The Democrats Own the Ills of the Inner Cities

Yes, the Democrats think they own the problems besetting the residents of our inner cities, but not in the way they believe. Democrats try to own the problems solely as election issues. They see their constituents’ problems only as tools, weapons with which to beat Republicans over their heads during election years, charging that white conservative racism is the cause of all the woes of inner city people. But Democrats take no responsibility for creating solutions. Democrats hold all the relevant government offices and the power to make lives better, but they never, ever, fix any of the problems. Eugene Slaven in his August 27 AT article, "Democrats Have Nothing to Fear but Losing Black Votes", notes that “...leftists... routinely highlight every statistic showcasing socioeconomic disparities between whites and blacks...” If elected Democrat office-holders would resolve the problems, these issues would be gone from their rhetorical tool belt, and no longer be available to them during election season.

In the most real sense, however, Democrats actually do own these horrible problems which continue to grind down their constituents. This is because for decades in most large cities, the Democrats have owned the municipal administrations and U.S. House congressional representation. Republicans are nowhere to be seen.

Why do the inner-city residents continue to vote for Democrats when Democrats are unwilling and/or unable to solve their problems? Why do they not vote for Republicans, instead? A recent caller to the Dennis Prager show opined disparagingly that inner city blacks just want handouts from the government, and the Democrats make sure this practice continues. The blacks, she stated, “know” that Republicans would cut off the free stuff, so, they always vote for Democrats. Prager responded at length, that “free stuff” is addictive, like a narcotic. But he missed one major point, and while doing so he committed the “sin” of tarring an entire population with a very broad brush.

First, some inner city blacks, just like some people of every stripe everywhere, would be happy to live off of “free stuff” paid for by others rather than find a job and go to work. But a majority would rather be productive, work for a living, and provide for their families themselves, if they could find a way to do so.

But the most obvious reason that inner-city residents do not elect Republicans is because there are almost never any Republicans on their ballots, once you go down ballot below president and U.S. senators. Republicans, for the most part, have given up on campaigning in the inner cities, and this is a grave mistake, because the cities would benefit from conservative solutions that only Republicans can provide. It is against the nature of most Democratic politicians to conceive of conservative solutions. And the suburbs will not survive in the long term if their inner cities do not survive. Besides, it’s the right thing to do.

The cities of Cleveland and Akron Ohio, which are both in Congressional District 11, are illustrative. The last Republican elected mayor of the city of Cleveland was the beloved and now recently deceased George Voinovich. Mayor, later governor and senator, Voinovich became mayor in a fit of electoral revulsion after Mayor Dennis Kucinich left office, leaving the city of Cleveland broke and in debt. George Voinovich, with the volunteer assistance of the business community, brought Cleveland back into the black and on the road to prosperity. He served as mayor from 1980-1989, but no Republican has been elected mayor in Cleveland since then. The city has endured 26 straight years of Democratic leadership.

It is the same with District 11’s congressional representatives. Louis Stokes (1993-1998), Stephanie Tubbs Jones (1999-2008), and Marcia Fudge (2008-present), were/are all Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. In her ongoing eight years in office, Ms. Fudge has had no serious challenger in a primary or general election. Until now.

District 11’s problems are appalling. Dr. Beverly Goldstein, who is the Republican nominee running against Marcia Fudge for her congressional seat in November, grew up in Detroit and attended Detroit City Schools. As a Ph.D. audiologist, Dr. Goldstein ran hearing clinics in the inner city of Cleveland for 14 years, serving mostly minority citizens. In the 1980s, with the assistance of Republican State Senator Grace Drake, Dr. Goldstein, as an unpaid volunteer, created, passed, and achieved funding in the Ohio General Assembly for legislation requiring screening for hearing loss of all Ohio newborns at birth. Those infants identified as at risk for hearing loss become eligible for hearing aids or cochlear implants and speech services, enabling them to develop age-appropriate language, which otherwise most of them would not achieve.

