Central-Illinoisand_beyond: October 2018

Wednesday, October 31, 2018

KILL SHOT: President Trump Releases Campaign Ad That ABSOLUTELY DESTROYS the Open Border Democrat Party

THIS IS DEVASTATING!

The Donald J. Trump Campaign released a devastating ad in the last week of this midterm election.

The video highlights illegal alien cop killer Luis Enrique Monroy Bracamontes who, laughs, smiles and curses as he states his desire to kill more American police officers.

The ad also highlights the violent criminals currently traveling with the illegal alien caravans through Mexico to the southern US border.

Don’t Bother Voting, Democrats! Pelosi Says the Election Is Over

RUSH: Well, CNN was the first to do it. A month ago, CNN declared the Democrats have won the House because of one of their polls. Nancy Pelosi is declaring victory in the battle of the House.

She was on the Late Show with Stephen Colbert last night and said, “Up until today I wouldn’t have said, ‘If the election were held today, we will win.’ But what I’m saying now is, ‘We will win! We will win! We will win the House.'” Nancy Pelosi, predicting the House has already been won by the Democrats.

So no need for you Democrats to vote now.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: So it’s over. Nancy Pelosi on television last night on The Late Show With Stephen Colbert on CBS, I guess. They said that we’re gonna win. She wouldn’t have said it a month ago, she wouldn’t have said it two or three weeks, although I think she did. CNN certainly did. But she said last night, “We’re gonna win. We’re gonna win.” What do you think the message is to… What do you think the message is to Democrat voters when the Speaker of the House-in-waiting says that it’s over, that we win?

I think it says, “Yeah, don’t worry about it, Democrats. We got this. I mean, it’s over. You Democrats probably don’t need to vote. It’s that much in the bag. I mean, the Speaker of the House-in-waiting is already saying it!” CNN now happily reporting this. “Democrats Will Win Control of the House!” (laughing) That’s what it says on their graphic. Pelosi: “Democrats Will Win Control of the House!” Well, we’ll see if there is this thing called karma.

But she’s not the first. John King (who is doing the reporting right now on Pelosi saying they’ll win the House) also said the Democrats had already won the House, according to one of their polls about a month ago.

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2018/10/31/pelosi-says-the-election-is-over/

Ted Malloch: TRICK or TREAT? Democrats Promise American Horror Story if They Win in November

Guest post by Ted Malloch author of The Plot to Destroy Trump

Happy Halloween!

Did you know that Halloween originates in ancient Celtic traditions?

Beginning in the Middle-Ages, children and sometimes even adults would dress up in costumes and go around door to door during Hallowmass, begging for food or money in exchange for songs and prayers, often said on behalf of the — dead.

This end of October portends another kind of ‘witching hour.’

Six days hence Americans will choose their political leadership in the

2018 Midterm election.

Much is at stake.

The politicians from both camps have dressed up, “costumed” and paraded before us, the citizenry.

Now it is our turn to reward or excuse them.

Get out and vote. Your ballot counts.

On the one hand, we have the Democrat trick.

If elected, the Dems will immediately start to IMPEACH President Trump without any grounds for doing so.

They will obstruct EVERYTHING.

They will vote AGAINST everything and person that Trump and the Republicans want — from taxes to health care and from military spending to a border wall or a Supreme Court Justice.

They will start dozens and dozens of Congressional inquisitions ruled by the likes of these new scary committee chairs in the House of Representatives-

Commerce   Jose Serrano (D-NY)
Defense   Pete Visclosky (D IN)
Homeland Security Lucille Roybal-Allard (D-CA)
Military   Debbie Wasserman-Schultz (D-FL)
Oversight   Elijah Cummings (D-MD)
Judiciary   Shelia Jackson-Lee (D-TX) and Jerrold Nadler (D-NY)
Immigration   Zoe Lofgren (D-CA)
Government Operations   Gerry Connolly (D-CA)
Ways and Means   Richard Neal (-MA)
Intelligence    Adam Schiff (D-CA)
Financial Services   Maxine Waters (D-CA)
Operations   Nita Lowry (D-NY)

In other words, radicals who have no objective, other than totally destroying Trump and his political party and every conservative idea, person, and policy they support.

BOO!

This should — in and of itself — scare every American.

Vote for them and this is what we get.

Guaranteed!

On the other hand, we have the Republican treat.

Tax Cut bill lowering rate from 35 to 21 per cent.
Gorsuch and Kavanaugh appointed and confirmed to the Supreme Court
Deregulation and roll back of regulation
Travel Ban toughening immigration enforcement
Jerusalem became capital of Israel with US Embassy moved there
Withdrawal from Paris Climate deal
Pulling out of Trans-Pacific Partnership
Leaving the UN Council on Human Rights
Roll back of Obama’s Cuba policies
Beating ISIS
Ending the Iran deal
Mexico and Canada trade deal NAFTA gone
Start of nuclear deceleration in North Korea
Strong Economy—3 million new jobs, lowest unemployment, new stock market highs, renewed optimism and confidence, and 4 % economic growth.

And MORE winning on the way…

Which do YOU want?

TRICK or TREAT ?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/ted-malloch-trick-or-treat-democrats-promise-american-horror-story-if-they-win-in-november/

A True Democrat: Pennsylvania Candidate Scott Wallace Trashes Police – Calls Them “Dogs” (LEAKED AUDIO)

Another Liberal Maggot

Scott Wallace is a good Democrat.
Scott wants to raise your taxes, keep the border open and he hates cops.

And now there is even video of him trashing cops.

Scott is running for Congress in Pennsylvania.

Western Journal reported:

According to The Washington Free Beacon, congressional candidate Scott Wallace seems to have been caught in Pennsylvania making an insulting remark about cops.

