header

header

Tuesday, March 6, 2012

The Vetting, Part I: Barack's Love Song To Alinsky

Prior to his passing, Andrew Breitbart said that the mission of the Breitbart empire was to exemplify the free and fearless press that our Constitution protects--but which, increasingly, the mainstream media denies us.

“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” – “Who guards the guardians?” Andrew saw himself in that role—as a guardian protecting Americans from the left’s “objective” loyal scribes.
Andrew wanted to do what the mainstream media would not. First and foremost: Andrew pledged to vet President Barack H. Obama.

Andrew did not want to re-litigate the 2008 election. Nor did he want to let Republicans off the hook. Instead, he wanted to show that the media had failed in its most basic duty: to uncover the truth, and hold those in power accountable, regardless of party.

From today through Election Day, November 6, 2012, we will vet this president--and his rivals.

We begin with a column Andrew wrote last week in preparation for today’s Big relaunch--a story that should swing the first hammer against the glass wall the mainstream media has built around Barack Obama.

***

In The Audacity of Hope, Barack Obama claims that he worried after 9/11 that his name, so similar to that of Osama bin Laden, might harm his political career.

But Obama was not always so worried about misspellings and radical resemblances. He may even have cultivated them as he cast himself as Chicago’s radical champion.

In 1998, a small Chicago theater company staged a play titled The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, dedicated to the life and politics of the radical community organizer whose methods Obama had practiced and taught on Chicago’s South Side.

Obama was not only in the audience, but also took the stage after one performance, participating in a panel discussion that was advertised in the poster for the play.

Recently, veteran Chicago journalist Michael Miner mocked emerging conservative curiosity about the play, along with enduring suspicions about the links between Alinsky and Obama. Writing in the Chicago Reader, Miner described the poster:
Let's take a look at this poster.
It's red—and that right there, like the darkening water that swirls down Janet Leigh's drain [in Psycho’s famous shower scene], is plenty suggestive. It touts a play called The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, Alinsky being the notorious community organizer from Chicago who wrote books with titles like Reveille for Radicals and Rules for Radicals. On it, fists are raised—meaning insurrection is in the air.
And down at the very bottom, crawling across the poster in small print, it mentions the panel discussions that will follow the Sunday performances. The panelists are that era's usual "progressive" suspects: Leon Despres, Monsignor Jack Egan, Studs Terkel . . .
And state senator Barack Obama.
Miner obscured the truth. His article only reveals only a small portion of the poster. Here’s the whole poster:


AlinskyPosterFullRez
And here’s the press release:
Press Release

So, what’s in the play? It truly is a love song to Alinsky. In the first few minutes of the play, Alinsky plays Moses – yes, the Biblical Moses – talking to God. The play glorifies Alinsky stealing food from restaurants and organizing others to do the same, explaining, “I saw it as a practical use of social ecology: you had members of the intellectual community, the hope of the future, eating regularly for six months, staying alive till they could make their contributions to society.”

In an introspective moment, Alinsky rips America: “My country … ‘tis of whatthehell / And justice up a tree … How much can you sell / What’s in it for me.” He grins about manipulating the Christian community to back his programs. He talks in glowing terms about engaging in Chicago politics with former Mayor Kelly. He rips the McCarthy committee, mocking, “Everyone was there, when you think back – Cotton Mather, Hester Prynn, Anne Hutchinson, Tom Paine, Tom Jefferson … Brandeis, Holmes … Gene Debs and the socialists … Huey Long … Imperial Wizards of all stripes … Father Coughlin and his money machine … Daffy Duck, Elmer Fudd … and a kicking chorus of sterilized reactionaries singing O Come, All Ye Faithful …”

And Alinsky talks about being the first occupier – shutting down the O’Hare Airport by occupying all the toilet stalls, using chewing gum to “tie up the city, stop all traffic, and the shopping, in the Loop, and let everyone at City Hall know attention must be paid, and maybe we should talk about it.” As Alinsky says, “Students of the world, unite! You have nothing to lose but your juicy fruit.”

