Wednesday, July 4, 2012

New York Democrat Rangel Accused of Suppressing Hispanic Vote

I have no respect for Cr*p like this!


Rep. Charlie Rangel (D-NY) last year railed against voter identification laws, saying such laws were the “Ku Klux Klan without the hoods.” He said such laws are tactics used by Republicans to suppress voters.

And now, in a rich instance of irony and hypocrisy, Rangel has been accused of suppressing Hispanic voters to ensure his reelection, according to the New York Post.
A Dominican American organization, along with New York state Senator Adriano Espaillat, called the Department of Justice to “investigate whether access to the ballot was denied or suppressed for Latino/Dominican voters in the Democratic Primary for the 13th Congressional District.” Additionally, the Dominican American National Roundtable and Espaillat claimed that “many Hispanics in the upper Manhattan/Bronx district were told their names were not on voting rolls and that they were not offered interpreters" according to the Post. Senator Adriano Espaillat is trying to unseat Rangel and currently trails Rangel by roughly 800 votes in their district primary with ballots still yet to be counted.
Espaillat, according to the Post, will head to the New York state Supreme Court “to demand his campaign and the press be granted the right to monitor the final days of counting ballots" to ensure Rangel’s campaign does not engage in any more shenanigans.
When he was falsely accusing Republicans of voter suppression, it seems as if Rangel thought those suppression tactics could come in handy to preserve his power. This is yet another case of Democrats falsely hating in Republicans what they hate about themselves.
The hypocrisy on the left regarding voting issues and laws knows no end.

Krauthammer-this-is-the-third-summer-of-recover-in-a-row-that-isnt-recovering-three-strikes-and-youre-out/

Well Said!

The manufacturing sector has stopped hiring and Krauthammer says that blaming China and Europe is par for the course with Obama who blames everything else except his own policies. Krauthammer explains that Obama gave us the “largest stimulus in galactic history” which did nothing to help the economy recover and now with three summers of recovery in a row that aren’t summers of recovery, Krauthammer says “three strikes and you’re out”:


http://www.therightscoop.com/krauthammer-this-is-the-third-summer-of-recover-in-a-row-that-isnt-recovering-three-strikes-and-youre-out/

Obama to FactCheck.org: Drop dead

Note: This story is a followup om Obama accusing Romney of outsourcing!

He is caught in lies and won't admit it!  Some good comments on sight!


The Obama campaign accuses Mitt Romney in new campaign ad of being a “pioneer in outsourcing,” repeating a charge that the Romney campaign has strenuously contested over the past week.
The ad refers back to a June Washington Post story that showed Bain Capital invested in firms that created jobs overseas. The Romney campaign demanded a retraction of the story, to no avail, and more recently pointed to a FactCheck.org analysis questioning the “outsourcing” charge.
The Obama campaign has dismissed the FactCheck.org assessment as inaccurate and penned a letter to the truth-squadding website disputing its conclusions. And its newest commercial re-ups the attack on Romney’s business record.
“What a president believes matters,” the ad begins. “Mitt Romney’s companies were pioneers in outsourcing U.S. jobs to low-wage countries. He supports tax breaks for companies that ship jobs overseas.”
“President Obama believes in insourcing. He fought to save the U.S. auto industry and favors tax cuts for companies that bring jobs home. Outsourcing versus insourcing. It matters.”
The whole FactCheck.org/Politifact/Glenn Kessler approach to covering the campaign has its uses, but one of the limitations is that it often blurs the difference between standard-issue political rhetoric and brazen, obvious distortion of the facts. Right now, the Obama campaign is casting undisputed facts of Romney’s records (Bain assets created jobs overseas and also cut jobs in the U.S.) in a very negative light (it created foreign jobs at the cost of the U.S. economy.) Romney’s response so far has been to try and discredit the whole line of attack as false and “vicious,” without really getting into the weeds of what it means to lead a major financial firm with a complex web of foreign entanglements.