Since January, 2016 candidate Dr. Goldstein has learned about the problems plaguing the mostly black residents of our inner cities by attending black events and meetings in the cities almost every day and night; talking with, but mostly listening to, the residents to learn their concerns, and joining their groups and becoming friends with both women and men. Dr. Goldstein then researched and quantified the problems thus brought to her attention:

• Cleveland ranks Number 1 in the nation in child hunger [Greater Cleveland Food Bank] and Number 3 in the United States in overall hunger (WRAAA [Western Reserve Area Agency on Aging] website, 2016)
• Of the 435 U.S. House Districts, only 14 districts are poorer than District-11 (reported on WTAM AM 1100, March 17, 2016)
• Over 21,000 persons in Cuyahoga County (Cleveland area), and over 6,600 persons in Summit County (Akron area), are homeless (2013 Data, Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless website, 2016)
• Project ACT of the Cleveland Metropolitan School District identified 4,048 homeless district children attending its schools (Help Line Statistics, August, 2015)
• District-11 Median Household Income is $32,014, vs. $48,081 for Ohio as a whole (Ballotpedia website, 2016)
• District-11 includes five of the top 20 most affluent communities in Cuyahoga County and three exceptionally affluent communities in Summit County
• Unemployment in District-11 is 17.3% (Ballotpedia website, 2016). This includes the district’s most wealthy communities. If these are eliminated from the equation, unemployment in the remaining inner cities and the inner ring suburbs is estimated at about 40%
• Cleveland has an extremely high infant mortality rate, 1st in the nation. The black infant mortality rate is 18.1 per 1,000 births, compared to a 4.8 White infant mortality rate (2012-2013 Community Health Status Assessment, Center for Community Solutions website, 2016)
• Domestic Violence Incidents – 2013
• Total Population of Cuyahoga and Summit Counties: 1,806,970
• Total reported Domestic Violence cases: 6,850
• Victims with reported injuries requiring hospital visit and/or hospitalization: 3,190 (Northeast Ohio Coalition for the Homeless website, 2016)

None of this has improved under 26 years of Democratic municipal governments, and under the last 23 years of Democratic congressional representation of District 11.

In her eight years in the U.S. House of Representatives Ms. Fudge has not improved the situation of her District-11 constituents. Incredibly, it is possible that she does not recognize what is important to the people she represents. On July 15, 2015 Fudge was quoted by Sabrina Eaton, Northeast Ohio Media Group Washington Correspondent, as saying that the issues that “matter to people in my district… [are] income equality, women’s rights and universal voter registration.” The anecdotal evidence and the statistics collected by Dr. Goldstein tell a completely different story: the issues that matter to the people in her and Fudge’s district are a lack of jobs, leading to poverty and the inability to feed their families, along with the whole litany of social ills outlined above. They are also concerned about providing a quality education for their children, and are overwhelmingly in favor of school choice.

Struggling residents of D-11 are not complaining to Dr. Goldstein that others have more money than they do. Distribution of wealth is not what they are talking about. They just want a job, or a better job through job training, so as to earn as much money as the next persons performing those jobs.

Not once has anyone even mentioned women’s rights. Dr. Goldstein has met with hundreds of black women entrepreneurs who have started their own businesses and founded mutual support industry groups. They have the right and have created the opportunity to craft businesses and wealth, and that’s what they are doing.

Lack of universal voter registration has also never been cited by anyone. When asked about voter registration, residents respond “of course I vote.”

These are absolute non-issues to inner city residents. But Representative Fudge seems never to sit down and talk with her most needy residents, so she is entirely unaware of what they know is important to them.

It gets worse. Fudge’s inattention and lack of understanding has led to her voting against her constituents’ interests on a large number of occasions. A review of Fudge’s voting record demonstrates that her votes in Congress are the exact opposite of the needs and desires of Ohio District-11 constituents.

Jobs: Her vote to increase immigration was a vote to give away jobs that should rightfully go to our inner city citizens, and to force lower wage rates on her constituents who already are working.

