I seen one of Obama's ads during the Olympics . I was almost yelling at the tv! He says among the ad that he is for the Middle Class (what can he do....tax the rich that wont creat jobs!) He said he ws going toput people back to work (what an Idiot)
The biggest thing that got to me was when he said he was going to payon and Reduce the Debt! I about puked. If he ws re-elected he will not think about cutting but he will spend spend spend!
Thursday, August 2, 2012
Obama Campaign Sues to Restrict Military Voting
This Douchbag knows the Military is not to happy with his policies!! This Lawsuit better not Win!
Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.
The National Defense Committee reports:
If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter, somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men and women of our military.
Make no mistake, the Democrat lawsuit is intended to disenfranchise some unknown number of military voters. The judge should reject it with prejudice.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-sues-to-restrict-military-voting
President Barack Obama, along with many Democrats, likes to say that, while they may disagree with the GOP on many issues related to national security, they absolutely share their admiration and dedication to members of our armed forces. Obama, in particular, enjoys being seen visiting troops and having photos taken with members of our military. So, why is his campaign and the Democrat party suing to restrict their ability to vote in the upcoming election?
On July 17th, the Obama for America Campaign, the Democratic National Committee and the Ohio Democratic Party filed suit in OH to strike down part of that state's law governing voting by members of the military. Their suit said that part of the law is "arbitrary" with "no discernible rational basis."Currently, Ohio allows the public to vote early in-person up until the Friday before the election. Members of the military are given three extra days to do so. While the Democrats may see this as "arbitrary" and having "no discernible rational basis," I think it is entirely reasonable given the demands on servicemen and women's time and their obligations to their sworn duty.
The National Defense Committee reports:
[f]or each of the last three years, the Department of Defense’s Federal Voting Assistance Program has reported to the President and the Congress that the number one reason for military voter disenfranchisement is inadequate time to successfully vote.I think its unconscionable that we as a nation wouldn't make it as easy as possible for members of the military to vote. They arguably have more right to vote than the rest of us, since it is their service and sacrifice that ensures we have the right to vote in the first place.
If anyone proposes legislation to combat voter fraud, Democrats will loudly scream that the proposal could "disenfranchise" some voter, somewhere. We must ensure, they argue, that voting is easy and accessible to every single voter. Every voter, that is, except the men and women of our military.
Make no mistake, the Democrat lawsuit is intended to disenfranchise some unknown number of military voters. The judge should reject it with prejudice.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/08/02/obama-campaign-sues-to-restrict-military-voting
Reid: Press 'Should Be Writing' Anonymous Romney Tax Story
When I hear this Ass Open his mouth it Stinks of Crap! If I heard right, If someone is revealing or passing on or talking to an open group or the Public PRIVATE Tax information that only the Taxpayer and the IRS is entitled to this Information it is a FELONY for someone spreading private of confidential Tax information!! This Lowlife Scumbag of an Elected official Should be investigated by the IRS or FBI for spreading the Info or the So called Person that gave him this info. This guy is walking garbage. He should be investigated on How he got Rich on his land deals. If I also Rember Romney gave 23 years of taxes in 2008 when running against Romney! I sure hope he does not cave on this Bull*h*t by the left Liberal Hacks!! They just want to get his taxes for class warfare!
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) doubled down and insisted that the anonymous source that allegedly called his office to inform him that Mitt Romney had not paid taxes on ten years of returns was not a figment of his imagination.
In fact, now Reid says he had “a number of people” who told him the same thing but again refused to name any of these alleged sources. And Reid insists the burden is not on him to produce his sources but rather on Romney to disprove the hearsay.
"I am not basing this on some figment of my imagination," Reid said in a telephone call with Nevada reporters, according to the Las Vegas Review-Journal. "I have had a number of people tell me that."
When Reporters asked for more details, Reid said, “No, that's the best you're going to get from me."
"I don't think the burden should be on me," Reid said, according to the paper. "The burden should be on him. He's the one I've alleged has not paid any taxes. Why didn't he release his tax returns?"
On Monday, Reid gave the mainstream media the excuse it needed to again badger Mitt Romney about releasing his tax returns.
Even though Reid has not released his tax returns and will not do so, he told The Huffington Post in an interview published Tuesday that an “anonymous” source called his office and said Romney had not paid taxes on ten years worth of tax returns.
"Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain," Reid said while refusing to name the alleged former investor with Bain Capital who had tipped him off. "But obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?"
Give Reid credit this time around. He openly revealed what his motive had been along, which was to get the mainstream media focused on Romney’s taxes instead of Obama’s economy.
