Hunter Biden Claims He’s In Debt, Unemployed with No Monthly Income as He Fights His Baby Mama Lunden Roberts in Child Support Lawsuit

And why would we feel sorry for this Clown?

Hunter Biden is demanding his financial records are kept secret in his ongoing child support lawsuit filed by his baby mama Lunden Roberts.

Biden’s lawyers filed a motion for a Protective Order in the Arkansas Circuit Court of Independence on Wednesday and argued that they want to spare their client “public embarrassment, annoyance, undue prejudice, and/or oppression.”

Hunter had a child with 28-year-old Lunden Roberts after meeting her at a DC strip joint where she worked as a stripper and she is not being compliant — she is demanding a hefty child support payment!

 

Lunden Roberts is demanding Biden pay $11,000 in legals fees in addition to child support and she is refusing to agree to his terms.

Hunter Biden claimed in a sworn statement that he is currently in debt, unemployed with no monthly income.

‘In an effort to demonstrate to this court my good faith, I attest that I am unemployed and have had no monthly income since May 2019,’ Biden’s statement reads.

Via The Daily Mail:

‘The likelihood that [Biden’s] private records will be used in an inappropriate or malicious manner for reasons that have absolutely nothing to do with these proceedings is exceedingly high and should not be tolerated by the court,’ the filing reads.

Any such disclosures, Biden’s attorneys claim, would furthermore cause their client ‘undue prejudice, annoyance, embarrassment, and/or oppression.’

‘Due to the extraordinary circumstances surrounding the parties involved in this matter, it is in the interest of justice and necessary for a Protective Order to be in place,’ Biden’s attorney Dustin McDaniel states.

While Roberts – who is demanding Biden pay her $11K in legal fees in addition to child support – is said to agree that a Protective Order is appropriate, she has so far refused to fully commit to the current terms demanded by Biden, despite his ‘best efforts’ to secure her acquiescence.

In addition to the Protective Order, Biden is also requesting an upcoming December 2 hearing be delayed until a decision on the order is made, adding that he has been so far been unable to complete an affidavit of his financials.

In a signed sworn statement, Biden claims he has been unable to complete the mandatory requirement because he currently lacks the information to do so.

‘In an effort to demonstrate to this court my good faith, I attest that I am unemployed and have had no monthly income since May 2019,’ Biden’s statement reads.

The former Ukraine energy executive goes on to admit he has incurred ‘significant debts’, partially caused by his April 2017 divorce to Kathleen Biden, which are currently being calculated by his accountants and will be disclosed to the courts as soon as possible.

‘For the aforementioned reasons, I cannot complete an Affidavit of Financial Means at the time,’ he claims.

While Roberts and Biden continue to negotiate the specific terms of the order, should agreement be found, all financial information disclosed by both the defendant and plaintiff during the proceedings will remain entirely confidential.

Hunter Biden was paid millions of dollars sitting on the board of Burisma Holdings and other positions provided by his VP daddy Joe in various pay-to-play schemes — perhaps he shouldn’t have blown all the money on crack and strippers.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/hunter-biden-claims-hes-in-debt-unemployed-with-no-monthly-income-as-he-fights-his-baby-mama-lunden-roberts-in-child-support-lawsuit/

EXCLUSIVE: THEY FOUND SOMETHING! After US Attorney Durham Visited Rome Obama’s Former CIA Director Brennan’s Security Clearance Was Once Again Questioned

After AG Barr and US Attorney John Durham reportedly expanded their investigation into the beginnings of Russia collusion after their trips to Rome in August and September.  At the same time, complaints of John Brennan holding a security clearance were back in the news.

Jeff Carlson at TheMarketsWork reported –

John Durham, the U.S. attorney tasked with investigating the origins of the FBI’s counterintelligence investigation into the Trump campaign in 2016, is expected to seek an interview with former CIA Director John Brennan and former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper following an expansion of his investigation.

