Thursday, June 22, 2017
Coming from a Socialist who praises Dictators and Dictator wannabees (Obama)
Did the Russians hack the Georgia election? Leftists are all over media creating straw men to disguise the simple truth that voters have rejected their treasonous Trump resistance movement. Jon Ossoff losing in Georgia is the fifth election Democrats have lost since Trump's crushing defeat of Hillary. Losing the Georgia race has to be particularly painful, because, once again, leftists lied to themselves and their base that Ossoff would surely win, just as they did with Hillary.
My question is, how crazy will Democrats' official Resistance Summer domestic terrorism become after their devastating loss in Georgia? Thus far, leftists have mock-beheaded Trump; mock-put a bullet in his head; mock-stabbed Trump; dreamed of beating Trump with a golf club; talked about blowing up the W.H., physically attacked Trump voters; kidnapped and tortured a Trump supporter; and gunned down Republicans who were practicing for a charity baseball game.
Leftists are disappointed, desperate, deranged, and overflowing with hatred for our president and his supporters – an extremely dangerous mix of emotions. How much lower will leftists take their depravity and violence?
My fellow Americans, I wish to express my deep, heartfelt thanks for your help stopping Jon Ossoff, "Nasty" Pelosi's latest anti-Trump minion. A handful of Hollywood leftists spent mega-millions to help their Great Leftist Hope candidate win the Georgia congressional seat. Ossoff could not vote for himself because he does not live in the 6th District. Masters of deception, Democrats pretended that their national leftist push for Ossoff represented the thinking of Georgia voters. They lied.
My wife Mary and I spent months in Georgia with the Conservative Campaign Committee in their boots-on-the-ground effort to inspire Georgia voters to "drop the remote and vote." We ran radio ads on major stations, conducted numerous sign-waving sessions at busy intersections, sent out mailers, organized phone-from-home, produced videos and tons of social media. We left no stone unturned to get votes for Republican Karen Handel.
Brothers and sisters who love America, we cannot let up. Rest assured: leftists will triple down on their insane efforts to remove our president. We must remain engaged. Republicans must continue to vote in large numbers, not taking any of the upcoming races for granted.
Again, thanks for your help carrying Karen Handel across the finish line. God bless.
Two articles, one in CNN and one in Breitbart. Can anyone spot the difference?
A police officer was stabbed in the back and neck Wednesday at an airport in Flint, Michigan, and the suspect is in custody and being questioned, according to authorities.The FBI said it believed the attack was an "isolated incident" and is investigating whether it was an act of terrorism."We are aware of reports that the attacker made statements immediately prior to or while attacking the officer, but it is too early to determine the nature of these alleged statements or whether or not this was an act of terrorism," the FBI said.
Officer stabbed in Michigan by man yelling "Allahu Akbar"
Why would CNN leave out what the stabber actually said in the article plus the person's race? CBS radio also is not saying what the person said or his name and saying it is impossible to tell if it is terrorism.
Somehow, the other day, when a white person drove a truck into Muslims in London, the media were immediately able to declare it terrorism and say the driver's race. Isn't that amazing?
I am not a law enforcement officer or a reporter, but my deep analysis of the situation leads me to conclude that the stabbing was a terrorist attack done in the name of Islam.
Why don't the media report what they know instead of intentionally keeping certain information from the public?
John Eastman, law professor at Chapman University, writes in American Greatness this week that the powers invested in Special Counsel Mueller to investigate "Russian hacking/collusion/obstruction poses grave dangers to our body politic and our liberty." His advice to President Trump: Fight fire with fire. Turn the law and the courts back on your opponents. Trump is being investigated without any probable cause of a crime. The Obama administration, in contrast, is a target-rich arena of criminal activity.
It is unconstitutional to issue a search warrant when there has been no crime and there is no probable cause. But that is exactly what President Trump's DOJ has inflicted on the president and his team with Mueller's special investigation. It was not just cowardice, but folly for the DOJ to buckle to the left-wing media's hysterical insistence to investigate our president's alleged collusion with the FSB.
