Sunday, June 24, 2018

WATCH: Maxine Waters comes completely unhinged, calls for public harassment of Trump’s Cabinet

Would love to see people throw eggs at this Nasty Sleazy Leftist Anti American Shitstain

WATCH: Maxine Waters comes completely unhinged, calls for public harassment of Trump’s Cabinet

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) calls for public harassment of Trump's Cabinet in completely unhinged rant. (Image source: YouTube screenshot)

Rep. Maxine Waters (D-Calif.) — the face of the anti-Trump “resistance” — openly called for her supporters to harass and maybe even attack members of President Donald Trump’s administration over the weekend.
Waters’ comments come amid outrage over the Trump administration’s “zero tolerance” illegal immigration policy, which mandates the criminal prosecution of any individual who enters the U.S. illegally.

What did Waters say?

Waters made her comments on Saturday during a toy drive outside of the Wilshire Federal Building in Los Angeles, according to the American Mirror.
“History will record while he tried to step on all of us, we kicked him in his rear and step on him,” Waters screamed. “If you think we’re rallying now, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet!”
“Already, you have members of your Cabinet that are being booed out of restaurants…who have protesters taking up at their house, who say, ‘No peace, no sleep! No peace, no sleep!” Waters continued, referring to Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen’s run-ins with protesters.
She then claimed administration officials’ insistence that their policies are biblical is a farce.
“God is on our side,” she declared. “Let’s stay the course!”
Then the California Democrat appeared to endorse harassment and perhaps even violence against members of Trump’s administration.
“Let’s make sure we show up wherever we have to show up and if you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them, and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere,” she said.
“Mr. President, we will see you every day, every hour of the day, everywhere that we are to let you know you cannot get away with this!” Waters yelled.

As Mediaite noted, Waters later reiterated her comments during an interview on CNN. She said:
I have no sympathy for these people that are in this administration who, you know, know it is wrong what they are doing on so many fronts but they tend to not want to confront this president or even leave…And I want to tell you, for these members of his Cabinet who remain and try to defend him, they are not going to be able to go to a restaurant, they are not going to be able to stop at a gas station, they are not going to be able to shop in a department store. The people are going to turn on them, they are gonna protest, they are gonna absolutely harass them.

Maxine Waters Orders Democrats To Form Mob, "Physically Push Back" Against White House Employees





It’s Like the 1950s All Over Again=> Democrats Kick Undesirable Family Out of Virginia Restaurant


Illegal invaders place children in harm's way

Have the establishment news media ever been so disingenuous?  Has the demagoguery ever been more pronounced? Time Magazine's Photoshopped cover of President Trump glaring down at an innocent child he heartlessly separated encapsulates in a single image the media's deceit and politicization of border security law.
With recent history in mind, the narrative that President Trump is separating children from parents because he is racist and mean-spirited is laughable on its face.  Never mind that detained adults cannot be housed with children as a matter of law.  It's common, but hidden knowledge that President Obama also separated children from their parents at the border when his administration chose to enforce the law.  And if I recall, Mr. Obama's administration repeatedly made the dubious claim that it deported more illegal aliens than the previous administration.
We all know of an everyday occurrence in America.  Thousands of U.S. citizen children are separated from their U.S. citizen parents because their parents broke the law.  More people are locked up in the United States, per capita, than any other country in the world.  Approximately 2.4 million people are housed in prisons and jails across the fruited plain.  "As well as another 22,870 immigration detainees housed in local jails under contract with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)," the Economist noted in 2014.
Of all the incarcerations in the United States, no children are ever housed with adults.
Millions of traumatized, heartbroken, sobbing children have been separated from their parents in America due to no fault of their own.

