header

header

Friday, July 31, 2020

“You Won’t Be Safe in Joe Biden’s America” – Trump Campaign Ties Joe Biden to the Radical Left in Hard Hitting Ad (VIDEO)

O)


You won’t be safe in Joe Biden’s America”

The Trump campaign rolled out a new hard-hitting ad tying Biden to the radical left.

The Democrat party has gone full-blown radical left and Joe Biden embraces it.

Biden agreed to cut funding from police and redirect the money to social justice programs.

TRENDING: Ghislaine Maxwell Documents Unsealed: Allegations Against Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Others -- FBI Knew Had Evidence of the Crimes for Years

The media paints Biden as a moderate, but he’s a dangerous Marxist.

WATCH:

Biden this week admitted he’s a Trojan horse for the radical left during a campaign event in Wilmington, Delaware.

“If I’m elected and this [economic package] passes I’m going to be good to go down as one of the most progressive presidents in American history,” said Biden.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/wont-safe-joe-bidens-america-trump-campaign-ties-joe-biden-radical-left-hard-hitting-ad-video/

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/07/31/i-understand-your-frustration-folks/

https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/07/31/trump-approval-jumps-back-to-50/



FAUCI EXPOSED: Jim Jordan’s Grilling Proves It’s All Political (VIDEO)


Dr. Anthony Fauci testified before a House subcommittee on Friday on a national strategy for combating the Coronavirus.

Congressman Jim Jordan (R-OH) grilled Fauci on whether the protesters and rioters are increasing the spread of COVID-19.

Rep. Jordan asked Fauci if the government should “limit” the protesting.

Fauci danced around the question and didn’t condemn the rioting.

TRENDING: Ghislaine Maxwell Documents Unsealed: Allegations Against Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Others -- FBI Knew Had Evidence of the Crimes for Years

Jim Jordan pointed out to Fauci that he has been running his mouth and opining on everything from baseball to masks, to churches and small businesses.

Fauci’s testimony further confirms the lockdowns are all political and that he is also political.

WATCH:


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/fauci-exposed-jim-jordans-grilling-proves-political-video/


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/who_are_the_quacks_spreading_misinformation_about_covid19.html


https://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2020/07/31/jordan-corners-dr-fauci-on-protests/

https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/08/01/carlson-rips-cnn-for-omitting-china-in-nba-commish-interview-get-a-pass-from-the-media-by-being-woke/

Pot Calling the Kettle Black – Radical Leftist Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor Claims Conservative Judges Are Biased


Obama appointed radical left Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor, who never votes against a far-left leaning position no matter how unconstitutional the argument, claims the conservative Justices on the court are biased.  What a horrible joke.

Law and Crime reported yesterday that Justice Sotomayor is disgusted with the actions of the other Supreme Court Justices:

U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor called out her conservative colleagues on the bench for increasingly issuing stays which favor their ideological fellows.

“Yet again, this Court intervenes to grant a stay pending appeal, in this case less than two weeks before the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit is poised to hear an expedited appeal on a preliminary injunction entered by the District Court,” Sotomayor’s dissent–joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg–begins.

TRENDING: Ghislaine Maxwell Documents Unsealed: Allegations Against Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Others -- FBI Knew Had Evidence of the Crimes for Years

The underlying case concerns a dispute between Idaho Governor Brad Little, a Republican, and a non-partisan group promoting a ballot petition to increase K-12 public school funding.

Such measures need a certain number of valid signatures to be placed on a state’s general election ballot, and the Coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic has made in-person signature-gathering a dangerous proposition. A district court allowed the group to accept petitions online, but Gem State Republicans were keen to stop that and appealed directly to the Supreme Court–bypassing the appeals court procedure and gifting a win to the measure’s opponents without discussing the actual merits of the case whatsoever.

It’s unknown if Justice Sotomayor has ever sided with the constitution and the conservative court when a case was presented that was in opposition to the radical far-left position.  The positions of liberal Justices twist logic and common sense in a way that boggles the imagination at times.

