Central-Illinoisand

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Elizabeth Warren: My Aunt Bea Was White Before She Was Indian

Note:...and to think some Liberal said this woman was a dem rising star??? Wow god help us!!

Cherokee genealogist Twila Barnes has caught Elizabeth Warren in yet another lie about her false claims of Native American heritage.

When Elizabeth Warren's "Aunt Bea," Bess A. Reed Veneck, died in 1999 at the age of 98, Ms. Warren was listed as the "informant" on the death certificate that identified Aunt Bea as White. Line 14 of the death certificate allowed the informant to specificy the race of the deceased. Presented with the option of selecting "American Indian," "Black," or "White," Ms. Warren chose to identify Aunt Bea's race as White.
Thirteen years later, Ms. Warren was telling a different story about Aunt Bea's heritage. Television cameras caught her spinning this tale in early May, 2012:

"My Aunt Bea has walked by that picture [of her father] at least a thousand times, remarked that her father, my papaw, had high cheekbones like all of the Indians do because that's how she saw it and she said and your mother got those same great cheekbones and I didn't. She thought that was the bad deal she had gotten in life."

Additional evidence confirming that Bess A. Veneck is Aunt Bea comes from the December 5, 1997 obituary of Donald J. Herring, Elizabeth Warren's father, in the Daily Oklahoman that listed "sister-in-law, Bess A. Veneck of OKC" as a survivor.
Ms. Barnes also recently uncovered evidence showing that Ms. Warren's mother,Pauline Reed Herring (sister to Bess A. Reed Veneck) was listed in the 1940 census as White, not American Indian.
Ms. Warren's mother was White in 1940, her Aunt Bea was White in 1999, but by 2012 Aunt Bea had become Indian in Elizabeth Warren's eyes. That's what you call real transformation.
Michael Patrick Leahy is a Breitbart News contributor, Editor of Broadside Books’ Voices of the Tea Party e-book series, and author of Covenant of Liberty: The Ideological Origins of the Tea Party Movement.

A comment from someone else...I love it

And, Elizabeth Warren was dumb before she was stupid......or is it the other way around?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/02/Elizabeth-Warren-My-Aunt-Bea-Was-White-Before-She-Was-Indian

Obama is going after Romney and Bain again.......What a Hack!

Photo: “LIKE” and SHARE if you have had enough of Obama’s failed promises and leadership in Washington, D.C.

http://www.promisegap.com/

Photo: When you put it this way, Obama doesn't look very good! (original video here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5LaJc0Jkpk)

Sunday, July 1, 2012

Obama Team: Obamacare Still Not A Tax

Wow..More idiots are denying its a tx! I wonder why? Re-election time?

The only legal peg on which Chief Justice Roberts was able to hang his hat in ruling Obamacare constitutional was a broad reading of the Taxing Clause. In order to do so, he had to deliberately misread the Obamacare law; had he not done so, the law would have been struck down as a violation of the Commerce Clause.

Nonetheless, the Obama administration insists that Obamacare isn’t a tax.

The latest Obama spokesperson to deny Roberts’ logic and essentially admit that Obamacare is unconstitutional is Jack Lew, the White House Chief of Staff. This morning, he appeared on CNN to explain:

First of all, the law is clear, it’s called a penalty. Second of all, what the Supreme Court ruled is that the law is constitutional. Actually, they didn’t call it a tax. They said it was using the power under the constitution that permits it. It was not labeled.

This is, simply put, a lie. Lew’s first two sentences are in direct conflict with one another. The law is clear – it’s called a penalty. But if the administration is going to stand by its original construction of the statute, they can’t then claim that the Supreme Court ruled it constitutional on their basis. The notion that the Supreme Court ruled the statute constitutional without any specific basis is simply false. Lew continued:

This is a penalty. It’s something that only 1 percent of people who can afford insurance and choose not to get it will pay. Everyone who has insurance, everyone who chooses to buy insurance will not pay it. What they’re going to get is security — they’re going to get lower premiums and better health care. That’s a good thing for the American people.

It’s also a lie that a tiny percentage of the population will pay the penalty. The fact is that under the new Obamacare regime, millions will opt for the penalty, simply because there’s no purpose to paying $1,500 per year for health insurance when you can pay a $750 penalty, wait to get sick, then jump on a federally-mandated health plan. And it’s also a lie that we’re all going to get lower premiums and better health care. Who’s going to pay for that? And how are we going to achieve that if the insurance companies are forced to bear the brunt of restrictions that force them to take those with pre-existing conditions, charge men and women equally, do away with coverage limits?

The key here is that the Obama administration is now caught between a rock and a hard place. They can either admit that this is an unconstitutional seizure of individual liberty (i.e. it’s a mandate) or they can admit that the statute is the single largest tax increase in world history. Neither position will be attractive to voters.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/01/Obama-team-Obamacare-still-not-a-tax

Obamacare Ruling Will Add Hundreds of Billion In New Costs

A new analysis by the American Action Forum has found that the Supreme Court's Obamacare ruling will stick taxpayers with hundreds of billions in new costs to implement President Obama's healthcare exchanges.

