated with and what was said.

 http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/putin-no-secret-deal-trump-saying-russians-like-blaming-everything-jews/

 

REPORT: 1 in 4 EU Citizens ‘On Verge of Total Poverty’ as Leaders Open Continent to Third World Migrant Invasion (VIDEO)

Brussels could be facing a revolt, one in four people in the European Union live on the verge of poverty, thid world immigrants have invaded and Europe is now a continent without leadership.

One in four citizens living within the failing European Union project lives on the verge of total poverty. A number of EU “leaders” thought that French President Emmanuel Macron would somehow fix problems within the bloc. One wonders the EU leadership’s logic behind thinking that adding another spineless, greedy globalist would be effective in “resetting” anything.

The statistics that were revealed at the Brussels Economic Forum only showed the growing income inequality that somehow “shocked” the greedy bastards running the worst governmental system after communism (and associated ideologies).

They try to rationalize their success by looking at the fall in unemployment, yet a tenth of those who work make well below the poverty line. The EU leadership will continue importing unskilled and unneeded immigrant and refugee populations, despite this. The more ignorant and culturally disparate the group, the better to import in the eyes of the “kind-hearted” EU shills.

Look directly at Angela Merkel. She is the sun that everyone in the EU revolves around. Her unwillingness to address her countless and never-ending failures shows her pomposity. At this very moment, the UN refugee agency head is pleading with President Trump to reconsider cutting key funding, the global elites do not understand that refugees are abusing the system, that manyare not even refugees, that they are an invading class that is creating a fifth column within the EU society.

Western leadership – save for a few key figures like Trump, Farage, Netanyahu, Orban and figures like Geert Wilders and Marine Le Pen – is either oblivious to the damage they are doing to the citizens of their nations, or they know and do not care.

The income inequality in Europe is a byproduct of faulty leadership. Socialism is not working, Europe. The wealthiest 20 percent in the EU earn five times as much as those that make up the bottom 20 percent of income.

According to statistics from the European Commission, one in ten full-time workers live in poverty. This is a side effect of Merkel. The young people in Europe are going to be hit the hardest. They are the most vulnerable to poverty and based on the way that Europe has brainwashed their youth into thinking that by tolerating and helping the Muslim invaders, they are going to become second-class citizens in a decade’s time.

It should not shock you to know that Germany’s rise in poverty was the largest among the top European nations. This is all thanks to Angela Merkel, a compliant media that does whatever is asked of them, and spineless leadership that partners with Islamic interests.

Europe is on the verge of a revolt, there will be a conflict that boils over into something far more frightening than simple income inequality and that conflict will look directly at European leadership.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/06/report-brussels-explode-revolt-1-4-eu-citizens-verge-poverty-video/

John Sununu DESTROYS Alisyn Camerota Over Russian Non-Scandal

Love the Video      This shows how these Idiots on the left are so full of shit

Former Governor of New Hampshire, John Sununu has to be President Trump’s best part-time talking head. He appeared on CNN’s New Day and was interviewed by Anchor Alisyn Camerota about the ‘Russia non-scandal” and let her have it. Despite the fact that he didn’t strike her or raise his voice Sununu’s masterful responses did more damage to Camerota than Greg Gianforte’s body slam did to Ben Jacobs.

John Sununu is Republican royalty in the Granite State, and indeed the national GOP. He’s served a handful of Presidents,  and candidates, been the Governor of New Hampshire, and been advising GOP leaders for a very long time. I witnessed him deconstruct moderator Candy Crowley after the second Obama/Romney debate where the moderator corrected Romney about Benghazi and was totally wrong. The point is that Sununu understands the game of politics and he’s been playing (and winning) for a very long time and he is even better (and calmer) when he is angry.

In the interview below  Camerota spends several minutes trying to get Sununu to admit that he is “troubled” by the allegations against the Trump team (of collusion with Russia), all she succeeds at doing is proving Sununu’s point about the liberal media. In fact, at one point in their conversation Sununu actually pushes Camerota to admit that there is NO EVIDENCE that President Trump has done anything wrong, or even that anything wrong has actually taken place! He is a master.