Justice Sotomayor consistently sides with the liberal far-left position in cases before the Court.  Up is down and front is back in the logical world of the far left.  She’s not biased, conservative Justices are.


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/pot-calling-kettle-black-radical-leftist-supreme-court-justice-sotomayor-claims-conservative-judges-biased/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/black-conservative-launches-campaign-expose-racist-joe-biden/

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/teachers_unions_are_upping_their_demands_before_theyll_agree_to_teach.html


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/after_a_big_buildup_leftwing_media_hack_joy_reid_is_bombing_in_the_ratings.html

Esteemed French Dr. Didier Raoult Testifies Person Behind Death Threats He Received Is Top Doctor Linked to Gilead Pharmaceuticals


Way back in late March Laura Ingraham reported on the latest study by the French research team led by the renowned epidemiologist Dr. Didier Raoult that was able to repeat his findings from a previous study.

This time Dr. Raoult administered hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin to 80 patients and observed improvement in EVERY CASE except for a very sick 86-year-old with an advanced form of coronavirus infection.

This was very promising news once again from Dr. Didier Raoult.



TRENDING: Ghislaine Maxwell Documents Unsealed: Allegations Against Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Others -- FBI Knew Had Evidence of the Crimes for Years

Unfortunately, this doctor’s work with the cheap readily available drug helped President Trump so the the liberal media either ignored, attacked or mocked his research.

Dr. Raoult tweeted his results.
Translated: Our two articles published tonight help to demonstrate:
1. The effectiveness of our protocol, on 80 patients.
2. The relevance of the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin, thanks to research carried out in our P3 containment laboratory.



It is ABSOLUTELY CLEAR TODAY that Dr. Raoult was correct in his findings.

Today there are over 5 global studies that support the doctor’s findings that HCQ is a cheap and very effective treatment for coronavirus.

Unfortunately, this was not the preferred treatment by professionals who hoped to reap vast rewards for their own treatment for the coronavirus. Gilead pharmaceuticals was hoping to promote its own drug remdesivir as a potential option to treat the disease. Gilead had the support of Dr. Anthony Fauci who downplayed HCQ at every opportunity.

The opposition to Dr. Didier Raoult was so strong that he even received death threats.

During testimony before parliament Dr. Raoult told lawmakers under oath that the person who sent him death threats was a top recipient of Gilead Pharmaceuticals.

Via Covexit:

Professor Raoult testified that, shortly after he started to talk about HCQ as a treatment, in March, he received anonymous death threats. He filed a complaint with the police, and an enquiry was opened by the French judiciary. The medical doctor behind the threats was found and happens to be from a Nantes university hospital. It happened to be the person who received the most money from Gilead over the past 6 years. Professor Raoult presents this as a “personal experience.” In his testimony, he remained diplomatic and suggested “to be attentive to this level of problem.”

International politics and greed are preventing millions of people from receiving the life-saving treatment of HCQ to battle the coronavirus.

Hopefully, some day the criminal minds behind the assault on HCQ will be brought to justice.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/esteemed-french-dr-didier-raoult-testifies-person-behind-death-threats-top-doctor-linked-gilead-pharmaceuticals/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/ghislaine-maxwell-documents-unsealed-allegations-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-others-fbi-knew-evidence-crimes-years/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/bill-clintons-spox-releases-statement-response-witness-alleging-clinton-jeffrey-epsteins-island-2-young-girls/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/huge-development-51-global-studies-find-hcq-effective-treating-covid-19-16-find-hcq-not-effective-10-late-treatment-studies/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-real-bad-guys-epstein-case-uncovered-director-robert-muellers-fbi/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-evidence-shows-fbi-tried-tie-citizen-trump-epstein-case-no-success/

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/real-trump-epstein-relationship-former-president-clinton-partied-epstein-orgy-island-citizen-trumps-relationship-mostly-adversarial/

It's hard to feel sorry for Illinois

The pandemic has hit us hard.  In other words, I think a little generosity is good, and we should help states adversely affected by the pandemic.

Unfortunately, Illinois does not have a pandemic problem.  The pandemic has hurt, but the issues are lot more complicated than blaming the virus.

