Democrats Send Out Secret Weapon Hanoi Jane Fonda to Pennsylvania to Plead with Swing Voters to Dump Trump

Just seems like the left is always using Washed up Clowns to go to bat for them

Oh no! Not Hanoi Jane!
Democrats sent out communist sympathizer and treasonous Jane Fonda this weekend to knock on doors and push swing voters to dump Trump.

Fonda wore an AFL-CIO T-shirt for her canvassing campaign against President Trump.

She was out campaigning against the ONE PERSON who is bringing manufacturing jobs back to America today.

 

The Daily Mail reported:

Actress Jane Fonda reveals she’s ‘scared for our democracy’ and to raise political awareness for the upcoming election she rolled up her sleeves and went door-knocking in the swing state of Pennsylvania.

Though she has two Oscars, four Golden Globes, and immeasurable accolades to her name, the 81-year-old returned to political activism earlier this month to canvass for Working America in a working class neighborhood in Scranton.

There, she spoke to disgruntled voters who to open up about their political views, their concerns in the upcoming election, and to educated them about Trump’s policies.

‘I’m scared. I’m scared for our democracy, for our ability to live together in community across lines of race, class and religion. I’m scared for my grandchildren and for the planet. The country is contorted and polarized, with the flames of hate fanned by leaders at the highest level,’ she revealed in a Washington Post op-ed.

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/democrats-send-out-secret-weapon-hanoi-jane-fonda-to-pennsylvania-to-plead-with-swing-voters-to-dump-trump/

Beto Admits He Will Forcefully Confiscate Firearms If He’s Elected President (VIDEO)

He's just as Stupid as the other Clowns running telling us they want to take away The tax cut.their not hiding their far left Garbage any more

2020 Democrat hopeful Robert “Beto” O’Rourke announced he will enact “red flag laws” and forcefully confiscate AK-47’s and AR-15’s if he’s elected president of the United States.

“And more importantly and politically difficult to say, buy those weapons of war back — mandate that — not voluntarily. Let’s be clear with our fellow Americans. No place for an AK-47 or an AR-15 on the streets of our communities,” Beto said during an appearance on MSNBC on Sunday.

WATCH:

 

On Saturday, a reporter asked Beto in Charlottesville how he’d reassure people afraid the government would take their assault weapons away.

“I want to be really clear that that’s exactly what we are going to do,” he said. If you own an AK-47 or AR-15, “you’ll have to sell them to the government.”

Someone tell “Beto” that the government can’t buy back something they never owned in the first place.

Make no mistake, Democrats hate the 2nd Amendment and they all want to confiscate firearms. Beto is just honest about his plans.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/beto-admits-he-will-forcefully-confiscate-firearms-if-hes-elected-president-video/

Tom Steyer’s tax disclosure is transparent as mud

Hey Dumbass, you need to include ALL of what you put up, not Parts of them. 

Tom Steyer, Democrat for President, is confused by the word transparency. He sets up a website titled Transparency that contains ten years of his tax returns -- except it doesn’t. It contains ten years of parts of tax returns that he wants us to see, excluding potentially thousands of pages. In order to bury this fact, he includes a lot of tax returns for his non-profits that are already publicly available. When you scroll through those to his personal income tax returns transparency just becomes another twelve-letter word at the top of a web page.

It’s easy to solute him for doing what President Trump won’t. Except that he didn’t. He has conveniently excluded hundreds of pages of his tax returns – each year! That’s thousands of pages of details that just might be, shall we say, inconvenient.

How do we know this? Throughout the pages he did choose to include are references to Statements A, B & C as well as 31 or more numbered statements. All stuck in the mud. There are actual required forms missing too, including his Schedule C, which reports personal self-employment income. This form nets close to a million dollars out of the almost $150 million in 2017 but for some reason, this was something that must be hidden from us in the name of transparency.

Steyer also had $14 million of income from a form Schedule E. This schedule includes rental income and he has included a few pages that don’t even come close to this amount, which means that there are many, many pages excluded on his Transparency website. Which brings me to the other form of income reported on Schedule E – Royalty Income. Book royalties would be reported on this form but he doesn’t strike me as the Tom Clancy type. The more common form of royalty is from energy partnerships like oil and gas wells and coal mines. It’s well known that Mr. Green For You But Not For Me has made his fortune on the backs of carbon emissions. Could it be that he doesn’t want us to know that he may not have sold all of those oil wells and coal mines?

Also missing are details of his investment income of over $100 million, which includes an enormous amount of foreign income. The only reason I can think of for excluding this little fact is that the foreign source is Russian oligarchs. I have no way of knowing this but what other explanation could there be for him intentionally cutting out those dozens or hundreds of pages from his Transparency website?

Another thing muddying things up are the pages calculating his actual taxes due. Why is this important? Mr. Everybody Else Should Pay More Taxes But Not Me only paid about 22% federal taxes on his $146,274,636  of adjusted gross income in 2017. If I remember, Warren Buffett’s secretary pays a higher tax rate. I also remember a certain Republican presidential candidate that the press castigated incessantly for being successful. If they can see through the mud on his Transparency site, they may want to ask him about that little oversight.

I’m certain that if Trump provided this level of transparency the media would be calling it what it is – clear as mud.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/tom_steyers_tax_disclosure_is_transparent_as_mud.html

https://www.breitbart.com/2020-election/2019/09/02/sf-chronicle-california-constitution-may-bar-tax-returns-law-aimed-at-trump-proposition-4/

Beto's toilet mouth

This Clown needs to try Tide Pods to clean up his act a little. Trump don't talk like this in office. Beto is such a Clown and polling what?  Zero?

The terrible Odessa-Midland mass shooting over the weekend has predictably led to Democrats to make new bids for political hay, with many calling for more gun grabs, something which wouldn't have stopped the criminal in this instance because he didn't bother about legally owning his gun.