It was reportedly the meetings Durham and Attorney General William Barr recently had in Rome—where they obtained new evidence—that were the impetus for the broadening of the scope of the probe.

According to Fox News’ Catherine Herridge, her sources told her that Durham is now “very interested to question” Brennan and Clapper.

According to Herridge, the meetings “took place on Aug. 15 and Sept. 27, 2019, in Rome,” and that it was during one or both of these trips, that Barr and Durham “gathered new evidence.”

The news comes following months of speculation about whether the former top Obama officials would be questioned over their involvement in the investigation and spying on the Trump campaign.

It was recently revealed in a court motion by the lawyer for former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn, that the Justice Department (DOJ) had obtained two cell phones belonging to Joseph Mifsud, a Maltese Professor who has been cited as playing a key role in the FBI’s determination to open its probe into the Trump campaign.

Ironically, at the exact same time calls were made to remove former Obama CIA Director John Brennan’s security clearance.

The news of Brennan’s security clearance not being revoked came out at the exact same time as Barr and Durham’s first visit to Rome.

This leads us to believe that whatever they found is connected to Obama and Brennan’s CIA. 

For some time, George Papadopoulos has said that those who approached him in London were most likely CIA –

Is Rome the key to the undoing of Spygate?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/exclusive-they-found-something-after-us-attorney-durham-visited-rome-obamas-former-cia-director-brennans-security-clearance-was-once-againquestioned/

Hillary Clinton Is not just a sore loser, she is a total loser

As one can readily see, Hillary Clinton has been unable to recover from having lost the 2016 presidential election -- a self-inflicted wound that she will never cop to. Or, possibly, an act of divine intervention. She has come up with well over a dozen reasons for her defeat -- every one but the real one, i.e. she is a loser -- not just a sore loser, but a total loser. She is incredibly incompetent, fundamentally dishonest, and criminally corrupt, and these are her good qualities. In addition, she is bereft of a trace of integrity or character, has absolutely no judgment, and is devoid of people skills ( she’s very easy to dislike and distrust and thereby become a member of her deplorables). The 2016 race was hers to lose, and by failing to listen to advice on where to campaign, she managed to do just that -- lose! Thank God -- a Hillary Clinton presidency would be the last nail in America’s coffin.

We could go through the litany of Hillary Clinton’s failures – Cattlegate, Whitewater, Travelgate, Filegate, her clumsy and opaque handling of the health care assignment her husband handed her, her tour of duty in the U.S. Senate, or her stint at the State Department, starting with her failure to get the Russian word for “reset” correct and ending with her dereliction of duty in the case of Benghazi (which produced four dead Americans, including her “friend” Ambassador Christopher Stevens), which, on testifying before Congress, she fobbed off with “what difference, at this point, does it make?”

But, for present purposes, I would just like to focus on the liberties that she has always taken with the truth. When Bill Safire of the New York Times called her a congenital liar, he flattered her. You see, the Clintons don’t just tell lies, they live them.

Consider her most recent whopper -- the one in which she observed, on being asked what was her most difficult decision, that it was remaining in her marriage. Why was this her biggest whopper? Because she had no choice but to remain in her marriage, if, indeed, the arrangement that the Clintons have qualifies as a “marriage,” rather than a political partnership looking to advance the ambitions of each of the partners.

Some have applauded her incredible loyalty to Bill in view of his tawdry behavior. However, if all they had was an “arrangement” to advance their ambitions, his infidelities were irrelevant as far as hurt feelings were concerned.

But they were necessary to make her both the object of sympathy (although one has to wonder why you are deserving of pity on your husband’s 1000th marital transgression). Also, every time he got caught, so it goes, he owed her one. Ergo, the health care assignment, her Senate term, and, finally, her stint as Secretary of State. In each of these situations she distinguished herself more for her failures than any accomplishment.

