Tuesday, January 2, 2018

Democrat Congressman Uses 11-Year-Old Barron Trump to Attack POTUS Trump

Another Shitstain on the Left. Leave it to a Shit eating filthy Disgusting Liberal to attack an innocent child. If that was someone on the right trashing Obama's daughters that would be front page

Image result for steve cohen

We already know that Democrats are pure evil, but every once and a while they go so low it’s even shocking to those of us who are jaded.
Democrat Congressman Steve Cohen of Tennessee sunk to a new low over the holiday weekend when he used Trump’s 11-year-old son Barron to smear the President.
The despicable Democrat criticized President Trump for golfing and says he ‘never sees him with Barron’, Trump’s youngest son.
Cohen then called Trump a narcissist who will ‘start a war’.
Steve Cohen tweeted, “He golfs when he could be reading or be in church or be with his family. Never see him with Barron. You’d think he’d be golfing with Dad occasionally but narcissists only engage in activities where they are the show. No movies, sports viewing either just Fox! He will start a war!”
Trump supporters fired back!

 http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/democrat-congressman-uses-11-year-old-barron-trump-attack-potus-trump/

De Blasio: New York won't be dragged down into this 'heyday of hatred'

Funny coming from an Asswipe that hates Conservatives


New York City Mayor Bill De Blasio during his inauguration ceremony on Monday ripped prejudice and discrimination that he said is “suddenly en vogue,” and touted a new “progressive era” in the city.
“In this heyday of hatred, this new dawn of divisiveness, we in our city refuse to be dragged down to a place we know is beneath us,” De Blasio said. 
“We will not be passive in the face of regression. We will not ignore or deny the threat. We will confront it head on. To do anything less would be an affront to our very identity as New Yorkers,” De Blasio said.
Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who is seen as a likely presidential candidate in 20202, presided over De Blasio’s swearing-in ceremony.
Sanders praised De Blasio and his administration, saying they understand “our job is to bring people together with love and compassion, and to end the divisions and the attacks that are taking place.”
Former President Bill Clinton presided over De Blasio’s swearing-in ceremony at his inauguration four years ago.
ADVERTISEMENT
De Blasio sparked speculation about a potential White House run when he recently visited Iowa and spoke at a political fundraiser. While De Blasio denied that he is running for president, potential candidates often visit Iowa — the first state in the nominating process — to gauge support for a run.
De Blasio was re-elected to a second four-year term as New York mayor in November.
http://thehill.com/homenews/state-watch/366989-de-blasio-new-yorkers-wont-be-dragged-down-in-heyday-of-hatred

Comrade Bill de Blasio tells conservatives to get out of NY


https://youtu.be/FgJ37ywJBhI

http://dailycaller.com/2018/01/02/de-blasio-really-has-an-issue-with-a-basic-american-right/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/bernie-sanders-wears-700-coat-swear-corrupt-nyc-mayor-second-term/

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/photos-bernie-sanders-vows-spread-progressive-vision-every-corner-land-2018/

New David Brock Revelations Highlight History of Destruction



Democratic activist David Brock has been exposed as one of the key sources of money behind efforts during the 2016 presidential campaign to entice women to accuse Donald Trump of past sexual misconduct.