The play finishes with Alinsky announcing he’d rather go to Hell than Heaven. Why? “More comfortable there. You see, all my life I’ve been with the Have-Nots: here you’re a Have-Not if you’re short of money, there you’re a Have-Not if you’re short of virtue. I’d be asking more questions, organizing them. They’re my kind of people – Hell would be Heaven for me.”

That’s The Love Song of Saul Alinsky. It’s radical leftist stuff, and it revels in its radical leftism.

And that’s Barack Obama, our president, on the poster.

This is who Barack Obama was. This was before Barack Obama ran for Congress in 2000—challenging former Black Panther Bobby L. Rush from the left in a daring but unsuccessful bid.

This was also the period just before Barack Obama served with Bill Ayers, from 1999 through 2002 on the board of the Woods Foundation. They gave capital to support the Midwest Academy, a leftist training institute steeped in the doctrines of -- you guessed it! -- Saul Alinsky, and whose alumni now dominate the Obama administration and its top political allies inside and out of Congress.

Stanley Kurtz, author of Radical-in-Chief
, described the Midwest Academy as a "crypto-socialist organization.” Yet almost no one has heard of Midwest Academy, because the media does not want you to know that the president is a radical's radical whose presidency itself is a love song to a socialist "community organizer."

The reason Newt Gingrich surged in the Republican primary contest in January is that he was attempting to do the press's job by finding out who the current occupant of the White House actually is. Millions also want to know, but the mainstream media is clearly not planning to vet the President anytime soon. Quite the opposite.

For example, Miner tries to turn Obama’s appearance on the Alinsky panel into a plus for the president:
Obama was on the panel that talked about Alinsky the last Sunday of the play's run at the Blue Rider Theatre in Pilsen. Neither Pam Dickler, who directed the Terrapin Theatre production, nor Gary Houston, who played Alinsky, can remember a word Obama said. But he impressed them. "You never would have known he was a politician," says Dickler. "He never said anything at all about himself. He came alone, watched the play, and during the panel discussion was entirely on point and brilliant. That evening I called my father, who's a political junkie, and told him to watch out for this man, he's going places." Houston was just as taken by Obama—though he remembers him arriving in a group.
But is it a good thing to impress the sort of people who show up to laud The Love Song of Saul Alinsky? Here are the other members of the Obama panel:

Leon Despres: Despres knew Saul Alinsky for nearly 50 years, and together they established the modern concept of “community organizing.” Despres worked with secret Communist and Soviet spy Lee Pressman to support strikers at Republic Steel in Chicago in 1937; the strike ended in tragedy when 14 rioting strikers were killed and many wounded in a hail of police bullets. Despres worked with another Communist Party front, the Chicago Civil Liberties Committee, but eventually left because of the “Stalinism” of its leaders.

Also in 1937, Despres and his wife delivered a suitcase of “clothing” to Leon Trotsky, then hiding out from Stalin’s assassins in Mexico City. Despres and his wife not only met with the exiled Russian Communist, but Despres’s wife sat for a portrait with Trotsky pal and Marxist muralist Diego Rivera while Leon took Rivera’s wife Frida Kahlo to the movies.

Quentin Young: From 1970 until at least 1992, Quentin Young was active in the Communist Party front organization, the Chicago Committee to Defend the Bill of Rights – a group dedicated to outlawing government surveillance of radical organizations. He was also a member of the Young Communist League. Young, a confidante and physician to Barack Obama, is credited with having heavily influenced the President’s views on healthcare policy.
Timuel Black: An icon of the Chicago left, Black was originally denied officer training because military intelligence claimed he had secretly joined the Communist Party. Black also worked closely with the Socialist Party in the 1950s, becoming president of the local chapter of the Negro American Labor Council, a organization founded by Socialist Party leader A. Phillip Randolph.