The reason: states who decide to dump Medicaid beneficiaries will shift the cost for insurance subsidies to federal taxpayers.
From the report:

Suppose that every state takes advantage of this opportunity, and that every individual who is either on Medicaid or would be eligible for the expansion actually moves to the exchanges. The federal government would save as much as $130 billion in Medicaid in 2014, but it would be on the hook for $230 billion in new insurance subsidies. The net bottom line: a $100 billion annual expansion in federal costs.

The American Action Forum is quick to point out that not all states will likely make the leap. However, even if only a portion choose to, the costs overs 10 years will be astronomical:

Of course, not all states may forego the expansion, without doubt fewer than 100 percent of those eligible will take up subsidies, and actual insurance choices are impossible to foresee perfectly. Accordingly, the net cost will be lower than the full $100 billion, but it seems safe to say that the ACA will leave the taxpayer on the hook for an additional $500 billion or so in federal costs over the first 10 years.

The new costs may only add fire to voters' discontent with Obamacare. Indeed, as the New York Times reported this week, as of a month ago, only 34 percent of Americans said they supported Obamacare's passage.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/01/Obamacare-Ruling-Will-Add-Hundreds-of-Billion-In-New-Costs

Maxine-waters-i-have-not-decided-whether-or-not-to-call-obamacare-mandate-a-tax-audio/

Its a Tax Dumbass! (sorry I lose my civility with stupid people!)

Following the Supreme Court’s decision to uphold the individual health insurance mandate in President Barack Obama’s health care law as a tax, California Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters praised the court’s ruling but told The Daily Caller that she personally has “not decided” whether or not to call the mandate a tax.
TheDC asked Waters if she agrees with Chief Justice John Roberts that the provision requiring all Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a fine is a federal tax.
“What I have not decided is whether or not it’s better to call it a tax or a mandate. What I have decided is it’s absolutely necessary that it be paid for, that if we’re going to cover all of these preexisting conditions that I just alluded to, we have to have the income by which to do it and so I have not decided that one may be better than the other,” she told TheDC. “I’m going to think about that and I’m going to review and perhaps I’ll have a different opinion on it later on, but right now I’m just happy.”
When pressed on the issue, Waters would not say if the Democratic-controlled Congress intended to create a new tax when it passed the health care law in 2010.
“I don’t want us to start projecting out and start to talk about what’s going to happen in the future,” Waters responded. “The first thing we must know and understand is that this independent, very, high positioned branch of government will make their decision based on the deliberations that they’re involved in, based on their experiences, based on their beliefs and we cannot anticipate what they’re decisions are going to be.”
Obama and White House Budget Director Jeffrey Zients have said the individual mandate is not a tax. In his oral argument before the Supreme Court, Solicitor General Donald Verrilli Jr. said that same.
When questioned by TheDC on Thursday, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid would not say if they view the mandate as a tax. However, they both said the Supreme Court made the right decision to uphold the law.
“Call it what you will, it’s a step forward for America’s families and you know what? Take yes for an answer,” Pelosi said Thursday.
“I’m not about here to give you all a dissertation on constitutional law. The law has been withheld [upheld], and I’m very happy it has been,” Reid said.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/29/maxine-waters-i-have-not-decided-whether-or-not-to-call-obamacare-mandate-a-tax-audio/#ixzz1zPvX4nof

Allen-west-black-caucus-liberals-judged-holder-by-color-of-his-skin-not-by-content-of-his-character/

Note: Other than reminding us of the Wisconsin Libs not doing their jobs by walking out, I also seen this when I watched them walkout as a racist thing( except Pelosi,, she is just a Screwball) Instead of seeing the vote as a srewed up Government program where people were killed. These Libs are Heartless to the families of the dead people!

Florida Republican Rep. Allen West said liberal Democrats in Congress — including many members of the Congressional Black Caucus — who walked out on the bipartisan votes to hold Attorney General Eric Holder in criminal and civil contempt of Congress did so because Holder is black.
“Today the Congressional Black Caucus and other liberal Members of Congress judged the Attorney General by the color of his skin, and not by the content of his character,” West said of their walkout in a Facebook post. “I am disappointed my colleagues would rather engage in a political stunt to distract the American people from knowing the truth behind the Attorney General’s disregard of the law and disrespect of congressional oversight to provide requested documents.”
On Thursday 17 Democrats joined all but two House Republicans to vote to hold Holder in criminal contempt of Congress. And 21 Democrats joined all House Republicans to vote to hold Holder in civil contempt of Congress. (SEE ALSO: GOP congressman who voted ‘no’ on criminal contempt demands Holder’s resignation)
Despite the bipartisan support to hold Holder in criminal and civil contempt of Congress, President Barack Obama’s White House and some congressional Democrats claim that the effort was political.
West said that’s hardly the case — as Holder has only provided Congress with 7,600 pages of documents, many of which have been redacted or fully blacked out, out more than 140,000 pages the DOJ has identified internally related to Operation Fast and Furious.
“Lady Justice wears a blindfold because she represents objectivity — in that justice is or should be meted out objectively, without fear or favor, regardless of identity, money, power, gender or race,” West said.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/29/allen-west-black-caucus-liberals-judged-holder-by-color-of-his-skin-not-by-content-of-his-character/#ixzz1zPt6hdJ6

http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/29/issa-grassley-release-details-about-fast-and-furious-whistleblower-retaliation-cover-up/

http://dailycaller.com/2012/06/29/grassley-politics-in-us-attorneys-holder-decision/

Central-Illinoisand_beyond