Thursday, October 23, 2014

The Democratic Campaign Platform: Lie to Win

President Obama “giftwrapped” the truth Monday, when he told Al Sharpton that Democratic candidates are lying when they distance themselves from him.  The Washington Post summed it up:
Obama’s comments not only “suggested the election was indeed something of a referendum on him…but that Democratic candidates are actually on-board with him -- something most of them have made pains to argue is not the case.  Obama's comments are the kind of thing Democrats might privately say to assure donors and the party base, but wouldn't really say in public.”
In other words, straight from the mouth of one liar to another: “Do what you need to do to win.”
Habitual lying -- a proclivity of Obama extensively documented by American Thinker contributor Jack Cashill in his new book, “You Lie!” -- is a disorder that has infected the entire Obama administration, as scandal after scandal festers in the “culture of deception” that pervades the White House.
It’s the culture created, as Andrew McCarthy observed in his column on the Obama administration’s handling of the Ebola outbreak, when “incompetence meets mendacity.”  The vastness of this deceptive culture reaches beyond the Obama administration into the entire Democratic Party, on full display in midterm campaigning across the country.
Take the example of candidate Alison Lundergan Grimes, Senator Mitch McConnell’s opponent on the Kentucky ballot.  After listing multiple examples of Grimes’s lies, Breitbart’s Michael Leahy described her campaign operation as a “culture of deception.”
Grimes has certainly produced plenty of slick commercials in which she promises she is “not Barack Obama.”  Running as another “Great Democrat Rural Hope,” she tells voters she disagrees with Obama on “guns, coal, and the EPA” -- but intrepid undercover reporter James O’Keefe’s hidden camera documented how perfectly her campaign follows Obama’s deceptive playbook.
Caught on tape, several staffers admitted that Grimes is lying about her support of coal, calling it all a “lying game.”  As one prominent campaign donor put it to another of O’Keefe’s cameras, “She’s gonna f*** [the coal industry] as soon as she’s elected. She can’t say it straight up. She’s going to do what she has to do to get elected and then she’s gonna f*** ‘em.”
Sound familiar?
Yes, Americans, you can keep your health insurance and your doctor. 
Yes, Kentuckians, you can keep your coal and your guns.
And yes -- Democrats think that the voters who cling to those lies are stupid.
Democratic candidates also count on the fact that their supporters who do recognize the lies and deceptive strategies are as unprincipled as the candidates themselves.  As McCarthy further observed, it’s as if “the fibs told to escape the latest jam are more admired for craftiness than condemned as breaches of trust.”
It’s even sadder to realize that even after millions of dollars worth of McConnell campaign ads that point out Grimes’s lying, somewhere in the neighborhood of 44% of Kentucky voters still plan to vote for her. Thousands of voters who apparently really are as stupid or as unprincipled as the Democrat campaign thinks they are.
Although some prominent Democrats have blasted the Grimes campaign as being “disorganized,” as a Kentuckian constantly bombarded with commercials, ads, and robo-calls, I can tell you how very Alinsky-ized it appears. Her campaign may appear disorganized, but listening to her speeches, like this one at a “rally,” reveals the community organizer in her. She may not need teleprompters on both sides of her at the podium, but it is obvious how “rehearsed and scripted and pandering” she really is.
In fact, local reporters have complained that Grimes limits “reporters to just a question or two here and there, during which she doesn't stray from what often sound like scripted answers.”
Grimes won’t even admit that she voted for Obama. As reporter Keith Koffler noted:  Sure, it’s a sad commentary on Obama. But it is also, quite simply, one of the most craven performances I have ever seen on the campaign trail.”
“Craven” is the word. And it also describes several other Democratic Senate candidates with the same MO.
After Grimes non-answer, Charles Krauthammer concluded that Kentucky voters should be wondering if they can “trust her to speak straight on anything else.” Chuck Todd observed: “if you can't find a way to stand behind your party's president, you can disagree with him but can't answer that basic question and come across looking ridiculous. I think [Grimes] disqualified herself.”
While Todd’s conclusion appears reasonable, in essence it captures the Democrat dilemma -- candidates can’t answer that basic question without exposing either themselves or the President as liars.
After the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee announced it had pulled its support for Grimes in Kentucky, Keith Koffler speculated on the reasons:
It’s not clear to me if this is because they don’t think she can win – she’s down only by a few points to McConnell – or if it is actually in retaliation for her disloyalty to the president, who has raised large sums for the DSCC.  I hope it’s in retaliation because, certainly, she deserves as a matter of principle to be denied access to money he has raised.
Of course, Koffler assumes that the party still holds some principles -- positive ones, that is.
But really, we should wonder -- will the party that tells lies together, stay together? While the nation gradually loses its trust in Obama, Democrat candidates should (or at least, might) begin losing trust in their leader and the party.
Columnist Walter Hudson, writing about “the number one reason why the left always wins,” noted:  “They don’t care about the means. They don’t care about the process. They only care about the results.”
Apparently, Democrats don’t care about character either.
“Grimes,” observed Koffler, “must assume that having character is not a qualification Kentucky voters are interested in.”
Alison Grimes is simply a prettier version of the politician Barack Obama. A vote for Grimes is a vote for Obama. It’s a vote for every single one of his failed policies.  It’s a vote for Obama’s lies.  It’s a vote for more lying, this time delivered with a southern accent.
Grimes and fellow Democrats can run on their platform of lies, but they can’t hide from the truth.