It was only the latest caper for Brock, who spent the 1990s attacking the Clintons before undergoing a political conversion, and devoting his efforts — and other people’s money — to a crusade to destroy Republicans and the conservative media.
Brock founded Media Matters for America in 2004. Billed as a “charity” — and exempted from taxes — the group theoretically corrects conservative bias in the media. In practice, Media Matters attempts to eliminate conservative perspectives altogether, targeting popular hosts, journalists, and outlets. The organization also routinely promotes left-wing causes: in 2011, for example, Media Matters aligned with the radical Occupy Wall Street movement.
Despite the group’s political agenda, mainstream media outlets routinely rely on Media Matters for talking points. Recently, for example, CNN’s Chris Cuomo admitted on the air that he relied on material from Media Matters in criticizing Breitbart.
The zenith of the group’s influence was in the 2008 presidential elections, when mainstream media worked in concert to elect Barack Obama, and to avoid and discourage efforts to probe his views and record.
In advance of the 2012 election, Media Matters drew up a plan, Project 2012, which aimed to destroy opposition media sources, especially Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, and Breitbart. One part of the plan, “litigation,” proposed to “[b]ring litigation against Fox News and its feeders holding them accountable for illegal and tortious actions.” The document explained that lawsuits were needed because the federal government was “reluctant to police the media.”
Brock has also entered the political arena through his super PAC, American Bridge 21st Century, which he started in 2010, to conduct opposition research against Republicans. The group is backed by left-wing billionaire George Soros, who has been involved in Brock’s other efforts.
Emails released by Wikileaks in 2016 raised questions about whether American Bridge and other pro-Clinton super PACs were coordinating improperly with the campaign.
Since the 2016 elections, Brock has quarterbacked efforts by Democratic organizations to impeach the president, as described in a confidential memo obtained by the Washington Free Beacon last January. He has also talked about creating a “Breitbart of the left” in the media.

But some Democrats are already tired of his antics. Paying women to attack Donald Trump is just the latest example of how Brock is willing to debase his cause to defeat his enemies.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2018/01/01/new-david-brock-revelations-highlight-leftists-path-destruction/

Baltimore Residents Blaming Murder Increase on Lack of Police After BLM Protesters Demanded Pullback

Remember when a bunch of these Idiots in the BLM bowel Movement wanted all the police gone out of there area

Black American residents of Baltimore, Maryland, are now blaming a lower police presence for the city’s soaring murder rate despite three years of Black Lives Matter (BLM) activists insisting that police be pulled from their neighborhoods.

Baltimore has now experienced higher murder rates for three years in a row after riots and BLM-sponsored protests began rocking the city after the death of Freddie Gray, a suspect who died in police custody in the spring of 2015, National Public Radio (NPR) reported.
Since the riots, police morale has collapsed, and city officials began planning a lighter police footprint in response to complaints of residents and protest leaders.
But now, black leaders are blaming cops for the spiraling murder rate, saying that the police pullback has put them in danger.
advertisement
The Rev. Kinji Scott, a Baltimore activist, is blaming city hall for leaving the neighborhoods unprotected.
“We wanted the police there,” Scott insisted. “We wanted them engaged in the community. We didn’t want them beating the hell out of us, we didn’t want that.”
Scott and others are now pressuring the city to bring police back in as a deterrent to the soaring crime rate.
Despite the loud proclamations from BLM activists that the police are the problem, Scott and his fellow activists are now claiming that they never wanted police to go away.
In an interview with NPR, Scott claims only the progressive activists wanted cops to be eliminated:
No. That represented our progressives, our activists, our liberal journalists, our politicians, but it did not represent the overall community. Because we know for a fact that around the time Freddie Gray was killed, we start to see homicides increase. We had five homicides in that neighborhood while we were protesting.
What I wanted to see happen was that people would be able to trust the relationship with our police department so that they would feel more comfortable. We’d have conversations with the police about crime in their neighborhood because they would feel safer. So we wanted the police there. We wanted them engaged in the community. We didn’t want them beating the hell out of us, we didn’t want that.
Scott also blamed the city for not fostering a community atmosphere between police and the neighborhoods.
The primary thrust nationwide is what President Obama wanted to do: focus on building relationships with police departments and major cities where there had been a history of conflict. That hasn’t happened. We don’t see that. I don’t know a city—Baltimore for certain—we’ve not seen any changes in those relationships. What we have seen is that the police has distanced themselves, and the community has distanced themselves even further. So the divide has really intensified, it hasn’t decreased.
And of course we want to delineate the whole culture of bad policing that exists—nobody denies that—but as a result of this, we don’t see the level of policing we need in our community to keep the crime down in our cities that we are seeing bleed to death.
This is despite Baltimore protesters carrying signs that read things such as “disarm the police,” or wearing T-shirts promising to kill cops.