"What if he has paid no taxes, like I am saying he hasn't," Reid said on Wednesday. "What if he has all these moneys as we already know... in the Cayman Islands, Bermuda, Swiss banks. I mean, gee whiz, rather than ask me why I should do this, that is a story you should be writing."
Reid’s accusations would not be admissible in a court of law, but he knows the mainstream media does not care about the veracity of his accusations when they hurt a Republican.
And for those in the mainstream media who did not get the message the first time, Reid, by saying, “this is a story you should be writing,” left nothing for misunderstanding this time.
Some more links of iInterest
Something sounds really fishy here. Office is used as storage. Taxpayers foot the bill. Community organizer posters on windows. Re-elect Obama posters. Sounds like they are sharing a bed...I mean office together somewhere! Interesting Reading Here
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/30/Is-Anti-Chick-fil-A-Alderman-Moreno-using-his-taxpayer-funded-aldermanic-office-to-help-Obama-s-reelection-campaign-in-Chicago
Capital Confusion: Obama's Broken Promise on Jerusalem Stirs Anger
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/07/29/Capital-Confusion-Obama-s-Broken-Promise-on-Jerusalem-Stirs-Anger
Elizabeth Warren: We Need Much Higher Government Spending to Keep Up with China ( and to think that this Idiot Can't help myself is a Rising star of the Democrat Party She is a big Liberal spender like Obama. I can't see her state voteing her back in!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/08/01/elizabeth_warren_our_government_doesnt_spend_nearly_enough_money
Elizabeth Warren's Next Task: 'The Salvation of Capitalism (What a douchbag) Civility...sorry
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/31/Conservatives-Ridicule-Elizabeth-Warren-s-Claim-She-Will-Save-Capitalism
What They Hid in the Highway Bill
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/07/27/what_they_hid_in_the_highway_bill
No Joke: The Regime Replicates the Policy That Created the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/07/27/no_joke_the_regime_replicates_the_policy_that_created_the_subprime_mortgage_crisis
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/30/Is-Anti-Chick-fil-A-Alderman-Moreno-using-his-taxpayer-funded-aldermanic-office-to-help-Obama-s-reelection-campaign-in-Chicago
Capital Confusion: Obama's Broken Promise on Jerusalem Stirs Anger
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2012/07/29/Capital-Confusion-Obama-s-Broken-Promise-on-Jerusalem-Stirs-Anger
Elizabeth Warren: We Need Much Higher Government Spending to Keep Up with China ( and to think that this Idiot Can't help myself is a Rising star of the Democrat Party She is a big Liberal spender like Obama. I can't see her state voteing her back in!
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/08/01/elizabeth_warren_our_government_doesnt_spend_nearly_enough_money
Elizabeth Warren's Next Task: 'The Salvation of Capitalism (What a douchbag) Civility...sorry
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/31/Conservatives-Ridicule-Elizabeth-Warren-s-Claim-She-Will-Save-Capitalism
What They Hid in the Highway Bill
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/07/27/what_they_hid_in_the_highway_bill
No Joke: The Regime Replicates the Policy That Created the Subprime Mortgage Crisis
http://www.rushlimbaugh.com/daily/2012/07/27/no_joke_the_regime_replicates_the_policy_that_created_the_subprime_mortgage_crisis
Illegals Obama Refused to Deport Charged With 19 Murders, 142 Sex Crimes
Remember....He says its the Right Thing to do......................Yeah Right
Well, this seems fair -- perfectly in line with Obama's socialist drive to spread the wealth.
After hundreds of innocent Mexicans died as a result of the Obama Administration flooding that country with thousands of guns through the cynical and politically motivated Fast and Furious program, it's only fair for the White House to allow Mexican citizens to wreak havoc and misery here in America:
The Obama administration released illegal immigrants who went on to commit more crimes, including charges of 19 murders, 3 attempted murders and 142 sex crimes, the House Judiciary Committee said in a report Tuesday.
All told, the nearly 47,000 illegal immigrants the administration was notified of but declined to deport between 2008 and 2011 under its Secure Communities program had a recidivism rate of 16 percent, the committee said.
They were just part of the nearly 160,000 immigrants — most of them here legally — who were flagged by Secure Communities during the three year period but who were either not eligible to be deported or who the administration decided to release. Those immigrants went on to be charged in nearly 60,000 more crimes, according to the committee and the Congressional Research Service, which issued a report on the matter.
The findings stem from the Obama administration’s Secure Communities program, which was designed to identify immigrants who run afoul of the law and who the administration decides it wants to deport.
Equality, it's a beautiful thing.