“Wallace, who is running in Pennsylvania’s 1st congressional district against Republican representative Brian Fitzpatrick, was captured saying ‘dogs are smarter than police officers’ during a conversation with a constituent at a campaign event,” that outlet reported.

A woman who asked to remain anonymous told Free Beacon that she was at the event and another person made the opinionated comment that teachers are smarter than police officers, which was part of a discussion about arming school staff to prevent mass shootings.

That’s apparently when Wallace responded with the insulting dog quip. It’s unclear from the clip if it was meant as a joke, but even so it’s pretty un-funny.

Well, at least he didn’t call them pigs.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/10/a-good-democrat-pennsylvania-candidate-scott-wallace-calls-police-officers-dogs-leaked-audio/

Why are Dems getting so worked up about birthright citizenship?

The Dems and the media are having another Trump-induced stroke over the issue of "birthright citizenship." The Dems; the media; and Paul Ryan, the speaker of the House, would have you believe that the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution guarantees U.S. citizenship to anyone born in this country.

The 14th Amendment was passed by a Republican Congress after the Civil War to guarantee citizenship and equal rights to the freed slaves.

The relevant portion of the 14th Amendment reads:

Section 1: All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.

The 14th Amendment does not guarantee citizenship to everyone born in the USA. The language states that the persons born or naturalized, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens.

If you are a naturalized citizen, you take an oath to defend the U.S. Constitution and renounce allegiance to foreign powers and thus subject yourself to the jurisdiction of the USA:

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty, of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

The question, then, is, how is a person born in the United States subject to the jurisdiction of the USA?

The few relevant Supreme Court cases state that the status of the parents determines the citizenship of the child. This means that if the parents are illegal aliens, they are not subject to the jurisdiction of the USA for purposes of the 14th Amendment citizenship test.

Proponents for U.S. citizenship for all born in the USA of illegal aliens cite the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898). But this case dealt with legal immigrants, not illegal, who had established a legal residence in the USA and thus domiciled in the USA. The Court stated:

[A]t the time of his said birth, his mother and father were domiciled residents of the United States, and had established and enjoyed a permanent domicil and residence therein at said city and county of San Francisco, State aforesaid.

The key is that the parents were lawfully "domiciled" in the USA.

In Elkins v. Moreno, the Supreme Court dealt with "domicile" for in-state tuition in Maryland. "Domicile" is complicated, but the key is that one has a permanent legal residence.

President Trump has announced he will deal by executive order with the question of citizenship for children born of illegal aliens. Senator Lindsey Graham announced he will introduce legislation to amend the 14th Amendment, similar to President Trump's proposed executive order.

The question is the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" if the baby's parents are illegal aliens.

President Trump can issue an executive order to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Services that the policy of the United States is that children born of illegal aliens are not citizens because the parents as illegal aliens are subject to a foreign power. Illegal aliens are citizens of a country other than the USA and owe legal allegiance to that country.

The ACLU will immediately file a lawsuit, most likely by forum shopping in the 9th Circuit in California or Hawaii, to challenge the executive order. The Supreme Court will eventually determine the meaning of "subject to the jurisdiction."

The important fact is that President Trump will force a discussion of this issue, which he may win in court. A constitutional amendment will take too long, so the best method is an executive order to get the case to the Supreme Court as quickly as possible.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/10/why_are_dems_getting_so_worked_up_about_birthright_citizenship.html

Would the American left suborn an invasion?

Sometime in the 1960s, as I recall, a prominent person in the news made the sarcastic statement that if an enemy invasion army were to land on our shores, the ACLU would meet the soldiers on the beaches to protect their rights. The ACLU quickly protested, averring that, patriots all, they would do no such thing. Being a parody writer myself, I once wrote a fictional piece about the Japanese air raid on Pearl Harbor (Dec. 7, 1941) in which an ACLU lawyer sought an injunction against American armed resistance. He stated, "As soon as those Japanese aircraft entered American airspace, their pilots were entitled to the full protections of the United States Constitution, including the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law."

Today, we are living parody. A massive parade of foreign nationals is marching toward our border, its members openly proclaiming that they intend to illegally enter our country. They have already stormed and breached the southern border of Mexico in a glaring preview of their defiance of law, so they are clearly to be believed.

And where is the American political left? Are leftists decrying the violation of our national sovereignty? Are they demanding that our government protect its citizens from encroachment? Of course not. They are the parody. They of the left are seeking ways in which to prevent the administration from doing any of that.

This is President Trump's PATCO moment. Remember that? Soon after President Ronald Reagan took office, in 1981, members of the unionized left organized a strike of the Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization. They were adamant that their demands be met, or else PATCO would shut down all air traffic in the United States. Reagan gave the union members 48 hours in which to return to work or be irrevocably fired. You can't do that, the striking controllers jeered. Twenty-four hours later, they were all fired, and not one of those who continued the illegal strike has been rehired. Shortly afterward, PATCO ceased to exist.

Reagan's bold stance was noted by the USSR, our deadliest enemy at the time, and the Soviets were reminded of his tenacity when he walked out of the nuclear arms reduction talks, an act that the left screeched would start a nuclear war. Instead, the Russians relented, and the talks were concluded in our favor.

Now it is Trump who is being told by the left that he has no right to defend the nation against invasion. Leftist lawyers are coming to the aid not of their country, but of the invaders. They are claiming that Trump is violating the Constitution, or at least their twisted interpretation of it.

A former member of the Supreme Court, the late Justice Robert H. Jackson, in his dissenting opinion in Terminiello v. Chicago, made a statement that ranks among the most powerful ever made from the bench. He said, "The Constitution is not a suicide pact."

Those on the left most assuredly disagree.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/10/would_the_american_left_suborn_an_invasion.html

https://spectator.org/government-created-whitey-bulger-responsible-demise/

header