It's good to see the Chicago Tribune set the record straight:

Why do we have such little faith in Illinois pols to manage the people’s money responsibly? Because we, like you, live here.

Since 2003, Democrats have controlled the state legislature and failed to address rising pension unfunded liabilities. That year, under Gov. Rod Blagojevich, Illinois borrowed $10 billion and still shorted the pension funds. Lawmakers skipped full payments to the pension funds in 2006 and 2007, then borrowed again to make partial pension payments in subsequent budget years.

Even after raising income taxes 67% for four years in 2011, and after another tax hike in 2017 with GOP support, this state’s balance sheet remains a mess. We’ll ask: How is it possible to accumulate for more than a decade billions in unpaid bills and unfunded pension obligations, and still leave Springfield every May claiming to have a balanced budget?

So we have learned: Give Illinois money, and the politicians will mismanage it. 

No kidding, they will mismanage it.

Many in Illinois think a President Biden and Congress will be more generous than a second-term President Trump.  I don't think so.

Our next president will face a huge budget deficit, and it's hard to see how he can send billions of dollars to Illinois without throwing the economy into further recession.

Candidate Biden may be saying what Illinois wants to hear.  Reality will be different, because I don't think the country is in the mood to bail out corruption and obvious mismanagement.

PS: You can listen to my show (Canto Talk) and follow me on Twitter.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/its_hard_to_feel_sorry_for_illinois.html

About those 'peaceful protests'...

A great deal of effort is being used to maintain the claim that protests are peaceful.

If an article begins with "The earth is flat," how many people will continue reading?   The reader might conclude that it would be a waste of time and that the author has some serious problems.  Credibility is paramount.  Propagandists know that every story must have at least a kernel of truth.  Progressives appear to be ignoring this axiom.

When MSNBC's Ali Velshi claims, "I want to be clear on how I characterize this.  This is a mostly a protest.  It is not generally speaking unruly," with fires raging behind him, he has no credibility.  Ellen Rosenblum, the Oregon attorney general, claims that the riots in Portland were "perfectly peaceful."  When Representative Jerry Nadler claims rioting in Portland is a myth he has destroyed his credibility.  Snopes has done its best to discredit a report that is unfavorable for the "peaceful protesters."

Richmond Police chief Will Smith held a press conference where he recounted how rioters torched a home with a child inside on May 31.  Smith claimed, "Protesters prohibited us from getting on scene.  We had to force our way to make a clear path for the fire department."  This is a harsh indictment of our "peaceful protesters."  Apparently, there is no need for it to be reported on by the "mainstream" media.  It is also something that needs to be discredited if possible.  This is a job for the Snopes website.

Snopes asks, "Did Protesters Set Fire to a Building with a Child Inside?"  The author points to "conflicting accounts" of what happened.  She concludes that the claim is "unproven."  Snopes zeroed in on an article in what is described as "the right-leaning news outlet The Washington Times."  The Times article quotes Chief Smith making the claim that "protesters" attempted to block the fire department.  Snopes then gives Richmond fire lieutenant Christopher Armstrong's account. 

According to Armstrong, "demonstrators" did not set fire to the house.  He related how a car fire spread to the house.  There is no mention of how the car caught on fire or how close to the house it was.  If demonstrators set the car on fire, and it was parked close to the house, it is reasonable to assume that it would spread to the house.  Armstrong disagrees with Smith's claim that protesters used vehicles to stop the fire truck from proceeding to the blaze.  He claimed that fire equipment was slowed en route by burning trash cans.  Who could possibly be burning trash in the road?

Snopes then quotes Armstrong's email:

There was a single protestor initially impeding our response however multiple individuals (amount undetermined) joined the single protestor in stopping the truck from after it was already stopped. At least two of individuals threw objects at the fire truck, shortly thereafter they all ran past the fire truck as Richmond Police Officers came around the corner as a response for our request for help.