Read more: http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/10/the_democratic_campaign_platform_lie_to_win.html#ixzz3H1MpLMnk 

Sheriff Babeu: Administration knowingly lied

More Lies From these IDIOTS! Wow How do people around the World respect these Clowns for the Lies they are putting out Constantly!


Thursday on Fox News Channel's "Your World With Neil Cavuto," Pinal Co., AZ Sheriff Paul Babeu said the Obama administration not only "knowingly lied" about releasing criminal illegal immigrants last year but also they will not release the names of those criminals to law enforcement so they can protect the citizens.

Babeu said he sent a letter to DHS Assistant Secretary John Morton over a year ago top get the names of the criminals released in his county and to this point he has received no reply. 
Babeu said, "I need to protect the citizens of my county and God knows where these individuals are. And they have a greater propensity for recidivism, the return to crime, because they're not even from our country. And they have committed some of the most egregious crimes of murder and armed robbery and assault against a cop."

VIDEO: Mark Levin: Obama Will Get His ‘Full Mussolini On’ After the Midterms



Obama Mussolini

Radio talk show great, constitutional scholar, and best-selling author Mark Levin, appearing with “Hannity” on FOX News Tuesday evening, predicted that after the election, Obama would become even more dictatorial with his unconstitutional executive orders, comparing him to Italy’s former fascist dictator, Benito Mussolini. 
When asked by Hannity what Obama would do after the upcoming midterm elections, Levin predicted that he Obama would “get his full Mussolini on,” and will do everything that he can in his final two years to “screw up the country.” 
“I think with Obama, it’s going to get worse. You’re going to see his full Mussolini coming out with his pen and his phone, these executive fiats that are utterly unconstitutional. He’s going to do everything that he can in the last two years of his presidency to further screw up the country, whether it’s the border and amnesty, whether it’s the economy, whether it’s God knows what. He’s been a very divisive, very damaging, very counterproductive president and so has his Party. And that’s why we need to throw Harry Reid out of the United States Senate.” 
Levin blasted both parties, saying that Democrats “need a good swift kick in the ass this election,” and that the country has “gone to hell” under Obama and the Democrats and that “everybody knows it.” 
“None of these Democrats that are running are moderates: they’re all radicals,” he told Sean Hannity. “They all believe in massive centralized government,” he assessed. 

Levin told Hannity that the “Republicans are running a very quiet campaign; they’re not standing up for any principles, very little substance. This is an enormous opportunity to expand the Republican Party, to build it, to create momentum for 2016, and they’re not doing it.” 

Hannity agreed, saying that the Republicans have “been timid and afraid of their own shadows. They haven’t inspired people to go out and vote for them. It’s more, ‘things are so bad,’ that’s why they’re getting the votes.” 


Limbaugh Suggests Voter Fraud May Be Only Reason Dems Stay in Power

This is why I don't like to post leads in polls because I feel the liberal "scumbags" of the party could commit major voter fraud and change things. Now I see this and all the voter fraud links in the past I would believe this!