•    Fudge voted for giving immigrants easier access to our jobs, with work permits and green cards in 2010 [HR 5281] & 2011 [HR 3012]  

•     Fudge voted against stronger border security in 2013 [H J Res 79]

•     Fudge voted against controlling massive illegal immigration in 2014 [HR 5272]

Jobs and the Overall Economy: Many inner city residents are already trained to work in well-paying construction jobs in the trades; many are union members. These workers express great frustration that Fudge voted against bills that they know would have improved America’s economy and provided many well-paying jobs for which they are qualified.

•     Fudge voted against creating a Natural Gas Pipeline in 2013 [HR 1900]

•     Fudge voted against improving our North American Energy Infrastructure in 2014 [HR 3301]

•     Fudge voted against lowering Gasoline Prices in 2014 [HR 4899]

•     Fudge voted against approving the Keystone XL Pipeline in 2014 [HR 5682 and three bills in 2015]

Veterans: Many veterans, and particularly disabled veterans, have approached Dr. Goldstein, begging her to listen to their problems when she gets to Congress, most with the same story. Fudge’s staff does not return their phone calls or respond to their emails. Because she does not listen to them, she does not understand their needs. Thus:

•     Fudge voted against the Veterans Benefits Continuing Funding Resolution in 2013 [H J Res 72]

•     Fudge voted against the Veterans Administration Accountability Act in 2015 [HR 1994]

National Security: Fudge’s votes placed at great risk the safety and survival of our children and grandchildren who live in District 11 and all over America when she voted in favor of the Iran Nuclear Deal Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2015. This deal ensures that within 10 years, Iran, the leading state sponsor of international terrorism will, with the agreement of the United States, have nuclear warheads. Together with Iran’s strong effort to develop ballistic missiles which can reach the United States, the nation which has institutionalized “Death to America” will target with atomic warheads New York, Washington DC, Kansas City, and, yes, all of the men, women, and children in Ohio District 11.

•     Fudge voted for the Iran Nuclear Deal (JCPOA) three times in 2015 [H Res 411; HR 3460; HR3461]

What was she thinking? How can a congressional representative be so unknowledgeable about her constituents’ concerns? It comes from not paying attention. Ms. Fudge (and her staff) has the reputation in the district of failing to respond to masses of constituents’ phone calls and emails. This includes veterans and the poor. Also, Fudge has spent weeks on the road campaigning for Hillary Clinton, away from her own district, not listening to the people she represents. She has become a member of the Washington DC Democratic Party elite. Hillary even appointed Fudge Chair of the Democratic National Convention. Her constituents are not impressed. See, "New DNC Chair `Absentee Landlord` in Home District" and "Bringing Congressional District 11 in Ohio Back Home".

Many of Fudge’s constituents, particularly the ones with the biggest problems and in the greatest need, cannot access her or her staff. Many do not own cars. Fudge’s local office is so inaccessible that if inner-city Cleveland residents have problems, and their phone calls and emails have gone unanswered, it is almost impossible to come to Fudge’s office to talk to a staffer. The trip from inner city Cleveland requires three buses, followed by a walk of .8 miles. In the heat; in the snow; maybe with a stroller and a couple of kids. This is a daytrip, impossible for someone who has a job or who must be present when their children get home from school. And there is no practical public transportation option at all for Akron residents who have no access to a car.

Where problems go unrecognized, they go unsolved.

Republicans, and especially conservatives, must go to the inner cities and get involved. They must meet the people who live there, and talk with them. Conversations build relationships. Go to one meeting or event in the city every week. You will not be sorry, and together with with your new friends you can begin to discuss conservative solutions to seemingly intractable problems. And you may even be able to get elected if you choose to run.

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2016/08/the_democrats_own_the_ills_of_the_inner_cities.html

Why did the 30 Benghazi emails FBI discovered escape destruction?

The  Continuing Lies that are being exposed from this Corrupt worthless Garbage

Everyone is wondering what’s in the 30 previously unknown emails related to Benghazi the FBI managed to discover on Hillary’s server and turned over to the State Department for potential redaction.  But the manner by which they escaped destruction may tell us a lot, no matter how much redaction takes place.