In the early ‘60s Black was a leader of the Hyde Park Community Peace Center, where he worked alongside former radical Trotskyist Sydney Lens and the aforementioned Communist Dr. Quentin Young. Black served as a contributing editor to the Hyde Park/Kenwood Voices, a newspaper run by Communist Party member David S. Canter. By 1970, Timuel Black was serving on the advisory council of the Communist Party controlled Chicago Committee to Defend the Bill of Rights.

Timuel Black says he has been friends with domestic terrorists William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, “going back to 1968, since long before I knew Barack.” In April 2002, Black, Dohrn and Democratic Socialists of America member Richard Rorty spoke together on a panel entitled “Intellectuals: Who Needs Them?” The panel was the first of two in a public gathering jointly sponsored by The Center for Public Intellectuals and the University of Illinois, Chicago. Bill Ayers and Barack Obama spoke together on in the second panel at that gathering. Communist academic Harold Rogers chaired Timuel Black’s unsuccessful campaign for Illinois State Representative.

Studs Terkel: A sponsor of the Scientific and Cultural Conference for World Peace in 1949, which was arranged by a Communist Party USA front organization known as the National Council of the Arts, Sciences, and Professions.

Roberta Lynch: A leading member of Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) and a leader of the radical Marxist New American Movement (NAM).

Are we expected to believe that “Baraka Obama” was a countervailing voice of reason on a panel of radicals?

The reason that Obama's Alinskyite past, and his many appearances in political photography and video from the 1990s, are conspicuously missing from the national dialogue is that State Senator Barack Obama's reinvention as a reasonable and moderate Democratic politician could not withstand scrutiny of his political life.

Because the mainstream media did not explore his roots, the American public remains largely ignorant of the degree to which Obama’s work with ACORN and his love of Alinsky were symbolic of his true political will.

If any of the candidates can resist the media, and parlay Newt’s strategy into a nomination, we’ll have the choice between an imperfect but well-known Republican and the real “Baraka” Obama, not the manufactured one the media prefers.

Comments

Glad you liked it. Would you like to share?

Sharing this page …
Thanks! Close

Add New Comment

  • Image
Real-time updating is paused. (Resume)

Showing 20 of 194 comments

  • dontcare4uatall 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    And I eey I will always LOVE you ooh ooh
  • ladyway 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    PLEASE, don't be deceived. KNOW your candidates. Where their heart is will be how they govern.
  • jleinf 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Barry needs to send his document forgers back to "cut and paste" school. Did you see the sweet job they did with the pica stamp from the 1980's? Hilarious!
  • hidefullofhoney 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Barry is a fraud. WE ALL KNOW IT. I am ANGRY with him for the Lies & TREASON AGAINST the US CONSTITUTION. WE HAVE SACRIFICED SO MUCH FOR THE FREEDOM AFFORDED TO US BY THAT SACRED DOCUMENT. The Liberal MORONS do NOT UNDERSTAND HOW MUCH SAFER THE USA IS BECAUSE OF THE CONSTITUTION. I have lived in EASTERN EUROPE IN THE 1990's- NOT A LIBERTY LOVING SOCIETY& I can see how our society is giving away our RIGHTS TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.HONESTLY I DON'T TRUST THE FEDs FROM the KENNEDY ASSASSINATION TO 9/11 too many lies and cover-ups, but it is not the SYSTEM ITs THE PLAYERS in the system. REGUARDLESS THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT NEEDS TO BACK-OFF AND SHRINK ITS SIZE leaving us the BILL OF RIGHTS AND US CONSTITUTION.
  • thirty2deuce 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    After reading this article I signed up for the www.breitbart.com daily newsletter subscription. I hope that all the videos and information that Andrew Breitbart was planning to release this year sees the light of day. This would be a fitting tribute to his life, and his passion to reveal what the liberal media is holding back. I plan to do my part in helping this information get out to those who may not be signed-up to the newsletter.
  • dallasdick 4 comments collapsed CollapseExpand
    Sean Hannity has also taken on the arduous task of vetting BHO as of his show last night. I personally think a consortium of conservative pundits, personalities, bloggers, radio and TV hosts should rally with MRC and Bozell to blitz the media with the combined findings of all involved to get this vetting process central to the American public on all fronts. Independents and even some on the left; all Americans should be the goal of the conservative movement efforts to put this POTUS on public trial leading up to the November election. We need an organized all out firestorm of vetting information to smother the MSM cover up of this felonious fiend in the Whitehouse and his corrupt co-conspirators.
  • chester1818 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Dear Fellow Americans:

    While you are absolutely correct that the boring, somewhat liberal, and
    Mormon Mitt Romney cannot beat the charismatic, sitting President Obama;
    there is another choice and I believe it is the only one that can win.
    It isn't the Roman Catholic, uncharismatic, liberal(?) Rick Santorum
    either. But both these guys along with your choice will hopefully make
    possible the nomination by brokered convention of the only(in my
    estimation) candidate who can separate the many independents and others
    from their slobbering, irrational love affair with Obama. This
    charismatic person draws large crowds and the liberals do not want to
    face her. Yes her, and you know it. She and only she can unite us and
    deliver all the conservative and Republican vote. I will not vote for
    Romney, Santorum, Paul or Gingrich; I would vote independent like I did
    in the last Presidential election. But I will vote for Sarah and there
    are many like me. And you know it. Some conservatives may not vote for
    the office of President if one of the first 4 is the nominee. Some
    probably won't vote at all, hurting our Congressional especially Senate
    chances. And you know this is true. The anybody but Obama slogan does
    not fly...I've taken heat blogging against Mitt below Ann's
    column/endorsements. You must have a candidate that can deliver some
    Democrats and Independents while keeping the base in those swing(purple)
    states of Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, North Carolina(yes N.C.)

    Sarah can deliver all of what McCain won and most of his supporters in
    the other states. But her charismatic delivery about the difference
    between conservatism and Obama's collectivism will snatch the needed
    number(not all, we do not need all) of liberals from their irrational
    slobbering love affair. It will take this former governor, not a
    candidate without executive experience, to beat Obama. She worked with
    both sides of the aisle to get a good deal from Alaska from the resource
    companies. Her state has a trust fund for all Alaskans and sends all
    its citizens checks. Who else has that kind of experience? That is
    just what we need in Washington. She will favor using our resources,
    building the pipeline(s), etc. She is the conservative that can sell
    herself and the message to these all important swing states' Independent
    and Democratic voters. And it is that group that will decide the
    election, not my fellow voters in Connecticut. First CT only delivers 7
    electoral votes and like Rhode Island will vote 55-60% for Obama. Those
    states and others like Illness(lol) and California are already in the
    Obama camp, whether won by 51, 60 or even 70%. They still only deliver
    the same number of electoral votes.
    Friends, its electoral count that matters and Ohio and Pennsylvania have
    a lot and will vote Sarah long before they will vote Newt and she only
    needs 50% plus 1 vote in those states. North Carolina, Florida, and
    maybe Virginia will vote Newt but all 3 will vote Sarah. So Sarah is
    the only chance against this sitting and unfortunately, personally
    popular and charismatic, young family man. She is charismatic, has
    already been vetted(hopefully we can start vetting Obama). Enough
    disenchanted liberal and even pro abortion women will vote for her,
    perhaps while holding their noses and surely without ever owning up to
    it.

    Sarah is the real deal; a woman who has a family(with all the ups and
    downs) but has made it in politics. She does not carry the anti-woman
    message that Obama should be pinned with since he is an Islam
    supporter. And what about the historically polygamy friendly Mormonism
    of Romney? Well? And finally 3 wives is no recommendation for Newt and
    slides him close to the other two. I'm sorry but it will sink him in
    Ohio, Pennsylvania and the northern precincts of Virginia(and therefore
    Virginia); and therefore the Presidential election.