By merely enforcing the immigration laws already on the books, every single one of these crimes could've been prevented.
More blood on Obama's hands -- more blood the media will cover up because week seven of whining about Mitt Romney only releasing two years worth of tax returns is much bigger news than 60,000 preventable crimes, you know, if all you care about is reelecting Obama.
Wednesday, August 1, 2012
Elizabeth Warren: We Need Much Higher Government Spending to Keep Up with China
To think that People of her State will vote for Her.......What a Hack she is!!
I'm flabbergasted:
Here we have a woman who looks at our $16 Trillion national debt and thinks, we simply must spend far more. After all, China (coincidentally our top foreign creditor) spends roughly 9 percent of their GDP on infrastructure, whereas we spend "just" 2.4 percent on similar projects. We can "do better," she says. The New York Sun's Ira Stoll spoils the statist party by pointing to a minor arithmetic-related complication:
May I add another teensy quibble? We're already broke:
Elizabeth Warren isn't some random yahoo candidate with nutty ideas. She's her party's highest-profile candidate recruit of the cycle and has been offered a plum primetime speaking slot at the truncated (due to lack of funds, ironically) Democratic National Convention in September. Team Obama is choosing to showcase her worldview on the biggest possible stage. This shouldn't come as a surprise; the president and Ms. Warren are ideological soul-mates. Indeed, it was Warren's material that he cribbed in his infamous "you didn't build that" diatribe. And it's he who continues to propose an unpaid-for, half-trillion-dollar Stimulus 2.0 boondoggle, even in the face of his previous $825 Billion flop. With that in mind, watch the Obama campaign's breathtaking new ad on deficits:
Incredible. This president has been crowned the undisputed debt king, having added $5 Trillion in debt over just 3.5 years -- that's a trillion dollars more than his predecessor's wars and "tax cuts for millionaires" managed to accumulate in eight. This president's unanimously-defeated budget would have increased the gross national debt by $11 Trillion over the next decade, despite its inclusion of virtually every single tax hike he and Warren are pressing today. Yet he's attacking his opponent over this issue. Shameless doesn't even begin to cover it. The truth is that the president and the wannabe Senator are both playing versions of the same cynical game, which relies on voter ignorance. Out of one side of their collectivist mouths, they claim that their tax increases are designed to help control our unsustainable deficits and debt. This can be achieved, they say, by compelling "the rich" to pay their "fair share" (Quick reminders: It can't, "the rich" already do, and that cohort includes nearly a million small businesses). Out of the other side, they demand massive levels of new spending -- on top of our current, catastrophically bloated outlays. Obama and Warren couldn't care less about the contradiction; "deficit reduction" merely represents a popular buzz phrase to dupe voters into believing they have some plan in mind other than "more government." The president is generally more devious about camouflaging his intentions, as the mind-boggling commercial above proves. I'll at least credit Warren for being unapologetic and straightforward. She's openly advocating for hundreds of billions in additional, unpaid-for federal spending in order to keep up with a foreign government that already holds much of our existing debt. And she wasn't caught whispering this stuff on a hot mic; she put it in a television ad. Points for candor, I suppose, although that doesn't make her ideas any less insane or reckless.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/08/01/elizabeth_warren_our_government_doesnt_spend_nearly_enough_money
I'm flabbergasted:
Here we have a woman who looks at our $16 Trillion national debt and thinks, we simply must spend far more. After all, China (coincidentally our top foreign creditor) spends roughly 9 percent of their GDP on infrastructure, whereas we spend "just" 2.4 percent on similar projects. We can "do better," she says. The New York Sun's Ira Stoll spoils the statist party by pointing to a minor arithmetic-related complication:
The first problem is mathematical. U.S. gross domestic product is about $15 trillion a year. Increasing infrastructure “investment” to the 9% Chinese level that Ms. Warren cites would mean an additional $1 trillion a year in government spending. That’s an immense spending increase. To put it in context, the entire federal government spent about $3.6 trillion in 2011, on revenues of about $2.3 trillion. Where would this money come from? Not tax increases, right? Ms. Warren has already reportedly promised nearly a trillion dollar tax increase, spread over ten years, by raising the estate tax, imposing the Buffett Rule, and letting the Bush tax cuts expire for those earning $250,000 a year or more. But that money, she has said, would go toward deficit reduction. If Ms. Warren really wants to spend $1 trillion a year more on infrastructure, she’d need to eliminate all national defense spending ($705 billion) or all Social Security spending ($730 billion) and then find another more than quarter trillion dollars. Or else she’d have to go on the biggest borrowing or taxing binge in American history.