The reverend’s claims also seem to fly in the face of a list of 19 demands issued by protesters in 2015, one of which demanded that police be barred from entering certain buildings or parts of neighborhoods they had designated as “safe” from police. Clearly, the protesters wanted police removed from Baltimore’s neighborhoods. But now that they’ve gotten their wish, community leaders have suddenly realized what a bad idea such a pullback is.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/01/01/blm-protests-baltimore-residents-blaming-murder-increase-lack-police/

RABBI SHMULEY: Obama Ignored the Iranian People; Trump Can Champion Their Fight for Freedom

For decades, we have been hearing that the people of Iran despise their authoritarian radical Islamic regime. They reject the oppression as well as the mullahs’ determination to take the once-modern nation backwards to the dark ages of fundamentalist rule.

Still, for more than 30 years, the Iranian people did little to show their discontent. Now, popular anger over domestic tyranny has merged with frustration over Iran’s interference in the domestic affairs of other countries throughout the region to provoke the most serious threat to the genocidal regime since the 1979 revolution.
For all the dissatisfaction in the past, the public did not revolt, because they seemed unprepared to fight for independence against the overwhelming force of the brutal Revolutionary Guards. The one time the public did rise up, in 2009, they were ruthlessly suppressed by the guards and abandoned by the international community, most notably by Barack Obama. The former president betrayed not only the Iranian people by his failure to support the uprising, but also betrayed the rest of the world, which has faced an increasingly aggressive Iran ever since.
We have subsequently learned that Obama’s desperation to sign a nuclear agreement to have something to show for his otherwise inconsequential foreign policy legacy led him to agree to a nuclear deal so flawed that Iran has continued to advance toward regional dominance and a nuclear weapons capability.
advertisement
Most recently, it was revealed that Obama went so far as to sabotage his own administration’s efforts to bring Iran’s Hezbollah terrorist arm to justice for its drug-trafficking crimes for fear that would interfere with negotiations with Iran on the nuclear deal and undermine Obama’s propaganda line that the agreement would lead Iran to stop threatening U.S. interests. Obama also did nothing to address Hezbollah’s global terrorist activities.
By refusing to certify the Iranian nuclear agreement, President Trump has taken an important first step toward reversing the catastrophic impact of Obama’s Iran policies. Now he has an unexpected opportunity to support the one policy that could end the Iranian threat to its neighbors, to the United States and to the world: namely, regime change. That is the only way to stop the genocidal and hegemonic ambitions of the Iranian government.
Obama’s unwillingness to punish Iran for their continued violation of UN resolutions related to their nuclear activity and ballistic missile development emboldened the mullahs, who subsequently expanded their missile program, continued their covert nuclear weapons pursuit, increased their sponsorship of terror, and intensified their interference in their neighbors’ affairs. Thanks to the billions of dollars Obama paid Iran in ransom, and the billions more in sanctions relief afforded by the nuclear deal, Iran grew stronger and its tentacles now extend throughout the Gulf, into Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza and beyond.
Trump now has the opportunity to work for regime change without necessarily using military force. He can provide verbal and, more important, material support to the protestors. He can increase sanctions against Iran for brutalizing their people if the Iranians use the Revolutionary Guards to try to suppress the demonstrations.
For example, Iran should be cut off from the international banking system. That could cripple the economy and prevent the Europeans from continuing their mad rush to sign business deals with the Iranian government. Oil should also be embargoed. The sale of Boeing jets to Iran must be cancelled. The cases against Hezbollah’s illegal operations in the United States must be reopened and warrants sought for those responsible for attacks against Americans abroad. Furthermore, U.S. forces in Syria and Iraq, which succeeded in destroying ISIS, should now be directed to drive out Iranian and Hezbollah fighters.
Even the feckless Europeans would be unable to complain about tightening sanctions without looking like they are supporting the dictators in Tehran over the people in the streets clamoring for democracy. Perhaps Russia and China would again shield Iran at the UN Security Council with their vetoes, but the United States does not need the UN’s permission to help the people of Iran free themselves from the grip of the extremists who have turned Iran into one of the world’s greatest violators of human rights and threats to global peace and security.
The president must pledge whatever support the protestors need to bring about the end of the reign of terror of the mullahs. They should be given the assurance that sanctions will cease and aid will flow to a new government that adopts democratic principles, forswears its nuclear weapons program, ends ballistic missile research, ceases sponsorship of terror, stops its genocidal threats against Israel, and ends its interference in the affairs of its neighbors.