Snopes concludes, "Because the Fire Department and the police chief provided different versions of events for reasons yet unknown to us, we rate this clam 'Unproven.'"  Many situations can be labeled fake news if every "t" is not crossed and every "i" not dotted.  The bottom line of this story is that there was a house fire.  There was a child in the house, and rioters attempted to block the fire department from reaching the fire.  I determined that Snopes did not prove its case because it concluded "this clam 'Unproven.'"  Where did this clam come from?  


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/about_those_peaceful_protests.html


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/portlands-peaceful-protesters-plant-severed-pigs-head-american-flag-light-fire-outside-portland-justice-center/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/mob-peaceful-protesters-goes-home-los-angeles-deputy-involved-fatal-shooting/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/breaking-seattle-city-council-moves-abolish-police-department-replace-community-led-public-safety-system/



Trump had an intelligent goal when he tweeted about delaying the election

Leftists were all atwitter about a tweet Trump sent out early on Thursday.  In it, after attacking voting by mail, he suggested that it might be a good idea to delay the election until people can vote in person.  Leftists, predictably, were outraged and poured out pixels explaining why this wasn't possible.  They probably still don't realize that they were being played and that they just made Trump's case for him about getting voters into booths on November 3.

One of the things reflexively oppositional people don't realize is that they're incredibly easy to manipulate.  Someone who invariably says "no" is just as much a puppet as the easily controlled person who always says "yes."  If you say "not X" every time I say "X," if I want you to fall in line, I just start by saying "not X."  This is a principle as old as Bugs Bunny and Daffy Duck telling Elmer Fudd which of them he should shoot:

With that principle in mind, let's talk about what Donald Trump did.  The starting point is that Democrats are worried that they can't win.

Polls are of dubious value, especially because they're weighted heavily in favor of Democrats; they poll nationally rather than by state, thereby ignoring the Electoral College; and they ask anybody for an opinion instead of asking registered or likely voters.  Savvy Democrats are warning fellow Dems against trusting the polls.

Biden is also a problem.  Putting aside his fondness for segregationists in the 1970s, as well as his being behind imprisoning more black men than any president since the Confederacy, he's decompensating by the minute.  This is Biden:

Voters are utterly disinterested in him, too:

What do you do if you can't win honestly, you have no moral principles, and your only goal is power?  You cheat.  In a system with traditional voting — with people showing up at polling places and, in many states, having to show ID — fraud is, well, hard.

For the Democrats, therefore, the Wuhan virus has offered a wonderful opportunity: mandate that in-person voting be banned in America.  Instead, some Democrats are proposing that the states should mail ballots to everyone who has a driver's license (including, presumably, all those illegal aliens in the 15 states that give them licenses and all those people who Democrats insist don't know how to obtain ID to show at polling places).  Then, the Democrats promise, everyone who is a registered voter and is not committing fraud will dutifully mail the ballots back.

The opportunities for fraud are boundless.  Leftists insist there's no fraud (you can easily find the cites because the search engines frontload them), but reality says the opposite.  (See here and here, for example.)  In New York, a month after the primaries, the huge number of legitimately obtained absentee ballots has meant that there's still no winner.  In the last four elections alone, 28 million mail-in ballots went wandering, to be lost forever.

So what does Trump do?  He sends out a tweet worrying about the risks of mail-in elections and suggests that the election be delayed until the virus fears are gone:

Within seconds, the media are insisting that the election must go forward as planned.  Their hysteria alerts non-political junkies that this is an issue.  These voters don't want to be disenfranchised in an important election.  Trump bets they're going to say, "If I can go to Walmart to buy potatoes, I can go to my polling place to vote."

As Trump later explained:

The media are Daffy Duck.  Trump is Bugs Bunny squared.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/trump_had_an_intelligent_goal_when_he_tweeted_about_delaying_the_election_.html

Details emerging about fatal shooting of BLM ‘protester’ in Austin, TX are stunning

Another great ending when the Officer goes home at night and a Scumbag is off the street

The leftist outrage machine treated the fatal shooting of BLM “protestor” Garrett Foster last Saturday night in Austin, Texas with the customary spin, compete with a touching picture from Facebook of the deceased with his fiancé. Buzzfeed, for instance:

A man was killed Saturday night after gunshots were fired at a Black Lives Matter protest in Austin, Texas.

