Filmmaker Dinesh D’Souza’s movie alleging voter fraud in the 2020 election, “2000 Mules,” has made more than $1 million on streaming sites Rumble and its subscription-based platform, Locals in the first weekend out.
The conservative political commentator’s latest film hit the streaming site at noon on Saturday, and after 12 hours it had grossed “more than one million dollars” on Rumble and Locals, making the sales “good enough” to put the film in the “estimated box office top ten for the weekend of May 6th to May 8th,” according to PRNewswire.com. The movie also played on a limited basis in selected theaters on May 2 and May 4, reported Newsweek.
“The success of ‘2000 Mules’ on Rumble is a great sign for creators who do not want to be silenced or censored for their speech,” D’Souza told the outlet.
“Supporting creative independence is core to our values, and we are thrilled to offer creators a new way to distribute and sell movies independently,” Locals President Assaf Lev told the outlet.
WATCH:
D’Souza said the idea for the film came from True the Vote’s Catherine Engelbrecht and Gregg Phillips, who he said got a hold of a “treasure trove of cellphone data, this is called cellphone “geotracking,” which they believed proved “election fraud.” The two purport to show 2,000 people who allegedly made dozens of trips each to multiple drop boxes where they deposited mail-in ballots in key swing states such as Pennsylvania, Arizona, Georgia, Wisconsin and Michigan.
In the film, Phillips interviews an informant from Yuma County, Arizona, who alleged “mules” were paid based on the quantity of ballots they stuffed in drop boxes.
“I would get a call to find out how many ballots were brought in and if they were already pre-filled out first,” the informant, whose face was obscured and voice altered.
The Associated Press said the film used “flawed analysis of cellphone location data and ballot drop box surveillance footage” to cast doubt on the 2020 election. It explained why it came to this conclusion:
The film focuses on “ballot harvesting,” which is a term for “dropping off completed ballots for people besides yourself.” The AP noted that the practice is “legal in several states but largely illegal in the states True the Vote focused on.”
D’Souza’s films have generated controversy in the past. His 2012 documentary, “2016: Obama’s America,” was based on his book, “The Roots of Obama’s Rage,” and grossed $33 million.More recently, he released “Trump Card” in 2020, which explored corruption in the Democratic Party.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/dinesh-dsouzas-2000-mules-movie-alleging-voter-fraud-makes-1-million-on-streaming-sites?i
True the Vote is about to drop an information bomb regarding election fraud
In his smash-hit move, 2000 Mules, Dinesh D'Souza carefully, and entertainingly, demonstrated how True the Vote, a voter integrity organization, was able to prove incontrovertibly that left-wing non-profits used mules to stuff ballots, bringing in, at a minimum, hundreds of thousands of Biden votes in swing states. The movie, however, describes the data without releasing them and does not identify the non-profits. Now, though, True the Vote is planning to publish everything. That's an information bomb that should blow apart any claims that Biden's victory wasn't the result of massive fraud.
The genius of True the Vote was that it figured out how to use commercially available cell phone location data, along with videos of drop boxes, to prove that, in the five critical swing states that gave the election to Joe Biden, leftist non-profits used mules to deliver dozens of ballots to drop boxes. The numbers are staggering: at a minimum, 400,000 illegal ballots in the states that turned the election in Biden's favor.
In the review I wrote about the movie, I explained in somewhat more detail how the program worked, but I urge you to see the film for yourself. The only thing I found a bit disappointing was the fact that the movie did not name the non-profits involved.
Well, that disappointment is over. True the Vote has announced that, in a few weeks, it will make available to the public every single bit of information it has regarding the drop-box fraud. Or, as Catherine Engelbrecht, who founded True the Vote, calls it, pulling the ripcord:
Releasing the data matters because mainstream media outlets have alternately ignored the movie or, in the AP's case, "fact-checked it." Ali Swenson insists that cell phone information isn't as precise as True the Vote claims and that True the Vote's assumptions are "faulty."
Swenson's claim that those cell phone pings are way too vague to be useful is easily debunked. Back in 2018, the New York Times wrote about the extremely detailed information the apps on people's phones provide:
At least 75 companies receive anonymous, precise location data from apps whose users enable location services to get local news and weather or other information, the Times found. Several of those businesses claim to track up to 200 million mobile devices in the United States — about half of those in use last year. The database reviewed by the Times — a sample of information gathered in 2017 and held by one company — reveals people's travels in startling detail, accurate to within a few yards and in some cases updated more than 14,000 times a day. (Emphasis added.)
Swenson asserts that the film shows an interview with only one whistleblower who saw people pick up what she "assumed" were payments. True. But the fact is that in cases in which law enforcement has caught up with those mules who deliver multiple ballots to drop boxes, they always do it for money. It is, therefore, a reasonable assumption that, when someone repeatedly goes to a non-profit and then visits between 20 and 45 drop boxes, that person is not acting out of the goodness of his heart. If law enforcement would arrest these people, we could confirm this assumption.
Swenson quotes a single expert saying that cell phone data really won't prove whether the person was at, or merely near, the drop box. What Swenson ignores is that, although putting someone near a single drop box proves nothing, 2000 Mules shows that the cell phone pings revealed that specific people were beating a path to innumerable drop boxes. There is no reason that "delivery drivers, postal workers, cab drivers, poll workers and elected officials" would stop at only two places: leftist non-profits and multiple drop boxes. Only mules would do that.
Swenson argues that, even though True the Vote had video footage of obvious mules stuffing boxes, the movie doesn't prove that the footage aligns with pings. True. I suspect that proof will come when True the Vote pulls the ripcord.
Another Swenson argument is that showing someone dropping off a stack of ballots doesn't prove wrongdoing because people are allowed to do so for family members and household members. Considering that the data shows mules averaging 20 to 45 drop boxes, at each of which they dropped off an average of five ballots, I'm thinking those must be very big families...or, perhaps, it's evidence of election fraud.
The remainder of the "fact check" is the same: faulty assumptions; inaccurate facts; and extraneous, irrelevant information, all functioning as argument rather than analysis.
Judging by the AP's frantic effort to challenge the movie's premises, in a few weeks, it's going to be fun to see what happens when all of the facts — including the identity of those non-profits — are out there.
https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/05/true_the_vote_is_about_to_drop_an_information_bomb_regarding_election_fraud.html
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/new-mexico-audit-identifies-feature-dominion-voting-machines-allows-ballots-filled-machine/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/democrat-non-profits-use-ballot-traffickers-steal-election-georgia-wisconsin-many-traffickers-also-blm-antifa-rioters/
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2022/05/never-sit-front-one-meetings-play-candy-crush-phone-tgps-joe-hoft-unloads-elections-director-county-board-meeting/
No comments:
Post a Comment