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/07/obama-to-factcheckorg-drop-dead-127932.html

Tuesday, July 3, 2012

Exclusive - The Vetting - Obama Praised Private Equity When He Needed Cash

This Idiot has the nerve to criticize Romney?? Why do people like this guy? He talks against something while doing it himself!


President Barack Obama has attacked Gov. Mitt Romney's record in the private equity industry as CEO of Bain Capital. But ten years ago, as he struggled to raise funds for his long-shot U.S. Senate campaign, then-State Senator Obama decided to embrace the private equity industry and its wealthy Chicago political donors. At one point, Obama even sponsored a resolution in the Illinois Senate calling calling private equity firms like Bain "the best opportunity for long-term economic vitality" and for "the creation of jobs."

Obama's campaign ads dismissively compare Romney's work at Bain to that of a "vampire" draining jobs and money from vulnerable companies and workers. After pushback from a handful of pro-free market Democrats in late May, the President himself publicly defended his campaign's attacks on private equity firms like Bain.
But records from Obama's time as a state senator in Illinois, along with recollections of those who worked with him, present a very different stance. They indicate that Obama worked hard to position himself as a strong supporter of the venture capital industry. Obama attended industry social functions and used his position in the state senate to propose bills consistent with the legislative goals of the venture capital industry in the state.
"The Barack Obama I knew in Springfield was very pro-private equity, private capital, and high technology" Republican State Senator Kirk Dillard, who served with Obama in the Illinois State Senate, said in a telephone interview with Breitbart News about Obama's record last week. "Mr. Obama clearly had many friends in the private equity business when he was a legislator," Dillard added.
Maura O'Hara, the Executive Director of the Illinois Venture Capitalist Association, concurred with Dillard's assessment: "When he was in the State Senate I would describe him as a supporter of our industry." She recalls meeting Obama in 2002 at the IVCA's annual award dinner. That year, the IVCA's lifetime achievement award for "service to the private equity/venture capital community" was given to Jack Levin of Kirkland & EllisLaw Firm. State Senator Obama was asked to deliver the award because both he and Mr. Levin had attended Harvard Law School, albeit several decades apart. A photo from the event shows Obama grinning as he stands with his arm around Mr. Levin. Both men hold the award up between them.
In 2000, Obama had run as a reformer against incumbent U.S. Representative Bobby Rush (D-IL)--and lost by a wide margin. A few years later, when he began contemplating a run for the U.S. Senate under the tutelage of political consultant David Axelrod, Obama faced a rich primary opponent from the financial world in Blair Hull, and a daunting fundraising task. And so he began to court the wealthy elite himself--a tactical shift that the far-left Obama worried might compromise him. As Obama recalled in his second memoir, The Audacity of Hope:
I worry that there was also another change at work. Increasingly I found myself spending time with people of means--law firm partners and investment bankers, hedge fund managers and venture capitalists...And although my own worldview and theirs corresponded in many ways--I had gone to the same schools, after all, had read the same books, and worried about my kids in many of the same ways--I found myself avoiding certain topics during conversations with them, papering over possible differences, anticipating their expectations. (136-7)
Obama's effort to show support for private equity went beyond socializing. Between 2001 and 2003, State Senator Obama introduced two bills and one resolution designed to boost the private equity business in Illinois. The first bill, introduced by Obama in early 2001, created a tax credit of up to 20 percent for anyone who invested in a "qualified venture capital fund in Illinois." The bill was never adopted by the full Senate.
The following year, Obama introduced a bill titled the "Venture Investment Fund-Repeal." The bill itself is somewhat cryptic, but its purpose was to repeal the "Illinois Venture Investment Fund." (Ironically, this was a public venture capital fund similar to the Department of Energy program under Obama that funded Solyndra, the failed solar panel company which has dogged Obama's campaign for nearly a year.) At the time Obama introduced the bill, the Illinois Venture Capital Association had issued a legislative position paperwhich made four recommendations. Point one was the elimination ofpublic venture capital managed by bureaucrats rather than professionals. According to the position paper, "The role of Illinois' government is to create a positive investment and entrepreneurial environment, but not to attempt to manage these funds [emphasis added]." The IVCA recommended investing the public money with private equity funds instead (i.e. with its members). Obama's attempt to repeal the public venture funds died in committee, though the fund was eliminated in a consolidation move by the Illinois General Assembly about a year later.