When a judge sentences an offender parent to prison (and, alas, separates a crying child), no one claims that the judge is racist, heartless, and mean-spirited.  People understand that the judge is just doing his job.
Another arm of the criminal justice system that daily separates U.S. citizen children from U.S. citizen parents is the various Departments of Child Protective Services of the 50 states.
Child Protective Services agents sometimes separate children from their parents arbitrarily and without due process of law.  Oftentimes, the separation is warranted.  In many instances, parents present a real danger to their children.  Sometimes it's questionable.  It happens every day in America.
There is a law that is applied by all 50 states, though its language various from state to state.  In short, it is illegal to contribute to the delinquency of a minor or to act in an intentional or negligent way that renders a minor in need of state protective services.
That is precisely what is happening at our southern border.  Not only are the illegal invaders breaking United States law and trampling U.S. sovereignty, but those who bring children with them are willfully breaking state law.
The illegal invaders, whom the American news media refer to as migrants orimmigrants, are knowingly and intentionally putting children in great danger.  It is morally reprehensible to break the law while exercising supervisory responsibility of an innocent child.  A parent who shoplifts with a baby in a stroller.  A person who drives drunk with children in the car.  A foreigner who illegally trespasses across a sovereign border with a child in tow.  All three examples are really, really bad.  And the last has the added bonus of using a child as a political pawn to garner the sympathies of an irrational political party and its dishonest news media.
The question becomes whether illegal aliens who reject our immigration process and sovereignty and break our laws should be favored over U.S. citizens.
U.S. citizens who break our laws and put children in harm's way do not get passes.  Neither do they get a politicized news media to disingenuously advocate on their behalf with a concerted campaign of deceit and gratuitous emotionalism.
Of course, citizen-wrongdoers are of no value to the radical left for political points and open border demagoguery.


Descriptions of evil and their misuse

The term "Nazi" has lately been transformed from a garden-variety political slur into pointed but wildly inaccurate or completely false description of actions taken by politicians and other government officials.
Since the 1960s, "Nazi" and "fascist" could be thrown around without much fanfare or effect.  It was long understood that it could be used – and overused – as a general synonym for "hateful" or "evil."
In the current clash over immigration policy, however, specific actions are being used in comparison to the Holocaust and the brutal actions of the Third Reich.  This diminishes the reality of the Holocaust and desensitizes the ill informed to the horrors of that period.
If the treatment by Americans of illegal migrants, including children, can be compared to the actions of the Nazis toward Jews and others, we will lose all understanding of evil, and the lessons of the Holocaust will be forgotten.
Separation.  Concentration camps.  Internment.  These terms and others are being thrown around by people who should know better, with little regard for their implications.

A small excerpt from a memoir, Two Sisters: A Journey of Survival Through Auschwitz (Library of the Holocaust, 2016) offers a little context to help to understand the difference.
Livia Szabo Krancberg was from the northern Transylvanian town of Petrova, then considered part of Hungary, the last country in Europe to have its Jewish population deported en masse.  Hundreds of thousands were murdered.
She describes the scene shortly after arriving in Auschwitz:
Someone screamed out an order ... for the women.  Mother, Toby and I found ourselves in a group of single women ranging from about fifteen to maybe sixty five.  We were surrounded by guards instructing us to make a column, five women abreast.  I looked around.  I saw a group of women with children from babies to about fourteen years of age.  Rose [Livia's sister], holding Shullie in her arms, was in that group.  Also in that group I saw pregnant women, sick women and crippled women.  Little did I know that this group together with the male crippled and sick was doomed to be gassed that same day.
But, as luck had it, a German soldier saved Rose's life.  How so?  While Rose unaware of her fate was looking for her mother to whom she was totally attached, I spotted her.  "Rose," I waved.  "Mother, Toby and I are here!"  To get to my group, Rose had to cross a dividing line.  A German soldier saw her attempting to do just that.  He pushed her back to her group.  Rose watched the guard. As she saw him involved in holding the crowd together, she swiftly crossed the line and placed herself on the outside side of our row next to Mother.
Our group was heading toward Dr. Mengele's table to be selected as to who will live and who will die.  Oh!  Uh!  A German guard saw Rose.  He realized she was in the wrong group; she had a child.  He knew something we didn't.  He knew she belonged to the group with children, elderly, sick and crippled[.] ...
He looked at her.  She was young, strong and beautiful, and he made up his mind to save her life  Why?  I could only speculate.  Was she reminding him of his sister, or a friend, or someone he very much liked at one time?  He lined himself up with Rose.  In a soft whispering voice he asked whether or not the woman next to her was her mother.  If so she should give the child to her to carry.  Upon hearing the guard's words, she became annoyed.  She gestured with her hand, as if saying, 'Mind your own business!'  But the guard was determined to continue with his rescue efforts.
About a yard from Dr. Mengele's table, he forced the child out of her hands and put Shullie in my mother's.  Before she became aware of what had happened, she was in front of Dr. Mengele's table.  He looked her up and down...and showed her to the right.  Toby six years my junior, and I, he motioned to the right as well.  My mother, in her sixties, holding Shullie in her arms he motioned to the left to be gassed.
Livia never saw her mother or nephew again.  They had been reduced to ash before nightfall.  Their fate and millions like them and well as those who survived the hell they were subjected to should never be used as political theater.  It is overheated hyperbole masquerading as history.