According to Professor Eastman:
The special counsel will not to track down the details of a crime known to have been committed and determine "who dunnit," but will scour the personal and business affairs of a select group of people – the President of the United States, members of his family, his business associates, and members of his presidential campaign and transition teams – to see if any crime can be found (or worse, manufactured by luring someone into making a conflicting statement at some point). This is not a proper use of prosecutorial power, but a "witch hunt," as President Trump himself correctly observed. Or, to put it more in terms of legalese, this special prosecutor has effectively been given a "writ of assistance" and the power to exercise a "general warrant" against this select group of people, including the President of the United States, recently elected by a fairly wide margin of the electoral vote.That is the very kind of thing our Fourth Amendment was adopted to prevent. Indeed, the issuance of general warrants and writs of assistance is quite arguably the spark that ignited America's war for independence.
Professor Eastman suggests fighting fire with fire, prosecution with prosecution.
Unfortunately, the only antidote may be to fight fire with fire. President Trump: Perhaps it is time to make good on that old pledge to appoint a special prosecutor to look into the Clinton "matters" after all. And while you're add it, add in referrals to the grand jury for the contempt of Congress committed by the IRS's Lois Lerner and former Attorney General Eric Holder, an FBI investigation of the destruction of government documents and servers in the midst of the IRS scandal, an investigation into alleged perjury committed by IRS Commissioner John Koskinen in testimony about those matters given under oath to Congress, an "obstruction of justice" investigation against former Attorney General Eric Holder and others (and related perjury charges against Assistant Attorney General Thomas Perez) for allegedly ordering that an egregious voter intimidation case against the New Black Panther Party be dropped shortly before a default judgment was about to be entered in the government's favor, etc., etc., etc.
President Obama and his leftist minions spat on our constitution and flouted the rule of law for eight long years. Google "Obama flouts constitution," or see hereand here and here and here and here. Their abuse of power was ignored by the media and our partisan courts, but it has not been forgotten by conservatives.
President Trump's voters would like to see equality before the law upheld once again in America. It is bad for our country that rich and powerful Democrat politicians and bureaucrats harm our national security and ruin other people's lives, in flagrant violation of the law, and are never held to account for their crimes.
Professor Eastman's advice to fight fire with fire stops short. Based on his own analysis, it is unconstitutional to do warrantless searches with no probable cause. Ending the baseless "Russian collusion" witch hunt is fundamental to upholding our constitution.
Those who counseled President Trump to not prosecute Hillary Clinton said a Clinton investigation would distract the White House from furthering Trump's positive agenda. That was a strong argument – then. But as Professor Eastman points out, it backfired. Perhaps Trump's civility was taken as a sign of weakness. Hillary launched the lie that the Russians made her lose the election. Democrats instigated this phony Russian collusion investigation of Trump, precisely in an effort to distract the White House and halt the Trump agenda. The best defense is to return to offense.
President Trump has the responsibility to re-establish the rule of law in our country, and he will have the enthusiastic backing of his base if he does so. It is time to end Democrats' politically motivated abuse of the law. Stop the Mueller investigation, and go after Obama Inc.'s multiple crimes.
Wednesday, June 21, 2017
Dershowitz is a Democrat but honest on all issues. Good interview
These Leftist Ass Scabs are off the wall NUTS! This is why they are not winning elections
Another Total DipShit
Another Total DipShit
For Republicans, winning never gets monotonous.
The Karen Handel victory in the Georgia 6th District special election repeats a pattern depressingly familiar to the left. There have been four special congressional elections since the hated Trump took office, and Democrats have lost all four. In each contest, the left predicted victory – largely based on what they perceived was hatred of President Trump by ordinary Americans, which would generate "enthusiasm" for the Democrat candidate and drive people in overwhelming numbers to the polls.
Each of the four Democrat candidates was well financed and received strong support from the national party. Each Democratic candidate's campaign was augmented by hundreds or thousands of activist volunteer Democrats. And each and every race was seen as a referendum on Donald Trump – not his policies as much as the man himself. He is Hitler and Howdy Doody all rolled into one, a traitorous SOB (although most liberals only hint that Trump has committed treason), a threat to the rule of law, and a joke as a president.
And each and every time, liberals have been shocked to discover that ordinary people don't view the president that way.