The very fact that the emails were recoverable has got Hillary and her team of lawyers in a lot of trouble.  Ed Morrissey of Hot Air explains:

All along, Hillary and her team insisted that they had nothing responsive to investigators and those filing FOIA demands, and that the entire Benghazi probe consisted of rehashed questions already answered.

The new admission from State raises even more questions about the e-mail scandal. The claim from Hillary and her team that the lawyers checked all of her e-mail individually to determine whether they related to official business has long since been debunked. However, one would have expected Hillary and her team to specifically look for materials responsive to Congressional investigations in progress, especially on Benghazi and Libya, even if they were segregating other material by keyword search. Given that the State Department repeatedly argued in court that no such records existed until Hillary’s private e-mail system became public knowledge, the judicial branch may hold State and Hillary to those expectations.

Hillary misrepresented to Congress the thoroughness of the search process.  Let’s use that word instead of “lied,” because it leaves open the door of scapegoating the lawyers.  Bad things often happen to people who work with the Clintons when they are no longer useful.

So how on Earth did those emails escape the highly touted ability of BleachBit to make data inaccessible to God Himself?  Presuming for the sake of discussion that BleachBit really works, that leaves two possibilities.  Keep in mind that the 30 emails were found in a batch of 14,900 emails the FBI recovered through various methods.

1. The FBI recovered the emails through its thorough search of the records of every recipient of an email from the secret email account.
2. Somehow, an error was made, and the 14,900 emails were not deleted with BleachBit.

If number two is true, that was a highly incompetent effort at sanitizing.  Honestly, it seems unlikely.  So we are likely facing 30 emails that were sent to computers and accounts the FBI gained access to.

If the emails were sent to official government accounts, they are probably pretty innocuous.  Hillary had to have realized that anything sent to those accounts was going to be subject to discovery.  The very purpose of her email server was to evade discovery, so she knew that .gov accounts are discoverable.

The reason these emails were deleted from the records she handed over probably is that they included a keyword like Benghazi.  Instead of being marked to hand over, they were marked for destruction, even if the contents were comparatively innocuous.  Non-incriminatory emails should have been handed over but weren’t because the destruction was too inclusive.

But if some of these emails were sent to confidantes like Sidney Blumenthal and recovered via their failure to BleachBit everything, then Katy bar the door.  Assuming they are not completely redacted by the State Department.

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/08/why_did_the_30_benghazi_emails_fbi_discovered_escape_destruction.html

You read about it here first, now listen to Barack Hussein Obama’s half-brother Malik talk about his reasons for supporting Donald Trump for president

Malik Obama (a registered American voter) says his brother Barack failed to deliver on his promises and  he lied to the American people! He says he is voting for Donald Trump because he would be best for the Black community in America! 

The Martin Luther King Jr. Family has also endorsed Trump For President and as have many African-American leaders. Malik Obama stunned the world with this endorsement but the liberal media tried to hide it. Original BNI post: Did you know that Barack Obama’s half brother is voting for Donald Trump?

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/08/30/you-read-about-it-here-first-now-listen-to-barack-hussein-obamas-half-brother-malik-talk-about-his-reasons-for-supporting-donald-trump-for-president/

John Kerry criticizes media for terror coverage

Some talk on John Kerry's Idiotic Stupidity on NOT reporting Terrorism. 

Ex-Muslim scolds Barack Hussein Obama: “Help the American people before you bring in more filthy Muslim refugees”

Love this guy!

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/08/30/ex-muslim-scolds-barack-hussein-obama-help-the-american-people-before-you-bring-in-more-filthy-muslim-refugees/

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/08/30/americans-for-a-secure-wyoming-burn-a-quran-and-call-for-a-ban-on-islam/

This is a Really Stupid Muslim Invader in another Country. this is where you knock this dumbass off and you feel the thump thump of the wheels turning this stupid ass into pig feed. I was going to say pig shit but that comes later after the feed.





http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/08/31/warning-never-drive-through-calais-france-unless-you-have-a-firearm-and-are-prepared-to-use-it/

http://www.barenakedislam.com/2016/08/31/i-guess-missouri-residents-havent-had-enough-violence-and-destruction-by-black-lives-matter-now-they-want-even-more-from-muslim-jihadists-rapists-and-freeloaders/

Obama’s Muslim Refugee Resettlement Program is actually UN’s Agenda to Balkanize & Terrorize the West

    

   Obama and Hillary looks like they are selling    us out?     