But Chris Cuomo who is the brother and son of extremist liberal governors of NY doesn’t let the segment stand for itself. He refuses to allow a Republican to “win” the interview and he closes the segment by implying that Sununu was just doing a “good job” spinning the news. Here’s what Cuomo says,

“They’re certainly doing a better job coordinating messaging on how to deal with the investigation. Governor Sununu, always a capable mind and a good political debater to be sure.” 

The implication of course being that all Sununu did was repeat talking points. However, if you watch the segment and read the transcript below, you’ll see that Sununu proves without a shadow of a doubt that the media is biased and the Russia collusion story is bunk.

Transcript from RCP:

CAMEROTA: Let’s dive into all of these different Russian threads because I want to gauge your feelings on these separately.

Let’s talk about what Jim Sciutto, our Jim Sciutto is breaking this morning in terms of reporting. There are these — there were these intercepted communications picked up by our intel agencies that heard Russian government officials talking about some kind of what they called derogatory information they had on Donald Trump, then a candidate, and whether or not they could use it to leverage the Trump campaign.

Are you troubled?

SUNUNU: In the 2016 campaign, that’s right. I came on your show with derogatory business information on Donald Trump during the primary. Why is it a surprise? Why is it a news story that the Russians in Washington would convey the same material to the Russians in Moscow?

The same story that you’re quoting at the bottom of the story noted that the same sources that gave your reporter that information conceded that it was possible that the Russians were exaggerating or even making it up.

CAMEROTA: Yes.

SUNUNU: Why is this even a story worth talking about?

CAMEROTA: It is only a news story, you’re right, if, as part of the investigative thread it turns out they were able to leverage the Trump campaign and they were able to somehow use the information they had to help get the Trump campaign to do something that they wanted them to do. So, this is just one more thread down that line where, as you know, congressional committees and the FBI are trying to figure out if they can connect those dots.

SUNUNU: Everybody was talking about Trump’s business problems. Why is that news now again?

Look, let’s put this whole thing in context. You have to tell me what you think the venality (ph) was that they could have conveyed.

CAMEROTA: Well, do you think that Jared Kushner, in attempting to set up a backchannel as has been reported, do you think that the Trump campaign wanted something out of the Russians and there was a dove tailing of agendas?

SUNUNU: In the ten weeks between an election and an inauguration, there is a lot of discussion going on between all members of — or potential members of an administration with all kinds of folks. When I was named chief of staff, a lot of ambassadors that were slight acquaintances tried to become good friends in that ten weeks. It is not unusual.

You guys have made back channel a derogatory term. Back channel is a positive asset.

CAMEROTA: Is it?

SUNUNU: Nixon could have not have done China — Nixon could not have done China without a back channel.

CAMEROTA: Yes, even —

SUNUNU: Kennedy used back channels. Go ahead.

CAMEROTA: During the Cuban missile crisis. I mean, so, you’re saying that during the transition when there is another president, that you are comfortable with the incoming administration using a back channel, if the reporting is correct, using Russian equipment so as not to be caught on the U.S. surveillance and intelligence equipment? You’re comfortable with that kind of back channel?

SUNUNU: Well, let’s speculate on why — I don’t think it happened that way. But let’s speculate on why it might have happened. There might have been concerns that the intelligence community was feeding Obama the information that he probably shouldn’t have had.

And you know what, with what you are reporting now on what has come out from deep sources in the intelligence community, if that was a concern and I doubt it was, but if that was a concern, they were pretty smart to have those feelings, weren’t they?

CAMEROTA: Is there anything about the Russian investigation connected to the Trump campaign that troubles you?

SUNUNU: Yes. But the reporting that’s taking place and the exaggeration of venality and the suggestion — look, it’s now seven months since the election. And to this day, no one has cited a single piece of evidence.

In your last session, you guys were patting yourselves on the back because you said Clapper had passed the responsibility off to the FBI. But you forget that in the last weeks of the administration, Obama allowed all his intelligence agencies to share their information and there is no question in my mind that when that happened, since Clapper’s group had originated this, that anything the FBI had would have gone back to Clapper.

So, it’s nice for Clapper to try and wash his hands of it by throwing it in the FBI’s lap, but he was — had access in those days to whatever the FBI had. There is nothing there.