In Georgia's 6th, reality once again intruded on liberals' fantasies. They once again failed to grasp that some people may hate President Trump. But more people hate them. And unless they can grasp that fundamental point, 2018 will turn into another GOP victory.
The resentment of ordinary Georgia voters begins and ends with the $23 million that poured into the district from Democrat donors across the country – most prominently, from Hollywood and Silicon Valley. Handel's money also came from out of state, but it didn't come from people who look down their noses at Georgia voters and try to instruct them on what they should think.
That brings us to the national media. More than any other Democrat-allied group, the media promoted the narrative that Trump is so unpopular that a deep red congressional district was almost certainly going to flip.
Of course, the press professed to be neutral, and all those negative stories trying to wrap Trump around Handel's neck were what people were really thinking.
One tweet last night sort of blows that nonsense out of the water:
— Pamela Moore (@Pamela_Moore13) June 21, 2017
Have you ever seen such long faces? Whom are they trying to kid?
As long as the faces were at CNN when it became clear Handel was the winner, imagine the chins hitting the floor at the DNC. They were so sure of victory, so confident of success. If $23 million can't buy them a House seat, where do they go from here?
The media are thinking the same thing. The following is from CNN:
With the inflated price tag and the 15-month lag time between the special election and the November 2018 midterms, the contest might not hold much predictive value.
And if Ossoff had won? How "predictive" would that result have been?
After the initial glum reaction of pundits to Handel's win came the excuses. It was the weather, it was the big GOP advantage in registration, it was early voting, it was Republican outsiders, it was history, it was counter-historical, Ossoff wasn't liberal enough, no unions, blacks didn't turn out, and the most common complaint from the left about ordinary voters...
The people refused to vote "their interests."
All of those excuses fail to get to the crux of why the left keeps losing. Ordinary Americans simply don't like leftists very much. And when Hollywood and Silicon Valley unite to tell them they are stupid, are ignorant, are racist, are homophobic, hate Muslims, and shouldn't love America so much, what do they expect the reaction from ordinary people will be?
Republicans are not representatives of the people any more than Democrats are. But they speak the language of the ordinary voter and usually don't put them down. The coastal elites who run the Democratic Party and liberal establishment cannot disguise their contempt for ordinary Americans. In Georgia's 6th District, that smug, self-righteous sense of superiority played about as well as one might expect.
Until the Democrats can learn to mask their hatred of the hoi polloi, ordinary people will hate them more than they hate Trump and the Republicans.
"High office is like a pyramid; only two kinds of animals reach the summit – reptiles and eagles." –Jean le Rond d'Alembert
It took the election of Donald Trump for the progressives to unmask themselves, to reveal their true identities, just like the sinister aliens in that old television mini-series V: The Final Battle. In the series, having disguised themselves as humans, the aliens are ultimately shown to be reptiles from another planet who came to take over Earth. Over the years, they had infiltrated governments, businesses, and religious institutions. The actual humans finally develop a poison that afflicts only the aliens, rather as Trump afflicts Democrats. It is dispersed, and the aliens are forced to evacuate.
Those reptilian humanoid aliens are a pretty good analogy for our current crop of progressives. How else do we explain the inhumanity of people like now former anchor Scott Pelley of CBS, who opined to his audience that "the [House majority leader, Steve] Scalise attack was to some degree self-inflicted"? Joy Reid of MSNBC wondered if Scalise's positions on "moral issues" like gay marriage and Obamacare did not make his shooting somehow understandable! She later tweeted that Scalise "was a white man with a violent background [a blatant lie], and saved by a black lesbian, and yet..." She could not bring herself to congratulate those two Capitol Police officers.
At whose knees did these people learn to not be civilized adults? Certainly no one ever taught them the Golden Rule: kindness to others, simple consideration for their fellow humans at times of pain. Even if they differ on political issues.
A Democratic Party strategist from New Jersey, James Devine, almost immediately after the shooting, launched a couple of hashtags, #HuntRepublicans and #HuntRepublicanCongressmen! He appeared on the Tucker Carlson program to defend his scurrilous behavior to no avail. He had tweeted: "We are in a war with selfish, foolish & narcissistic rich people. Why is it a shock when things turn violent?"
The man is a reptile.
