Dems must lie about the SAVE America Act because passing it can destroy them

 They know that, once voter rolls are cleaned up, the information culled from those clean rolls will wipe out much of the money behind their party.

he statistical underpinning of the mathematical principle known as the Law of Large Numbers is a very powerful concept: The larger the sample, the closer the estimate of whatever is being studied can get to its true value.

This abstract math theory has very powerful real-world consequences.

For example, insurance companies set rates based on such analysis; casinos, with the saying “the house ultimately wins,” make very good money on large volumes; the CDC relies on large databases for nationwide public health initiatives; and political polling firms use that math to track political campaigns. One caveat about political polling is that it can also be disreputable, with agenda-driven polling-hack organizations rigging the database for “push polling,” which is mostly designed for targeted, headline-grabbing results.

Another example of Large Number utility occurs in court cases addressing constitutional safeguards against discrimination and other civil rights violations. There, the law of large numbers is a powerful tool to expose whether these problems exist. Relying on large data sets to see if a policy disproportionately harms a protected group, courts will conclude that discrimination exists. Statistical evidence is central to such court cases.

The FBI—an organization I proudly worked with on counterintelligence investigations before political corruption became a problem in the institution—relied heavily on large numbers, so much so that agents were known as “the Kings of Follow-up.” Using millions of data points, real criminal patterns stand out, with random noise fading away.

Understanding the utility of the Law of Large Numbers helps us appreciate the very real, beneficial advantages of passing the SAVE America Act. Leaving political spin and headline dissembling aside, statistical support for nationwide passage of the SAVE America Act ranges from 60–80% approval, with opposition at 20–35%.

Given that level of support, why won’t Congress pass it?

The Democrats, acting through their media, insist that photo ID would disenfranchise a significant number of voters, people too poor and ignorant to get driver’s licenses, board planes, or participate in any other aspect of American life (most of which requires some ID). That argument is the shiny white tip of the iceberg. What lurks underneath is the real reason: Photo ID would block votes from illegal aliens, which leans heavily Democrat.

Given that the public wants the SAVE America Act and knows that it’s easy to obtain the necessary ID, Congress’s inability to pass the Act boils down to the most powerful thing in Washington DC: Money.

The money flowing into US political campaign organizations, both Democrat and Republican, is huge; in 2024, it topped $15–16 billion. The SAVE America Act truly threatens those organizations’ political gravy train on two very powerful levels not yet seen. Both these things, though, become visible through the Law of Large Numbers.

The first benefit of honest elections will be cleaning up the voting rolls, which will destroy the database of organizations that rely on paid illegal aliens for get-out-the-vote (GOTV) efforts. This is very true for firms that have traditionally counted on mustering heretofore non-vetted voters. It makes their expensive business database obsolete immediately.

The second benefit is that honest elections will help the FBI find organizations behind illegal voting operations. Empowering the FBI with statistically validated, court-sanctioned probable cause to focus on identified geographic clusters of illegal voting, the SAVE America Act becomes an extinction event for illegal behavior and possibly even jail time for some cheaters.

Given that Democrats seem more inclined toward illegal voting than Republicans, the SAVE America Act will likely hit them harder. However, given how often the two parties can often be seen as “Tweedledee and Tweedledum”—that is, identical in all respects but for their—we can anticipate that a few Republicans will be swept into the net. It’s a small price to pay for honest elections in America. Those Republicans holding out against the Act had better not be financially dependent on such groups.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/03/dems_must_lie_about_the_save_america_act_because_passing_it_can_destroy_them.html