A suspect — who witnesses said tried to drive through the crowd of protesters before shooting the victim — was detained and questioned Saturday night, but was later released "pending further investigation," Austin Police Chief Brian Manley said Sunday.

The victim, who had multiple gunshot wounds, was brought to the hospital, where he was pronounced dead. No one else was injured during the incident, authorities said.

The victim was identified by family and friends as Garrett Foster, a 28-year-old Austin resident, who was protesting along with his fiancé, Whitney Mitchell, who is a quadruple amputee. Officials later confirmed his identity.

Shortly before he was killed, journalist Hiram Gilberto Garcia interviewedFoster, who was seen carrying a rifle. During the interview, Foster said that he had begun bringing his gun to protests after his roommate was arrested during one of them.

Openly carrying firearms in public places is legal in Texas, as long as it is not done "in a manner calculated to alarm," according to state law.

"They don’t let us march in the streets anymore, so I got to practice some of our rights," Foster said in the interview that was broadcast live on Periscope.

"I mean, if I use it against the cops, I'm dead, and I think all the people that hate us and want to say shit to us are too big of pussies to stop and actually do anything about it," Foster said.

Here is a YouTube clip of that interview in which Garrett rather ironically decried his opponents as “pussies.” The visage of the masked man is rather less charming (note Garrett’s eyes, the “window on the soul”) than the photo of the betrothed couple:

Hours later, the same journalist who interviewed Foster captured footage of the chaotic scene after he was fatally shot, including the sound of several gunshots.

"A car drove up — we were taking the streets — and he shot Garrett," an unnamed protester said in Garcia's video.

The protester said Foster was Mitchell's "caretaker, and has been for like 10 years."

A witness, Michael Capochiano, told the New York Times that he saw the suspect's car veer toward the crowd before the shooting, causing people to run away in fear.

But, as Paul Harvey used to say, “the rest of the story” is important. Yesterday, the shooter’s legal counsel identified him and told his version of the tale. Here is the press release from Clint Broden of Broden & Micklsen:

F. Clinton Broden and Broden & Mickelsen issue the following statement on behalf of our client, Daniel Perry.

Daniel Perry is an active duty sergeant with the United States Army. He is a former Eagle Scout from the North Texas area and served our country proudly for the past eight years. Sgt. Perry served a tour in Afghanistan and has been the recipient of numerous army awards and commendations.

On the evening of July 25, 2020, Sgt. Perry was in Austin, Texas driving for a ride share company in order to earn extra money. He had dropped his client off in the vicinity of Congress Avenue. He was then going to proceed to a “hot spot” in order to wait on notification to pick up another client or to pick up food for delivery. Sgt. Perry made a right onto Congress Avenue from Fourth Street and encountered a throng of people in the street. Prior to arriving at the corner of Fourth Street and Congress Avenue, Sgt. Perry did not know that a demonstration was taking place.

When Sgt. Perry turned on the Congress Avenue, several people started beating on his vehicle. An individual carrying an assault rifle, now known to be Garrett Foster, quickly approached the car and then motioned with the assault rifle for Mr. Perry to lower his window. Sgt. Perry initially believed the person was associated with law enforcement and complied with the command. After rolling down the window, it became apparent to Sgt. Perry that the individual with the assault rifle was not with law enforcement. It has now been confirmed by several witnesses that this individual with the assault rifle then began to raise the assault rifle toward Sgt. Perry. It was only then that Sgt. Perry, who carried a handgun in his car for his own protection while driving strangers in the ride share program, fired on the person to protect his own life.

Immediately after Sgt. Perry fired on the individual who raised the assault rifle toward him, a member of the crowd began firing on Sgt. Perry’s vehicle. Sgt. Perry drove to safety and immediately called the police. He waited for the police to arrive and fully cooperated with the police following the shooting and he continues to do so.