In March 2003, Obama introduced a State Senate Resolution to set up a "Private Equity Task Force." The language of the resolution can fairly be described as offering a glowing assessment of the importance of private equity and is starkly at odds with the Obama campaigns recent attacks on Bain Capital:
WHEREAS, Private equity is a vital aspect of the Illinois economy providing needed private capital to early and late stage companies in various industries, including but not limited to: retail, restaurant, manufacturing, biotechnology, pharmaceutical, medical devices, homeland security, software, wireless communications, transportation, and agriculture; and
WHEREAS, The development of the private equity sector of the Illinois economy offers the best opportunity for long-term economic vitality, for the expansion of jobs, for the improvement of productivity and a quality standard of living, and for providing the greatest number of citizens with genuine opportunity;
Compare the last paragraph with Obama's May defense of attacks on Bain Capital, in which he said: "My view of private equity is that it is set up to maximize profits, and that’s a healthy part of the free market, [but]...that’s not always going to be good for businesses or communities or workers."
Of course, not every investment is going to work out, but Obama's 2002 resolution specifically stated that private equity is "the best opportunity for long-term economic vitality...and for providing the greatest number of citizens with genuine opportunity." In other words, it is the best thing for communities and workers.
The message that Obama's prospective campaign donors received was that Obama was no longer positioning himself as the political reformer who would shake up Chicago and Washington--and that there was little daylight in between his own attitude towards private equity and the likely approach of rival Blair Hull.
It not certain that Obama wrote the task force resolution himself. People familiar with the legislative process in Illinois say that such a resolution would normally by written by a senator or his/her staff. But when asked about the tone of the resolution, those who served with Obama had little doubt it sounded like something he might have said at the time. Retired State Senator Dave Sullivan said, "This Senate resolution is the Barack that I know." Senator Dillard, another co-sponsor of the resolution, was equally firm: "My memory is that Senator Obama was a champion of private equity and his creation of a Senate Resolution to create a task force proves it."
When the Task Force resolution was adopted on May 30, 2003, Obama made a brief speech [pdf, page 161] in which he indicated that he had put it forward on behalf of "various persons in the industry":
This bill forms a Private Equity Task Force. As many of you know, venture capital and private equity is one of the key mechanisms by which we finance new businesses in the State of Illinois. For a variety of reasons, Illinois has been lagging behind some of our competitor states in the formation of venture capital and its deployment in terms of seeding and funding new companies. This is an issue which has peaked [sic] the interest of various persons in the industry and so they have asked that we form this Private Equity Task Force to examine these issues.
Obama's attempt to court private equity in the early 2000s was such that several people who knew him at the time believe he is still, at heart, a fan. "In my mind, he still believes in the industry," Maura O'Hara of the IVCA said. Others who worked for the Obama campaign in 2008, and who did not want to be quoted on the record agreed with her assessment. Republicans who knew him were less circumspect about the reasons for his current campaign rhetoric. "The President has private equity amnesia from his days as a University of Chicago professor, legislator, and he and the First Lady's days working at the prestigious Sidley Austin Law Firm," said Dillard. Former senator Sullivan offered a curt explanation for Obama's switch in tone: "I imagine it polls well."
A story published Saturday by the New York Times notes that "Obama commercials painting [Romney] as a ruthless executive who pursued profits at the expense of jobs are starting to make an impact on some undecided voters." The mainstream media has coordinated its attacks with the Obama campaign, though many of those attacks, including a Washington Post investigation into outsourcing at Bain, have been debunked.
Given Obama's record in Illinois, it is fair to ask when his own effusive admiration for private equity equity flip-flopped into his current disdain for "vampire" capitalism. When did he stop believing that private equity was the best chance for creating economic vitality, jobs, and genuine opportunity? And did he ever, in fact, believe it?

