Wednesday, April 25, 2018

Federal Judge Orders Government to Continue DACA, Accept New Applicants

So we have a Federal Judge giving orders to continue a UnConstitutional Move  to begin with by Dick-Tater Obama

A federal judge ruled against the Trump administration’s decision to end DACA on Tuesday night.

U.S. District Judge John D. Bates said Tuesday night that the Department of Homeland Security’s decision to end the Obama-era DACA “was unlawful and must be set aside.”
The Trump administration has 90 days to come up with a better argument for ending DACA.
DACA is unconstitutional to begin with; Obama couldn’t even get it through a Dem-controlled Congress.
WaPo reported:
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates on Tuesday called the government’s decision to end the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program “virtually unexplained” and therefore “unlawful.” However, he stayed his ruling for 90 days to give the Department of Homeland Security a chance to provide more solid reasoning for ending the program.
Bates is the third judge to rule against Trump administration attempts to rescind DACA, which provides two-year, renewable work permits and deportation protections for about 690,000 “dreamers,” undocumented immigrants brought to this country as children.
In his decision, Bates said the decision to phase out the program starting in March “was arbitrary and capricious because the Department failed adequately to explain its conclusion that the program was unlawful.”
“Each day that the agency delays is a day that aliens who might otherwise be eligible for initial grants of DACA benefits are exposed to removal because of an unlawful agency action,” Bates wrote.
Judge John D. Bates was first appointed by George W. Bush is 2001.
The lead plaintiffs in Tuesday night’s ruling are the NAACP and Princeton University
The American people voted for Donald Trump to stop this invasion of illegal aliens.
The abuse from unelected official from the bench must stop.

Commie NY Governor Cuomo Issues Cease and Desist Letter to ICE Agents Demanding the Immediate Halt of Their ‘Unconstitutional Actions’

This Socialist Commie DipShit doesn't know the Constitution does he?

The Commie Governor of New York, Andrew Cuomo issued a cease and desist letter to ICE agents Wednesday demanding they immediately stop their ‘reckless and unconstitutional enforcement actions.’

Governor Cuomo is upset ICE agents arrested hundreds of violent criminals last week, including murderers and child rapists so he sent a cease and desist letter to ICE demanding they stop.
Cuomo then stated he will also be issuing an Executive Order prohibiting ICE arrests in state facilities.
Cuomo first tweeted: I am issuing a cease and desist letter to ICE to demand the immediate stop of their reckless and unconstitutional enforcement actions.
Cuomo tweeted: I am also issuing an Executive Order prohibiting ICE arrests in state facilities and prohibiting state agencies from inquiring about immigration status.
Last week, Immigration and Customs Agents were forced to take matters into their own hands after the NYPD refused to follow orders. In a six-day blitz titled “Operation Keep Safe,” ICE agents made 225 arrests, 180 of whom were convicted of numerous crimes.
According to an ICE press release, “more than 80 had been issued a final order of removal and failed to depart the United States, or had been previously removed from the United States and returned illegally.”
New York City’s ‘sanctuary’ status under Mayor Bill DeBlasio has prevented the NYPD from doing more than ‘catching and releasing’ illegals, even those convicted of multiple crimes. Looking at the following list, you might remember the flak that then-canidate Trump took for pointing out the disproportionate number of crimes committed by illegals. One look at those rounded up below and there is a sigh of relief that these 225 people will no longer be in our country…. unfortunately there are millions more that still need rounded up…
Rep Lee Zeldin (R-NY) ripped Andrew Cuomo.
Zeldin responded to Cuomo: “This guy is out of control. King Cuomo actually believes that the law is whatever he says it is. No constitution, legislature or statute will ever take precedence over this man’s political ambitions.”
DHS Spox responded to Cuomo.
Americans were furious and slammed Cuomo:


Why has the Washington Post continually reported as if Trump is guilty of something?

I have seen a lot of pathetic stories from Washington Post, since it has been targeting Trump every day, but this piece by Philip Rucker is one of the most wretched:
"Most people will flip if the Government lets them out of trouble," Trump tweeted over the weekend.  He added: "Sorry, I don't see Michael doing that."
By asserting that the government would not be able to "flip" Cohen, Trump invited a question: If the Russia probe is the "witch hunt" the president says it is – and if he is as innocent as he so often proclaims – what incriminating evidence would Cohen have on Trump that would give him leverage to flip?
It was only the latest instance of the president adopting a posture vis-a-vis his legal troubles that is both combative and defensive – and, perhaps unwittingly, seems to assume guilt.
I've got a few questions for the Washington Post:

Why have you reported as if Trump is guilty of colluding with the Russians for almost eighteen months when there has been absolutely zero evidence that this is true?
Why have the FBI and Justice Department been so slow in producing evidence if there is nothing to hide?
Does the Post think Michael Cohen's office would have been raided if he weren't Trump's attorney?
Why do journalists act as if the raid had nothing to do with Trump?
Why did Obama's justice Department spy on a political opponent based on a garbage dossier funded by Democrats?
Why did Hillary and her aides dump emails and destroy computers and other equipment if they weren't intentionally violating the law?
Why did Obama and Hillary create the fake story of the video if they weren't guilty of gross negligence in Benghazi?

