Interest rates on federally-subsidized student loans are set to double on Monday while both Democrats and Republicans have traded rhetorical barbs on both whose fault the rate reset is and how to fix the whole mess. A promising budget-neutral proposal that was put together from pieces of good legislation was quickly killed, however, by Senate Democrats who took a my-way-or-the-highway attitude.
Matthew Chingos, an education policy analyst at the Brookings Institution,detailed how the potential compromise came together - and how quickly and easily it fell apart:
There's a legitimate debate to be had on whether or not the federal government should be subsidizing student loans for higher education at all, but unfortunately that's not the debate that legislators on Capitol Hill have been having. For those who think student loans need no subsidization, the legislation that Sens. Harkin and Warren killed was probably the least-bad of all the options out there. The only reason that Harkin and Warren took a stand against it is because it wasn't enoughof a hand-out to college graduates.
As I wrote last year, federal subsidization of student loans is a really bad policy - one that students themselves hardly benefit from at all, despite a $6 billion/year price tag for taxpayers.
No comments:
Post a Comment