The bawl of the left

Leftwing protestors are blasting loud taped recordings of bawling children at the residence of Homeland Security secretary Kirstjen Nielsen in Alexandria, Virginia. It's an action that follows from a controversial cover of Time magazine, which ran a picture of a crying child supposedly separated from her mother at the border, which turns out to have been a false claim to support a leftist narrative. What's followed from that now is the cry-blasting from the left. They're out to disturb the peace, as they are inclined to do, to promote their real agenda, which is ending immigration enforcement at U.S. borders entirely. This time, they've really taken it to an embarrassing new level: By trying to bawl their way into getting what they want.
As Alanis Morissette used to sing: How-w-w-w appropriate.
Thing is, the left has gotten absolutely famous for bawling. They're whiners. They're crybabies. They're snowflakes. They get 'triggered' when the wrong pronoun is used. They've used Play Doh therapy as a means of trying to get over the election of President Trump. They still haven't gotten over it. They are the biggest whiners and hypersensitive daisies the world has ever seen.
What's more, they have this toddler streak in all the things they insist on, too, particularly in regard to their idea of 'freedom.' As P.J. O'Rourke observed in his1992 book, 'Give War a Chance': 
They have a more innocent -- not to say toddlerlike -- idea of freedom. Liberals want the freedom to put anything into their mouths, to say bad words and to expose their private parts in art museums.

So leftists go a long way in terms of their identification with toddlers. Now they're trying to leverage actual crying children into their next political victory.
This is disgusting. What's more, it's sort of revelatory of what their fascination with crying is really about: The flip side of bullying. Bullies, recall, always cry when they get called out. Leftists essentially reveal themselves to be bullies in their latest series of stunts that coincide with their cry tactics.
Their bullying is in the doxxing of U.S. immigration enforcers, with Wikileaks publishing their names and addresses as the left encourages the harassment of them. To self-identified D-list actor Peter Fonda, this was just natural stuff until he got called out.
They ran Nielsen out of a Mexican restaurant in Washington, D.C. in a rabid harrassment activity, hoping to change U.S. laws by screaming and bullying.
They also bullied White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders, with the leftist owner of the Red Hen restaurant asking Sanders to leave a restaurant just last night.
Hounding and bullying are the flip side of all these leftists stand for.
And yet there is the crying, crying as a political tactic. Funny how crybaby tactics move so closely in tandem with bullying in the matter of the left.
What we are seeing now are bully tears, something that merits only scorn from the rest of us.]

Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino: The Trump Investigation “Started with Zero Evidence at All” – Trump Was Spied On Illegally!

Former Secret Service Agent Dan Bongino laid out an argument on his podcast that the reason that there is no start date for the Trump – Russia investigation is because there was no crime that backs reasons for spying on Trump.

