In the ceaseless superfluity of national and global headlines that imbrue us 24/7, it’s unmistakable that we’re living through intensely austere times unlike any others in recent memory. Perhaps that’s because never before in thehistory of the United States have we had a sitting president commit so many protracted spectacles of treason with such carte blanche arrogance as we’ve seen be allowed for the first mulatto president of the United States by a seemingly pusillanimous legislative branch of government. Allowances coerced by the overtones of political correctness that have everything to do with the chromaticity of said presidents skin. The gross abnegation and dereliction of duty by our country’s so-called lawmakers to hold accountable the monolithic catastrophe that Barack Hussein Obama has shown himself to be is ominous to say the least. Particularly when you apply critical thought to the extent of the implications such a vacuum of leadership poses and what exactly that means for all of us in the long term. You only need reference the homogeny of recent national headlines to deduce that whatever the destination at the end of this course Obama has set us on, when you commingle recent headlines with all of the other road signs we’ve passed throughout this asperous 6 year road trip that feels more like a carjacking, it’s evident this will be a place where we do NOT want to find ourselves as a nation.
Last week was replete with spectacular headlines. Beginning with the announcement by freshman U.S. Senator from Texas Ted Cruz, being the first (confirming the speculations of millions) to declare his candidacy for president of the United States in 2016. Cruz’s affirmation was spontaneously met with the anticipated vituperation of criticism and ridicule by the variegation of usual suspects at both ends of the political spectrum. Those suspects on the Left who swarm beneath the Democratic Party marquee, their Obama/Democrat-Centric media loyalists, not to mention the low-info hordes who make up their ‘boots on the ground’ Useful Idiot Militia. At the Right end we have those rancorous RINO’s of the GOP establishment buttressed by their respective support groups on Fox News. Then, of course, there’s the ‘birthers’. Those armchair constitutional scholars who cling bitterly to their intractable ignorance and parrot their insistence that Cruz isn’t constitutionally eligible to run for president. It’s ironic however, that despite this Cruz antipathy (reaching almost psychotic proportions in some circles) across the various social media bandwidths I’ve observed an overwhelming groundswell of support for the beleaguered Senator from the Lone Star State. My own included.
Amidst the harsh dissonance of the anti-Cruz diatribe, as we had Hillary Clinton’s emailscandal continuing in its downward spiral trailing flames of what is hopefully the impending crash and burn of her presidential aspirations, subsequently it was reported that Army deserter (and likely enemy sympathizer) Bo Bergdahl would be brought up on charges of desertion, and as Friday closed out the week with the jubilant news of Democratic Senator Harry Reid announcing his retirement from the Senate, we had the dominating headlines casting their shadow over the rest that focused on Barack Hussein Obama’s arduous nuclear negotiations with our enemy Iran. An Islamic terrorist regime who have often in the past publicly avowed their single-minded devotion to not only wipe Israel off the map, but most recently were being led in a chant by Iran’s supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, of “death to America“. This would be the same Ayatollah Ali Khamenei whom Obama currently is bending over backwards to appease in his nuclear negotiations.
As the following cumulative headlines, excerpts and the links for each will illustrate:
WOW: Iranian journalist defector says Obama admin arguing on the SIDE of IRAN in nuke negotiations:
~An Iranian journalist has defected to the West and he’s brought some shocking insight to how the nuke talks are going and whose side the Obama administration is on.
Amir Hossein Motaghi, who managed public relations for Mr Rouhani during his 2013 election campaign, was said by Iranian news agencies to have quit his job at the Iran Student Correspondents Association (ISCA).
He then appeared on an opposition television channel based in London to say he no longer saw any “sense” in his profession as a journalist as he could only write what he was told.
“There are a number of people attending on the Iranian side at the negotiations who are said to be journalists reporting on the negotiations,” he told Irane Farda television. “But they are not journalists and their main job is to make sure that all the news fed back to Iran goes through their channels.
And here’s what he said about the negotiations:
In his television interview, Mr Mottaghi also gave succour to western critics of the proposed nuclear deal, which has seen the White House pursue a more conciliatory line with Tehran than some of America’s European allies in the negotiating team, comprising the five permanent members of the UN security council and Germany. “The US negotiating team are mainly there to speak on Iran’s behalf with other members of the 5+1 countries and convince them of a deal,” he said.
This explains why France has been outraged at how the negotiations are going, and why Netanyahu has had to tell Congress the information Israel gathered from their intelligence assets. No wonder Saudi Arabia believes it can’t trust the Obama administration not to leak information to Iran.
It’s getting more and more obvious that Obama is selling out America to Iran. But are enough people paying attention?