We are at a historic moment when one of the world’s most evil regimes can be destroyed. Obama let the moment pass in 2009 with devastating consequences. President Trump and other world leaders cannot afford to make the same mistake.
http://www.breitbart.com/jerusalem/2018/01/02/obama-ignored-iranian-people-trump-can-champion-fight-freedom/

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2018/01/02/haley-iran-long-oppressed-people-rising-dictators/

Monday, January 1, 2018

Little Rocket Man Declares North Korea a ‘Nuclear Power’ – Says He Has Nuclear Button on his desk

I wonder if this Little Fat Bastard has Hillary's reset button that was used with Russia on his desk?

North Korean communist tyrant Kim Jong Un declared North Korea a “nuclear power” this new year.

Little Rocket Man added that he has a “nuclear button on his desk.”
It’s about time for another epic Trump tweet, isn’t it?
CNBC reported:
North Korean leader Kim Jong Un says the United States should be aware that his country’s nuclear forces are now a reality, not a threat.
Kim was speaking in his annual New Year’s Day address. He said the country had achieved the historic feat of “completing” its nuclear forces and added that the has a “nuclear button” on his desk.
The customary New Year’s address was broadcast Monday morning on North Korean state television.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/little-rocket-man-declares-north-korea-nuclear-power-says-nuclear-button-desk/


REPORT: MSNBC’s Chris Matthews Runs ‘Brazenly Sexist Operation’ As Staffers Suffer ‘Battered Wives Syndrome’

A new report reveals MSNBC Host Chris Matthews is known to operate a ‘brazenly sexist news operation,’ where staffers have told guests and former producers they suffer from ‘battered wives syndrome.’
Daily Caller reports:
Two former NBC producers independently alleged Matthews would rate the looks of his female guests on a scale and said Matthews was so abusive that staff joked about being battered women. The interviews in total paint Matthews as a tyrant liable to fly off the handle at the slightest mistake, who was eager to objectify women and made inappropriate sexual comments appear to be a matter of course for someone in his position.
Both former NBC producers requested anonymity out of concern for their future careers. One is actively seeking a job in media and the other still works closely with MSNBC. One expressed fears about being labeled a “troublemaker” and cited the string of former Fox News women who have all but disappeared from television.
“Sadly, I know other women who won’t even be an anonymous source regarding Chris [Matthews] because they’re that concerned about the door closing on career opportunities in media,” the producer concluded.
According to the two producers, whose combined time at the network nearly spans the existence of “Hardball,” Matthews frequently objectified his female guests and staffers, inappropriately commenting on their appearance and clothing.
“He would eye down a woman who walked on set or comment on their features or what they were wearing,” an ex-producer told the Daily Caller.
“He would objectify them and interrupt them in a way that he would never do to his male guests. He has a very outdated view of women.”
NBC recently confirmed through a spokesman that the company made a payment to a Matthews employee after she complained about sexual harassment.
Via Amber Athey of The Daily Caller:
Two sources familiar with the situation told The Daily Caller that Matthews paid $40,000 to settle with an assistant producer on his show, “Hardball with Chris Matthews,” in 1999 after she accused him of harassment. An NBC spokesperson contested that claim to the Caller, saying the company instead paid significantly less as part of a severance package.
The woman reportedly complained to CNBC executives that Chris Matthews would make inappropriate comments and jokes in front of fellow colleagues.
An MSNBC spokesman said Matthews’ comments were meant to be taken as jokes, not propositions; he was formally reprimanded, reported Athey.
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/01/report-msnbcs-chris-matthews-runs-brazenly-sexist-news-operation-staffers-suffer-battered-wives-syndrome/


Some Links of interest involving the Garbage on the Left

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/patriot-stories-rescue-j6-political-prisoners/ https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2026/09/horror-21-...