In case you think that the recent flood of Muslim invaders into the West is purely Barack Hussein Obama’s idea, then perhaps you may need to dig a little deeper and understand that this is all part of the United Nations High Commission for Refugees’ “TransformativeAgenda” via the influence of the Socialist International (SI). This agenda is nothing short of Balkanizing Europe and the united States and making our lands filled with chaos, terrorism, strife and wickedness.

The New American reports:

UN High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres and United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF) executive director Anthony Lake are the UN point men working closely with the Obama State Department. The active leadership of both these individuals in the U.S. and EU refugee policies is cause for alarm. Even more alarming is the fact that they are not the only troubling participants; the ranks of the UN officials involved in formulating refugee “solutions” are filled with persons — including from Communist China — who have neither the interests of the refugees nor the security concerns of the West in mind. Guterres is the former Socialist Party prime minister of Portugal and former president of the European Council. Perhaps most notably, he was, from 1999-2005, president of the Socialist International, the radical Marxist organization that includes many “former” communist parties that have rebranded themselves as “socialist” or “social democrat” — without significantly changing their politics or personnel.

Although virtually unknown to most Americans, the Socialist International (SI) has been exerting enormous political influence worldwide since the 1950s, especially through its dominant influence at the United Nations.

SI “ultimate objective … nothing less than world government”

The Socialist International membership includes more than 160 socialist parties from more than 100 countries, including from 54 nations where SI member parties are currently running the show or sharing power in a coalition government. At its 1962 Congress in Oslo, Norway, the Socialist International candidly proclaimed: “The ultimate objective of the parties of the Socialist International is nothing less than world government…. Membership of the United Nations must be made universal.” The SI has never deviated from that objective, and has used its growing influence to push greater empowerment of the UN and its agencies, to the point that the UN is now on the brink of becoming a world government.

SI called on the European Union to reach a speedy agreement to handle, in a “fair and humane” way, the flow of refugees and asylum seekers from the Middle East. The organization added, “While it is important to recognise that this is an issue of global dimension and requires that countries from all continents assume their fair share of responsibility, it is crucial for Europe today to act in line with the values, the spirit of solidarity and of common progress upon which the EU was founded with the participation of our movement, and in keeping with its moral and legal obligations.”

First, how does SI claim anyone must “assume their fair share and responsibility”? Where did that idea come from? Second, what is this claim of “common progress”? Take a look at the Middle East and take a look at the West. There are light years of difference between the progress of one and the living in the Dark Ages of the other, and that has been the result of choosing to do so. The West has been based upon the Christian faith, teaching victory in Christ over the nations and subduing the enemies of Christ through the Gospel. The Middle East, for the most part, has been subdued by the teachings of Allah. We all see what that has resulted in.

SI continued their appeal to the world, “The Socialist International remains committed to promoting political solutions to this crisis, convinced that political action is the only way to achieve the conditions necessary for peace, democracy and equality. This position has been borne out at the numerous meetings of its Migrations Committee, its regional committees and its Councils, the most recent of which, held at the UN headquarters in New York, adopted unanimously a Charter for the Rights of Migrants, Refugees and Asylum Seekers to which all its member parties worldwide subscribe.”

“At the SI Council meeting held at the UN in Geneva in December 2014 António Guterres, UN High Commissioner for Refugees and former President of the Socialist International, warned that the humanitarian system was reaching breaking point,” SI noted. “He also stressed the crucial need to tackle the root causes that create humanitarian problems, which urgently needed to be addressed from a political perspective.”

Others on the UN’s Inter-Agency Standing Committee (IASC), who are behind the scenes and have been pushing this agenda include Helen Clark, Dr. Margaret Chan, and Anthony Lake.