Obama “blowing up our alliances to secure a deal that paves Iran’s way to a bomb”:
~Why is Obama so avid to have this deal that he will make disastrous concessions to the Iranians and throw U.S. allies under the bus to get it? Does he really, really want Iran to have nuclear weapons? Is this really all about enabling Iran to destroy Israel?
“Obama Admin Threatens U.S. Allies for Disagreeing with Iran Nuke Deal,” by Adam Kredo, Washington Free Beacon, March 27, 2015:
LAUSANNE, Switzerland—Efforts by the Obama administration to stem criticism of its diplomacy with Iran have included threats to nations involved in the talks, including U.S. allies, according to Western sources familiar with White House efforts to quell fears it will permit Iran to retain aspects of its nuclear weapons program.
A series of conversations between top American and French officials, including between President Obama and French President Francois Hollande, have seen Americans engage in behavior described as bullying by sources who spoke to the Washington Free Beacon.
The disagreement over France’s cautious position in regard to Iran threatens to erode U.S. relations with Paris, sources said.
Western policy analysts who spoke to the Free Beacon, including some with close ties to the French political establishment, were dismayed over what they saw as the White House’s willingness to sacrifice its relationship with Paris as talks with Iran reach their final stages.~
Our allies are so freaked out by how close Obama is to Iran, they’re withholding intel from us:
~The Democrats and their allies in the complacent media assure us that Obama is being utterly reasonable and that it’s Netanyahu and the Republicans who are extremists on the Iran deal. But if that’s the case, then why are even our Israel-hating allies in the Middle East freaked out by how close Obama is to the Iranian government?~
Richard Engle reports on how bad it is:
Former Iraq Ambassador: Obama’s Foreign Policy Is in “G*ddam Free Fall”:
~Former Obama Iraq Ambassador James Jeffrey told Politico today that Barack Obama’s foreign policy is in “g*ddam free fall.”
The Politico reported:
The Politico reported:
Barack Obama faces a slew of Middle East crises that some call the worst in a generation, as new chaos from Yemen to Iraq — along with deteriorating U.S.-Israeli relations — is confounding the president’s efforts to stabilize the region and strike a nuclear deal with Iran.
The meltdown has Obama officials defending their management of a region that some call impossible to control, even as critics say U.S. policies there are partly to blame for the spreading anarchy.
“We’re in a goddamn free fall here,” said James Jeffrey, who served as Obama’s ambassador to Iraq and was a top national security aide in the George W. Bush White House.~
‘Death to America’; Obama doesn’t take the Iranian chant seriously. He should:
~Maybe I’m too sensitive, but when a foreign autocrat leads his people in chants of “Death to America,” I take it personally. President Obama and Secretary Kerry apparently don’t. The chant, which became a staple of the Islamic Republic during the 1979 revolution, is not a relic of the past. Just last weekend, at a rally in Iran, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei was interrupted by the chant as he was denouncing American “lies” and “arrogance.” He smiled and responded, “Of course yes, death to America, because America is the original source of this pressure.”
Senator Tom Cotton (R., Ark,) responded bluntly: “When someone chants, ‘Yes, certainly, death to America,’ we should take him at his word, and we shouldn’t put him on the path to a nuclear bomb.”~
LEAKED! Obama will let IRAN enrich uranium with 6,500 or more centrifuges!
~It’s being reported that the rift between Obama and Israel is being worsened by leaks of the deal being sought with Iran, including this very alarming tidbit:
The decision to reduce the exchange of sensitive information about the Iran talks was prompted by concerns that Netanyahu’s office had given Israeli journalists sensitive details of the U.S. position, including a U.S. offer to allow Iran to enrich uranium with 6,500 or more centrifuges as part of a final deal.
Here’s the White House response:
Obama administration officials believed these reports were misleading because the centrifuge numbers are part of a package that includes the size of the Iranian nuclear stockpile and the type of centrifuges that are allowed to operate. A deal that allowed 500 advanced centrifuges and a large stockpile of enriched uranium might put Iran closer to making a bomb than one that permitted 10,000 older machines and a small stockpile, the administration argues.
This is a typical argument from the Obama administration, and it’s kind of a bait and switch. Anyone can argue that they can make a much worse deal, but that’s no reason for making a bad deal.~
When you add the tendentious interests of Obama’s senior White HouseVizier, Valerie Jarrett, into the Iran equation, that should be enough to really start sounding the sirens and klaxons if they’re not blaring already by now. In a December 21st, 2014 Clothesline article I’d written titled, ‘Barack Hussein Obama: A Case Study Of How A Psychopathic Work Of Fiction Became President’, I dug a bit into the disturbing background of the most trusted Vizier and friend of Obama’s obscene caliphate.
‘Obama’s Strange Dependence on Valerie Jarrett’
~Edward Klein, former foreign editor of Newsweek and editor of the New York Times Magazine for many years, describes Jarrett as “ground zero in the Obama operation, the first couple’s friend and consigliere.”
