header

header

Monday, July 27, 2015

Scarborough Slams ‘Arrogant’ Obama for Saying There is No ‘Good Argument’ Against Iran Nuclear Deal

I Love it. A Liberal slamming him. This Clown (Obama) has no room to criticize anyone's foreign Policy when he really Sucks.When I hear him single someone out I think about how he did it in the Debate with Romney and was proven wrong again. When he said someone said he was a sponsor of terror through the Iran Deal. He acted like it offended him. He and his minions can call tea party people "terrorist and Hostage takers" when talking budget.
  Lets break his down. He is lifting sanctions which will give Iran the use of Domestic weapons, goods and services for the Country and Millions of dollars in frozen assets. Lets say that money is marked. Now we might see some of that marked money buying weapon material of any type. Now lets say that is suddenly used in another Country as a terror attack. 
  I would say that the "great" Iran deal helped buy that attack, and who was in charge of it? Not Bush, Not the Pillsbury Dough Boy, Obama. So I would say the Person that said Obama would be a sponsor of terror might have some truth to it.



MSNBC’s Joe Scarborough angrily reacted to President Obama’s remarks Monday morning in Ethiopia that he had yet to hear a single viable alternative to the Iran nuclear deal struck earlier in July.
“The good news, I guess, is that I have not yet heard a factual argument on the other side that holds up to scrutiny,” Obama said. “There’s a reason why 99 percent of the world thinks this is a good deal. It’s because it’s a good deal … It accomplishes our goal, which is making sure Iran does not have a nuclear weapon. In fact, it accomplishes that goal better than any alternative that has been suggested. And you’ve heard me stand up in front of the press corps and try to get a good argument on the other side that’s based in fact as opposed to rhetoric, and I haven’t gotten one yet.”
“Wow,” Scarborough said, speaking over co-host Mika Brzezinski. “Wow. Wow. Wow.”
The nuclear deal trumpeted by the administration has been fiercely criticized by both sides of the aisle who have noted the administration did not achieve the previously stated goal of “anytime, anywhere” inspections, that the arms embargo against the country was lifted, that Iran will receive $100 billion in sanctions relief that can be used to finance terrorism and that Iran will be a threshold nuclear state when the deal concludes.
“The president can say what he wants to say about the deal, but to say there’s no legitimate argument against this deal, to say it’s all rhetoric, is deeply offensive to very talented and bright foreign policy thinkers,” Scarborough said. “I’m stunned that the President of the United States would be that arrogant to come out and say he hasn’t heard a single argument that makes any sense against this Iran deal. Every foreign policy expert I talk to has countless concerns about it, even if they support the deal.”
“Obviously on issues like inspections, like the sanctions, like the time frame of when Iran can start developing nuclear capability again, obviously people have questions there, and I know the president knows that,” panelist Mark Halperin said.
Obama’s repeated the White House talking point that “99 percent” of the world supported the deal, something that Press Secretary Josh Earnest often claimed before being brought up short by questioning by ABC’s Jonathan Karl.

No comments:

Post a Comment