The point here is that Hillary had no choice but to stay in her marriage. Without her connection to Bill Clinton, Hillary could not be nominated for, let alone be elected to, dog catcher of even the smallest of communities. Her successes in  securing all of these positions was achieved by attaching herself to Bill’s coattails and riding them to each one of these positions.

So why did Hillary lose the 2016 Presidential election? Because she’s Hillary Clinton, a born loser. And, more to the point, Hillary Clinton belongs in the Big House, not in the White House.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/hillary_clinton_is_not_just_a_sore_loser_she_is_a_total_loser.html

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/did-hillary-clinton-onward-together-coo-sabotage-kamala-harriss-campaign/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/despite-screaming-headlines-from-fake-news-media-black-friday-shopping-frenzy-breaks-all-records-tops-4-billion-for-first-time/

The Cataclysmic Disaster the Impeachment Democrats Have Overlooked It won’t play well on the campaign trail or in the voting booth.

For many on the left, the Trump impeachment has been as much and as passionate the dream of three years as was the Zionist Dream of 2,000 Years (“Hatikvah”) for Jews to return as a free people back to the Biblical land from which the Romans had banished Jewish life. The Washington Post dreamed of impeachment immediately — from Day One on January 20, 2017. Rep. Al Green never stopped pushing for it. The attorney representing the so-called “whistleblower,” who in reality has blown no whistle on anything, pronounced the start of the “coup” right away.

The problem for the Democrats now is that there is a time and place for everything, even ridiculous things, and they have been so focused on impeachment for so long that they do not realize that, at least for now, their impeachment time has passed even if Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff feel they finally have the president in their “wheelhouse.” One is reminded of Shoichi Yokoi, the Japanese WWII sergeant, still holding out for the emperor in 1972, and all the others who still refused to concede Japan’s WWII defeat into the 1980s and beyond.

The Democrats tried so many times to find their impeachment moment. Would it be Stormy Daniels, with Michael Cohen running cash to her? And what else might be on the secret tapes by which the now-disbarred and incarcerated Cohen clandestinely recorded his own clients? Would it be catching the Trumps leveraging the presidency to make private profits for their hotels, resorts, and golf courses? Perhaps Russian collusion. Ah, sweet Russian collusion! Perhaps treason, stemming from a joint news conference that the president held with Russian leader Vladimir Putin. Perhaps the president had finagled with his taxes a decade or two before he ever ran for office? Perhaps Rod Rosenstein was seriously considering wearing a concealed wire to record the president secretly, so as to invoke the 25th Amendment? Perhaps a usurping of constitutional powers if the president would run roughshod over a Supreme Court ruling?

Or perhaps his cholesterol is too high, and his statin prescription is too low? Could he be impeached for firing Jim Mattis or Rex Tillerson? Or for tweeting too much? How about for barring Jim Acosta from press briefings? For firing Marie Yovanovitch? For causing a nuclear holocaust with North Korea? For a trade war with China? For using discretionary funds to build a wall? For firing Comey? For naming his son-in-law an adviser and getting him security clearance? For insulting the media and tagging the Corrupt Journalist Corps as propounders of fake news? For refusing to fund welfare and other government handouts for illegal immigrants? For telling California that they will not get any more federal funds unless they stop their insane forestry rules that are much of the root of their worst fires? For refusing to fund sanctuary cities and to respect their G-d-given right to defy the federal government and to contemn the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause? For refusing to fund California homelessness? Indeed, presumably after Ukraine, the next claim will be that his presidency is invalid because, at his swearing-in, someone in the Corrupt Journalist Corps will testify anonymously that the book on which Trump swore his oath of office was not a Bible but The Art of the Deal.

With the July 25, 2019, phone call between President Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, the “Gotcha!” Democrats feel they finally have got him. Thus the latest entry in the Encyclopedia of Impeaching Trump under “LGBTQ+”: Let’s Garble Billionaire Trump’s Quid + Quo.