CAMEROTA: So, Jared Kushner, meeting with a major Russian banker of a massive bank that has ties to Vladimir Putin, nothing to see there?

SUNUNU: Well, tell me what you think is to see there and I’ll comment on it.

CAMEROTA: What do you think would be the motivation?

SUNUNU: I don’t think there is anything there.

CAMEROTA: Why would they do it?

(CROSSTALK)

SUNUNU: So, you’re implying — you’re implying —

(CROSSTALK)

SUNUNU: Because during the ten weeks everything is trying to meet somebody who is going to be in the administration. Everybody who is involved in business, everybody who is involved in politics.

CAMEROTA: Sure.

SUNUNU: I can’t tell you how many people tried to meet with me between the times I was then chief of staff —

CAMEROTA: And did you meet with a Russian banker when everybody tried to meet with you?

JOHN SUNUNU, FORMER CHIEF OF STAFF TO PRESIDENT GEORGE H.W. BUSH: I can’t tell you how many people tried to meet with me between the time I was named chief of staff —

CAMEROTA: And did you meet with a Russian banker when everybody tried to meet with you?

SUNUNU: No, but I had breakfast with the vice president at the Russian embassy and a lot of folks there started talking to me.

CAMEROTA: Uh-huh. And would you have carved out time to meet with a Russian banker with ties to Vladimir Putin if he asked?

SUNUNU: I’m not even sure what would have happened if that had — first of all, Putin wasn’t there. But, look, you’re asking hypotheticals on hypotheticals. There’s nothing —

CAMEROTA: Well, I’m trying to actually take your temperature.

SUNUNU: You — you have nothing —

CAMEROTA: I mean I’m trying to gauge your — your comfort level with all of this.

SUNUNU: My comfort level — the only discomfort I have is with folks in the media trying to create a veniality without having the courage to specifically tell me what the veniality that I should be concerned about is.

CAMEROTA: Well, but —

SUNUNU: I don’t have — I have not identified an veniality. Have you?

CAMEROTA: Well, you should be concerned if there was collusion. And that’s what Congress —

SUNUNU: I don’t — I don’t see any evidence of collusion. Do you?

CAMEROTA: No. That’s what — that — but —

SUNUNU: OK. So that’s — that ends — that should end your reporting right there.

CAMEROTA: Well, we’re at the beginning of the —

SUNUNU: You should put an exclamation point after your “no.”

CAMEROTA: Understood. But we’re at the beginning of the investigation. So what Congress —

SUNUNU: You’re seven months into the investigation.

CAMEROTA: Not exactly.

SUNUNU: You’re seven months —

CAMEROTA: Robert Mueller has just taken over. Robert Mueller has just taken over.

SUNUNU: Oh, this is a new investigation.

CAMEROTA: Well, no. I mean, look, that’s not exactly fair, governor, because, as you know, Congress people have been calling —

SUNUNU: The Obama investigation went on for the last —

CAMEROTA: For a special counsel to do this, to handle this because — so it gets away from all of the partisan bickering. So it’s just starting in that regard.

SUNUNU: OK. Can I ask a question? If Mueller comes out and says that my version is correct and yours isn’t, how much crow are you going to eat?

CAMEROTA: Governor, I don’t have a version of events. I asked —

SUNUNU: Of course you do. The whole half hour I listened to is a version.

CAMEROTA: Governor — governor, we are asking questions of the sources of the people who know, attempting to see where the investigation is. The investigation isn’t complete. Everyone agrees on that.

SUNUNU: Without — without identifying — without identifying a veniality that should be investigated.

CAMEROTA: Governor, we appreciate your perspective, that there’s nothing to see here and that the investigation is, I don’t know, silly.

SUNUNU: Politically motivated by folks trying to rationalize a horribly run Democratic presidential campaign.

CAMEROTA: Governor John Sununu, thank you very much. Always great to get your perspective.

SUNUNU: Nice to be here, Alisyn.

CAMEROTA: Chris.

CHRIS CUOMO, CNN ANCHOR: They’re certainly doing a better job coordinating messaging on how to deal with the investigation. Governor Sununu, always a capable mind and a good political debater to be sure.

Much of this post was originally seen at Constitution.com

http://lidblog.com/john-sununu-destroys-alisyn-camerota/