We urge the public to allow the police to conduct a full investigation. We also need to correct statements that have been reported by the press. First, Sgt. Perry never left his vehicle preceding or immediately following the shooting. Second, Sgt. Perry did not “flee” but immediately called police upon getting to safety. Finally and most importantly, police have interviewed witnesses

who were demonstrating with Mr. Foster and these witnesses have confirmed that Mr. Foster raised his assault rifle in a direct threat to Sgt. Perry’s life.

Sgt. Perry and his family deeply sympathize with the loss and grief being experienced by Mr. Foster’s family. Sgt. Perry is devastated by what happened. Nevertheless, that does not change facts. The simple fact is that Sgt. Perry reasonably perceived a threat to his life when, as has now been confirmed by independent witnesses, Mr. Foster raised his assault rifle toward Sgt. Perry who was sitting in his car. We simply ask that anybody who might want to criticize Sgt. Perry’s actions, picture themselves trapped in a car as a masked stranger raises an assault rifle in their direction and reflect upon what they might have done if faced with the split second decision faced by Sgt. Perry that evening.

DANIEL PERRY

As always, keep in mind that our justice system is designed to get at the truth, and that process is still unfolding before our eyes. The Austin PD has not arrested Sgt. Perry, and no doubt leftists are outraged at that. Stay tuned.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/details_emerging_about_fatal_shooting_of_blm_protester_in_austin_tx_are_stunning.html


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/portland-ied-bomber-outed-grandmother-turns-police/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/07/17-year-old-boy-arrested-hack-twitter-accounts-obama-biden-kanye-west-others/

Obama turned John Lewis's funeral into a sleazy political event

Sometimes, heroes outlive themselves.  John McCain's reputation would have stood up better to scrutiny had he died a younger man.  The same is true for John Lewis.  In his heyday, he was a brave and honorable civil rights icon.  In his final years, he was an angry, dishonest partisan.  The younger Lewis would have been embarrassed by his funeral; the older Lewis would have reveled in it.

The funeral took place at Ebenezer Baptist Church in Atlanta.  Washington was left empty of Democrat politicians, for they were in Atlanta paying homage, which led some to wonder about their return home:

The funeral was fairly well attended.  Democrats, who have strongly supported barring people from attending loved funerals for their loved ones or attending regular church services, seemed comfortable with a different set of rules for themselves:


Image: YouTube screen grab.

Those are just minor issues.  The big takeaway was Barack Obama standing before the television cameras and demanding that we do away with the filibuster to destroy the integrity of the American voting system.  Oh, and of course, he implied that Donald Trump is George Wallace.

The eulogy began well enough, with Obama reciting Lewis's childhood in the Jim Crow South, his history-making commitment to the civil rights movement, and his long career at the heart of the American government.  Some might say that Lewis's political career alone, augmented by a eulogy from a black president, proves that the civil rights movement in America was a smashing success, but that's not how Democrats roll.

Instead, Obama insisted that America is a racist hellhole, and he stopped just short of explicitly stating that Donald Trump is George Wallace, the segregationist governor of Alabama.  He also essentially said that those federal police officers pushing back against violent Antifa terrorists are an army of Bull Connors, the Birmingham commissioner of public safety who used attack dogs and fire hoses against peaceful civil rights marchers:

Bull Connor may be gone. But today we witness with our own eyes police officers kneeling on the necks of Black Americans. George Wallace may be gone. But we can witness our federal government sending agents to use tear gas and batons against peaceful demonstrators.

Further, said Obama, the Republican party is trying to reinstate Jim Crow–era disenfranchisement:

We may no longer have to guess the number of jellybeans in a jar in order to cast a ballot. But even as we sit here, there are those in power are doing their darnedest to discourage people from voting – by closing polling locations, and targeting minorities and students with restrictive ID laws, and attacking our voting rights with surgical precision, even undermining the postal service in the runup to an election that is going to be dependent on mailed-in ballots so people don't get sick.

Each of those statements is a lie: this is not 1790, and voters don't have to walk three days through the snow, uphill in both directions to vote — something their forebears would have done for that precious vote.  If getting to the polls is a real problem, voters can apply for absentee ballots.  Restrictive ID laws affect only illegal aliens and fraudulent voters.  After all, Americans need ID for everything else they do.