    Sarah can unite and deliver the base and peel some liberal women
    concerned for their daughters' future and enough of the disgruntled in
    Virginia, Florida, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania and a few more
    to win. She will establish a pro-America, pro-liberty, pro-business
    administration and like Reagan can win 2 terms and her Vice President 1
    after that. Go Sarah!
  • Sisyphus2012 2 comments collapsed CollapseExpand
    Yes, they should rally together and make an unholy alliance..hahaha.
  • dallasdick 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    no that already exists in the marriage of Obamanog and MSM.
  • Unbelievable 4 comments collapsed CollapseExpand
    Sure hope Andrew had more then just this... We need to start the vetting big time! Thanks to Rush we have no time to waste. Right now they are eating us up alive!
  • trent1280 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand

    'Unbelievable' is correct. Entirely correct.

    Mr Limbaugh made a terrible series of blunders. Not once. Many times. Over a period of days. Unable to admit error, he magnified it through repetition and exaggeration. This was not "a gaffe". It was a cascade of multiple mistakes, compounded by hubris.

    The greater problem is this: the issue has been revised. It has now become an issue of Mr Limbaugh's vile language. No decent conservative can possibly support such public discourse. It is offensive and disgusting.

    Rush made himself look like a voyeur and a pervert by insisting that Ms Fluke "post the video so we can watch it". What sort of mentality is this?

    Some people are rightly attacked for watching porn. Mr Limbaugh begged that such a video be posted "so we can watch it". There is no humor in this. It is the spectacle of an old man wanting to leer at a young woman.

    Decent conservatives will repudiate such behavior.
  • DefendAmerica 2 comments collapsed CollapseExpand
    Liberals are just trying to make us THINK they are eating us alive...the truth is that they have never been more afraid for their cause!
    Over 50% of Americans believe that Obama's eligibility should be investigated.
    Obama is having trouble raising money and he just told the Democratic Party that they can have none of his monies!
    Contact Congressmen and Senators and demand an investigation based on Arpaio's findings. If they fail to act, tell them that they are committing Misprision of Felony...failing to investigate and prosecute a "probable cause" for felonious acts.
  • Sisyphus2012 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Yes, definitely do that. Call anyone you know, several times in fact, and demand an investigation based on Arpaio's findings. I really think you're on to something. Get all your friends and family members to call and email...
  • ONTIME 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Alinsky and his ranting will prove to be as worthless as all the other communist buttwipes that preceded him and those idiots that followed... the rule of law applies, man wants to be free of government not make life more oppressive.
  • Noodles5 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Why can't we get the image? It just keeps spinning and the poster won't load. What gives?
  • veteranwife 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Thanks, Andrew. We need this. Hey, did anyone catch the info about Quentin Young and that Communist Party front organization? The description is, "the Chicago Committee to Defend the Bill of Rights – a group dedicated to outlawing government surveillance of radical organizations." How amazing that when it looks like our un-American, anti-Constitutional enemies feel threatened with exposure, they call upon the very document they normally try to destroy, and in the process, give themselves a name that sounds totally patriotic. What a joke! And what's worse, is that our president does the same thing in his speeches, using terms that SOUND patriotic, but which are simply masking what he's really doing - taking care of his own backside and trying to shore up his anti-American support with ideas designed to devastate the true America. Wow. We so need to pay more attention to this vile man's words and how he and his cronies use them.
  • Greg757 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    Excellent!!!
  • Gene 1 comment collapsed CollapseExpand
    I look forward to learning more. What we need is another McCarthy hearing to route out those in our government who wish to destroy us.
  • Vickie DHaene 6 comments collapsed CollapseExpand
    The very first thing I noticed was the spelling of Baraka on the poster. I had to get the magnifying glass to make sure I seen the spelling correct. I did. Can anyone tell me when he changed the spelling to what we see today? Just curious.
  •  
     

  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
 

No comments:

Post a Comment