It may be that the Impeachment Democrats feel they have the president and the Republicans in a no-win situation: Either President Trump gets evicted from the White House or House Republicans will get cornered into voting to protect him, imperiling their seats. And if it goes to the full Senate for trial, it will put GOP Republican senators in close states in perilous political waters, forcing them either to commit presumed political suicide by severing their bonds with their Republican base if they vote to convict the president or to commit presumed political suicide by becoming anathema to Democrats and Never Trumpers in their states if they vote to acquit. Even better, Pelosi and her minions may think, the voting on impeachment will occur close enough to the November 2020 elections to remain fresh in voters’ minds.

That certainly is one way to look at it.

But there is another and truer reality. Republicans in more securely “red” jurisdictions who vote with the president will enhance their support and fundraising. Republican donors are giving more to Trump and to other national and local GOP campaign organs now than ever before in history. Forget the Koch brothers and their Never Trump donations to the Bushes in order to mass-import low-wage illegal immigrants into the United States to increase corporate profits by replacing American union workers and forcing out the lower-income labor class among disadvantaged minorities. They can take their Koch money and can go Kochen afn yam.

When the GOP stuck together as one tightly united group during the Kavanaugh Show Trial, the Republicans then turned a Democrat inquisition into precisely the vehicle that secured the United States Senate for the GOP through this term, even enlarging Republican control. Just ask Claire McCaskill, if you remember what that is. The same exact roadmap for sticking together tightly in the face of impeachment may very well do it for Republicans again. A one-party unilateral Democrat impeachment out of the House would go to the Senate with barely a leg to stand on. And the Senate trial that follows next could spell cataclysmic disaster for the Democrats.

First, it has become clear that a Senate trial would ensue precisely during the heat of the presidential primary season. Democrat senators would be stuck in Washington but still would have to remain absolutely silent about and during the impeachment, as jurors always must be during a trial, precisely at the time they would need to be kissing babies, eating barbecue and cotton candy at state fairs, and lying to voters in presidential primary states. Cory Booker would experience the ultimate Spartacus moment. Kamala Harris might find it time to admit that Silly Season is over, that she ain’t goin’ anywhere anyway, so may as well just smoke some weed in D.C. while listening to a new performer who does not yet exist. Bernie Sanders will do whatever he “damn” feels like because, ever since his heart attack, he really no longer matters except to his presumed high adviser Hyphen Cortez, who imagines that, perhaps as his vice president, she will be assigned to serve as his president of vice. Amy Klobuchar and Michael Bennet will be stuck in D.C., though few will notice. Joe Biden initially will plan to be a juror at the Senate trial, too, but his advisers eventually will persuade him that he no longer is the senator from Delaware nor a vice president who presides over the Senate. Elizabeth Warren will be stuck between Iroquois and a hard place, because she actually has built momentum while on the warpath. If she is forced to cede the race to Pete Buttigieg while she must sit silently through the Impeachment to Nowhere, she may find herself pounding impatiently on tom-toms while uttering repeatedly, “Hold on a sec. I’m gonna get me, um, a beer.”

It not only will be a disaster for Democrat senators trying to ward off Tom Steyer’s billions, Michael Bloomberg’s billions, and Deval Patrick’s notions that he is the new Obama that Booker and Harris and Biden are not. And with all the senators locked up in the jury box, the one who most should be before a jury and locked up — She-Who-Must-Not-Be-Named, the pantsuited vulture ever-lurking who has been implored by many, many, many people — may feel obliged to cave in to those many, many, many demands and run in the newly opened field.