But one thing stands out that's getting even more tiresome than that: Democratic presidential candidate Beto O'Rourke's reflexive use of foul language in his public statements. Here is what he tweeted for all to see:

Beto O'Rourke

✔@BetoORourke

We don't know how many have been killed. We don't know the motivation. But here's what we do know: This is fucked up.

96.5K

7:15 PM - Aug 31, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

28.4K people are talking about this

Then he went on to spew the F-word on national television:

It's far from the first time he's done it. See here, here, here, and here.

Way to expose the kids, Beto.

Now, there's no need to be a prude about the use of the f-word on all occasions. Sometimes the use of the f-word as an intensifier is acceptable, within certain well-defined contexts.

If a first-responder in an emergency, for example, or a military man in combat, or a firefighter fighting a monster wildfire, or an airline pilot in distress, uses that word, nobody considers that a problem. If a thug or a rabid leftist uses it, it's not good, but it's perfectly par for the course because it's expected. If a computer hacker uses it, O.K., because some of those people talk like that all the time (and Beto is a hacker whose f-bombs were nothing compared to his hacker record as a repulsive poet). If a writer for The Atlantic or some other high-quality literary organ uses the word, fine, so long it's within a carefully chosen context of words and their rhythms, precisely and sparingly used. Sometimes even a politican can use it, if the intensifier is the only word for to describe the situation or perhaps the word is heard in a private context, such as here, but once again, very sparingly and exceptionally.

But here we have a guy who's on the national stage, presenting himself as presidential material, openly and publicly and copiously using that word, his mouth going like an overflowing toilet. Everything he says gets this particular intensifier - important things, unimportant things, doesn't matter, because the one thing it always gets him is attention, the press coverage he craves. It's also rather elitist, given that broadcasters and anyone in a professional setting is not free to use that kind of language. He knows that and carries on with his barnyard intensifiers anyway, simply because he can. Yet these words are forbidden on family viewing broadcasts for a reason and violators can lose their broadcasting licenses should they fail to heed it, and it's also not used significantly in family newspapers. There's some language that everyone understands is to be used in public, and some that's reserved for private or non-public use, and here Beto is, conflating the two, trying to draw attention to himself based on his abundant use of foul language.

His wholesale employment of the f-word cheapens and coarsens the culture, and amounts to a horrible example to children, too, who repeat everything. That's why many voters and viewers tune out of television -- to protect the kids -- and certainly why some will tune out to him. Who wants to listen to this verbal sewage? Why should unsuspecting and unwilling people be subject to it? It's an ego thing that Beto keeps throwing it out at people without any reserve in a falsely understood effort to 'relate.'

He doesn't relate. He just sets his ego in motion. In the context of who he is - a non-accomplished former congressman and losing Senate candidate, this can be summarized as his only achievement, his lonely gift to the culture. This is what we know him for and what we will remember him for - his introduction of the 'f-word' into ordinary political discourse. His toilet mouth.

How disgusting. 

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/betos_toilet_mouth.html

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2019/09/debra_messings_doxxtherepublicans_threats_get_uglier.html

A Few Facebook Shares

   

      

       

  

     

Former FBI Assistant Director: The Worst Is Still to Come for Fired FBI Director James Comey

Fired FBI Director is not out of the woods yet.

As reported earlier he still is facing scrutiny in at least two other investigations.

And former FBI Assistant Director Kevin Brock says the worst is still to come for narcissist James Comey.

The Hill reported:

Next up will be the IG’s findings regarding Comey’s truthfulness before the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court and whether he attested to false or misleading statements in order to electronically monitor a presidential campaign.

That determination may not be as cut-and-dried as many think it is, but it hopefully, at a minimum, will explain why Comey believed he could sign off multiple times on a FISA application based largely on information that he, himself, described as “salacious and unverified.” His exposure here is potentially much more devastating than breaking FBI record retention and handling rules.

Close behind the IG’s second report will be findings by U.S. Attorney John Durham whether Comey and his rogue team of investigators violated FBI and departmental guidelines to initiate a counterintelligence investigation into a presidential campaign. They will determine if Comey had adequate justification for launching such an unprecedented investigation.

But beyond that, Mr. Durham and his team likely will follow up on emerging indicators that Comey may have colluded with other intelligence community leaders to actually “manufacture” the justification needed for an investigation by targeting covert informants against campaign representatives in violation of established policies and procedures.

In short, James Comey is not out of the woods after the first IG report, which has exposed him as someone who casually and carelessly disregarded established rules and regulations. It is not a stretch to imagine that this disregard carried over into other more serious areas of potential abuse of authority.

 https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/former-fbi-assistant-director-the-worst-is-still-to-come-for-fired-fbi-director-james-comey/



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/08/larry-c-johnson-keep-your-powder-dry-comey-is-not-out-of-the-woods-yet/


https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/gregg-jarrett-comey-was-not-a-whistleblower-his-motive-was-not-transparency-but-to-trigger-a-special-counsel/

Black Church Sign in Birmingham, Alabama: “A Black Vote for Trump Is Mental Illness, A White Vote for Trump is Pure Racism” (Video)

This is the left at work today in America — spewing hatred and racism while offering nothing.

A black pastor is defending a hateful sign displayed outside his Birmingham, Alabama Baptist church saying, “God motivates me to take a stand for what’s right.”

On one side, the church sign reads in bold letters: “A black vote for Trump is mental illness.” On the other side it reads, “A white vote for Trump is pure racism.”

This unhinged leftist is a church pastor?

 

Via the Washington Post:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/09/black-church-sign-in-birmingham-alabama-black-vote-for-trump-is-mental-illness-white-vote-for-trump-is-pure-racism-video/