New York Times columnist says J.D. Vance's troubled mom should have sold him to buy drugs

 Everyday we see great examples of the Human inbreds on the Left wishing harm on others on the Right.  they are the Garbage of todays America

Can't leftists disagree with someone without wishing to kill them?

What is it about leftists and their hatred for their fellow man?

Witness this one from New York Times columnist Jamelle Bouie on Bluesky:

Last we heard, Vance's mother had beaten her addiction to prescription drugs which had significantly damaged her life, and was very proud of her son. 

So Bouie wished his mother to become more addicted to lethal drugs, and for Vance to be sold to child traffickers and all but certain death, all because Bouie disagreed with a political opinion that Vance expressed when he was asked about the case of Alex Pretti who lost his life after interfering with ICE agents in the course of their duties in Minneapolis.

Vance told an interviewer that no apology was needed. Pretti had who kicked out ICE agents' tail lights, brought a loaded Sig-Sauer handgun with two clips to a protest, and interfered with ICE agents in the course of their duties. As a result, he got himself killed in the melee that he himself had created. It was a sad state of affairs and reasonable people can disagree about how the matter should have been handled, but that wasn't good enough for Bouie. He not only disagreed with Vance, he wished him grave bodily harm as an innocent child along with that of his mother.

It's worth noting that Vance didn't see a need to apologize but he didn't go into any diatribes about wishing the man dead, either.

Advertisement

Bouie, though, was another story: Like the evil nurse who wished grave birth injuries onto White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, who is pregnant, and the freaks on Bluesky who wished the same on Vance's wife who also is pregnant, the left seems to have a wish for harm onto anyone they don't agree with. It's not enough to disagree anymore, or even just call names and engage in lowlife ad hominem attacks, which both sides are pretty good at. Unique among the political sides of the aisle, they wish harm on those with whom they disagree, putting them one step behind the Bolsheviks, who were all about liquidation of critics.

Jonathan Turley writes of his disgust at this picture, noting:

As I discuss in my new book “Rage and the Republic,”  a common element to past radical movements has been the dehumanization of political opponents. In calling others “Gestapo,” “fascists,” and “Nazis,” you achieve a certain license to say and do things that you would ordinarily never say or do. By stripping them of any humanity or right to empathy, you are free to discard the limitations of decency and civility.

Rage is itself a type of drug. It is addictive and, while they never admit it, they like it.

Bouie shows the lack of self-awareness in his hateful posts, objecting that “this is a wicked man who knows he is being wicked and does it anyway.” It is the ultimate example of transference; a self-description ascribed to those you hate.

On his New York Times bio, Bouie insists that “I come from a left-leaning, social democratic perspective, but I strive for honesty, fairness and good faith in my writing.” He adds that “I abide by the same rigorous ethical standards as all Times journalists.”

If using Vance’s tragic childhood and his mother’s addiction is an example of the “fairness and good faith” of the New York Times, it is a chilling prospect.

Rigorous ethical standards. What a guy. Somehow, it fits to a tee that his name is 'mud.'

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2026/02/new_york_times_columnist_says_j_d_vance_s_troubled_mom_should_have_sold_him_to_buy_drugs.html