On the other hand, the Pelosi–Schiff impeachment trap will not particularly endanger Susan Collins of Maine, Cory Gardner of Colorado, Martha McSally of Arizona, or the other relatively few “purple-state” Senate Republicans who are up for reelection in 2020. Yes, they do face challenging reelection races. Yes, impeachment might have posed them a political dilemma if the Impeachment Dream had been implemented a year or two ago — but not when it all is unfolding well into 2020. Any such “purple-state” Republican easily can sidestep the political trap by making a speech at Senate Jury–voting time that fudges where he or she stands and asserts, plainly and forthrightly:

With elections only six [or so] months away, I have much too much faith in the wisdom and intelligence of the voters of [Maine/Colorado/Arizona] to interfere with their solemn right to exercise their own minds and to vote their own verdict on President Trump very soon. My constituents of the great state of [yada yada] always have proven themselves to be far smarter and insightful than the slugs here in Washington, and I refuse to be browbeaten by San Francisco Nancy Pelosi and Los Angeles Adam Schiff into taking away from the voters in my great state the right to decide for themselves.

That will cover them. And they almost surely will have Joe Manchin of West Virginia compelled to give an aspect of bipartisan support to their positions because Manchin never will survive another West Virginia election if he votes to convict.

But fudging on impeachment conviction will not cover Doug Jones in Alabama. His Democrat base will desert him if he does not vote to convict, and he will sign his political death warrant if he votes otherwise. Even if the Democrats miraculously somehow would win a few Senate seats in 2020 now held by Republicans, the great probability that Alabama will be coming home to the GOP assures another two years of Republican control and unobstructed approval of federal judicial appointments. For the Republicans, the timing of the impeachment trial, if impeachment ever passes the House, could not be better.

Moreover, the same timing confluence will imperil dozens of “swing state,” newly elected House Democrats who falsely presented themselves in 2018 as “moderates,” who never would elect Nancy Pelosi as their speaker, who would shun partisan politics and would work cooperatively to reduce drug prices, fix health care, address the pressing issues on our southern border, upgrade our roads, bridges, and the rest of our national infrastructure, and so much more. With November 2020 elections looming in Trump districts, their impeachment votes will haunt them. If they vote for impeachment, that exposure will cap for swing voters two years that they wasted without achieving a thing, failing even to ratify the Mexico-Canada-American (MCA) treaty that has awaited their simple sign-off for a year. If they vote against impeachment, their Democrat voters will abandon them and stay home.

Meanwhile, with the Democrats utterly having failed to knock down Trump’s approval ratings after a month of the Schiff Inquisition, wait until Impeachment 2020 shifts stadiums to the GOP home field in the Senate. The Republicans get to make the rules for a Senate trial, just as Pelosi–Schiff had the votes to fabricate the House party rules. Republicans get to call the witnesses and to lead and close the questioning. No more Schiff on the throne, but instead the war comes to House McConnell and House Graham. If conducted ideally, the thing could run all winter, spring, and summer, perhaps even providing an alternate ending to Game of Thrones. The O. J. Simpson trial began January 24, 1995, and ended with a jury verdict on October 3. That is how long a serious trial can take if milked for ratings. The Pelosi–Schiff impeachment, if it passes the House, will arrive in the Senate around the date of January 24, the O. J. Trial silver anniversary. No reason it should not continue until October 3 if need be. By then, Elizabeth Warren will be swimming in beer and borrowing Kamala’s weed to send smoke signals to caucus states. Joe Biden will be long gone. Bernie, too.

Even if Mitch McConnell opts instead for a quick two-week trial, consider the possibilities. It could be like the last week of America’s Got Talent! (AGT), when they have the best finalists every night all week. They could even do like AGT and Dancing with the Stars and let the folks at home vote. And just think of that fortnight of superstars who could return to the spotlight that awaits them and a national audience that yearns to hear and see them sweat:

• Hunter Biden, energy expert, corporate practices ethicist, millionaire (at $83,000 a month for a year), U.S. Navy Reserves (dischargee, cocaine corps).
• Veep Daddy Joe, former plagiarist from Delaware, vice president in charge of Ukraine oversight and dispenser of quid-pro-quo billions to Kiev.
• Hillary Clinton, secretary of state with insights into Russian reset, Vladimir Putin conquest of Crimea and East Ukraine, American uranium, Ukrainian speakers’ fees, and overall expertise on oversight of safety protocols for protecting American foreign embassies and staff.
• Lois Lerner. (Why not?)
• The Whistleblower.
• Other surprise guest cameos: Kerry? Huma Abedin? Obama?
• Documentary evidence: Hunter Biden’s taxes. Veep Daddy Joe taxes. Clinton Foundation taxes. Lois Lerner taxes. (Why not?) The Huma Abedin laptop and her custodian of records, the photogenic former Mr. Abedin.
• Adam Schiff (to testify about his contacts with the whistleblower, to reveal his sources who proved the Russian collusion to him).
• John Brennan, expert on communism in the Eastern bloc and treason at home, having been the only CIA head in American history to vote for a pro-Soviet communist U.S. president, the late and extinguished Gus Hall.

Nothing in politics ever works out quite as anticipated. But a cataclysmic disaster, a veritable Schiff Storm, is looming for the Democrats in November 2020. They have walked right into it without ever seeing it coming squarely at them.

https://spectator.org/the-cataclysmic-disaster-the-impeachment-democrats-have-overlooked/

https://spectator.org/the-paris-climate-agreement-was-doomed-even-before-the-united-states-withdrawal/

BET founder Robert L. Johnson warns Dems they are blowing it fighting Trump

Robert L. Johnson, the first African American to build a business from scratch and become a billionaire, is a very smart man. He knows President Trump and has worked with him on initiatives of concern to the black community.

Yesterday, excerpts from an interview with him by CNBC’s Hadley Gamble were broadcast on that network, telling Democrats they are doing it the wrong way when they attack the POTUS. The excerpts begin with him saying that the election is Trump’s to lose. He expressed an appreciation for Trump as a disruptor:

“I think the president has always been in a position where it’s his to lose, based on his bringing a sort of disruptive force into what would be called political norms. I don’t care whether it’s his way he conducts foreign policy, the way he takes on the government agencies and what they do with immigration. He brings his style.”

That style is what journalists and other Democrats mistakenly focus on, and doing so, they alienate a lot of people (non-elites, I would call them):

“Now, a lot of people, particularly those who voted for him and those who will vote for him again in the next election, like that style,” Johnson said. “I think what the Democrats have to do is to be careful not to get caught up in stylistic Trump and more on substantive Trump.

“His ability to dominate the news cycle and get the narrative going about what he said has, to me, sort of a double effect on the Democrats. One, they get all agitated about what he said, and then they go beyond just him. They extend it to his voters, and the voters say “wait a minute. I voted for this guy. I like what he’s doing. You know, why are you picking on me, saying ‘I’m not smart enough;’ ‘I’m sort of a cult?’”

You can watch the entire (under 3 minutes) CNBC segment below, including the hosts’ speculation as to whether or not Johnson is now a Trump supporter.

Johnson has been saying sensible things about President Trump for a while now, so he may not be reacting to the two recent polls showing that over a third of blacks now approve of the job President Trump is doing. But it is clear that he is in sync with that segment of the black community. Johnson sold BET, so he is no longer able to influence the programming there, but if the executives there are as smart as their founder, they will not be broadcasting the sort of denigration of Trump and his supporters that permeates the programming of MSNBC and CNN, purely out of self-interest.

Fortunately, few Democrats will heed his sage advice. They are literally deranged with their hatred of President Trump and those who back him.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/bet_founder_robert_l_johnson_warns_dems_they_are_blowing_it_fighting_trump.html

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/why_joe_biden_seems_so_different_.html

WE CAUGHT THEM: Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson Changes Timeline in New Book After We Caught Him in a Lie in 2018

On September 11, 2018 we reported that Glenn Simpson from Fusion GPS worked on his famous fake ,Trump – Russia dossier in early 2016 but the timing of his work with British Agent Christopher Steele and for the DNC was in question!

We identified that according to Christopher Steele’s testimony in front of the High Court of Justice in England, Steele was hired by Fusion sometime between June and November of 2016 just before the election.