Bongino started this discussion at the 34 minute mark of his podcast –
Let me throw a ‘what if’ out at you. What if the reason they cannot agree on a date, anyone at this point who was involved in the Spygate scandal on Trump. What if the reason they can’t agree on the date is because nobody really knows the date.
Why do people keep saying, if you listen to yesterday’s show, all things start happening around late spring of 2016. The reason they don’t want to agree on a date is because certain things happened in this investigation. In other words the recruitment of a spy, this guy Halper, to interact with Trump team members to try and entrap them and probe them for information.
Now Joe, the reason they are just up in the air on this is because traditionally the way federal investigations work and I guess….
The reason no one will agree on a date, and I brought this up on Laura Ingraham last night on her FOX show, is because if the date of the investigation is earlier than those things [spying on Trump team], and they can’t point to a tangible piece of evidence that led to this, you have an investigation that started with zero evidence at all. That’s why they keep leaving the date up in the air.
Bongino goes on the explain that if the crooks in the FBI and DOJ and other government agencies started spying on candidate Trump and his team before they were able to point to a reason to spy on these individuals, then the Trump team was spied on because of who they were and not because of a crime.
This is illegal. The federal government can’t just spy on someone. There has to be a crime or some tangible reason to support the spying operation and to date the government cannot supply that reason or date.
As we’ve noted previously, there are text messages from corrupt FBI Investigator Peter Strzok that show that the FBI set up multiple spies into the Trump campaign as early as 2015.

Get the facts, bring justice for the American people and Drain the Swamp!


FBI Agent Sally Moyer Who Texted ‘F*ck Trump’ is Registered Dem – Filtered Evidence From Hillary’s Devices Used in Probe

Earlier this week, Freedom Caucus Chairman Mark Meadows unmasked two of the previously unidentified, anti-Trump, pro-Hillary FBI investigators referred for investigation by the Inspector General.
These FBI attorneys do not work in “counterintelligence” as the FBI previously claimed as an excuse to withhold their names from the public.
The unnamed FBI officials “Agent 1” and “Agent 5” were involved in the FBI Clinton investigation and were also engaged in a romantic relationship just like fellow FBI lovebirds Strzok and Page.
According to Daily Mail at the time of the texts, Moyer was on the ‘filter team’ for the Clinton probe – a small team of government officials that determines whether information obtained by the FBI is considered ‘privileged’ or if it can be used in the investigation.
And she’s a registered Democrat…
No bias at the FBI though…nothing to see here.
Sperry reported: BREAKING: Sally Moyer, aka “Agent 5,” is a registered Democrat. She rooted for Hillary to win & IM’d “f*ck Trump” when she didn’t. As FBI’s Nat’l Security Law Branch chief, Moyer told agents investigating Hillary which evidence from her devices they could use & which they couldnt
The same FBI officials in charge of Hillary’s sham email investigation migrated to the Trump-Russia probe and even to Mueller’s witch hunt.
Mueller’s team of hack lawyers is a who’s who of corrupt and conflicted Obama and Hillary cronies.
There was not one anti-Hillary text message from FBI agents and lawyers in Horowitz’s report.
But there was no bias in the FBI when it came to Hillary’s sham investigation, says Horowitz.

HUGE! Devin Nunes Gives DOJ Til 5 PM Monday to Reveal When the Spying on Trump Campaign Began!

The Department of Justice sent Intel Chairman Devin Nunes a response on Friday night to requests for information from the DOJ and FBI on internal spying on the Trump campaign during the 2016 election, something that is unprecedented in US history.
Chairman Nunes has had it with the stonewalling.
Americans are fed up too.
The DOj and FBI are obviously hiding incriminating evidence.
Here’s the letter from the FBI to Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA):
But, once again, the DOJ and Rod Rosenstein refused to turn over all of the information.
Rep. Devin Nunes sent a new letter to the DOJ on Sunday. Nunes is giving the Rosenstein and the DOJ until Monday at 5 PM to turn over the rest of the documents on the illegal spying on the Trump campaign.

Rep. Nunes wants the DOJ to reveal when the spying on the Trump campaign began.

It is widely believed the spying took place before July 2016 when the DOJ previously said the spying began.

Maria Bartiromo on Sunday Morning Futures mentioned the demands this morning on her weekly show.
Rep. Nunes warned last week “there will be hell to pay” if the documents are not turned over.