The New American points out what these people and the State Department have been up to.

The collaborative relationship between the U.S. State Department and the UNHCR (including IASC, on which Antony Lake, Antonio Guterres, et al serve) is spelled out formally in the State Department document : “2014-2015 Framework for Cooperation Between the United States Department of State’s Bureau of Population, Refugees and Migration and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.”

That document begins: “The Bureau of Population, Refugees, and Migration at the United States Department of State (hereinafter referred to as PRM) and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (hereinafter referred to as UNHCR) have been working in formal partnership through a Framework for Cooperation since the year 2000 to provide protection, humanitarian assistance, and durable solutions to UNHCR’s beneficiaries.”

It continues: “They have a unique relationship: PRM has long been UNHCR’s top donor, while UNHCR has been PRM’s largest multilateral partner. PRM and UNHCR renew their bilateral Framework for Cooperation biennially to advance shared objectives.”

Ultimately, we can assume there is a greater end game than just being good “humanitarians,” and once this is in place and the chaos ensues, the UN will be called on to invade and “keep the peace.” This eventually seeks to be a predecessor to a one world government. If you are like me, you would like to see the complete defunding of the United Nations by the united States and the removal of that organization and all its tentacles from American soil.

Here’s more:

http://www.dcclothesline.com/2015/09/30/obamas-muslim-refugee-resettlement-program-is-actually-uns-agenda-to-balkanize-terrorize-the-west/

Retired General: Clinton and Obama Refused to Hear Intelligence that “did not fit their ‘happy talk’ narrative about the Middle East”

For months now, one official after another, whether retired or still in the administration, pops up accusing Hussein Soetoro and/or Hillary Clinton of some impropriety, crime or basically not performing their job duties. The latest to level these complaints against the Criminal-in-Chief and the former Secretary of State is retired Lt. General Michael Flynn.Flynn, who served two years under Hussein Soetoro as the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency (DIA), informed Breitbart News in an exclusive interview surroundinghis book The Field of Flight stated both Clinton and Soetoro refused to hear intelligence that “did not fit their ‘happy talk’ narrative about the Middle East.”

As Breitbart reported:

 In fact, he alleged the administration actively scrubbed training manuals and purged from the military ranks any thinking about the concept of radical Islamism. Flynn argued that this effort by Obama, Clinton and others to reduce the intelligence community to gathering only facts that the senior administration officials wanted to hear—rather than what they needed to hear—helped the enemy fester and grow, while weakening the United States on the world stage.

“The administration has basically denied the fact that we have this problem with ‘Radical Islamists,'” Flynn said during the interview. “And this is a very vicious, barbaric enemy and I recognize in the book that there is an alliance of countries that are dedicated basically against our way of life and they support different groups in the Islamic movement, principally the Islamic State and formerly Al Qaeda—although Al Qaeda still exists. The administration denied the fact that this even existed and then told those of us in the government to basically excise the phrase ‘radical Islamism’ out of our entire culture, out of our training manuals, everything. That was a big argument I had internally and I talked a little bit about it in the Senate testimony that I gave two years back.”

This is nothing new. In fact, previous reports indicated Obama rarely attended any intelligence briefings, preferring to “read” the reports. Americans already knew departments under Hussein Soetoro were scrubbing training manuals referencing Islam and substituting constitutional supporting individuals, groups and patriotic organizations as potential terrorists. Here Flynn admits his knowledge of the usurper-in-chief’s refusal to address issues that compromised national security; yet, he, along with many others, did not hold the traitor accountable.

Flynn went on to further implicate Hillary Clinton and Hussein Soetoro in their actions to brush aside the intelligence neither wanted to hear about happenings in the Middle East.

“There’s a narrative that the President and his team, including Hillary Clinton, wanted to hear—instead of having the tough news or the bad news if you will that they needed to hear,” Flynn said. “Now, there’s a big difference. And the one thing about intelligence is we should stand for truth to power—meaning we should always say what we believe, and lay the facts out, lay the tough right facts out and then you let the policymakers make the decisions that they have to make. What has happened in the last 10 years, frankly in the last 8 years, is we have seen a level of dishonesty coming out of both the policy and the decision making structure with the American people.”