Media launching smear campaign against Trump's physician

CNN and many other news organizations have already tried and convicted a Navy combat doctor, Admiral Ronny Jackson, M.C., USN.  This is really a political hit directed against President Trump.  Essentially the MSM and Democrat enablers waited until the very last minute and dropped a P.R. bomb on their target.
"I told Admiral Jackson just a little while ago, what do you need this for?" Trump said of his conversation with the White House physician.  "This is a vicious group of people, they malign ... what do you need it for?"
In case there was still any doubt about what path Trump wants Jackson to take, the president noted that "I don't want to put a man through a process like this. It's too ugly and too disgusting. ... If I were him, I wouldn't do it."
Having been medically evacuated from combat for tangling with dirty SEA jungle water, I spent almost a year in the care of Navy medical personnel and then DVA physicians.  To this date, I will take USN over DVA.  USN medical teams are the very best.  With that said, I fully respect whatever Admiral Ronny Jackson decides to do with full honor to his service.
So let's level the media playing field with a few questions for honest inquiring reporters as this emerging feeding-frenzy destruction of Admiral Jackson is playing out.

The takeaway is that Trump's lack of concern with vetting, coupled with his desire to surround himself with people he likes, leads to situations like this one with Jackson.  And that's nobody's fault but Trump's.
It has been charged that he was not "vetted," yet he would have had a White House Yankee White Clearance, so how could the raw allegations could be missed over his entire W.H. career?
If the accusations predate his tour as physician to the three presidents, Bush, Obama, and Trump, they would have been adjudicated at the time of awarding a Yankee White Clearance.
Why is this most stringent clearance vetting process in our national security not noted in his defense?  With a Yankee White, did the FBI still miss everything alleged in their Presidential Appointment Schedule (PAS) vetting process?
Did they review the USN Medical I.G. report that sided with Admiral Jackson?  So far, it now looks like a six-year revenge move on a team that lost in a case of workplace conflict.  The American people are fair – heck the media is famous for workplace conflicts.  Is that the new standard?
A person who viewed the report confirmed to Fox News that the watchdog had recommended the Obama administration consider replacing either Jackson or his rival, Dr. Jeffrey Kuhlman – or both. 
President Trump actually gave President Obama a vote of confidence in his elevating Dr. David Shulkin in rank from undersecretary for the Veterans' Health Administration (VHA) to secretary of the Department of Veterans' Affairs (DVA) last year.  Now that Shulkin has been fired, let us all now see how that act of bipartisan comity is going to be repaid with the nomination of Admiral Jackson.
So if reporters can actually ask inappropriate "dumb questions" of President Trump when he is with the president of France, why not ask a polite and important question of former President Obama?  After all, President Obama is one of the most impressive "original sources" of Admiral Jackson's fitness for duty, and he and his family observed his medical skills and behavior and kept him on board.
President Obama, did you find Admiral Jackson medically professional and competent at all times since there was a DON Medical I.G. report in 2012, and then, with that complete, did you make him your personal physician for your entire second term?
Another indicator of a last-minute political hit is this: why wasn't Dr. Jackson's medical judgment attacked when he performed so well in a major W.H. press conference discussing President Trump's fitness for duty?  If the opponents of Admiral Jackson had damning "raw" information, why did it not come out at that time?
The MSM and all opponents unfairly maligning Dr. Jackson should always note that if this entire issue is seen as nothing more than a last-minute political attack, President Trump in his own words is a counter-puncher.
Will the Democrat senators who waited until the last minute to blow up the confirmation process be held responsible for burning through the most precious resource for  a veteran needing help: time?

JUDICIAL WATCH: New Hillary Emails Reveal Classified Documents, Clinton Foundation Pay-to-Play

Judicial Watch strikes again!