Rush Limbaugh believes that Democrats aren’t as popular as they might seem, so why they keep holding power struck him as confusing. But in reaction to a report about possible voter fraud in Cook County, Limbaugh suspected that––voter fraud––must be a big reason for them continuing to win.
Limbaugh cited polls, as well as less-than-impressive book sales for Hillary Clinton and Andrew Cuomo‘s recent books, to say Democrats aren’t as popular as the media might build them up to be. Of the left in general, Limbaugh said, “They don’t have any audience on their cable news shows. They’re not these rock star, popular, admirable figures that people run around emulating and wish they were like.”
And to him, for some Democrats to be doing well in their elections so far “doesn’t make any sense.” And while he didn’t directly blame voter fraud in every case for Democrats holding power, Limbaugh did say 1) “that kind of stuff is happening all over the country, I’m convinced of it,” and 2) “I’m really starting to be curious about the degree, the amount of voter fraud taking place out there.”
Listen to the audio below, via The Rush Limbaugh Show:

Obama Claims Executive Privilege Over 15,000 Fast and Furious Docs

These Clowns or Idiots if you will are Hiding their LIES and corruption. I Hope Judicial Watch keeps hitting them hard!

The Obama administration is claiming executive privilege over more than 15,000 documents related to Operation Fast and Furious, including correspondence between Attorney General Eric Holder and his wife, according to records received Wednesday night by the watchdog group Judicial Watch.
Last month, a federal judge ordered the Justice Department to release to Judicial Watch the list of documents, known as a “Vaughn index,” that it is withholding from the public, calling its requests for further delays “unconvincing.”
The 1,307-page Vaughn index lists 15,662 documents related to Operation Fast and Furious that the Obama administration is asserting executive privilege over—the first time that full list and description of the records has been released.
According to Judicial Watch, the withheld documents include communications between top officials at the Justice Department and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms (ATF), as well as with the United States Ambassador to Mexico.
The Obama administration is also asserting executive privilege over nearly 20 emails between Holder and his wife Sharon Malone.
“Obama’s executive privilege claims over these records are a fraud and an abuse of his office,” Judicial Watch president Tom Fitton said in a statement.  “There is no precedent for President Obama’s Nixonian assertion of executive privilege over these ordinary government agency records. Americans will be astonished that Obama asserted executive privilege over Eric Holder’s emails to his wife about Fast and Furious.”
Judicial Watch also says the Justice Department is asserting privilege over publicly available press clips, letters from Congress, and inter-agency communications that would normally be subject to the Freedom of Information Act.
“Few of the records seem to even implicate presidential decision-making and advice that might be subject to President Obama’s broad and unprecedented executive privilege claim,” Judicial Watch said in a press release.
Judicial Watch filed a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit against the Justice Department in September 2012 for documents the department was withholding from Congress related to Operation Fast and Furious, where federal agents allowed thousands of guns to cross the border and fall into the hands of violent drug cartels.
Hundreds of those of those weapons have since turned up at crime scenes, including the 2010 murder of Border Patrol agent Brian Terry and a 2013 shooting in Phoenix, Arizona.
The Republican-led House of Representatives held Holder in contempt in 2012 for what it said was a failure to respond to subpoenas from congressional investigators for more documents on Operation Fast and Furious.
“This list of documents was provided in order to fulfill a procedural step in this case,” DOJ spokesman Brian Fallon said in a statement. “We will make a further submission, related to these same materials, on November 3 in connection to the case brought by the House Oversight Committee.”

EDITORIAL: Green cards on the table

In the last article this P.O.S. said he is going to fix immigration. If he gives any type of amnesty without securing the border He is not fixing amnesty. He is trying to make a one party rule and this Country was not Founded on that principle. We have two parties for checks and balances. This Guy is waiting till after the election to do this and why???  So the Idiot Numbnuts that still like the guy will vote their party. These idiots are Pathetic!

The White House intended to remain silent about its plans for immigration. Revealing a scheme to open the floodgates of amnesty would be disastrous on the eve of the critical midterm elections. But this is the gang that can’t shoot straight.
The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services on Friday threw open the door to as many as 100,000 Haitians, who will now move into the United States without a visa.
Sen. Chuck Grassley, Iowa Republican, rightly and accurately denounced enabling Haitians awaiting a U.S. visa to enter the country and legally apply for work permits as “an irresponsible overreach of the executive branch’s authority.”