A writer at the Washington Post, Malcolm Harris, tweeted that "the shooting of conservative Republicans could be justified." He implied that he hoped Scalise would die! His actual tweet is beyond the pale. The New York Times embarrassed itself by dredging up the lie that Sarah Palin was responsible for the Gabby Giffords shooting in Tuscon in 2011 because of an ad showing targeted districts in the crosshairs of a gun sight, an ad not even created by her campaign. The charge was disproven long ago. Jared Loughner, the schizophrenic who shot Giffords, had never heard of Palin and had been angry at Giffords for years. The Times knew that the charge was specious but used it anyway in its post-shooting editorial. Like the rest of the media talking heads and self-described elite opinion editors, they continue to believe that the American people are terminally stupid. Why anyone reads this propaganda rag is a mystery. There is rarely an objective word among the paper's full-time anti-Trump campaign.
The Scalise example isn't the only one. After the young man, Otto Warmbier, was imprisoned in North Korea and sentenced to fifteen years' hard labor, former late-night comic Larry Wilmore said the young man "might be America's biggest idiot frat boy," a despicable slander against a young man who was described by eyewitnesses as "mature and polite." Then he mocked Warmbier's name for sounding like "warm beer." He called him "Otto von Crybaby. This is a man so ignorant of the facts about the North Korean regime, he actually thinks his mockery is funny. Writers at Salon and the Huffington Post also attacked Warmbier. The HuffPost said he deserved to be imprisoned because he's white.
Who are these vile, thoughtless, cruel people, and how did they come to infect our politics and media?
Albert Einstein wrote: "If the rabble continues to occupy itself with you, then simply don't read that hogwash, but rather leave it for the reptile from whom it has been fabricated."
This who they are. It is time for decent people to reject the vicious nonsense perpetrated by the left on a daily basis. The agony they are suffering since the election is self-inflicted. One cannot treat the majority of the American people like insects to be swatted away except at election time and expect to win respect or elections. The repulsive things said and or written in the wake of the Alexandria shooting by the persons cited above are just a few, those that came from news outlets. Much worse appeared all over social media, which is consistent with the left's venomous rejection of the election results. Time to take Einstein's advice and not listen to or read their hogwash. With each passing day, Trump is seeming more and more like an eagle.
When Robert Mueller III accepted his position as special counsel, he knew he would have to procure a scalp, or at the very least real blood from the president or someone close to him.
Mueller is a much admired man; he has had a good, long, and honorable career. He has bipartisan respect for having served his country with integrity and distinction. However, in government, integrity is no guarantee of longevity, or even survival, for that matter. (See? "Matter" and "investigation" are not synonyms unless you're Loretta Lynch.)
No one survives in Washington for very long without understanding the establishment and the "game."
With this investigation, the progressive-elite zealots, who constitute the apparatchik-academia-media triad that controls day-to-day governance, the "news," and what our children learn, will accept nothing less than an outcome that permanently damages this president and his administration. That would be their worst-case scenario; what they really pine for is impeachment.
Yet didn't they tell us Comey (who has given new meaning to "I going to take a leak") was a universally respected person as well? Wasn't he full of integrity, an exceptional leader and administrator as well as a skillful prosecutor? Didn't they also tell us he was honorable and truthful? I think the last few months have put that illusion to bed.
Let's be clear: the president is Mueller's target. If he didn't know this going in, the Washington Post's recent declaration of the fact sourced by anonymous "officials who described the financial focus of the investigation [and who] spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly" should clarify the matter for Mueller.
They were "not authorized to speak publicly"? Mueller as special counsel has only recently been appointed, and even more recently his investigation staffed. Yet already there are leakers on his team? How is that for integrity and honor?
Another thing: When staff is hired from only one end of the political spectrum, it is not unusual for the result of the investigation to reflect that. Are these appointees going to throw their lives and careers away in the service of the truth? History is replete with those who have sold themselves for much less.
Let's go over Mueller's staff. As Glenn Reynolds pointed out, "he has chosen lawyers who records show have contributed substantially to Democratic campaigns. Indeed, two have given the maximum $2,700 donation to Hillary Clinton last year, while another worked for the Clinton Foundation. No one could accept them as impartial towards the man who defeated her."