May I add another teensy quibble? We're already broke:
Incredible. This president has been crowned the undisputed debt king, having added $5 Trillion in debt over just 3.5 years -- that's a trillion dollars more than his predecessor's wars and "tax cuts for millionaires" managed to accumulate in eight. This president's unanimously-defeated budget would have increased the gross national debt by $11 Trillion over the next decade, despite its inclusion of virtually every single tax hike he and Warren are pressing today. Yet he's attacking his opponent over this issue. Shameless doesn't even begin to cover it. The truth is that the president and the wannabe Senator are both playing versions of the same cynical game, which relies on voter ignorance. Out of one side of their collectivist mouths, they claim that their tax increases are designed to help control our unsustainable deficits and debt. This can be achieved, they say, by compelling "the rich" to pay their "fair share" (Quick reminders: It can't, "the rich" already do, and that cohort includes nearly a million small businesses). Out of the other side, they demand massive levels of new spending -- on top of our current, catastrophically bloated outlays. Obama and Warren couldn't care less about the contradiction; "deficit reduction" merely represents a popular buzz phrase to dupe voters into believing they have some plan in mind other than "more government." The president is generally more devious about camouflaging his intentions, as the mind-boggling commercial above proves. I'll at least credit Warren for being unapologetic and straightforward. She's openly advocating for hundreds of billions in additional, unpaid-for federal spending in order to keep up with a foreign government that already holds much of our existing debt. And she wasn't caught whispering this stuff on a hot mic; she put it in a television ad. Points for candor, I suppose, although that doesn't make her ideas any less insane or reckless.
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2012/08/01/elizabeth_warren_our_government_doesnt_spend_nearly_enough_money
Reid: 'I Heard Romney Has Not Paid Taxes for Ten Years'
I try not to Use George Carlins seven dirty words, but when you have elected crap or Garbage like this scumbag its hard to keep in control when he opens his mouth ( I still smell crap when he opens it!) Romney Released 23 years of taxes in 2008 so I would like to know what year this Idiot is looking for??
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/mitt-romney-doesnt-need-to-release-all-of-his-income-taxes-mccain-says/2012/04/15/gIQAOojVJT_blog.html
There is more info out there than just this link. This Guy won't put any House Bills on the floor or has not had a budget in 3 years. This Guy is a total Douchbag!! No Credibility!
One more thing.....This Scumbag needs to release maybe ten years of his returns. How did he get all his Money??
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/election-2012/post/mitt-romney-doesnt-need-to-release-all-of-his-income-taxes-mccain-says/2012/04/15/gIQAOojVJT_blog.html
There is more info out there than just this link. This Guy won't put any House Bills on the floor or has not had a budget in 3 years. This Guy is a total Douchbag!! No Credibility!
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) will not release his own tax returns but that did not stop him from making accusations about Mitt Romney, based on a single "anonymous source."
Reid told the liberal Huffington Post that Romney’s father “must be so embarrassed about his son” for not turning over his taxes and said someone who had invested with Bain capital had called his office and told him Romney did not “pay any taxes for 10 years.”
"He didn't pay taxes for 10 years! Now, do I know that that's true? Well, I'm not certain," Reid told the HuffPo. "But obviously he can't release those tax returns. How would it look?”
Reid claims he has one "source." His source never worked at Bain and was only an investor with the company, which leads one to ask why an investor would even have such information. We are also expected to believe the “source” just randomly called Reid's office to reveal info about Romney’s tax returns.
Such accusations should not be given the time of day, but the mainstream media wants an excuse to push Romney to release his taxes. Since the media knows it cannot continue its own incessant interrogation of Romney about his taxes, they are looking for any reason to put Romney's tax returns in the news.
Clearly, Reid’s accusation, based on a random and lone source, was the excuse the mainstream media needed to continue talking about Romney’s taxes instead of Obama’s economy. A Romney campaign official called Reid's speculations “troubling and disappointing.”
One more thing.....This Scumbag needs to release maybe ten years of his returns. How did he get all his Money??
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
CNN Stunner: Legal Analyst Says Michael Cohen Just “Demolished” Bragg’s Case Against Trump
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is waking up to a nightmare unfolding this morning. His “Got Trump” convictions are hanging on by...
-
Despite the existence of a dangerous world -- Russia and Iran just for starters -- Secretary of Defense Hagel recently proposed cutting ...
-
I was always taught to respect authority. If you attack the police or Federal Agents it won't end well. The agent used deadly force to...
-
T here’s a particular dangerous breed of dishonest Democrat politician who speaks in moderate terms to get elected, only to govern as a rad...