header

header

Saturday, May 21, 2022

 The Senate passed a bill with 100% yes to protect SCOTUS Judges homes.  Pelosi is not bringing it to the floor for a vote.   Why?   Does she want to see violence or is she taking orders to NOT vote on this?  They are saying its a local Issue?  They are Federal Employees. Sounds familiar?  Refusing extra security on Jan 6th?  Why did she block that?


As the most reliable and balanced news aggregation service on the internet, DML News App offers the following information published by Fox News:

As the Biden administration warns of a potential surge in violence following a near-future ruling from the Supreme Court on abortion, top Democrats in the House appear to remain at odds with their party in the Senate on whether Congress should take action to ramp up security for the court’s justices, or leave it to law enforcement.

Speaking to Fox News on Thursday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., seemingly expressed opposition to providing protection for justices and their families, insisting that law enforcement officials should be the ones to determine whether the threats they receive warrant a response.

The article goes on to state the following:

The legislation, dubbed the Supreme Court Police Parity Act, was introduced by Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, and Sen. Chris Coons, D-Del., amid protests following a leaked draft opinion from the Supreme Court which signaled federal protections for abortion granted under Roe v. Wade could soon be overturned.

The measure would provide Supreme Court justices and members of their family with around-the-clock security protection. The legislation also allows Supreme Court police to arrest individuals who interfere with the court’s ability to perform its duties and creates a criminal penalty for individuals who impede or obstruct those duties.


Meanwhile House Majority Leader Steny H. Hoyer (D-Md.), said the security protection should be extended to law clerks and staff who “have increasingly faced threats to their physical safety.”

“Violence or the threat of violence against judges, their clerks, or the families of judicial-branch officials is never acceptable,” Hoyer said. “Our majority is determined to protect those who serve our country in the federal judiciary, and we believe that this effort must extend not only to the family members of judges and justices but to the family members of the clerks and staff who support them and have increasingly faced threats to their physical safety, which is done in Rep. Stanton’s Supreme Court Families Security Act.”

To get more information about this article, please visit Fox News.


https://dennismichaellynch.com/report-pelosi-senate-dems-weigh-in-on-house-bill-to-protect-justices/


https://owens.house.gov/posts/owens-co-signs-letter-to-pelosi-calling-for-an-urgent-vote-on-bill-to-protect-supreme-court-justices-and-their-families

https://thefederalist.com/2022/01/04/pelosi-is-blocking-access-to-house-january-6-records-what-is-she-hiding/

https://centerforsecuritypolicy.org/pelosi-has-blocked-answers-to-questions-about-lack-of-security-at-capitol-on-january-6/

https://freebeacon.com/courts/a-county-chairman-refused-to-boost-security-at-supreme-court-justices-homes-then-he-had-police-guard-his-residence/


No comments:

Post a Comment