In addition, hires James Quarles, a former assistant prosecutor during the Watergate investigation; Aaron Zebley; and Jeannie Rhee, once a senior adviser to Attorney General Eric Holder, are all former partners at Mueller's old law firm, WilmerHale. Mueller, who got his appointment as the result of leaks orchestrated by his best friend Comey, has now hired his friends in turn. That's the way it's done in Washington; you have to reward your friends when you have the opportunity.
Another hire, Andrew Weissmann, headed the high-profile investigation into the wrongdoings at Enron and, earlier, investigated organized crime when he worked for the U.S. attorney's office in the Eastern District of New York.
Starting last century, Weissmann, Rhee, and Quarles alone have donated more than $50,000 to Democrats, according to Federal Election Commission records.
Why was it easy for Trump, who until he was elected probably never gave conservative judges a second thought, to find conservative justices for appointment, but Robert Mueller III can find only progressives and donors to Hillary for his staff? Perhaps that is exactly what he was looking for.
With the "Hillary for President" never-ending campaign, which still refuses to acknowledge she actually lost, isn't it naïve to believe that donors to her campaign are going to be open-minded and follow the evidence? Most people would realize how well the Clintons treat their friends when in power and roll the dice for Hillary – that's where the money is.
Just as Chris Rock said money makes a bald spot look like a part, it can also buy quite a bit of loyalty. It is so much easier to self-delude when there might be personal enrichment on the horizon.
While it's always good to "follow the money," this is not about the money. Most of the people involved here are already rich. This is primarily about ideology and the political rewards and appointments that can come with being on the right side.
Even so, say Mueller and his entirely unbiased staff investigate and find nothing. Does anyone believe that will be accepted by the Patriots of Resist? No, there will be immediate shouts of "cover-up" and "scoundrels."
Mueller will no longer be the widely respected man he is today, and he is a widely respected man today because he knows this and he knows how to play the game. The only way for Mueller to escape his investigation unscathed is for him to find something that proves that Donald Trump should not be president.
James Freeman of the Wall Street Journal says of Mueller's investigation: "Robert Mueller is conducting an investigation in search of a premise. But if this is starting to look like the Seinfeld of federal productions – a show about nothing – recent events suggest it could end up being about something worse."
Yeah, it's called a witch hunt.
Prof at elite university calls whites ‘inhuman a**holes,’ says ‘time to end this.’ School’s reaction?
Another DipShit Teaching the young minds of this Country. Another sign of how far the Disgusting left has taken us
The best answer to the question posed in the title would be a .WAV file of chirping crickets. The institution in question is Connecticut’s Trinity College, which academically speaking is a good school: It comes in at number 38 in U.S. News and World Report’s ranking of liberal arts colleges. The faculty member in question is one Johnny Eric Williams, who teaches sociology.
One last question worth asking is whether Johnny Eric Williams will still be teaching at Trinity after the administration reacts to a post he made on his Facebook page three days ago. So far there has been no comment from the university regarding the post, which contained the following (via Campus Reform):
Campus Reform provides the back story for Williams’s angry and obscene rant, explaining that two days earlier, he had shared a link an equally over-the-top post at the website Medium titled “Let Them F*cking Die” [the second word is spelled out in the original]. The reference here is to House Majority Whip Steve Scalise and others, who were wounded last week on a ball field in Alexandria, Va., when a man armed to the teeth suddenly and inexplicably opened fire on them.
The script that liberals have followed since the shooting ignores totally the fact that the gunman was “one of theirs” — James Hodgkinson was a card-carrying Democrat with radical ideas — because it fails to comport with their narrative that all shooters are right-wing lunatics. Instead they have taken refuge in hyperbole — Scalise is the most anti-LGBT lawmaker inside the Beltway — and what they believe to be irony: One of the Capitol Police officers who rushed to his aide is a black lesbian.
In light of all this, Johnny Eric Williams saw fit to vent in print:
Back in the time of Martin Luther King, the goal of civil rights activists was equality for blacks and other oppressed minorities. Now that that dream has been realized and then some, will Trinity College apply equal justice in judging the suitability of Johnny Eric Williams’s continuing tenure on the faculty? You can bet your bottom dollar that if he were white, he would been cleaning out his desk by Monday at the latest.