We need to understand the role Valerie Jarrett plays in Obama’s private and political life. “If it wasn’t for Valerie Jarrett, there’d be no Barack Obama to complain about,” starts Klein’s chapter on Jarrett.
A longtime friend told Klein that Jarrett is the “eyes, ears and nose” of the Obamas. She tells them whom to trust, who is saying what, whom to see at home and abroad.
As Obama told the New York Times, “Valerie is one of my oldest friends. … I trust her completely.”
Valerie Jarrett reflects Obama in many ways. Like himself, Valerie looks more white than black. Her mother had three white grandparents, and her father was black. Like Obama, she lived in the Muslim world for part of her childhood, when her father practiced medicine in Iran. When Valerie Jarrett hired Michelle to work for Daley and befriended her, the Obamas gained access to the exclusive world of upper-class black Chicago politics. Valerie knew everyone whom it was important to know in black and Jewish money circles. She gave Barack entrée and legitimacy. She financed and promoted his ambitions for national office.
Then we have this startling, but unsurprising headline in a March 26th wnd.com article by Bob Unruh:
Obama’s ‘jihad against Jews’ spills Israel’s nuke secrets:
~In a move blasted by commentators as part of President Obama’s “jihad against Jews,” the White House has abruptly declassified details of Israel’s nuclear program.
According to Israel National News, the Obama administration declassified a Department of Defense top-secret document with details of Israel’s assets, “a highly covert topic that Israel has never formally announced to avoid a regional nuclear arms race.”
The report said until now, the U.S. has respected that effort by remaining silent. “But by publishing the declassified document from 1987, the U.S. reportedly breached the silent agreement to keep quiet on Israel’s nuclear powers for the first time ever, detailing the nuclear program in great depth,” the report said.
It openly questioned, “Obama revenge for Netanyahu’s Congress talk,” and other commentators were more direct.~
Remarkable isn’t it? Such conspicuous, ingrained perfidy and manifested abuses of power for 6 years running, yet not a single supposed leader of this decrepit Republican establishment seems inclined to do a damn thing about any of it. Obama has systematically subverted and denigrated practically every government agency and institution with his malign “fundamental transformation“. And that’s not even touching on the devastating reverberations this administration has created throughout the Middle East under the calamitous influence of Obama’s foreign policies. Reverberations which have seen this administration methodically invert America’s foreign relations to the extent where Obama is seemingly making allies out of our enemies and enemies out of allies. Never mind I guess one of those enemy allies still chants for our death.
But with these submissive RINO’s in the GOP who continuously surrender any opposition to the non compos mentis ambitions of this nihilist, then underscore their abdication by making it abundantly clear their principal means of defense [i.e. impeachment] is “off the table”, it’s no surprise that this iconoclast amateurs debasing presidency has ground its gears into overdrive, surging ahead on Obama’s charted path of political subterfuge and subversion.
But you can’t assign sense or reason to the questionable motives of a man now believed by millions to be the worst president in all of our nation’s history, without viewing them in the overall context of this unabating train wreck of a presidency. Among his notorious traits has been Obama’s established lawlessness and dereliction, undergirded by his other glaring characteristic for pathological lying. A litany of outrageous scandals that anyone possessing a shred of common sense knows would not only have seen the removal long ago of any white politician who engaged in such gross violations, but also finding that pallid politician summarily indicted, prosecuted and sentenced to (if not execution) at least imprisonment for the remainder of their natural born lives. Yet Obama gets away with it. All upon the perceived threat of any high profile detractor who dares speak out against America’s 1st black president being designated a “racist” by Obama’s seditious cabal of adulating sycophants.
Now we have Obama’s recent statement of intending to advance his agenda [political jihad] “by hook or by crook”, as presented in a March 23, 2015 article by Dave Urbanski at theblaze.com appropriately titled,
Obama: I’ll Advance My Agenda ‘by Hook or by Crook’:
~During these last two years of his second term in office, President Barack Obama said he’s determined to advance his agenda — regardless of Republican cooperation — “by hook or by crook.” Obama made the statement as part of his recent interview with the Huffington Post.
Here’s how Obama put it:
What we have done though is consistently looked for additional opportunities to get stuff done. Wherever we see a possibility of increasing wages, creating more jobs, making sure that more people are able to access opportunity, we’re gonna seize it. And we’re going to, wherever possible, try to reach out to Republicans and see if they can work with us. And where they’re not willing to work with us, we will do it administratively or we will convene the private sector.
