Somebody at one of the twin mouthpieces for the socialist Democrats, CNN, must have seen the recent interview Megyn Kelly conducted with Weather Channel founder and scientist John Coleman. Coleman is given some air time on their network, presumably to put that whole hoax issue to rest. It didn’t work.
The interview on CNN is conducted by liberal maggot Brian Stelter, a choice which is about as far from Fox’s Megyn Kelly as one could get. He opens by describing the topic as “one of the biggest crises we will face – climate change.” While describing “climate deniers” as being painted by the media as fringe characters and kooks, Stelter proceeds to attempt to do exactly that.
This non-scientist describes the scientific consensus as having already determined man-caused climate change to be real and attempts to portray the debate as one of a proper response to a real problem. Those who know better see any response as a manipulation for financial gains and control by the global elite.
Coleman quickly puts the Democrat propagandist in his place. He informs Stelter that the word denier is dismissive and tells him the more correct way to characterize his position is that of a skeptic.
Coleman informs the viewers that he is a scientist and his counterpart on the segment, David Kenny, the current Weather Channel CEO is not. Coleman raises the issue of CNN’s strong position that there is a consensus that global warming is real, saying “there is no consensus in science. Science isn’t a vote, science is about facts.”
Coleman notes how the issue and the debate has become a political one rather than one of science and how it has become a huge platform of the Democrat Party. He also points out that the science is on his side.
Stelter asks the question about the supposed 97% of climate scientists being in agreement in supporting the assertion of the legitimacy of the pro-climate change Chicken Little’s, to which Coleman responds with information as to the scientific funding methodology and the expected bias of the conclusions associated with it. There is a $2.5 billion pie, and if scientists want a piece of it, they have to produce favorable results.
The obviously liberal Weather Channel CEO speaks more to the issue of whether or not Coleman should be referencing his network than the supposed science which he claims supports his position. He says he doesn’t think a fight with Coleman is a fight worth having, probably because of those troublesome facts that might get into the way.
As the segment closes Stelter asks a question which is demonstrative of the hoax/hysteria fabrication. He asks, “Do people ever say to you that climate change is good for business, good for The Weather Channel” because it causes very scary storms that cause people to tune in?”
It’s obvious that Stelter didn’t hear a word Coleman said. The number and severity of storms in the past several years is actually down, with fewer hurricanes and tornados than in recent decades. Then again, this whole thing is about using the weather to gain political control and taxing authority. It’s really got nothing else to do with the weather.
Kenny closes out his comments with the usual assertions that weather is now global warming and that droughts and other natural disasters, formerly referred to “Acts of God” are now acts of climate change.
http://gopthedailydose.com/2014/11/02/cnn-libtard-global-warming-worm-beaten-down-by-weather-channel-founder/#
No comments:
Post a Comment