Lastly, the reference to the postal service is a demand that ballots get mailed to everyone in America with a driver's license (which puts the lie to the claim that voters can't get IDs), which is an invitation to vote fraud on an epic scale.  (Absentee ballots differ because voters must request them.)  Even without fraud, this video of an experiment in Philadelphia shows how risky it is to rely on the postal service to protect American votes:

Having set the stage, Obama insisted the only way to honor Lewis's legacy was to enact automatic voter registration; re-enfranchise ex-felons; make Election Day a national holiday; give senators to D.C. and Puerto Rico; and, to make all that happen, eliminate the filibuster.

In the end, Lewis had slipped from a place on the pedestal that he'd earned through bravery and integrity.  I suspect that the elder Lewis would have applauded Obama's demagoguery.  Still, I'd like to think the young Lewis, who valued the vote above anything, would have resented these efforts to disenfranchise half of America — the half that votes for the party that fought to end slavery during the Civil War and that ensured the passage of the Civil Rights Act.


https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/07/obama_turned_john_lewiss_funeral_into_a_sleazy_political_event.html


https://www.breitbart.com/clips/2020/07/31/alveda-king-obama-politicized-john-lewis-funeral-he-took-us-back-to-segregated-1960s/


Is Obama hinting he wants the News media he mentions blocked?

https://www.breitbart.com/the-media/2020/07/31/obama-privately-warns-top-dem-donors-trump-voters-glued-to-breitbart-fox-news-rush-limbaugh/

Auburn African American Literature Professor: ‘F*ck Every Single Cop’

It's this type of human Garbage that is teaching your kids.   Will Auburn keep this "Crap" or get rid of him?  If Auburn keeps him and they need the Police on campus I would kindly ay 'F^ck Auburn"!

Auburn Prof Jesse Goldberg

Incoming professor Jesse Goldberg, who will teach “African American & American Literature and Composition” at Auburn University, took to social media to proclaim, “fuck every single cop,” before urging police officers to “refuse to do their job and quit.” A university spokesperson told Breitbart News that “Goldberg’s comments inexcusable and completely counter to Auburn values.”

Incoming professor Jesse A. Goldberg has not even begun teaching his first semester at Auburn University, but has already started inflicting controversy onto the institution, according to a report by Yellowhammer News.

“Fuck every single cop. Every single one,” tweeted Goldberg on Wednesday. “The only ethical choice for any cop to make at this point is to refuse to do their job and quit.”

“The police do not protect people. They protect capital,” he added. “They are instruments of violence on behalf of capital.”

The report added that Goldberg’s tweet has since been deleted, and his Twitter account has been set to private.

In his Twitter bio, the professor describes himself as, “Lecturer @ Auburn U | Black Studies, Critical Prison Studies, Queer Theory, American Literature | Abolitionist | martial artist | views are mine | he/him/his.”

Meanwhile, Goldberg’s Facebook cover photo displays an image of a poem entitled, “Against the Police.”

In a Wednesday Facebook post, Goldberg echoed the sentiments shared in his initial since-deleted tweet, reports Yellowhammer News.

“ACAB. Yes, all. Police do not protect people. They protect capital,” said the professor in his Facebook post.

ACAB is an acronym that stands for “all cops are bastards.”

“Cops are instruments of violence on behalf of capital,” continued Goldberg. “Literally the only ethical decision for a cop in this moment is to refuse to do their job, to quit. The only good cop is a cop who quits.”

Auburn University executive director of Public Affairs Brian Keeter told Breitbart News in a statement that the university finds “Goldberg’s comments inexcusable and completely counter to Auburn values.”

Keeter continued:

Hate speech of any kind is simply wrong. Auburn is fully committed to the fundamental right of free speech, but we do not support hateful words or actions that degrade, disrespect or exclude. Especially during these difficult times in our nation, it’s vital that we reject crude stereotypes and work together to foster mutual understanding and respect within our communities.

“Auburn officials are considering options available to the university,” he concluded.

https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2020/07/31/auburn-african-american-literature-professor-fck-every-single-cop/