Hillary has a longhistory of lying, being corrupt, and violatingthe Constitution; it didn’t just begin with Benghazi. At 27-years-old, she served as an attorney for the Watergate investigation — and was fired for “lying, unethical behavior.”
Her supervisor, Jerry Zeifman, “a lifelongDemocrat,” immediately fired her after the investigation was over and also refused giving her a good recommendation. When asked about his reasoning behind this, he said, “Because she’s a liar. She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer. She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee, and the rules of confidentiality.”
Considering her role in the more-recent Benghazi cover-up, it seems as if nothing much has changed since 1974.
How could a 27-year-old House staff member do all that? She couldn’t do it by herself, but Zeifman said she was one of several individuals – including Marshall, special counsel John Doar and senior associate special counsel (and future Clinton White House Counsel) Bernard Nussbaum – who engaged in a seemingly implausible scheme to deny Richard Nixon the right to counsel during the investigation.
Why would they want to do that? Because, according to Zeifman, they feared putting Watergate break-in mastermind E. Howard Hunt on the stand to be cross-examined by counsel to the president. Hunt, Zeifman said, had the goods on nefarious activities in the Kennedy Administration that would have made Watergate look like a day at the beach – including Kennedy’s purported complicity in the attempted assassination of Fidel Castro.
The actions of Hillary and her cohorts went directly against the judgment of topDemocrats, up to and including then-House Majority Leader Tip O’Neill, that Nixon clearly had the right to counsel. Zeifman says that Hillary, along with Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar, was determined to gain enough votes on the Judiciary Committee to change House rules and deny counsel to Nixon. And in order to pull this off, Zeifman says Hillary wrote a fraudulent legal brief, and confiscated public documents to hide her deception. [...]
The brief was so fraudulent and ridiculous, Zeifman believes Hillarywould have been disbarred if she had submitted it to a judge.
Zeifman says that if Hillary, Marshall, Nussbaum and Doar had succeeded, members of the House Judiciary Committee would have also been denied the right to cross-examine witnesses, and denied the opportunity to even participate in the drafting of articles of impeachment against Nixon.
Of course, Nixon’s resignation rendered the entire issue moot, ending Hillary’s career on the Judiciary Committee staff in a most undistinguished manner.
Hillary has no problem with lying, cheating, or violating the Constitution to fulfill whatever corrupt agenda she has — whether it is secretly plotting to deny former President Nixon the right to counsel during an investigation or covering up the four murders in Benghazi.
Help us spread the word by sharing this article.
http://www.capitalisminstitute.org/hillary-watergate/
No comments:
Post a Comment