However, the DNC’s infamous law firm Perkins Coie supposedly hired Fusion GPS on behalf of the DNC in April of 2016, after Paul Manafort was hired by candidate Trump –

So when the Trump campaign named Paul Manafort as its campaign convention manager on March 28, 2016, you can bet that Simpson and Jacoby’s eyes lit up. And as it happened, at the exact same time that Trump hired Manafort, Fusion GPS was in negotiations with Perkins Coie, the law firm representing the Clinton campaign and the DNC, to see if there was interest in the firm continuing the opposition research on the Trump campaign they had started for the Washington Free Beacon. In addition to whatever sales pitch Simpson might have offered about Manafort, the Clinton campaign had independent reason to believe that research into Manafort’s connections might pay some real political dividends: A Democratic consultant and Ukrainian-American activist named Alexandra Chalupa, told the Clinton campaign about Manafort’s work for Yanukovich. “I flagged for the DNC the significance of his hire,” Chalupa told CNN in July of this year.

Perhaps it was this alignment of the stars that clinched the deal. According to an Oct. 24, 2017, letter from Perkins Coie, the firm hired Fusion GPS to continue its research in April, shortly after Manafort was hired by Trump.

The problem with this timeline is that Glenn Simpson told the Senate that he worked with Christopher Steele long before the DNC supposedly hired Fusion GPS.

Simpson under oath stated that he was working with Steele when Paul Manafort was hired by the Trump team which was in March of 2016 (p. 86 of above link)

It was clear that either Simpson or Steele was caught in a lie.  Now we see that Simpson is hatching another tall tale.

In a new book coming out now in an apparent effort to counter the upcoming FISA abuse report on December 9th, Fusion GPS and Simpson are editing their story.  They now say out of the blue that Christopher Steele hired Fusion GPS in March 2016, not the other way around??!!??

Stephen McIntyre@ClimateAudit

 · Nov 29, 2019

Replying to @ClimateAudit

6/ in Aug 2018 deposition in connection with Gubarev v Buzzfeed lawsuit, Steele said that he was engaged by Fusion in accordance with an oral agreement "in June 2016". https://media.washtimes.com/media/misc/2018/12/13/Steele_August_filing.pdf …

Stephen McIntyre@ClimateAudit

7/ Fusion book says (p62) that Steele hired Fusion for help re Manafort [presumably on behalf of Deripaska] "before Trump tapped Manafort to run his campaign". (Manafort appointed campaign chairman on Mar 29/2016. So this previously unknown episode is before then.

Any person who trusts Christopher Steele and Fusion GPS is a fool!  They deserve to be held accountable with the others for their attempted take down and coup of the President of the United States.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/we-caught-them-fusion-gpss-glenn-simpson-changes-timeline-in-new-book-after-we-caught-him-in-a-lie-in-2018/

https://spectator.org/a-decade-of-election-interference-in-america/

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/the_ukrainian_boogiewoogie_and_going_on_offense_.html

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/corrupt-doj-and-mueller-attorney-van-grack-committed-many-false-and-fraudulent-activities-in-efforts-to-indict-general-flynn/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/rep-ratcliffe-reveals-why-schiff-is-withholding-transcripts-of-icig-michael-atkinsons-closed-door-testimony/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/on-thanksgiving-day-ilhan-omar-posts-video-of-her-preaching-islam-from-altar-in-church-gives-thanks-to-allah-and-progressive-movement/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/rolling-stone-rips-bloomberg-just-killed-the-bloomberg-news-agency/

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2019/11/bloomberg_the_billionaire_nothingburger.html

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/11/saturday_schadenfreude_kamala_harriss_staff_quits_and_tells_media_her_campaign_is_a_disaster.html

They LIED.....Shocking

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/11/newsweek-fires-reporter-who-wrote-inaccurate-story-on-trumps-thanksgiving-day-activities/