On Wednesday, conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch released 281 pages of newly discovered emails found on Hillary Clinton’s private server.
The emails, dated 2010-2013, contain classified information and show more Clinton Foundation pay-to-play with the State Department.
Ten emails contain classified information redacted “in the interest of national defense or foreign policy,” including confidential sources, and concern Israel and the Middle East. Most of the emails include exchanges with former British Prime Minister Tony Blair. The emails show Hillary Clinton conducted classified and sensitive negotiations about the Israel-Arab conflict on her unsecure, non-governmental server.
  • A document labeled “plan” was completely redacted as classified.
  • A November 2012 email chain discusses the “Mid East” and includes then-Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan, Blair as “aclb” and Clinton.
  • Another November 2012 email chain discusses the “Mid East” and includes Sullivan, Clinton’s office manager Claire Coleman, Blair and Clinton.
  • A November 2012 email chain fully redacted is titled “Mid East Peace” and includes Blair, Clinton, Obama’s Special Envoy to the Middle East David Hale as “haledm2@state.gov,” Sullivan and Blair’s Chief of Staff and former Downing Street aide Catherine Rimmer.
  • In an April 2011 email exchange between Blair, Clinton and Sullivan concerning “Israel,” Blair says he “had another long session with BB [Netanyahu].”
  • A May 2011 exchange concerns “Israel” and includes Blair, Clinton and Sullivan.
  • A May 2011 email concerns “Palestinians” and includes Blair, Clinton and Sullivan. Blair says, “I’ve also sent you a paper.”
  • A June 2011 email regarding “Israel” includes Blair, Sullivan and Clinton. Blair says, “Saw Israeli PM. Put the concept of a Q statement. He was receptive. Palestinians interested too. I know there are discussions also you guys are having. And the French initiative….”
  • In a July 2011 email – with several national security redactions – written by Blair to Clinton and Sullivan, Blair says, “I saw BB….. Molcho [chief negotiator in the Israeli negotiating team with the Palestinians] will speak to David Hale. I can see Cameron and Sarkozy with David…. I saw Egyptians….”
  • A September 2010 email exchange is titled “Info for you,” and includes Sullivan, Blair and Clinton. Blair writes that he just spent three hours with Netanyahu, and Sullivan, using his Sprint BlackBerry, he writes “We have pitched this to [redacted].”
Huma Abedin is in many of these emails assisting the Clintons with their influence peddling:
Many of the emails involve Abedin, who joined the State Department as deputy chief of staff in 2009. From June 2012-February 2013, she was granted status as a “special government employee,” allowing her to work as a consultant to clients like Teneo and served as a paid consultant to the Clinton Foundation.
Several of the emails demonstrate the commingling of Clinton State Department and Clinton family foundation business:
  • In a November 2010 email with subject line, “How do I get through to Bill Clinton,” Rafael Anchia, a lawyer with Haynes Boone, asks Clinton campaign official Ed Meier if he could get to the “gatekeepers” to get Bill Clinton to give a speech in Spain, noting that “a large bank is willing to pay for it.”
Bill Clinton was also caught conducting State Department and Clinton Foundation work simultaneously:
The Clinton Foundation work in Malawi involved a Clinton Foundation owned “for-profit agribusinesses including Tukula Farming Company which operates 7200 acres of commercial farms” in the impoverished country.
Other emails show that Bill Clinton appears to conduct State Department and Clinton Foundation business simultaneously:
  • In a September 2012 email with subject line “Burma,” Desai briefs Jake Sullivan on Bill Clinton’s discussions in Burma. Desai reports, in part: “WJC mentioned work of CF [Clinton Foundation] and offered to help in any way. TS [Than Shwe, president of Burma] said he already had asked HRC about WJC foundation and wanted to invite WJC foundation to work in myanmar in collaboration with gov agencies and other ngos … TS invited WJC to open offices in Rangoon and Mandelay.” That same day, Abedin writes Desai (cc’s Mills, Sullivan, Fuchs and three other persons whose email address are redacted) with subject line “Re: He had v good meeting with Libya and Burma:” “hrc looking forward to hearing about Burma. We meet at 545. I believe you have downloaded to jake?”
  • In a September 2012 email with subject line “Columbia / President Santos,” Desai and Toiv discuss a request by Colombian president, Manuel Santos, that Bill Clinton say some positive words about Santos’ initiative reaching out to the FARC terrorist group. Santos provided the Clinton Foundation with suggested language. Toiv said that she would “check” and also mentioned that she was working on a “visa issue.”
President of Judicial Watch Tom Fitton had this to say about the new Hillary emails showing once again the Clintons are above the law:
“It is shameful that Hillary Clinton attempted to delete or hide classified information and that Obama appointees James Comey and Loretta Lynch refused to prosecute her. It is clear that the Clintons were using the State Department to run an extensive influence peddling scheme. Americans should be concerned that while untold resources are devoted to the abusive Mueller special counsel investigation of President Trump, this Justice Department seems uninterested in prosecuting the Clintons.”
The Clintons both need to be prosecuted for their many pay-to-play schemes involving their foundation.
President Trump, when we chanted “Lock her up!” we meant it.
You can support Judicial Watch by clicking here.