This policy change isn't a surprise, however, in the sense that a gradual increase in the individual mandate tax was written into the legislation. The idea was to attract consumers with carrots (affordable coverage!) at first, then resort to sticks down the line. The former approach hasn't worked outespecially well, so the law's supporters have no choice but to go with the latter -- drawing attention to one of the law's most enduringly unpopular provisions in an effort to coerce people into compliance. The problem is that when you add up thousands of dollars in spending to meet high deductiblesplus inexorably rising monthly premiums, paying the mandate tax fine is still a bargain for people who simply can't afford Obamacare, many of whom can claim a hardship exemption anyway. The Associated Press report also mentions a story we highlighted last week, namely that the administration has sharply downgraded its new enrollment expectations:
The Affordable Care Act at work, ladies and gentlemen. Elsewhere in Obamacare news: (1) A federal judge has ruled that a lawsuit filed by House Republicans against the Obama administration must proceed, validating a previous decision. (2) Lawmakers on both sides of the aisle say prospects for a bipartisan deal to fend off coming Medicare premium hikes are dimming. (3) Critics are alleging that the administration is withholding a 'secret' list of 11 state-based Obamacare co-ops feared to be on the verge of financial collapse. A series of such implosions have made headlines in recent months, including instances in Kentucky and Tennessee in the last week alone. Nebraska Sen. Ben Sasse has announced his intention to put a hold on all executive HHS nominations until the White House agrees to a "compete and transparent accounting" of these failures.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/10/20/obamacare-mandate-tax-n2067865
No comments:
Post a Comment