By hook or by crook, we’re going to make sure that when I leave this office, that the country is more prosperous, more people have opportunity, kids have a better education, we’re more competitive, climate change is being taken more seriously than it was, and we are actually trying to do something about it. Those are going to be the measures by which I look back and say whether I’ve been successful as president.~
How much morecrook can it get?!? Which brings us then to Obama’s expressed partiality for Islam and his alliance with a known radical Islamic terrorist organization, the Muslim Brotherhood,whom he has brought directly into his own administration and scattered all over inside of government. These are the radioactive centrifuges powering many of the intense suspicions held by a majority of his dissenters. In Obama’s America he refuses to identify radical Islam, but Christians however are now designated as extremists. Obama has recited to us recurrently that Islam is woven in the fabric of our country since its founding, that it’s a religion dedicated to peace, tolerance, and progress. Christianity on the other hand, according to Obama, has been responsible for many horrible deeds done in the name of Christ. From my place of observation in the cheap seats, I just can’t listen to the articulated farcicality of this degenerates cognitive rats nest anymore.
The fact we actually have educated people seriously extending credibility to this absurd burlesque at this point is remarkable unto itself, not to mention horrifying in a Stephen King sort of way too.
The YouTube link below, is from the March 26th, 2015 edition of conservative talk radio personality Michael Savage, conducting a more recent interview with the Christian convert and former Islamic PLO member Walid Shoebat. Shoebat goes into a thorough and disturbing analysis explaining the current chaotic circumstances across the Middle East, and the part which Obama’s disastrous foreign policies are playing a supporting role in. Shoebat also engages Savage in a lengthy dialogue detailing the circumstances surrounding the release of Army deserter Bo Bergdahl whom Obama illegally swapped 5 high ranking Islamic terrorist detainees at Gitmo in exchange for, and the ties to radical Islamic sources both Bo Bergdahl and his father, Bob Bergdahl, are alleged to have.
Here’s a headline and excerpt to a June 2nd, 2014 article Shoebat referenced in his interview with Savage, from his website at shoebat.com titled;
Father Of Soldier Who Obama Released, Declares Muslim Victory Call, And Obama Smiles As Soon As He Hears The War Cry Of Allah:
While the Obama administration is proudly touting how it was able to free an American soldier who was captured by the Taliban, what no one picked is the fact that Obama SMILED as soon as he heard the most famous war cry of Islam, “bismillah al-rahman al-rahim,” Arabic for “in the name of Allah the most gracious, the most merciful.”
Watch Obama smile as soon as Bergdahl gives the most famous Muslim expression, the “Bismillah” or the “Basmallah”:
The “basmallah” is the Islamic expression for victory and only indicates that Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl’s father is a Muslim.
EVIDENCE THAT BERGDAHL CONVERTED TO JIHADI ISLAM
We were first hit with news from Brietbart that the Taliban said that Robert Bowe Bergdahl’s son, Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, converted to Islam, changed his name to Abdullah, and even trained the Taliban in bomb making techniques.
And like father like son, the young Bergdahl, also trims his mustache and extends his beard, as these pictures show:
A craven deserter AND enemy sympathizer who fled his post, who is responsible for the deaths of several good men during searches for him (one soldier whose parents this administration purposely misled regarding the circumstances of their sons death) and whom this administration knew years ago was a deserter. Yet as Obama’s administrative lie trotter, Susan Rice, tried peddling the false narrative that Bergdahl had served “with honor and distinction“, this bogus claim was flatly contradicted by the subsequent testimony of Bergdahl’s fellow platoon mates who laid waste to Rice’s assertions, having known first hand themselves the pathetic excuse for a man and a soldier Bergdahl was.
But in the media build up since the initial report of Bo Bergdahl being charged with desertion, we have this scurrilous development that, if true, is completely indefensible and likely to give a lot of people’s blood pressure a perceptible boost:
In closing, those who listened to the YouTube clip of Savage’s March 26th, 2015 interview with Shoebat in its entirety, I’ll leave you to ruminate on the extensive information imparted and the sobering implications it suggests. You certainly won’t hear this type of polarizing conversation being discussed on Fox News, as they’re generally inclined to just to tap dance around that 800 pound Gorilla. No pundit on that network would even dare suggest that Obama’s a Muslim, much less speculate as to what pedigree of Muslim he might be.
But if while reading this, you found yourself wondering at intervals where the hell our lawmakers are in the midst of Obama’s devastating jihadists blitzkrieg, believe me, that’s a question I’ve been asking repeatedly myself for a long time. I mean these legislative eunuchs rattle their sabers for the cameras and tell us incessantly how lawless Obama is, but yet they do nothing. You’d think after a few years of this schizophrenics waltz these people would take into account public perception given the disparity between their frequent accusations contrasted then by the evident fecklessness they follow those accusations up with.
It’s…Sinister.
Webster’s New World College dictionary defines it in a nutshell:
No comments:
Post a Comment