Because of Hussein Soetoro‘s and Hillary Clinton’s unwillingness to hear the entire facts and happenings concerning the Middle East, along with others in the administration, Flynn accused Soetoro of presenting a “narrative to the American people about the war on terrorism and radical Islamism that is simply inaccurate.”

“The President has said they’re jayvee, they’re on the run, they’re not that strong, what difference does it make what we call—that’s being totally dishonest with the American public,” Flynn said. “There’s one thing that Americans are, and we’re tough, resilient people but we have to be told the truth. I think what a lot of this is, in fact what I know a lot of it is. It’s a lot of happy talk from a President who did not meet the narrative of his political ideology or his political decision-making process to take our country in a completely different direction and frankly that’s why I’m sitting here talking to you here today, Matt. The intelligence process starts really at the ground level, but the priorities—the priorities, Matt, for an intelligence system and the intelligence community in our country and that’s the President of the United States.”

With this being known by Flynn, as well as the American public from statements made by Hussein Soetoro, no one in Congress pegged Soetoro for his mishandling of threats against the united States. Instead, those inside the Beltway turned a blind eye, refusing to hold the man accountable. Now, Flynn comes out pointing the finger at Soetoro and Clinton only to support a book. Where was he when all of this was happening?

Flynn then went on to declare that the Hussein Soetoro’s administration refusal to seriously consider these threats “allowed an enemy that is using very smart, savvy means to impact our way of life.”

“That means infiltrating into refugee populations, that means conducting of smart information operations,” Flynn said. “Most people don’t know but these guys have very sophisticated information operations going on, with publications of magazines and websites. They have leaders in their groups that have thousands and thousands—I’m talking tens of thousands of followers on social media and Instagram and Twitter. So we are not even allowed to go after these kinds of things right now. This is the problem—it’s a big problem. In fact, if we don’t change this we’re going to see this strengthening in our homeland.”

This is old rhetoric. Americans know it. The media knows it, as well as those in Congress. Yet, Republicans and Democrats alike are beating down the door to support, in some way, illegal alien invasion, amnesty, and “refugee resettlement” in order to garner votes in upcoming elections.

 http://www.dcclothesline.com/2016/08/30/retired-general-clinton-and-obama-refused-to-hear-intelligence-that-did-not-fit-their-happy-talk-narrative-about-the-middle-east/

Leaked Memo Reveals Soros Plan for Federally Controlled Police

More from the Guy that wants a no Border One World Government

A leaked document from George Soros’s Open Society Foundations exposes the billionaire’s level of involvement in attempting to build what his organization describes as a “national movement” to reform local police forces across the U.S. The reform largely consists of federal guidelines for local police forces.

The document identifies an opportunity in the police killings of African-American men in Ferguson, Staten Island, North Charleston, and Baltimore. It relates that the U.S. contingent of Open Society held a planning meeting titled, “Police Reform: How to Take Advantage of the Crisis of the Moment and Drive Long-Term Institutional Change in Police-Community Practice.”

The extensive memo further documents that Soros-financed groups and personalities influenced President Obama’s Task Force on 21st Century Policing, which last May released a final report consisting of 60 recommendations providing guidance to localities on how to modify policing practices.

The information was contained in a 59-page report on an Open Society Foundations’ U.S. Programs board meeting in New York from May 7-9 of last year.

The document states that the Foundations’ U.S. Programs (USP) was seeking to use “this moment” – meaning the so-called crisis in policing following high profile shootings and charges of racism – to “create a national movement” for police reform.

States the board meeting document:

The federal government is seeking philanthropic support for a number of its initiatives. In addition to seeking support to advance the implementation of the recommendations of the Presidential Taskforce, the White House recently launched the Policing Data Initiative to explore how best to use data and technology to build trust, voice, and solutions to improve community policing. The Department of Justice recently selected the first six cities to host pilot sites for the National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice, which was launched last fall to help repair and strengthen the relationship between law enforcement and the communities they serve by exploring strategies intended to enhance procedural justice, reduce implicit bias, and support racial reconciliation.

