Obama's slobber-filled media coverage.

Gallup: More People Watched George W. Bush’s Second Inauguration Than Obama’s…

You’d never know it judging by yesterday’s slobber-filled media coverage.

ALTHOUGH THE ADORING PRESS PROPAGANDISTS DID THEIR LEVEL BEST TO LIKEN OBAMA'S SECOND INAUGURATION TO THE SECOND COMING OF CHRIST....THE FACTS ARE THE FACTS...No one really gives a damn about his inauguration, the majority of Americans' are still stunned by the fact that he actually won re-election! Those who attended the inauguration (where the tickets for the inauguration and subsequent ball were being auctioned off at 50% of their original cost) admitted they were not very enthused and were just making an appearance. No word yet from the propagandist pool of "reporters" on the actual numbers of those in attendance. Anyone else notice the lack of panoramic photo shots of the crowd yesterday?

Via Politico:

Turns out turnout wasn’t just lower on the Mall. Gallup finds fewer Americans watched President Obama’s inauguration yesterday than did so in 2009.

Only 38 percent of Americans surveyed said they watched yesterday’s presidential inauguration as it happened, while another 27 percent saw, read, or heard news coverage of the events, according to Gallup’s new survey. In 2009, 60 percent said they watched the ceremonies live, while 20 percent saw news coverage later. That means about two-thirds of Americans saw some coverage of the second inauguration, while four our of every five saw coverage of the first.

Viewership was even lower than President George W. Bush’s second inauguration in 2005, when 40 percent watched live and an additional 33 percent saw news coverage later, according to Gallup’s survey.