During a discussion on “The View” this Tuesday about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign, co-host Jey Behar admitted that she would still “vote for” Hillary’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, despite him being a serial sexual harasser, abuser and assaulter, not to mention a rapist:
People have to understand, it’s policy.Teddy Kennedy. Remember Chappaquiddick? Am I the oldest person in the room? Chappaquiddick. I mean, a girl drowns and he abandons her and she drowned and women still voted for Teddy Kennedy.Why? Because he voted for women’s rights. That’s why. That’s the bottom line of it in my opinion.I mean, I don’t like either one of them, to tell you the truth, Teddy or Bill. They’re both dogs as far as I’m concerned. But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor.
Behar tried to defend her bullshit by arguing that the decision by some Republicans two years ago to not vote in favor of renewing the Violence Against Women Act meant only one thing: They hate women. She of course conveniently forgot to mention why they voted against the renewal.
Me What I Want
During a discussion on “The View” this Tuesday about Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s campaign, co-host Jey Behar admitted that she would still “vote for” Hillary’s husband, former President Bill Clinton, despite him being a serial sexual harasser, abuser and assaulter, not to mention a rapist:
People have to understand, it’s policy.Teddy Kennedy. Remember Chappaquiddick? Am I the oldest person in the room? Chappaquiddick. I mean, a girl drowns and he abandons her and she drowned and women still voted for Teddy Kennedy.Why? Because he voted for women’s rights. That’s why. That’s the bottom line of it in my opinion.I mean, I don’t like either one of them, to tell you the truth, Teddy or Bill. They’re both dogs as far as I’m concerned. But I still will vote for Bill Clinton because he votes in my favor.
Behar tried to defend her bullshit by arguing that the decision by some Republicans two years ago to not vote in favor of renewing the Violence Against Women Act meant only one thing: They hate women. She of course conveniently forgot to mention why they voted against the renewal.
National Reviewer contributor Betsy Woodruff, a woman, explained that Senate Democrats had added a few controversial provisions, including one that would have given Native American tribal courts jurisdiction in cases involving attacks on Native women by non-Native men:
That sounds simple enough, but it’s actually incredibly problematic for many conservatives. Tribal courts aren’t bound by the First, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments, and often “fail to provide due process,” as the Republican committee members’ report argues. So passage of the law would undermine the constitutional rights of American citizens. And if tribal courts have jurisdiction over these cases, why not give them jurisdiction over others?Senator Hatch argued this on February 7, saying that the latest version of the bill he used to support “not only stops short of guaranteeing all constitutional rights but also does not provide for direct review of convictions in U.S. courts. I simply cannot support depriving American citizens of constitutional rights and judicial protection.” Sounds reasonable.
The bill also included a provision designed to provide an extra layer of protection for LGBT abuse victims:
That’s also an admirable goal — sexual orientation shouldn’t keep people from getting help — but the legislation could make shelters (many of which operate on shoestring budgets) unduly vulnerable to lawsuits. David Muhlhausen of the Heritage Foundation argues that the anti-discrimination provisions could mean that if an all-female shelter turned down protection to a gay man, the man might be able to sue.
But what the hell do FACTS like these matter to liberal women like Joy Behar, aye? Speaking of which, let me do everyone a favor and translate her diatribe for you all:
“I’m too much of a halfwit to understand the rational reasons Republicans do what they do, so screw it; I’m going to vote for a rapist because pee pee, poo poo, licky licky lickity split!”
Excuse my language, but what a dumb, ignorant sack of shit!
*ptuy*
http://www.newsbusters.org/blogs/nb/scott-whitlock/2016/01/05/joy-behar-id-vote-rapist-long-theyre-liberal#.drfoxx:NorO
No comments:
Post a Comment