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/02/Barack-Obama-Champion-of-Private-Equity

Obama-campaign-rejects-factcheck-org-report-defending-romney/

President Barack Obama’s campaign staffers are pushing back against the FactCheck.org site after it concluded June 29 that Gov. Mitt Romney had not exported any U.S. jobs before he left Bain Capital in 1999 to run the Winter Olympics.
“The statement that Gov. Romney ‘left’ Bain in February 1999 — a statement central to your fact-check —- is not accurate,” said Stephanie Cutter, Obama’s deputy campaign manager, in a letter released late Sunday night.
“Romney took an informal leave of absence but remained in full legal control of Bain… at a minimum, we ask that a copy of this letter be posted prominently along with your Outsource overreach report, enabling the readers you serve to drawn their own conclusions,” she wrote.
The issue is important to the Obama campaign, which is using TV attack-ads to reduce Romney’s potential support among working class swing voters by portraying him as a heartless, job-cutting, factory-closing, offshoring and outsourcing corporate predator.
That portrayal is critical for Obama as he attempts to overcome a strong pro-Romney turnout by blue-collar and middle-class voters.
Romney’s team says his business experience as a successful investor at Bain Capital will help him reanimate the nation’s stalled economy and reduce record unemployment levels.
Romney’s work at Bain helped create profits for investors and 100,000 new jobs at numerous successful companies, including Staples, the office-supply firm, and Steel Dynamics, a high-tech steelmaker, say Romney’s advocates.
The Obama letter was prompted by Factcheck’s June 29 report slamming Obama’s TV-ads for portraying Romney as a job-exporter.
“One [Obama] TV ad, called ‘Come and Go,’ claims that Romney ‘shipped jobs to China and Mexico,’” said the Factcheck report.
But “the claims in the [Obama] ads are untrue, and others are thinly supported,” said Factcheck, which is a liberal-leaning site established by the Annenberg Public Policy Center.
“After reviewing numerous corporate filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, contemporary news accounts, company histories and press releases, and the evidence offered by both the Obama and Romney campaigns, we found no evidence to support the claim that Romney — while he was still running Bain Capital — shipped American jobs overseas,” said the report.
A third company, Holson Burnes, did have some work in China, but “we don’t know whether the company’s outsourcing to China increased under Bain or decreased and, more important, we don’t know if that outsourcing came at the expense of U.S. jobs,” said Factcheck.
“The Obama campaign doesn’t know, either,” it added.
Factcheck’s claims are useful to the Romney campaign, which can cite them in TV-ads designed to counter Obama’s negative ads.
The Obama team’s June 1 letter claims that Romney did not give up his legal ownership, nor his oversight of Bain, while he was reorganizing the 2002 Salt Lake City Winter Olympics.
The continued legal ownership in Bain implicates him in at least two examples where Bain-owned electronics firms moved work and jobs to lower-cost facilities in Mexico in June 2000 and June 2001, said the letter.
However, the letter does not provide any examples of Romney directing any business decisions at Bain after he departed for the Olympics.
In fact, the campaign’s letter included a 2007 description from the Washington Post that suggested Romney’s departure for the Olympics was so rapid that it took two years to arrange his formal legal separation from the successful investment firm. “R. Bradford Malt, one of Bain’s lawyers, who now manages Romney’s personal finances, said Romney took a leave of absence [for the Olympics], “partly because of the speed it all happened and partly because it was a limited gig,” according to the Post.
Romney formally quit management of the firm in 2001, prior to his successful campaign for Massachusetts governor in 2003.
The Obama campaign’s pressure on Factcheck comes shortly after the White House and its progressive allies apparently persuaded Chief Justice John Roberts to drop his initial judgement that the far-reaching Obamacare law violated the Constitution’s limits on government power.
According to a July 1 report by CBS, two court sources said Roberts changed his position amid pressure from progressives in the legal sector and in the media. The progressives claimed rejection of the Obamacare law would damage the court’s standing.
The social and political pressure stemmed from Obama’s insistence that the federal government has the authority to make people buy health insurance.
On June 28, Roberts backed that claim. In his majority opinion upholding Obamacare, he announced that the federal government has the authority to tax people who refuse to buy health insurance.


Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/02/obama-campaign-rejects-factcheck-org-report-defending-romney/#ixzz1zbpSLSJJ

Healthcare Spending Must Fall Sharply Under Supreme Court Ruling

We now know that a mandate is a tax, but that means nothing to those needing health care. The question now is how long the system can last after the Supreme Court’s ruling moved health care spending to the Ponzi scheme list.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that minimum insurance coverage will cost $12,000 or more for a family choosing the least expensive option. Instead of spending that much, the family could just pay the tax of $2,085. Those making more than $104,250 would pay a penalty of 2 percent of their income. Unless a family earns more than $600,000 a year, the tax is less expensive.

With the best economic decision being to pay the tax, there will be less money available to fund health care. The tax could generate as little as $250 billion a year if every household opts out of insurance and makes the economically rational decision to pay the tax.

Last year, annual health care spending topped $2.6 trillion, about $8,400 for every man, woman and child in the country. Assuming Medicare is self-funding its $600 billion in spending, an incorrect but simplifying assumption, the shortfall the system now faces could be as much as $1.75 trillion.

In effect, the Supreme Court ruled that health care spending will be paid for by a tax or voluntary contributions. Some families will choose the voluntary payments but a majority seem likely to take the low-cost tax alternative. Unless the government can finance an additional $1.75 trillion in deficits, care must be rationed or the quality of care must decrease.

With the Supreme Court ruling, health care joins Social Security and Bernie Madoff on the list of multi-billion-dollar Ponzi schemes doomed to failure.


Read more on Newsmax.com: Healthcare Spending Must Fall Sharply Under Supreme Court Ruling
Important: Do You Support Pres. Obama's Re-Election? Vote Here Now!

Recession Imminent? U.S. Manufacturing Plunges

Note:   Interesting number facts!

The Wall Street Journal reports today that, for the first time in three years, U.S. manufacturing has plunged to an index of 49.7 in June after sitting at 53.5 in May.

An index below 50 indicates the manufacturing sector is not only slowing but contracting.
At the American Enterprise Institute, James Pethokoukis wonders if the American economy isn't once again in recession after three years of a shaky economic expansion:
But these numbers are just the latest in a long string of worrisome reports including rising initial unemployment claims, slowing job growth, falling consumer confidence, and declining durable goods orders. Oh, and the rest of the global economy is slowing, too.
RDQ Economics reports that this is the largest manufacturing decline since 9/11 and the second largest since the worst of the Carter Recession in 1980.
This coming Friday, jobs numbers for the month of June will be released, and early signs do not look promising. On Thursday, we learned that the GDP had plunged from 3.0% in the previous quarter to 1.9%. Initial unemployment claims have also creeped back towards the dreaded 400,000 mark. 386,000 last week, 392,000 the week prior.
But there is even worse news for the economy…
The upholding of ObamaCare by our Supreme Court means that America's second-to-the-last chance to kill off this extraordinary drag on our economy resulted in a big miss last week. Our last chance is this November. Job creators understand this and, up till now, have felt uncertain about adding new employees. Now they’re absolutely certain that new hires are a bad idea given the burdensome regulations, costs, taxes, and fines headed their way regardless -- but even more so now with each new hire.
New hires can not only put job creators in a new cycle of beauracratic pain, but God only knows what nasty surprises await in the 2600 page monstrosity ACA, which is now the law of the land.

Watch: Axelrod Can’t Believe His Ears as He Learns Obama Got on 2008 Ballot With Election Fraud, Resulting in Criminal Convictions of Multiple Dems

Gateway Pundit hit it out of the park the last few days on reporting news you dont hear on the Garbage media Election meddling does not happ...