We are gaining a better understanding of these efforts in order to determine how best USP can use this moment to create a national movement. We have already had a set of preliminary conversations with about a dozen key stakeholders and will undertake a field scan to map the areas of work currently underway to advance police reform, including an assessment of the redundancies and gaps in work, and opportunities for collaboration. As we proceed, we will engage the funder network we helped to establish, the Executive Alliance on Men and Boys of Color, which now includes forty foundations.

The document also identifies reducing incarceration rates as another goal of police reform:

The police killings of African-American men in Ferguson, Staten Island, most recently in North Charleston, Baltimore, and many other American cities, highlight that reform of policing policy and practice must be integral to our criminal justice agenda. Notably, while such reform activities are inextricably linked with our concerns about racial justice and equity, in particular about advancing opportunity for boys and men of color, they are also critically related to our goal of reducing incarceration, given the role that police practices play in bringing people into the justice system.

The memo states Soros-financed groups and activists influenced Obama’s police reform task force.  One of the nine members of the task force was Bryan Stevenson, identified on the final task force report itself as “Founder and Executive Director, Equal Justice Initiative.” However, as the Soros document highlights, Stevenson also serves on the board of the Open Society Foundations’ U.S. Programs.  The Foundations’ document also states that a number of Soros-financed organizations gave testimony to Obama’s police reform task force.

The document states:

Perhaps more promising is the taskforce empaneled by President Obama on policing, which developed more than 60 recommendations to provide direct support and guidance to localities on how to improve policing practices. (USP Advisory Board member Bryan Stevenson served as a member of the taskforce and a number of grantees, including NAACP-Legal Defense Fund [LDF], Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights [LCCHR], and others, testified at its hearings.)

Since the release of the taskforce’s recommendations earlier this month, there has been much discussion about how best to ensure effective implementation given the federal government’s limited authority to dictate reform at the local level.

The memo reveals a coalition of Soros-financed groups and other organizations advocating for police reform:

The events of the past several months have understandably led to a wide range of activities, including a variety of advocacy efforts, to respond to the significant challenges in policing that have been exposed and the opportunity to promote meaningful and lasting change. For example, organized under the banner of the Civil Rights Coalition on Police Reform, organizations like the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under the Law, LCCHR, and LDF are advocating for federal reform efforts with a particular emphasis on data collection and transparency and, as noted above, effecting federal funding streams. A variety of other national advocacy organizations, including grantees Advancement Project, PolicyLink, the Center for Popular Democracy, and the ACLU are working to provide advocates with toolkits and resources to help their organizing efforts. Locally based groups such as the Ohio Student Association, the Organization for Black Struggle, the Asian Law Caucus, and the ACLU of New Jersey, to name a few, are advocating for specific reforms at the city and state levels.

It identifies Black Lives Matter as central to the national campaign: “Another layer of grassroots and youth-oriented groups like Freedom Side, Ferguson Action, Black Lives Matter, and Million Hoodies Movement for Justice are also advocating for specific reforms.”

Earlier this month, Breitbart News first reported that another hacked Soros document confirmed that the Open Society last year approved $650,000 to “invest in technical assistance and support for the groups at the core of the burgeoning #BlackLivesMatter movement.”

The Open Society also called for a discussion on whether it would be appropriate for the Soros group to try to “shape” Black Lives Matter in the future, that document related.

(Note: Emphasis added by this reporter in all quotations from documents.)

Aaron Klein is Breitbart’s Jerusalem bureau chief and senior investigative reporter. He is a New York Times bestselling author and hosts the popular weekend talk radio program, “Aaron Klein Investigative Radio.” Follow him on Twitter @AaronKleinShow. Follow him on Facebook.

With research by Joshua Klein.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2016/08/30/leaked-soros-memo-federally-controlled-police/

http://www.dailywire.com/news/8753/10000th-syrian-muslim-refugee-lands-us-soil-michael-qazvini