That was just the beginning. The immigration agency earlier this month had solicited a printer able to handle a “surge” of 9 million green cards “to support possible future immigration-reform initiative requirements.”
In an ordinary year, about 1 million green cards are issued, and over the life of this contract the company is expected to produce up to 34 million cards, a figure representing an increase of the population of the United States by 10 percent.
The cards do not come with automatic voter registration, but that’s obviously what the scheme portends. President Obama’s promised “executive actions” to bring about this enormous wave of amnesty constitute a transparent and cynical ploy to expand the Democratic voter base, creating a permanent majority.
Republicans running for the House and Senate should demand that Mr. Obama lay his green cards on the table now, before — and not after — the Nov. 4 elections. No other campaign issue carries as much of an impact on the future of the nation.
In economic terms, importing millions of unskilled workers creates competition for the diminishing number of available jobs. Combine a flooded job market with the Democratic proposals for a doubling of the minimum wage to $15 an hour, and millions more American citizens will be without a job.
Those who do have jobs will pay to provide federal freebies, from Obamaphones to Obamacare, to the formerly illegal aliens now with a green card.
As the recent influx of minor children over the southern border demonstrates, word of amnesty on the way travels fast. Handing green cards to those who cheated the system and entered the country illegally creates an incentive to millions more to follow in their path, collecting as many benefits as possible along the way.
It’s a disaster in the making — indeed already here — for public health and national security, straining the welfare state to its limit.
Most Americans want no part of this.
A Gallup survey finds that 74 percent of Americans want the level of immigration to stay where it is, or reduce it. Mr. Obama has no support for his amnesty scheme except from those who want to transform America into a nation that no one would recognize.
Voters can get to work on stopping the transformation on Nov. 4.


The Regime's Brazen Green Card Lie

WH Insists: Don't Read Anything Into Purchase Order for Up to 34M Green Cards

(CNSNews.com) - Reporters tried again on Wednesday to find out if a DHS purchase order for millions of green cards signals the magnitude of President Obama's intention to unilaterally grant legal status to illegal aliens after the midterm election.
The purchase order requests "an estimated 4 million cards annually" and up to 34 million total.
"What we're talking about here is an order from the Department of Homeland Security to a contractor, related to ongoing operations at the Department of Homeland Security. They're responsible for issuing green cards," White House spokesman Josh Earnest told Fox News's Ed Henry.
"I think those who are trying to read into those specific orders about what the president may decide are -- are a little too cleverly trying to divine what the president's ultimate conclusion might be."
Earnest called Henry's question "a relatively clever way to ask about the policy that the president has not yet announced, as it relates to executive actions that he's prepared to take to address the problems in our broken immigration system."
In a presolicitation notice posted at Federal Business Opportunities on Oct. 6, the Department of Homeland Security announced its intention to purchase card stock used by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services to "produce Permanent Resident Cards and Employment Authorization Documentation cards. The requirement is for an estimated 4 million cards annually with the potential to buy as many as 34 million cards total," the notice said."
"I think the report is, they ordered some paper," Earnest said on Wednesday.
Asked if the order was "coincidental," Earnest replied, "I'm saying that there are decisions that are made by lots of agencies, including the ordering of specific colored sheets of paper. Those sorts of decisions are not micro-managed by the White House.
"Don't be absurd with us," a reporter shot back. "That's not just an ordinary colored piece of paper. It is a central...central to what the president has promised in public to do..."
"It's also central to what they're already doing," Earnest said. "You would have to ask the DHS about orders for green- colored paper that they've ordered," he added. "I will tell you that anybody that tries to look at the order -- I mean, this is crazy."
Earnest repeated that DHS is responsible for issuing green cards to "individuals who are seeking to legally enter this country. And what they will do is, they will order -- they will order the card stock...I mean, I -- here's the thing. I am really not trying to be clever. I'm really trying to just be like as really straightforward as I can, which is, the United States -- the -- the White House does not make specific direction to agencies about which (inaudible)."
The reporter noted that no president would want to issue an executive order, then have someone at DHS look up and say, "Oh Christ, we don't have any paper for this."
Earnest said, "The fact of the matter is, there are still decisions to be made about what the policy will entail. And when we're ready to announce that policy, we will announce it. What I would caution you against doing is making assumptions about what will be in those announcements based on the procurement practices of the Department of Homeland Security. OK?"
Four months ago, President Obama announced that he would take "aggressive steps" to "fix as much of our immigration system as I can, on my own, without Congress."
He directed his Homeland Security and Justice Departments to "identify additional actions my administration can take on our own, within my existing legal authorities, to do what Congress refuses to do and fix as much of our immigration system as we can.  If Congress will not do their job, at least we can do ours.  I expect their recommendations before the end of summer and I intend to adopt those recommendations without further delay."
But as summer neared an end, the White House announced that President Obama would delay his executive order until after the mid-term election.
Earlier this month, President Obama insisted that he "meant what I said" when he promised to "act to fix as much of our immigration system as I can on my own...So this is not a question of if, but when."