In an interview earlier in the day on Thursday, President Barack Obama made the claim that it was his management style to hold his cabinet
On Obama’s management style claim:
“On the first, the claim is farcical. We have Benghazi. Nobody has been held accountable. Surely not the secretary of state. The only person who was demoted is the number two ambassador in Tripoli who was rather heroic that night. And he got sent the to a desk job because he spoke out about it. And as for the botched rollout, nobody has been held accountable in HHS. Then you have the attorney general. Was he held accountable when he deceived the American people over the eaves dropping on the associated press reporter and on James Rosen? No. there was no accountability. But I thought the second claim the president made was interesting. He’s right. The big strides were made when you have big majorities. But there is one big difference. In the New Deal and the Great Society, even though FDR and LBJ had great majorities, they always took care to make sure the big socially revolutionary pieces of legislation had some support, in fact large support, from the opposition. Social Security did,
On if congressional Republicans have an obligation to fix the flawed law:
“Not if you believe as the Republicans do and as I do that the law is in and of itself a disaster, that the architecture of the law, the intrusiveness of the law, the contradictory nature of the law is such that it cannot work it's going to hurt overall the American medicine which is the finest in the world and you really have to
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2013/12/05/Krauthammer-Rejects-Obamas-Claim-That-Cabinet-Members-Have-Been-Held-Accountable
No comments:
Post a Comment