SHTFPlan.com's Mac Slavo comments: Frankly, this question is raised at the end of every presidential term. But would it ever really happen?
For instance, Bush could have used a terror attack as an excuse to deny office to Obama; many believed he might do so. Fortunately, he didn’t. But it is clear enough that no potential president has ever been so roundly dismissed and attacked by the press and a plurality of American leaders than has Trump – as Michael Snyder notes in detail, Obama and many others have repeatedly issued statements claiming that Trump is unfit for office, and has many other deficits. If Trump does win – and it isn’t just rigged for Hillary – it is possible that it could happen.
Of course, in such a case, Obama won’t ADMIT that Trump is the reason… he too would blame some unprecedented crisis, like an economic collapse or large-scale terror attack. Even then, the move would be very conspicuous. But perhaps at that point, the system will be so cornered that it won’t matter. Millions of Americans would protest in the streets and revolt in every way; but that would in turn only feed the need for riot cops and military troops to keep the peace, further justifying a martial law scenario. Though it seems a remote possibility, there is every chance that America is walking into a nightmare where rights don’t exist and the country is operated under arbitrary emergency rule. Shudder the thought.
Will Barack Obama Try To Stay In Office If Donald Trump Wins The Election?
If Donald Trump wins in November, will Barack Obama leave office and hand over power in an orderly fashion? Normally we would not even have to ask such a question, but these are not normal times. This week, Obama publicly stated that Trump “is unfit to serve as President” and that he is “woefully unprepared to do this job“. In addition, he told the press that Trump “doesn’t have the judgment, the temperament, the understanding to occupy the most powerful position in the world.” If Obama really believes those things are true, would he really just stand aside and hand the keys to the White House to Trump?
Never before have I ever heard a sitting president claim that one of the major party candidates could not function as president. But that is what Obama has just done. The following is an excerpt from a transcript of remarks made by Obama earlier this week that comes directly from the official White House website. I have highlighted certain phrases in bold text, because I want you to truly consider the implications of what he is saying here…
But there have been Republican Presidents with whom I disagreed with, but I didn’t have a doubt that they could function as President. I think I was right, and Mitt Romney and John McCain were wrong on certain policy issues, but I never thought that they couldn’t do the job. And had they won, I would have been disappointed, but I would have said to all Americans they are — this is our President, and I know they’re going to abide by certain norms and rules and common sense, will observe basic decency, will have enough knowledge about economic policy and foreign policy and our constitutional traditions and rule of law that our government will work, and then we’ll compete four years from now to try to win an election.
But that’s not the situation here. And that’s not just my opinion; that is the opinion of many prominent Republicans. There has to come a point at which you say, enough.
Earlier today, I came across an outstanding article by Joseph Farah of WND in which he summarized the claims that Obama was making against Trump…
He said Trump would not abide by “norms and rules and common sense.”
He questioned whether he would “observe basic decency” should he reach the Oval Office.
He said he would have been disappointed to lose the elections of 2008 and 2012, but never doubted whether his rivals in those elections, John McCain and Mitt Romney, could function as president or had the knowledge to make government work. “That’s not the situation here,” he added.
He added Trump “doesn’t have the judgment, the temperament, the understanding, to occupy the most powerful position in the world.”
He said he was “woefully unprepared to do this job.”
Obama said Trump lacked knowledge about Europe, the Middle East and other parts of Asia.
This is some extremely strong language, and I truly wish one of the reporters at the press conference would have asked one incredibly important follow up question.
Will Barack Obama try to stay in office if Donald Trump wins the election?
If no one else will ask the question, I will: “Mr. President, if Donald Trump wins the election to become the next president of the United States, will you willingly and peacefully leave office and cooperate fully with the transition of power the way all of your predecessors in the White House have done in the past?”
It’s a simple question that needs to be asked and answered – given Obama’s highly inflammatory rhetoric over the last week.
Like Farah, I believe that it is a fair question.
If Barack Obama truly believes all of the things he said about Donald Trump, does he also believe that he has a responsibility to keep Donald Trump from taking office?
Absent a major national emergency of some sort, this would be very difficult for Obama to do. But if there were some sort of enormous national crisis between now and next January, Barack Obama could potentially employ some of the extraordinary emergency powers that have been endowed on the office of the president over the past several decades.
There is not a single statute, regulation, executive order or presidential directive that contains all of the powers that a president would possess during a major national emergency. Rather, these powers have been layered on top of one another for a very long period of time, and they come from literally dozens of different laws, regulations, court decisions, executive orders and presidential directives.
One document that I would refer you to is National Security Presidential Directive 51 which was put into effect during the Bush administration. It is all about “national continuity policy” and it defines a “catastrophic emergency” as “any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions”.
In such a scenario, the president would have almost unlimited power, and he would wield enormously powerful executive orders such as this one. If there was a big enough emergency, the president would potentially be able to declare martial law, suspend elections and essentially become a dictator.
Let us hope that we never see such a thing play out in the United States of America.
The former secretary of State gained ground in the McClatchy-Marist poll, and Trump lost support. Clinton had the support of 48% of those surveyed, and Trump had 33%. Last month, Clinton had 42% while Trump had 33%.
When third-party candidates are included, Clinton’s lead held strong. She had 45%, and Trump had 31%, Libertarian candidate Gary Johnson had 10% and Green Party candidate Jill Stein had 6%.
One thing that I found interesting about both of these polls is that they show two third party candidates gaining ground. The NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll had Gary Johnson with 10 percent support and Jill Stein at five percent.
Jill Stein is still behind Johnson at this point, but she is potentially the much stronger candidate. If she starts to catch fire with Bernie Sanders supporters, she could possibly even hit the 15 percent threshold for being invited to participate in the upcoming presidential debates.
And Donald Trump certainly needs something to change about this race, because right now he is really struggling.
But there is a long way to go until November, and as we have seen, anything is likely to happen in this election cycle.